The combined effect of nitrogen fertilizer and sowing season on response to water-limited stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

A field experiment was carried out for over two seasons (autumn and spring) as a split–split plot scheme based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots included two irrigation levels of the maximum available water depletion (maximum allowable depletion (MAD)) of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agricultural science 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.31-49
Hauptverfasser: Bardehji, S., Eshghizadeh, H. R., Zahedi, M., Sabzalian, M. R., Gheisari, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 49
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 31
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 159
creator Bardehji, S.
Eshghizadeh, H. R.
Zahedi, M.
Sabzalian, M. R.
Gheisari, M.
description A field experiment was carried out for over two seasons (autumn and spring) as a split–split plot scheme based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots included two irrigation levels of the maximum available water depletion (maximum allowable depletion (MAD)) of 55 and 85% as non-stress and drought-stress environments, respectively, and the subplot accommodated two levels of nitrogen (0 and 62.5 kg N/ha, urea fertilizer); also, 20 barley genotypes were assigned to the sub-subplots. The biplot analysis of both sowing seasons showed that grain yield (GY) had a high positive correlation with total biomass (TB), whereas it had a high negative correlation with proline and total soluble carbohydrate as drought-tolerance-determinant characteristics. The genotypes which had the lowest and highest GY ranked significantly (P ≤ 0.01) different with changing the sowing season under each irrigation level, indicating a larger plant interaction and non-stability in response to the season change (about two-fold), as compared to the change in the irrigation conditions. It could also be concluded that barley genotypes might experience a higher decrease in GY and sensitivity to water deficit in the autumn sowing season, as compared to the spring planting season, which was also intensified by nitrogen application. However, the response to nitrogen application depends on the plant genotype.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859621000149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584163273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859621000149</cupid><sourcerecordid>2584163273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-62a6053af1d86c82d7f20a53fd949b038ccb0d4988ca28b2efcda643ab1022713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AjS6m5jGPzFKKWqHgwroeMslNTZlJapIqdeNfd0oLLkS43Lv4zjkXDkKXlEwoodXtCyGMiqIuGSWE0Lw-QiOal3VWDPsYjXY42_FTdBbjatBUpBYj9L14A6x831oHGoMxoBL2Bjubgl-CwwZCsp39goCl0zj6T-uWOIKM3uFhAsS1dxFw8vhTJghZZ3ubhrCYBhaxdbiVoYMtvp75oGHT449Nt5QB8Hxyc45OjOwiXBzuGL0-3C-ms2z-_Pg0vZtnitMqZSWTJSm4NFSLUgmmK8OILLjRdV63hAulWqLzWgglmWgZGKVlmXPZUsJYRfkYXe1z18G_byCmZuU3wQ0vG1aInJacVXxQ0b1KBR9jANOsg-1l2DaUNLuemz89Dx5-8Mi-DVYv4Tf6f9cPCZ6AUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584163273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The combined effect of nitrogen fertilizer and sowing season on response to water-limited stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Bardehji, S. ; Eshghizadeh, H. R. ; Zahedi, M. ; Sabzalian, M. R. ; Gheisari, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bardehji, S. ; Eshghizadeh, H. R. ; Zahedi, M. ; Sabzalian, M. R. ; Gheisari, M.</creatorcontrib><description>A field experiment was carried out for over two seasons (autumn and spring) as a split–split plot scheme based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots included two irrigation levels of the maximum available water depletion (maximum allowable depletion (MAD)) of 55 and 85% as non-stress and drought-stress environments, respectively, and the subplot accommodated two levels of nitrogen (0 and 62.5 kg N/ha, urea fertilizer); also, 20 barley genotypes were assigned to the sub-subplots. The biplot analysis of both sowing seasons showed that grain yield (GY) had a high positive correlation with total biomass (TB), whereas it had a high negative correlation with proline and total soluble carbohydrate as drought-tolerance-determinant characteristics. The genotypes which had the lowest and highest GY ranked significantly (P ≤ 0.01) different with changing the sowing season under each irrigation level, indicating a larger plant interaction and non-stability in response to the season change (about two-fold), as compared to the change in the irrigation conditions. It could also be concluded that barley genotypes might experience a higher decrease in GY and sensitivity to water deficit in the autumn sowing season, as compared to the spring planting season, which was also intensified by nitrogen application. However, the response to nitrogen application depends on the plant genotype.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859621000149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Autumn ; Barley ; Carbohydrates ; Crop yield ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Cultivars ; Depletion ; Drought ; Drought resistance ; Fertilizers ; Genotypes ; Irrigation ; Nitrogen ; Plant growth ; Planting season ; Proline ; Seasons ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Tall, Mustafa Wahbi (1899-1949) ; Urea ; Water deficit</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.31-49</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-62a6053af1d86c82d7f20a53fd949b038ccb0d4988ca28b2efcda643ab1022713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-62a6053af1d86c82d7f20a53fd949b038ccb0d4988ca28b2efcda643ab1022713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0477-0315</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859621000149/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bardehji, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eshghizadeh, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahedi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabzalian, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheisari, M.