A Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competitive Dual Collection Channel under Asymmetric Information and Reward–Penalty Mechanism

We investigate a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where the retailer and the third-party recycler compete against each other to collect waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) given that collection effort is their private information. Using the principle-agent theory, we develop a CLSC model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2018-06, Vol.10 (7), p.2131
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Wenbin, Zhou, Shuya, Zhang, Meng, Sun, Hao, He, Lingyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2131
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 10
creator Wang, Wenbin
Zhou, Shuya
Zhang, Meng
Sun, Hao
He, Lingyun
description We investigate a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where the retailer and the third-party recycler compete against each other to collect waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) given that collection effort is their private information. Using the principle-agent theory, we develop a CLSC model with dual collection channel without the government’s reward–penalty mechanism (RPM). An information screening contract is designed for the manufacturer to attain real information on collection effort levels; meanwhile, the optimal decision-making results of other decision variables are derived. Next, we take RPM into account to further examine the efficacy of the government’s guidance mechanism in improving collection rate and profits of CLSC members. Our results indicate that (i) the collection competition reduces the total collection quantity and the expected profits of all the CLSC members without RPM; (ii) all CLSC members’ expected profits are improved if both two collection agents select a high collection effort level without and with RPM; (iii) RPM increases buyback price, collection price, collection quantity, and franchise fee but decreases wholesale price and retail price; with the reward–penalty intensity increasing, the manufacturer’s expected profit first decreases and then increases, while the expected profits of H-type retailer and H-type third-party recycler continue to increase. We find that RPM may ultimately stimulate the collection agents to collect more WEEEs, while the intense collection competition reduces the profits of CLSC members.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su10072131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2582920927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2582920927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-426defea77fec32645d903ca18c3a24be4691c85a089e824f703653c0326ccd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtKxDAUhoMoOIyz8QkC7oRqLr1lOdTbwIjiZV1iespkSJuapA5d6Tv4hj6JHUfQszmHn-_8_PwIHVNyxrkg576nhGSMcrqHJoxkNKIkIfv_7kM0835NxuGcCppO0PscF8Z6qKKltR1-7LvODLhYSd3ijQ4rXNimg6CDfgN80UszCsaACtq2W6xtweC-rcDhuR-aBoLTCi_a2rpG_kCyrfADbKSrvj4-76GVJgz4FtT4q31zhA5qaTzMfvcUPV9dPhU30fLuelHMl5FiIglRzNIKapBZVoPiLI2TShCuJM0Vlyx-gTgVVOWJJLmAnMV1RniacEVGVqkq5lN0svPtnH3twYdybXs3hvElS3ImGBEsG6nTHaWc9d5BXXZON9INJSXltuPyr2P-DfEQcDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582920927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competitive Dual Collection Channel under Asymmetric Information and Reward–Penalty Mechanism</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Wenbin ; Zhou, Shuya ; Zhang, Meng ; Sun, Hao ; He, Lingyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenbin ; Zhou, Shuya ; Zhang, Meng ; Sun, Hao ; He, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where the retailer and the third-party recycler compete against each other to collect waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) given that collection effort is their private information. Using the principle-agent theory, we develop a CLSC model with dual collection channel without the government’s reward–penalty mechanism (RPM). An information screening contract is designed for the manufacturer to attain real information on collection effort levels; meanwhile, the optimal decision-making results of other decision variables are derived. Next, we take RPM into account to further examine the efficacy of the government’s guidance mechanism in improving collection rate and profits of CLSC members. Our results indicate that (i) the collection competition reduces the total collection quantity and the expected profits of all the CLSC members without RPM; (ii) all CLSC members’ expected profits are improved if both two collection agents select a high collection effort level without and with RPM; (iii) RPM increases buyback price, collection price, collection quantity, and franchise fee but decreases wholesale price and retail price; with the reward–penalty intensity increasing, the manufacturer’s expected profit first decreases and then increases, while the expected profits of H-type retailer and H-type third-party recycler continue to increase. We find that RPM may ultimately stimulate the collection agents to collect more WEEEs, while the intense collection competition reduces the profits of CLSC members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su10072131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Collectors ; Competition ; Decision making ; Efficiency ; Electronic equipment ; Electronic waste ; Environmental policy ; Information sharing ; Manufacturers ; OEM ; Product development ; Profitability ; Profits ; Reinforcement ; Remanufacturing ; Retail stores ; Suppliers ; Supply chains ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2018-06, Vol.10 (7), p.2131</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-426defea77fec32645d903ca18c3a24be4691c85a089e824f703653c0326ccd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-426defea77fec32645d903ca18c3a24be4691c85a089e824f703653c0326ccd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><title>A Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competitive Dual Collection Channel under Asymmetric Information and Reward–Penalty Mechanism</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>We investigate a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where the retailer and the third-party recycler compete against each other to collect waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) given that collection effort is their private information. Using the principle-agent theory, we develop a CLSC model with dual collection channel without the government’s reward–penalty mechanism (RPM). An information screening contract is designed for the manufacturer to attain real information on collection effort levels; meanwhile, the optimal decision-making results of other decision variables are derived. Next, we take RPM into account to further examine the efficacy of the government’s guidance mechanism in improving collection rate and profits of CLSC members. Our results indicate that (i) the collection competition reduces the total collection quantity and the expected profits of all the CLSC members without RPM; (ii) all CLSC members’ expected profits are improved if both two collection agents select a high collection effort level without and with RPM; (iii) RPM increases buyback price, collection price, collection quantity, and franchise fee but decreases wholesale price and retail price; with the reward–penalty intensity increasing, the manufacturer’s expected profit first decreases and then increases, while the expected profits of H-type retailer and H-type third-party recycler continue to increase. We find that RPM may ultimately stimulate the collection agents to collect more WEEEs, while the intense collection competition reduces the profits of CLSC members.</description><subject>Collectors</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electronic equipment</subject><subject>Electronic waste</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>OEM</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Remanufacturing</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtKxDAUhoMoOIyz8QkC7oRqLr1lOdTbwIjiZV1iespkSJuapA5d6Tv4hj6JHUfQszmHn-_8_PwIHVNyxrkg576nhGSMcrqHJoxkNKIkIfv_7kM0835NxuGcCppO0PscF8Z6qKKltR1-7LvODLhYSd3ijQ4rXNimg6CDfgN80UszCsaACtq2W6xtweC-rcDhuR-aBoLTCi_a2rpG_kCyrfADbKSrvj4-76GVJgz4FtT4q31zhA5qaTzMfvcUPV9dPhU30fLuelHMl5FiIglRzNIKapBZVoPiLI2TShCuJM0Vlyx-gTgVVOWJJLmAnMV1RniacEVGVqkq5lN0svPtnH3twYdybXs3hvElS3ImGBEsG6nTHaWc9d5BXXZON9INJSXltuPyr2P-DfEQcDY</recordid><startdate>20180622</startdate><enddate>20180622</enddate><creator>Wang, Wenbin</creator><creator>Zhou, Shuya</creator><creator>Zhang, Meng</creator><creator>Sun, Hao</creator><creator>He, Lingyun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180622</creationdate><title>A Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competitive Dual Collection Channel under Asymmetric Information and Reward–Penalty Mechanism</title><author>Wang, Wenbin ; Zhou, Shuya ; Zhang, Meng ; Sun, Hao ; He, Lingyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-426defea77fec32645d903ca18c3a24be4691c85a089e824f703653c0326ccd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Collectors</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electronic equipment</topic><topic>Electronic waste</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>OEM</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Remanufacturing</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Wenbin</au><au>Zhou, Shuya</au><au>Zhang, Meng</au><au>Sun, Hao</au><au>He, Lingyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competitive Dual Collection Channel under Asymmetric Information and Reward–Penalty Mechanism</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2018-06-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2131</spage><pages>2131-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>We investigate a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where the retailer and the third-party recycler compete against each other to collect waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) given that collection effort is their private information. Using the principle-agent theory, we develop a CLSC model with dual collection channel without the government’s reward–penalty mechanism (RPM). An information screening contract is designed for the manufacturer to attain real information on collection effort levels; meanwhile, the optimal decision-making results of other decision variables are derived. Next, we take RPM into account to further examine the efficacy of the government’s guidance mechanism in improving collection rate and profits of CLSC members. Our results indicate that (i) the collection competition reduces the total collection quantity and the expected profits of all the CLSC members without RPM; (ii) all CLSC members’ expected profits are improved if both two collection agents select a high collection effort level without and with RPM; (iii) RPM increases buyback price, collection price, collection quantity, and franchise fee but decreases wholesale price and retail price; with the reward–penalty intensity increasing, the manufacturer’s expected profit first decreases and then increases, while the expected profits of H-type retailer and H-type third-party recycler continue to increase. We find that RPM may ultimately stimulate the collection agents to collect more WEEEs, while the intense collection competition reduces the profits of CLSC members.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su10072131</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2018-06, Vol.10 (7), p.2131
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2582920927
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Collectors
Competition
Decision making
Efficiency
Electronic equipment
Electronic waste
Environmental policy
Information sharing
Manufacturers
OEM
Product development
Profitability
Profits
Reinforcement
Remanufacturing
Retail stores
Suppliers
Supply chains
Sustainability
title A Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competitive Dual Collection Channel under Asymmetric Information and Reward–Penalty Mechanism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A39%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Closed-Loop%20Supply%20Chain%20with%20Competitive%20Dual%20Collection%20Channel%20under%20Asymmetric%20Information%20and%20Reward%E2%80%93Penalty%20Mechanism&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Wang,%20Wenbin&rft.date=2018-06-22&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2131&rft.pages=2131-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su10072131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2582920927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582920927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true