Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct
Are there individual differences in the tendency to enjoy tasks regardless of the tasks' contents or situational determinants? To answer this question, we constructed and validated the six-item Trait Task Enjoyment Scale (TTES). In Study 1, it had an internally consistent one-factor structure (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality assessment 2021-11, Vol.103 (6), p.818-832 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 832 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 818 |
container_title | Journal of personality assessment |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Czikmantori, Thomas Hennecke, Marie Brandstätter, Veronika |
description | Are there individual differences in the tendency to enjoy tasks regardless of the tasks' contents or situational determinants? To answer this question, we constructed and validated the six-item Trait Task Enjoyment Scale (TTES). In Study 1, it had an internally consistent one-factor structure (pooled N = 997); good test-retest reliabilities over 1 and 4 months; measurement invariance regarding gender (strong) and time (partial strong); and was not redundant with respect to a large number of theoretically related constructs. In Studies 2 and 3, the TTES predicted self-reported momentary task enjoyment, one of its opposites, boredom, and voluntary persistence in a free-choice paradigm. It did so for various tasks, including thirty diverse tasks presented in vignettes and a memory task in the lab. Results suggest that the TTES may predict momentary task enjoyment regardless of objective task aversiveness or, in this case, equally well for tasks with boring or enjoyable contents. The TTES addresses an important gap in current research on task enjoyment and is an adequately valid and reliable research tool. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584135005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584135005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c6ea91a7dfcc52a1fe676b68665a28327a474bd9e2086f15af34fe0bc6861f0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90D1PwzAQgGELgWgp_ARQJBaWFH8n2UClQKVKLGW2ro4tpSR2sRNQ_z2J2jIwMHl57s56EbomeEpwju8xppTlBZlSTMmU5DnlGTtBYyIYTbNM0FM0Hkw6oBG6iHGDMSaE03M0YkwKyTEfI76C-JHM3cbvGuPaBGICLlm4svqqyg7q5Kmy1gTjtElm3sU2dLq9RGcW6miuDu8EvT_PV7PXdPn2spg9LlPNOWlTLQ0UBLLSai0oEGtkJtcyl1IAzRnNgGd8XRaG4lxaIsAybg1e654Qi0s2QXf7vdvgPzsTW9VUUZu6Bmd8FxXlhaSCFKzo6e0fuvFdcP3vFBU5J0xgLHol9koHH2MwVm1D1UDYKYLVkFUds6ohqzpk7eduDtu7dWPK36ljxx487EHlrA8NfPtQl6qFXe2DDeB0FRX7_8YPNiaEkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584135005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Czikmantori, Thomas ; Hennecke, Marie ; Brandstätter, Veronika</creator><creatorcontrib>Czikmantori, Thomas ; Hennecke, Marie ; Brandstätter, Veronika</creatorcontrib><description>Are there individual differences in the tendency to enjoy tasks regardless of the tasks' contents or situational determinants? To answer this question, we constructed and validated the six-item Trait Task Enjoyment Scale (TTES). In Study 1, it had an internally consistent one-factor structure (pooled N = 997); good test-retest reliabilities over 1 and 4 months; measurement invariance regarding gender (strong) and time (partial strong); and was not redundant with respect to a large number of theoretically related constructs. In Studies 2 and 3, the TTES predicted self-reported momentary task enjoyment, one of its opposites, boredom, and voluntary persistence in a free-choice paradigm. It did so for various tasks, including thirty diverse tasks presented in vignettes and a memory task in the lab. Results suggest that the TTES may predict momentary task enjoyment regardless of objective task aversiveness or, in this case, equally well for tasks with boring or enjoyable contents. The TTES addresses an important gap in current research on task enjoyment and is an adequately valid and reliable research tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33656404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Boredom ; Enjoyment ; Individual differences ; Measurement ; Vignettes</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2021-11, Vol.103 (6), p.818-832</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c6ea91a7dfcc52a1fe676b68665a28327a474bd9e2086f15af34fe0bc6861f0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c6ea91a7dfcc52a1fe676b68665a28327a474bd9e2086f15af34fe0bc6861f0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Czikmantori, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennecke, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Veronika</creatorcontrib><title>Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>Are there individual differences in the tendency to enjoy tasks regardless of the tasks' contents or situational