Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite
Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection has raised serious concerns for the safety and efficiency of geo-energy systems. Cyclic injection has recently been proposed as an alternative injection scheme to reduce the large magnitude injection-induced seismicity. However, the influence of cyc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rock mechanics and rock engineering 2021-10, Vol.54 (10), p.5389-5405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 5389 |
container_title | Rock mechanics and rock engineering |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Ji, Yinlin Zhuang, Li Wu, Wei Hofmann, Hannes Zang, Arno Zimmermann, Günter |
description | Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection has raised serious concerns for the safety and efficiency of geo-energy systems. Cyclic injection has recently been proposed as an alternative injection scheme to reduce the large magnitude injection-induced seismicity. However, the influence of cyclic injection on the activation of natural fractures in granite and the resulting seismic risk is not yet clear. This study investigates the injection-induced activation of a critically stressed natural fracture in a granite core sample, particularly focusing on the comparison between monotonic and cyclic water injection under pressure-controlled and volume-controlled conditions. Experimental results show that the acceleration and deceleration of fracture slip are modulated by the shear stress imbalance between the fixed shear stress and the evolving frictional strength of the fracture. Fracture slip affects the fluid pressure distribution on the fracture, which in turn regulates the frictional strength of the fracture. At a small total shear displacement (i.e., ~ 0.9 mm in this study), cyclic injection with a restricted peak injection pressure results in aseismic fracture slip at much smaller peak slip rates compared to that during the monotonic injection. On the one hand, the more uniform reduction in effective normal stress caused by cyclic injection encourages slow and stable fracture slip, characterized by the smaller peak slip rates. On the other hand, the flowback of injected fluid or suspension of injection could prevent the occurrence of fast-accelerated fracture slip during cyclic injection. However, the fracture can become unstable when it has experienced a considerable amount of total shear displacement (larger than ~ 0.9 mm in this study), and likely gained a significantly enhanced permeability. Continued injection after the unstable shut-in stage, signified by an unusual increase in slip rate and an accelerated drop in injection pressure, could result in rapid and unstable fracture slip. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2583691632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583691632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4390a332277e0828c7d636b0c94321f5bc16aa4e4cdb4fea028437c609882a003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngeXU2ye5mj1JsLVQtVtFbyKbZkrpNapIie_DdjVbw5mGYGeb_Z5gPofMcLnOA6ioAlEAzIHkKRnlWHaBBzijLWEFfD9EAKkIzUlJyjE5CWAOkYcUH6HPUq84o_CKj9nhq11pF4yyeu6htNLLrenxnolmlecALbcImqR9NeAu46fHcu42Lxq7wonMfWNolXkTZdDr1ZotdiyW-l3HnZYfHXqpUaWwsnnhpTdSn6KiVXdBnv3mInsc3T6PbbPYwmY6uZ5mivIgZozVISgmpKg2ccFUtS1o2oGpGSd4WjcpLKZlmatmwVksgPH2nSqg5JxKADtHFfu_Wu_edDlGs3c7bdFKQgtOyzhOZpCJ7lfIuBK9bsfVmI30vchDfmMUes0iYxQ9mUSUT3ZtCEtuV9n-r_3F9Actzf_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583691632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ji, Yinlin ; Zhuang, Li ; Wu, Wei ; Hofmann, Hannes ; Zang, Arno ; Zimmermann, Günter</creator><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yinlin ; Zhuang, Li ; Wu, Wei ; Hofmann, Hannes ; Zang, Arno ; Zimmermann, Günter</creatorcontrib><description>Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection has raised serious concerns for the safety and efficiency of geo-energy systems. Cyclic injection has recently been proposed as an alternative injection scheme to reduce the large magnitude injection-induced seismicity. However, the influence of cyclic injection on the activation of natural fractures in granite and the resulting seismic risk is not yet clear. This study investigates the injection-induced activation of a critically stressed natural fracture in a granite core sample, particularly focusing on the comparison between monotonic and cyclic water injection under pressure-controlled and volume-controlled conditions. Experimental results show that the acceleration and deceleration of fracture slip are modulated by the shear stress imbalance between the fixed shear stress and the evolving frictional strength of the fracture. Fracture slip affects the fluid pressure distribution on the fracture, which in turn regulates the frictional strength of the fracture. At a small total shear displacement (i.e., ~ 0.9 mm in this study), cyclic injection with a