Impediments to expropriation. Peasant property rights in medieval England and Marcher Wales
In this paper, an attempt will be made to discuss the likely context for pre-plague indications of expropriation and its limits. There is plentiful evidence of an active land market in medieval villages by the end of the thirteenth century, and most likely for some time earlier. Fluctuation in the r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Continuity and change 2021-08, Vol.36 (2), p.211-232 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Continuity and change |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Schofield, Phillipp R. |
description | In this paper, an attempt will be made to discuss the likely context for pre-plague indications of expropriation and its limits. There is plentiful evidence of an active land market in medieval villages by the end of the thirteenth century, and most likely for some time earlier. Fluctuation in the rate of buying and selling coincided with difficult harvest years and suggests a link between impecunious peasant sellers and wealthier peasant buyers. There is also some association between the selling of land and pre-existing indebtedness. In a period of partial commercial and market development, the extent to which exchange of land or of moveables proceeded to a significant structural redistribution of land and resources was constrained, and even in those parts of the country where an early peasant land market was well-established, significant adjustment is not evident. Instead, impediments to expropriation, such as seigneurial control of peasant land and limited capacity for extensive capital accumulation, acted as constraints on significant accumulation and redistribution. That said, there is limited suggestion in our sources of a redistribution of property rights associable with inequality of dealing and the advantage of wealthier landholders and creditors. In exploring this last point, particular use is made of the court records for the Welsh marcher lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0268416021000151 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2583928623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0268416021000151</cupid><sourcerecordid>2583928623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4caf9050725560336f5978684812384c281feff1a503f0d69c8f5b9083b2b9d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPW2eSTTZ7lFK1UFFQUfCwZHeTdst-1GQr9t-bpQUP4mEYmHnvzbxHyCXCBAGT62dgUsUogSEAoMAjMsJYphFD9X5MRsM6Gvan5Mz7dcAokDgiH_NmY8qqMW3vad9R871x3cZVuq-6dkKfjPa67ekwNK7fUVctVwFZtbQJNPOlazprl7VuSzrUg3bFyjj6pmvjz8mJ1bU3F4c-Jq-3s5fpfbR4vJtPbxZRwSX0UVxom4KAhAkhgXNpRZqo4EYh4youmEJrrEUtgFsoZVooK_IUFM9ZnpYxH5OrvW748nNrfJ-tu61rw8mMCcVTpiTjAYV7VOE6752xWbDZaLfLELIhw-xPhoHDDxzd5K4ql-ZX-n_WD3q0cls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583928623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impediments to expropriation. Peasant property rights in medieval England and Marcher Wales</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Schofield, Phillipp R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Phillipp R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, an attempt will be made to discuss the likely context for pre-plague indications of expropriation and its limits. There is plentiful evidence of an active land market in medieval villages by the end of the thirteenth century, and most likely for some time earlier. Fluctuation in the rate of buying and selling coincided with difficult harvest years and suggests a link between impecunious peasant sellers and wealthier peasant buyers. There is also some association between the selling of land and pre-existing indebtedness. In a period of partial commercial and market development, the extent to which exchange of land or of moveables proceeded to a significant structural redistribution of land and resources was constrained, and even in those parts of the country where an early peasant land market was well-established, significant adjustment is not evident. Instead, impediments to expropriation, such as seigneurial control of peasant land and limited capacity for extensive capital accumulation, acted as constraints on significant accumulation and redistribution. That said, there is limited suggestion in our sources of a redistribution of property rights associable with inequality of dealing and the advantage of wealthier landholders and creditors. In exploring this last point, particular use is made of the court records for the Welsh marcher lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-4160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-218X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0268416021000151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>13th century ; 15th century ; Accumulation ; Capital formation ; Court records ; Creditors ; Debt ; Expropriation ; Historians ; Inequality ; Land ; Land market ; Markets ; Merchants ; Middle Ages ; Peasants ; Plague ; Property rights ; Redistribution ; Tenants ; Trade ; Villages ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Continuity and change, 2021-08, Vol.36 (2), p.211-232</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4caf9050725560336f5978684812384c281feff1a503f0d69c8f5b9083b2b9d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4caf9050725560336f5978684812384c281feff1a503f0d69c8f5b9083b2b9d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0268416021000151/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27344,27924,27925,33774,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Phillipp R.