determinants? To answer this question, we constructed and validated the six-item Trait Task Enjoyment Scale (TTES). In Study 1, it had an internally consistent one-factor structure (pooled N = 997); good test-retest reliabilities over 1 and 4 months; measurement invariance regarding gender (strong) and time (partial strong); and was not redundant with respect to a large number of theoretically related constructs. In Studies 2 and 3, the TTES predicted self-reported momentary task enjoyment, one of its opposites, boredom, and voluntary persistence in a free-choice paradigm. It did so for various tasks, including thirty diverse tasks presented in vignettes and a memory task in the lab. Results suggest that the TTES may predict momentary task enjoyment regardless of objective task aversiveness or, in this case, equally well for tasks with boring or enjoyable contents. The TTES addresses an important gap in current research on task enjoyment and is an adequately valid and reliable research tool.</description><subject>Boredom</subject><subject>Enjoyment</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Vignettes</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90D1PwzAQgGELgWgp_ARQJBaWFH8n2UClQKVKLGW2ro4tpSR2sRNQ_z2J2jIwMHl57s56EbomeEpwju8xppTlBZlSTMmU5DnlGTtBYyIYTbNM0FM0Hkw6oBG6iHGDMSaE03M0YkwKyTEfI76C-JHM3cbvGuPaBGICLlm4svqqyg7q5Kmy1gTjtElm3sU2dLq9RGcW6miuDu8EvT_PV7PXdPn2spg9LlPNOWlTLQ0UBLLSai0oEGtkJtcyl1IAzRnNgGd8XRaG4lxaIsAybg1e654Qi0s2QXf7vdvgPzsTW9VUUZu6Bmd8FxXlhaSCFKzo6e0fuvFdcP3vFBU5J0xgLHol9koHH2MwVm1D1UDYKYLVkFUds6ohqzpk7eduDtu7dWPK36ljxx487EHlrA8NfPtQl6qFXe2DDeB0FRX7_8YPNiaEkg</recordid><startdate>20211102</startdate><enddate>20211102</enddate><creator>Czikmantori, Thomas</creator><creator>Hennecke, Marie</creator><creator>Brandstätter, Veronika</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211102</creationdate><title>Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct</title><author>Czikmantori, Thomas ; Hennecke, Marie ; Brandstätter, Veronika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c6ea91a7dfcc52a1fe676b68665a28327a474bd9e2086f15af34fe0bc6861f0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Boredom</topic><topic>Enjoyment</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Vignettes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Czikmantori, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennecke, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Veronika</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Czikmantori, Thomas</au><au>Hennecke, Marie</au><au>Brandstätter, Veronika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2021-11-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>818</spage><epage>832</epage><pages>818-832</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><abstract>Are there individual differences in the tendency to enjoy tasks regardless of the tasks' contents or situational determinants? To answer this question, we constructed and validated the six-item Trait Task Enjoyment Scale (TTES). In Study 1, it had an internally consistent one-factor structure (pooled N = 997); good test-retest reliabilities over 1 and 4 months; measurement invariance regarding gender (strong) and time (partial strong); and was not redundant with respect to a large number of theoretically related constructs. In Studies 2 and 3, the TTES predicted self-reported momentary task enjoyment, one of its opposites, boredom, and voluntary persistence in a free-choice paradigm. It did so for various tasks, including thirty diverse tasks presented in vignettes and a memory task in the lab. Results suggest that the TTES may predict momentary task enjoyment regardless of objective task aversiveness or, in this case, equally well for tasks with boring or enjoyable contents. The TTES addresses an important gap in current research on task enjoyment and is an adequately valid and reliable research tool.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>33656404</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3891 |
ispartof | Journal of personality assessment, 2021-11, Vol.103 (6), p.818-832 |
issn | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2584135005 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Boredom Enjoyment Individual differences Measurement Vignettes |
title | Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A54%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task%20Enjoyment%20as%20an%20Individual%20Difference%20Construct&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Czikmantori,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-11-02&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=818&rft.epage=832&rft.pages=818-832&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584135005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584135005&rft_id=info:pmid/33656404&rfr_iscdi=true |