</creatorcontrib><title>The combined effect of nitrogen fertilizer and sowing season on response to water-limited stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>A field experiment was carried out for over two seasons (autumn and spring) as a split–split plot scheme based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots included two irrigation levels of the maximum available water depletion (maximum allowable depletion (MAD)) of 55 and 85% as non-stress and drought-stress environments, respectively, and the subplot accommodated two levels of nitrogen (0 and 62.5 kg N/ha, urea fertilizer); also, 20 barley genotypes were assigned to the sub-subplots. The biplot analysis of both sowing seasons showed that grain yield (GY) had a high positive correlation with total biomass (TB), whereas it had a high negative correlation with proline and total soluble carbohydrate as drought-tolerance-determinant characteristics. The genotypes which had the lowest and highest GY ranked significantly (P ≤ 0.01) different with changing the sowing season under each irrigation level, indicating a larger plant interaction and non-stability in response to the season change (about two-fold), as compared to the change in the irrigation conditions. It could also be concluded that barley genotypes might experience a higher decrease in GY and sensitivity to water deficit in the autumn sowing season, as compared to the spring planting season, which was also intensified by nitrogen application. However, the response to nitrogen application depends on the plant genotype.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Planting season</subject><subject>Proline</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Tall, Mustafa Wahbi (1899-1949)</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Water deficit</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AjS6m5jGPzFKKWqHgwroeMslNTZlJapIqdeNfd0oLLkS43Lv4zjkXDkKXlEwoodXtCyGMiqIuGSWE0Lw-QiOal3VWDPsYjXY42_FTdBbjatBUpBYj9L14A6x831oHGoMxoBL2Bjubgl-CwwZCsp39goCl0zj6T-uWOIKM3uFhAsS1dxFw8vhTJghZZ3ubhrCYBhaxdbiVoYMtvp75oGHT449Nt5QB8Hxyc45OjOwiXBzuGL0-3C-ms2z-_Pg0vZtnitMqZSWTJSm4NFSLUgmmK8OILLjRdV63hAulWqLzWgglmWgZGKVlmXPZUsJYRfkYXe1z18G_byCmZuU3wQ0vG1aInJacVXxQ0b1KBR9jANOsg-1l2DaUNLuemz89Dx5-8Mi-DVYv4Tf6f9cPCZ6AUQ</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Bardehji, S.</creator><creator>Eshghizadeh, H. R.</creator><creator>Zahedi, M.</creator><creator>Sabzalian, M. R.</creator><creator>Gheisari, M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0477-0315</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The combined effect of nitrogen fertilizer and sowing season on response to water-limited stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)</title><author>Bardehji, S. ; Eshghizadeh, H. R. ; Zahedi, M. ; Sabzalian, M. R. ; Gheisari, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-62a6053af1d86c82d7f20a53fd949b038ccb0d4988ca28b2efcda643ab1022713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Planting season</topic><topic>Proline</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Tall, Mustafa Wahbi (1899-1949)</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Water deficit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bardehji, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eshghizadeh, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahedi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabzalian, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheisari, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bardehji, S.</au><au>Eshghizadeh, H. R.</au><au>Zahedi, M.</au><au>Sabzalian, M. R.</au><au>Gheisari, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The combined effect of nitrogen fertilizer and sowing season on response to water-limited stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>31-49</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>A field experiment was carried out for over two seasons (autumn and spring) as a split–split plot scheme based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plots included two irrigation levels of the maximum available water depletion (maximum allowable depletion (MAD)) of 55 and 85% as non-stress and drought-stress environments, respectively, and the subplot accommodated two levels of nitrogen (0 and 62.5 kg N/ha, urea fertilizer); also, 20 barley genotypes were assigned to the sub-subplots. The biplot analysis of both sowing seasons showed that grain yield (GY) had a high positive correlation with total biomass (TB), whereas it had a high negative correlation with proline and total soluble carbohydrate as drought-tolerance-determinant characteristics. The genotypes which had the lowest and highest GY ranked significantly (P ≤ 0.01) different with changing the sowing season under each irrigation level, indicating a larger plant interaction and non-stability in response to the season change (about two-fold), as compared to the change in the irrigation conditions. It could also be concluded that barley genotypes might experience a higher decrease in GY and sensitivity to water deficit in the autumn sowing season, as compared to the spring planting season, which was also intensified by nitrogen application. However, the response to nitrogen application depends on the plant genotype.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859621000149</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0477-0315</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.31-49
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2584163273
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural production
Autumn
Barley
Carbohydrates
Crop yield
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Cultivars
Depletion
Drought
Drought resistance
Fertilizers
Genotypes
Irrigation
Nitrogen
Plant growth
Planting season
Proline
Seasons
Spring
Spring (season)
Tall, Mustafa Wahbi (1899-1949)
Urea
Water deficit
title The combined effect of nitrogen fertilizer and sowing season on response to water-limited stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A14%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20combined%20effect%20of%20nitrogen%20fertilizer%20and%20sowing%20season%20on%20response%20to%20water-limited%20stress%20in%20barley%20(Hordeum%20vulgare%20L.)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Bardehji,%20S.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=31-49&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859621000149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584163273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584163273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859621000149&rfr_iscdi=true