</creatorcontrib><title>Impediments to expropriation. Peasant property rights in medieval England and Marcher Wales</title><title>Continuity and change</title><addtitle>Cont. Change</addtitle><description>In this paper, an attempt will be made to discuss the likely context for pre-plague indications of expropriation and its limits. There is plentiful evidence of an active land market in medieval villages by the end of the thirteenth century, and most likely for some time earlier. Fluctuation in the rate of buying and selling coincided with difficult harvest years and suggests a link between impecunious peasant sellers and wealthier peasant buyers. There is also some association between the selling of land and pre-existing indebtedness. In a period of partial commercial and market development, the extent to which exchange of land or of moveables proceeded to a significant structural redistribution of land and resources was constrained, and even in those parts of the country where an early peasant land market was well-established, significant adjustment is not evident. Instead, impediments to expropriation, such as seigneurial control of peasant land and limited capacity for extensive capital accumulation, acted as constraints on significant accumulation and redistribution. That said, there is limited suggestion in our sources of a redistribution of property rights associable with inequality of dealing and the advantage of wealthier landholders and creditors. In exploring this last point, particular use is made of the court records for the Welsh marcher lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd.</description><subject>13th century</subject><subject>15th century</subject><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Court records</subject><subject>Creditors</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Expropriation</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land market</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Merchants</subject><subject>Middle Ages</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Plague</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Redistribution</subject><subject>Tenants</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0268-4160</issn><issn>1469-218X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPW2eSTTZ7lFK1UFFQUfCwZHeTdst-1GQr9t-bpQUP4mEYmHnvzbxHyCXCBAGT62dgUsUogSEAoMAjMsJYphFD9X5MRsM6Gvan5Mz7dcAokDgiH_NmY8qqMW3vad9R871x3cZVuq-6dkKfjPa67ekwNK7fUVctVwFZtbQJNPOlazprl7VuSzrUg3bFyjj6pmvjz8mJ1bU3F4c-Jq-3s5fpfbR4vJtPbxZRwSX0UVxom4KAhAkhgXNpRZqo4EYh4youmEJrrEUtgFsoZVooK_IUFM9ZnpYxH5OrvW748nNrfJ-tu61rw8mMCcVTpiTjAYV7VOE6752xWbDZaLfLELIhw-xPhoHDDxzd5K4ql-ZX-n_WD3q0cls</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Schofield, Phillipp R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Impediments to expropriation. Peasant property rights in medieval England and Marcher Wales</title><author>Schofield, Phillipp R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4caf9050725560336f5978684812384c281feff1a503f0d69c8f5b9083b2b9d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>13th century</topic><topic>15th century</topic><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Court records</topic><topic>Creditors</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Expropriation</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land market</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Merchants</topic><topic>Middle Ages</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Plague</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Redistribution</topic><topic>Tenants</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Phillipp R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Continuity and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schofield, Phillipp R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impediments to expropriation. Peasant property rights in medieval England and Marcher Wales</atitle><jtitle>Continuity and change</jtitle><addtitle>Cont. Change</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>211-232</pages><issn>0268-4160</issn><eissn>1469-218X</eissn><abstract>In this paper, an attempt will be made to discuss the likely context for pre-plague indications of expropriation and its limits. There is plentiful evidence of an active land market in medieval villages by the end of the thirteenth century, and most likely for some time earlier. Fluctuation in the rate of buying and selling coincided with difficult harvest years and suggests a link between impecunious peasant sellers and wealthier peasant buyers. There is also some association between the selling of land and pre-existing indebtedness. In a period of partial commercial and market development, the extent to which exchange of land or of moveables proceeded to a significant structural redistribution of land and resources was constrained, and even in those parts of the country where an early peasant land market was well-established, significant adjustment is not evident. Instead, impediments to expropriation, such as seigneurial control of peasant land and limited capacity for extensive capital accumulation, acted as constraints on significant accumulation and redistribution. That said, there is limited suggestion in our sources of a redistribution of property rights associable with inequality of dealing and the advantage of wealthier landholders and creditors. In exploring this last point, particular use is made of the court records for the Welsh marcher lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0268416021000151</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-4160 |
ispartof | Continuity and change, 2021-08, Vol.36 (2), p.211-232 |
issn | 0268-4160 1469-218X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2583928623 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | 13th century 15th century Accumulation Capital formation Court records Creditors Debt Expropriation Historians Inequality Land Land market Markets Merchants Middle Ages Peasants Plague Property rights Redistribution Tenants Trade Villages Wealth |
title | Impediments to expropriation. Peasant property rights in medieval England and Marcher Wales |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A03%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impediments%20to%20expropriation.%20Peasant%20property%20rights%20in%20medieval%20England%20and%20Marcher%20Wales&rft.jtitle=Continuity%20and%20change&rft.au=Schofield,%20Phillipp%20R.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=211-232&rft.issn=0268-4160&rft.eissn=1469-218X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0268416021000151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583928623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583928623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0268416021000151&rfr_iscdi=true |