Soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence in the State of Amazonas, Brazil

The soil position in the landscape reveals its formation history. Landscapes combine surface features and subsurface components (parent material) of the earth, at which the soil inserts as a three-dimensional and dynamic natural body. The present research aimed to study the soil–landscape relationsh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental earth sciences 2021-11, Vol.80 (21), Article 714
Hauptverfasser: Fonseca, Julimar da Silva, Campos, Milton César Costa, Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de, Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos, Silva, Laércio Santos, de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite, Da Cunha, José Maurício, Simões, Emily Lira, dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page
container_title Environmental earth sciences
container_volume 80
creator Fonseca, Julimar da Silva
Campos, Milton César Costa
Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de
Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos
Silva, Laércio Santos
de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite
Da Cunha, José Maurício
Simões, Emily Lira
dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim
description The soil position in the landscape reveals its formation history. Landscapes combine surface features and subsurface components (parent material) of the earth, at which the soil inserts as a three-dimensional and dynamic natural body. The present research aimed to study the soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence and the factors determining soil diversification in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. The study extended along a transect of 9253 m, covering the distance between the first and the last profile, for a total of five profiles opened. Profile selection considered landscape topography, from the highest to the lowest relief of the terrain. Soil profiles characterization and classification were based on morphological, chemical, and physical properties and the mineralogy of the clay fraction by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Lithological contrasts and landscape variations determined the different soil types along the topolithosequence. Morphological, physical, chemical, and mineralogical attributes also varied along the landscape. The relief and the parent material, sandstone-gneiss, were the main factors influencing the pedogenesis. Goethite (5–40 g kg –1 ) was the predominant Fe oxide in all the soils, reflecting the low total iron content (Fe t  ≤ 68 g kg –1 ) of the soils and parent materials. The predominance of the sand fraction in all the studied profiles reflected the alluvial nature of the parent material, with the highest values (total sand > 800 g kg –1 ) occurring in the convex creep slope. Knowing the geomorphic surfaces and the parent material was effective for understanding the variation of the soil attributes along the landscape.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12665-021-10026-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2583230535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583230535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-1745c2731f073f1faa110838c87ad68047ef7b1dc181b9962878632ed98039823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBBIRCE_QGWJlgM_cn6UIeIlRaII1JZzZyeOLvZhOwWp-Af-kC_BIQg6ttld7czs7gBwjtEVRohfJ0wYqytEcFV6wip5BAZYMFYxIuXxby3QKRiltEYlKKYSsQGw8-C6z_ePTvs2Nbo3MJpOZxd8WrkeOg81TPtZDt5US29cSjCHPnQur0Iyr1vjG7PH5ZWB86yzgcHCyUbvgtfpEt5EvXPdGTixuktm9JOH4OXu9nn6UM2e7h-nk1ml6ZjkCvNx3RBOsUWcWmy1xhgJKhrBdcsEGnNj-QK3DRZ4IWV5iQtGiWmlQFQKQofg4qDbx1BOS1mtwzb6slKRWlBCUU3rgiIHVBNDStFY1Ue30fFNYaT2lqqDpapYqr4tVbKQ6IGUCtgvTfyT_of1BfilebU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583230535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence in the State of Amazonas, Brazil</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva ; Campos, Milton César Costa ; Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de ; Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos ; Silva, Laércio Santos ; de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite ; Da Cunha, José Maurício ; Simões, Emily Lira ; dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva ; Campos, Milton César Costa ; Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de ; Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos ; Silva, Laércio Santos ; de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite ; Da Cunha, José Maurício ; Simões, Emily Lira ; dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</creatorcontrib><description>The soil position in the landscape reveals its formation history. Landscapes combine surface features and subsurface components (parent material) of the earth, at which the soil inserts as a three-dimensional and dynamic natural body. The present research aimed to study the soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence and the factors determining soil diversification in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. The study extended along a transect of 9253 m, covering the distance between the first and the last profile, for a total of five profiles opened. Profile selection considered landscape topography, from the highest to the lowest relief of the terrain. Soil profiles characterization and classification were based on morphological, chemical, and physical properties and the mineralogy of the clay fraction by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Lithological contrasts and landscape variations determined the different soil types along the topolithosequence. Morphological, physical, chemical, and mineralogical attributes also varied along the landscape. The relief and the parent material, sandstone-gneiss, were the main factors influencing the pedogenesis. Goethite (5–40 g kg –1 ) was the predominant Fe oxide in all the soils, reflecting the low total iron content (Fe t  ≤ 68 g kg –1 ) of the soils and parent materials. The predominance of the sand fraction in all the studied profiles reflected the alluvial nature of the parent material, with the highest values (total sand &gt; 800 g kg –1 ) occurring in the convex creep slope. Knowing the geomorphic surfaces and the parent material was effective for understanding the variation of the soil attributes along the landscape.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-6280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-6299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-10026-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; Clay minerals ; Creep (materials) ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Geomorphology ; Gneiss ; Goethite ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Inserts ; Iron ; Iron content ; Lithology ; Mineralogy ; Morphology ; Original Article ; Physical properties ; Sand ; Sandstone ; Sedimentary rocks ; Soil ; Soil classification ; Soil dynamics ; Soil formation ; Soil profiles ; Soil properties ; Soil types ; Solifluction ; Terrestrial Pollution ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Environmental earth sciences, 2021-11, Vol.80 (21), Article 714</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-1745c2731f073f1faa110838c87ad68047ef7b1dc181b9962878632ed98039823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-1745c2731f073f1faa110838c87ad68047ef7b1dc181b9962878632ed98039823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6718-2126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-021-10026-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12665-021-10026-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Milton César Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Laércio Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Cunha, José Maurício</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, Emily Lira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</creatorcontrib><title>Soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence in the State of Amazonas, Brazil</title><title>Environmental earth sciences</title><addtitle>Environ Earth Sci</addtitle><description>The soil position in the landscape reveals its formation history. Landscapes combine surface features and subsurface components (parent material) of the earth, at which the soil inserts as a three-dimensional and dynamic natural body. The present research aimed to study the soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence and the factors determining soil diversification in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. The study extended along a transect of 9253 m, covering the distance between the first and the last profile, for a total of five profiles opened. Profile selection considered landscape topography, from the highest to the lowest relief of the terrain. Soil profiles characterization and classification were based on morphological, chemical, and physical properties and the mineralogy of the clay fraction by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Lithological contrasts and landscape variations determined the different soil types along the topolithosequence. Morphological, physical, chemical, and mineralogical attributes also varied along the landscape. The relief and the parent material, sandstone-gneiss, were the main factors influencing the pedogenesis. Goethite (5–40 g kg –1 ) was the predominant Fe oxide in all the soils, reflecting the low total iron content (Fe t  ≤ 68 g kg –1 ) of the soils and parent materials. The predominance of the sand fraction in all the studied profiles reflected the alluvial nature of the parent material, with the highest values (total sand &gt; 800 g kg –1 ) occurring in the convex creep slope. Knowing the geomorphic surfaces and the parent material was effective for understanding the variation of the soil attributes along the landscape.</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Creep (materials)</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Gneiss</subject><subject>Goethite</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Inserts</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iron content</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil classification</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil formation</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Solifluction</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>1866-6280</issn><issn>1866-6299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBBIRCE_QGWJlgM_cn6UIeIlRaII1JZzZyeOLvZhOwWp-Af-kC_BIQg6ttld7czs7gBwjtEVRohfJ0wYqytEcFV6wip5BAZYMFYxIuXxby3QKRiltEYlKKYSsQGw8-C6z_ePTvs2Nbo3MJpOZxd8WrkeOg81TPtZDt5US29cSjCHPnQur0Iyr1vjG7PH5ZWB86yzgcHCyUbvgtfpEt5EvXPdGTixuktm9JOH4OXu9nn6UM2e7h-nk1ml6ZjkCvNx3RBOsUWcWmy1xhgJKhrBdcsEGnNj-QK3DRZ4IWV5iQtGiWmlQFQKQofg4qDbx1BOS1mtwzb6slKRWlBCUU3rgiIHVBNDStFY1Ue30fFNYaT2lqqDpapYqr4tVbKQ6IGUCtgvTfyT_of1BfilebU</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva</creator><creator>Campos, Milton César Costa</creator><creator>Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de</creator><creator>Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos</creator><creator>Silva, Laércio Santos</creator><creator>de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite</creator><creator>Da Cunha, José Maurício</creator><creator>Simões, Emily Lira</creator><creator>dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-2126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence in the State of Amazonas, Brazil</title><author>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva ; Campos, Milton César Costa ; Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de ; Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos ; Silva, Laércio Santos ; de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite ; Da Cunha, José Maurício ; Simões, Emily Lira ; dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-1745c2731f073f1faa110838c87ad68047ef7b1dc181b9962878632ed98039823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Creep (materials)</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Gneiss</topic><topic>Goethite</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Inserts</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iron content</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil classification</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil formation</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Solifluction</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Milton César Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Laércio Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Cunha, José Maurício</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, Emily Lira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonseca, Julimar da Silva</au><au>Campos, Milton César Costa</au><au>Brito Filho, Elilson Gomes de</au><au>Mantovanelli, Bruno Campos</au><au>Silva, Laércio Santos</au><au>de Lima, Alan Ferreira Leite</au><au>Da Cunha, José Maurício</au><au>Simões, Emily Lira</au><au>dos Santos, Luís Antônio Coutrim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence in the State of Amazonas, Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle><stitle>Environ Earth Sci</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>21</issue><artnum>714</artnum><issn>1866-6280</issn><eissn>1866-6299</eissn><abstract>The soil position in the landscape reveals its formation history. Landscapes combine surface features and subsurface components (parent material) of the earth, at which the soil inserts as a three-dimensional and dynamic natural body. The present research aimed to study the soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence and the factors determining soil diversification in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. The study extended along a transect of 9253 m, covering the distance between the first and the last profile, for a total of five profiles opened. Profile selection considered landscape topography, from the highest to the lowest relief of the terrain. Soil profiles characterization and classification were based on morphological, chemical, and physical properties and the mineralogy of the clay fraction by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Lithological contrasts and landscape variations determined the different soil types along the topolithosequence. Morphological, physical, chemical, and mineralogical attributes also varied along the landscape. The relief and the parent material, sandstone-gneiss, were the main factors influencing the pedogenesis. Goethite (5–40 g kg –1 ) was the predominant Fe oxide in all the soils, reflecting the low total iron content (Fe t  ≤ 68 g kg –1 ) of the soils and parent materials. The predominance of the sand fraction in all the studied profiles reflected the alluvial nature of the parent material, with the highest values (total sand &gt; 800 g kg –1 ) occurring in the convex creep slope. Knowing the geomorphic surfaces and the parent material was effective for understanding the variation of the soil attributes along the landscape.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12665-021-10026-9</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-2126</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-6280
ispartof Environmental earth sciences, 2021-11, Vol.80 (21), Article 714
issn 1866-6280
1866-6299
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2583230535
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Biogeosciences
Clay minerals
Creep (materials)
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Science and Engineering
Geochemistry
Geology
Geomorphology
Gneiss
Goethite
Hydrology/Water Resources
Inserts
Iron
Iron content
Lithology
Mineralogy
Morphology
Original Article
Physical properties
Sand
Sandstone
Sedimentary rocks
Soil
Soil classification
Soil dynamics
Soil formation
Soil profiles
Soil properties
Soil types
Solifluction
Terrestrial Pollution
X-ray diffraction
title Soil–landscape relationship in a sandstone-gneiss topolithosequence in the State of Amazonas, Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A01%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%E2%80%93landscape%20relationship%20in%20a%20sandstone-gneiss%20topolithosequence%20in%20the%20State%20of%20Amazonas,%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20earth%20sciences&rft.au=Fonseca,%20Julimar%20da%20Silva&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=21&rft.artnum=714&rft.issn=1866-6280&rft.eissn=1866-6299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12665-021-10026-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583230535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583230535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true