restricted peak injection pressure results in aseismic fracture slip at much smaller peak slip rates compared to that during the monotonic injection. On the one hand, the more uniform reduction in effective normal stress caused by cyclic injection encourages slow and stable fracture slip, characterized by the smaller peak slip rates. On the other hand, the flowback of injected fluid or suspension of injection could prevent the occurrence of fast-accelerated fracture slip during cyclic injection. However, the fracture can become unstable when it has experienced a considerable amount of total shear displacement (larger than ~ 0.9 mm in this study), and likely gained a significantly enhanced permeability. Continued injection after the unstable shut-in stage, signified by an unusual increase in slip rate and an accelerated drop in injection pressure, could result in rapid and unstable fracture slip.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-2632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Civil Engineering ; Controlled conditions ; Deceleration ; Displacement ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Fluid injection ; Fluid pressure ; Fractures ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Granite ; Injection ; Original Paper ; Permeability ; Pressure ; Pressure distribution ; Seismic hazard ; Seismicity ; Shear stress ; Slip ; Water injection</subject><ispartof>Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2021-10, Vol.54 (10), p.5389-5405</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4390a332277e0828c7d636b0c94321f5bc16aa4e4cdb4fea028437c609882a003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4390a332277e0828c7d636b0c94321f5bc16aa4e4cdb4fea028437c609882a003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1634-1603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yinlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Arno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Günter</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite</title><title>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</title><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><description>Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection has raised serious concerns for the safety and efficiency of geo-energy systems. Cyclic injection has recently been proposed as an alternative injection scheme to reduce the large magnitude injection-induced seismicity. However, the influence of cyclic injection on the activation of natural fractures in granite and the resulting seismic risk is not yet clear. This study investigates the injection-induced activation of a critically stressed natural fracture in a granite core sample, particularly focusing on the comparison between monotonic and cyclic water injection under pressure-controlled and volume-controlled conditions. Experimental results show that the acceleration and deceleration of fracture slip are modulated by the shear stress imbalance between the fixed shear stress and the evolving frictional strength of the fracture. Fracture slip affects the fluid pressure distribution on the fracture, which in turn regulates the frictional strength of the fracture. At a small total shear displacement (i.e., ~ 0.9 mm in this study), cyclic injection with a restricted peak injection pressure results in aseismic fracture slip at much smaller peak slip rates compared to that during the monotonic injection. On the one hand, the more uniform reduction in effective normal stress caused by cyclic injection encourages slow and stable fracture slip, characterized by the smaller peak slip rates. On the other hand, the flowback of injected fluid or suspension of injection could prevent the occurrence of fast-accelerated fracture slip during cyclic injection. However, the fracture can become unstable when it has experienced a considerable amount of total shear displacement (larger than ~ 0.9 mm in this study), and likely gained a significantly enhanced permeability. Continued injection after the unstable shut-in stage, signified by an unusual increase in slip rate and an accelerated drop in injection pressure, could result in rapid and unstable fracture slip.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Controlled conditions</subject><subject>Deceleration</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Fluid injection</subject><subject>Fluid pressure</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Granite</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Water injection</subject><issn>0723-2632</issn><issn>1434-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngeXU2ye5mj1JsLVQtVtFbyKbZkrpNapIie_DdjVbw5mGYGeb_Z5gPofMcLnOA6ioAlEAzIHkKRnlWHaBBzijLWEFfD9EAKkIzUlJyjE5CWAOkYcUH6HPUq84o_CKj9nhq11pF4yyeu6htNLLrenxnolmlecALbcImqR9NeAu46fHcu42Lxq7wonMfWNolXkTZdDr1ZotdiyW-l3HnZYfHXqpUaWwsnnhpTdSn6KiVXdBnv3mInsc3T6PbbPYwmY6uZ5mivIgZozVISgmpKg2ccFUtS1o2oGpGSd4WjcpLKZlmatmwVksgPH2nSqg5JxKADtHFfu_Wu_edDlGs3c7bdFKQgtOyzhOZpCJ7lfIuBK9bsfVmI30vchDfmMUes0iYxQ9mUSUT3ZtCEtuV9n-r_3F9Actzf_I</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Ji, Yinlin</creator><creator>Zhuang, Li</creator><creator>Wu, Wei</creator><creator>Hofmann, Hannes</creator><creator>Zang, Arno</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Günter</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1634-1603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite</title><author>Ji, Yinlin ; Zhuang, Li ; Wu, Wei ; Hofmann, Hannes ; Zang, Arno ; Zimmermann, Günter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-4390a332277e0828c7d636b0c94321f5bc16aa4e4cdb4fea028437c609882a003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Controlled conditions</topic><topic>Deceleration</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Fluid injection</topic><topic>Fluid pressure</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Granite</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Water injection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yinlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Arno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Günter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ji, Yinlin</au><au>Zhuang, Li</au><au>Wu, Wei</au><au>Hofmann, Hannes</au><au>Zang, Arno</au><au>Zimmermann, Günter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite</atitle><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle><stitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5389</spage><epage>5405</epage><pages>5389-5405</pages><issn>0723-2632</issn><eissn>1434-453X</eissn><abstract>Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection has raised serious concerns for the safety and efficiency of geo-energy systems. Cyclic injection has recently been proposed as an alternative injection scheme to reduce the large magnitude injection-induced seismicity. However, the influence of cyclic injection on the activation of natural fractures in granite and the resulting seismic risk is not yet clear. This study investigates the injection-induced activation of a critically stressed natural fracture in a granite core sample, particularly focusing on the comparison between monotonic and cyclic water injection under pressure-controlled and volume-controlled conditions. Experimental results show that the acceleration and deceleration of fracture slip are modulated by the shear stress imbalance between the fixed shear stress and the evolving frictional strength of the fracture. Fracture slip affects the fluid pressure distribution on the fracture, which in turn regulates the frictional strength of the fracture. At a small total shear displacement (i.e., ~ 0.9 mm in this study), cyclic injection with a restricted peak injection pressure results in aseismic fracture slip at much smaller peak slip rates compared to that during the monotonic injection. On the one hand, the more uniform reduction in effective normal stress caused by cyclic injection encourages slow and stable fracture slip, characterized by the smaller peak slip rates. On the other hand, the flowback of injected fluid or suspension of injection could prevent the occurrence of fast-accelerated fracture slip during cyclic injection. However, the fracture can become unstable when it has experienced a considerable amount of total shear displacement (larger than ~ 0.9 mm in this study), and likely gained a significantly enhanced permeability. Continued injection after the unstable shut-in stage, signified by an unusual increase in slip rate and an accelerated drop in injection pressure, could result in rapid and unstable fracture slip.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1634-1603</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0723-2632 |
ispartof | Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2021-10, Vol.54 (10), p.5389-5405 |
issn | 0723-2632 1434-453X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2583691632 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Acceleration Civil Engineering Controlled conditions Deceleration Displacement Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Fluid injection Fluid pressure Fractures Geophysics/Geodesy Granite Injection Original Paper Permeability Pressure Pressure distribution Seismic hazard Seismicity Shear stress Slip Water injection |
title | Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A24%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclic%20Water%20Injection%20Potentially%20Mitigates%20Seismic%20Risks%20by%20Promoting%20Slow%20and%20Stable%20Slip%20of%20a%20Natural%20Fracture%20in%20Granite&rft.jtitle=Rock%20mechanics%20and%20rock%20engineering&rft.au=Ji,%20Yinlin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5389&rft.epage=5405&rft.pages=5389-5405&rft.issn=0723-2632&rft.eissn=1434-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583691632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583691632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |