Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis

Despite the fact that vulnerable communities are the most affected by unplanned cities, considerably less attention has been given to involving them in urban development in order to ensure equitable outcomes. In this regard, there is an urgent need for governments to introduce and enforce processes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2021-08, Vol.13 (16), p.8992
Hauptverfasser: Geekiyanage, Devindi, Fernando, Terrence, Keraminiyage, Kaushal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 16
container_start_page 8992
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 13
creator Geekiyanage, Devindi
Fernando, Terrence
Keraminiyage, Kaushal
description Despite the fact that vulnerable communities are the most affected by unplanned cities, considerably less attention has been given to involving them in urban development in order to ensure equitable outcomes. In this regard, there is an urgent need for governments to introduce and enforce processes that allow citizens, including vulnerable communities, to participate in development planning and policymaking. However, at present, there is a lack of guidance for practitioners regarding the definition of a clear purpose of community engagement and the selection of appropriate participatory methods to fulfil the set purpose. This study provides a thorough account of the participatory methods that can be used to achieve various engagement goals throughout the urban development process. This structured literature review used 71 reports published from 2000 to 2020. The review revealed 34 participatory methods, wherein most of the methods are devoted to informing, consulting and involving communities, whilst only a few methods are available for interactive public participation that supports true collaboration and empowerment. The study identified 12 purposes of community engagement in urban development, and mapped the 34 participatory methods for achieving them. The analysed case studies showed that the current community engagement practices are mainly in the pre-design and briefing stages of the urban development processes, and that most projects are aiming to achieve the ‘inform’ and ‘consult’ levels of engagement, with a few aiming to achieve the ‘involve’ and ‘collaborate’ levels. This study shows that community engagement is often overlooked during the professional design, development and post-development phases. The paper presents an onion model which can be used by practitioners to choose appropriate participatory methods based on the intended urban development phase, the engagement level and the purpose of the community engagement.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su13168992
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2582945832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A811315367</galeid><sourcerecordid>A811315367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-317ceeff2c7615fe37bc620ae3e33c3661042dd7d7add0ccd602f0af3e9e548c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVtLQzEMxw-ioKgvfoKCTwpHe9m5-TbnFRwOdc-Hrk1nx9Yem266b29lgi6BJITfP4Qky04YvRCioZe4ZIKVddPwneyA04rljBZ091-9nx0jzmgyIVjDyoMsDmXXWTclIxmiVbaT0Yc1GUJ89xqJdSS-AxmHiXTkBlYw990CXCSj4BUgXpE-eV1jhIVMavICKwufRDpNBhIhv05Bk9uV1eAUkL6T8zVaPMr2jJwjHP_mw2x8d_s2eMifnu8fB_2nXImyjrlglQIwhquqZIUBUU1UyakEAUIkpGS0x7WudCW1pkrpknJDpRHQQNGrlTjMTjdzu-A_loCxnfllSEtgy4uaN72iFjxRFxtqKufQWmd8DFIl17CwyjswNvX7NUvXLURZJcHZliAxEb7iVC4R28fXl232fMOq4BEDmLYLdiHDumW0_fla-_c18Q0ZQYmB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582945832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Geekiyanage, Devindi ; Fernando, Terrence ; Keraminiyage, Kaushal</creator><creatorcontrib>Geekiyanage, Devindi ; Fernando, Terrence ; Keraminiyage, Kaushal</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the fact that vulnerable communities are the most affected by unplanned cities, considerably less attention has been given to involving them in urban development in order to ensure equitable outcomes. In this regard, there is an urgent need for governments to introduce and enforce processes that allow citizens, including vulnerable communities, to participate in development planning and policymaking. However, at present, there is a lack of guidance for practitioners regarding the definition of a clear purpose of community engagement and the selection of appropriate participatory methods to fulfil the set purpose. This study provides a thorough account of the participatory methods that can be used to achieve various engagement goals throughout the urban development process. This structured literature review used 71 reports published from 2000 to 2020. The review revealed 34 participatory methods, wherein most of the methods are devoted to informing, consulting and involving communities, whilst only a few methods are available for interactive public participation that supports true collaboration and empowerment. The study identified 12 purposes of community engagement in urban development, and mapped the 34 participatory methods for achieving them. The analysed case studies showed that the current community engagement practices are mainly in the pre-design and briefing stages of the urban development processes, and that most projects are aiming to achieve the ‘inform’ and ‘consult’ levels of engagement, with a few aiming to achieve the ‘involve’ and ‘collaborate’ levels. This study shows that community engagement is often overlooked during the professional design, development and post-development phases. The paper presents an onion model which can be used by practitioners to choose appropriate participatory methods based on the intended urban development phase, the engagement level and the purpose of the community engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su13168992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Citation indexes ; Citizen participation ; Community involvement ; Community participation ; Empowerment ; Government publications ; Literature reviews ; Public participation ; Science ; Sustainability ; Systematic review ; Urban areas ; Urban development ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-08, Vol.13 (16), p.8992</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-317ceeff2c7615fe37bc620ae3e33c3661042dd7d7add0ccd602f0af3e9e548c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-317ceeff2c7615fe37bc620ae3e33c3661042dd7d7add0ccd602f0af3e9e548c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8884-3509 ; 0000-0001-5321-9071 ; 0000-0002-7892-8445</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geekiyanage, Devindi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Terrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keraminiyage, Kaushal</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Despite the fact that vulnerable communities are the most affected by unplanned cities, considerably less attention has been given to involving them in urban development in order to ensure equitable outcomes. In this regard, there is an urgent need for governments to introduce and enforce processes that allow citizens, including vulnerable communities, to participate in development planning and policymaking. However, at present, there is a lack of guidance for practitioners regarding the definition of a clear purpose of community engagement and the selection of appropriate participatory methods to fulfil the set purpose. This study provides a thorough account of the participatory methods that can be used to achieve various engagement goals throughout the urban development process. This structured literature review used 71 reports published from 2000 to 2020. The review revealed 34 participatory methods, wherein most of the methods are devoted to informing, consulting and involving communities, whilst only a few methods are available for interactive public participation that supports true collaboration and empowerment. The study identified 12 purposes of community engagement in urban development, and mapped the 34 participatory methods for achieving them. The analysed case studies showed that the current community engagement practices are mainly in the pre-design and briefing stages of the urban development processes, and that most projects are aiming to achieve the ‘inform’ and ‘consult’ levels of engagement, with a few aiming to achieve the ‘involve’ and ‘collaborate’ levels. This study shows that community engagement is often overlooked during the professional design, development and post-development phases. The paper presents an onion model which can be used by practitioners to choose appropriate participatory methods based on the intended urban development phase, the engagement level and the purpose of the community engagement.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Citation indexes</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community participation</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Government publications</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVtLQzEMxw-ioKgvfoKCTwpHe9m5-TbnFRwOdc-Hrk1nx9Yem266b29lgi6BJITfP4Qky04YvRCioZe4ZIKVddPwneyA04rljBZ091-9nx0jzmgyIVjDyoMsDmXXWTclIxmiVbaT0Yc1GUJ89xqJdSS-AxmHiXTkBlYw990CXCSj4BUgXpE-eV1jhIVMavICKwufRDpNBhIhv05Bk9uV1eAUkL6T8zVaPMr2jJwjHP_mw2x8d_s2eMifnu8fB_2nXImyjrlglQIwhquqZIUBUU1UyakEAUIkpGS0x7WudCW1pkrpknJDpRHQQNGrlTjMTjdzu-A_loCxnfllSEtgy4uaN72iFjxRFxtqKufQWmd8DFIl17CwyjswNvX7NUvXLURZJcHZliAxEb7iVC4R28fXl232fMOq4BEDmLYLdiHDumW0_fla-_c18Q0ZQYmB</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Geekiyanage, Devindi</creator><creator>Fernando, Terrence</creator><creator>Keraminiyage, Kaushal</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-9071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-8445</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis</title><author>Geekiyanage, Devindi ; Fernando, Terrence ; Keraminiyage, Kaushal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-317ceeff2c7615fe37bc620ae3e33c3661042dd7d7add0ccd602f0af3e9e548c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Citation indexes</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community participation</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Government publications</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geekiyanage, Devindi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Terrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keraminiyage, Kaushal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geekiyanage, Devindi</au><au>Fernando, Terrence</au><au>Keraminiyage, Kaushal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>8992</spage><pages>8992-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Despite the fact that vulnerable communities are the most affected by unplanned cities, considerably less attention has been given to involving them in urban development in order to ensure equitable outcomes. In this regard, there is an urgent need for governments to introduce and enforce processes that allow citizens, including vulnerable communities, to participate in development planning and policymaking. However, at present, there is a lack of guidance for practitioners regarding the definition of a clear purpose of community engagement and the selection of appropriate participatory methods to fulfil the set purpose. This study provides a thorough account of the participatory methods that can be used to achieve various engagement goals throughout the urban development process. This structured literature review used 71 reports published from 2000 to 2020. The review revealed 34 participatory methods, wherein most of the methods are devoted to informing, consulting and involving communities, whilst only a few methods are available for interactive public participation that supports true collaboration and empowerment. The study identified 12 purposes of community engagement in urban development, and mapped the 34 participatory methods for achieving them. The analysed case studies showed that the current community engagement practices are mainly in the pre-design and briefing stages of the urban development processes, and that most projects are aiming to achieve the ‘inform’ and ‘consult’ levels of engagement, with a few aiming to achieve the ‘involve’ and ‘collaborate’ levels. This study shows that community engagement is often overlooked during the professional design, development and post-development phases. The paper presents an onion model which can be used by practitioners to choose appropriate participatory methods based on the intended urban development phase, the engagement level and the purpose of the community engagement.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su13168992</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-9071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-8445</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2021-08, Vol.13 (16), p.8992
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2582945832
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Case studies
Citation indexes
Citizen participation
Community involvement
Community participation
Empowerment
Government publications
Literature reviews
Public participation
Science
Sustainability
Systematic review
Urban areas
Urban development
Urban planning
title Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A27%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20Participatory%20Methods%20in%20the%20Urban%20Development%20Process:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Case-Based%20Evidence%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Geekiyanage,%20Devindi&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=8992&rft.pages=8992-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su13168992&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA811315367%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582945832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A811315367&rfr_iscdi=true