The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans
Silicone is widely used in chronic implants and is generally perceived to be safe. However, textured breast implants have been associated with immune-related complications, including malignancies. Here, by examining for up to one year the foreign body response and capsular fibrosis triggered by mini...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature biomedical engineering 2021-10, Vol.5 (10), p.1115-1130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1115 |
container_title | Nature biomedical engineering |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Doloff, Joshua C. Veiseh, Omid de Mezerville, Roberto Sforza, Marcos Perry, Tracy Ann Haupt, Jennifer Jamiel, Morgan Chambers, Courtney Nash, Amanda Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira Stelzel, Jessica L. Bauer, Stuart J. Neshat, Sarah Y. Hancock, John Romero, Natalia Araujo Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo Leiva, Isaac Mora Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça Bayat, Ardeshir Kinney, Brian M. Hodges, H. Courtney Miranda, Roberto N. Clemens, Mark W. Langer, Robert |
description | Silicone is widely used in chronic implants and is generally perceived to be safe. However, textured breast implants have been associated with immune-related complications, including malignancies. Here, by examining for up to one year the foreign body response and capsular fibrosis triggered by miniaturized or full-scale clinically approved breast implants with different surface topography (average roughness, 0–90 μm) placed in the mammary fat pads of mice or rabbits, respectively, we show that surface topography mediates immune responses to the implants. We also show that the surface surrounding human breast implants collected during revision surgeries also differentially alters the individual’s immune responses to the implant. Moreover, miniaturized implants with an average roughness of 4 μm can largely suppress the foreign body response and fibrosis (but not in T-cell-deficient mice), and that tissue surrounding these implants displayed higher levels of immunosuppressive FOXP3
+
regulatory T cells. Our findings suggest that, amongst the topographies investigated, implants with an average roughness of 4 μm provoke the least amount of inflammation and foreign body response.
The surface topography of breast implants mediates the immune responses to them, and implants with an average roughness of 4 μm largely suppress foreign body response and fibrosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2582894638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2582894638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-959567372650531f7b55d0fc3ee8520a50ec6d33ba2bfba8c1b06cd4e5d674a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoKuoPuJCAW1vz6OrHUsQXCG4U3IUkXT0TmU7apHsxf290fK1cFCnIPbfgEHLM2TlnsrlIJQfgBRN5WC3botwi-4JDXTRl9bL9Z98jRym9MsZ4K8u2hl2yJz9gCbBP3p6WSNMce22RTmEMi6jH5ZqGnia3cjZ4pCaiThN1w7jSfkp0wM7pCROdMtuHiG7hqQndmkZMY_AJqfN0cBbPaNTGuMxo39HlPGifDslOr1cJj77eA_J8c_10dVc8PN7eX10-FFbWMBUttFDVshYVMJC8rw1Ax3orERsQTANDW3VSGi1Mb3RjuWGV7UqErqpLLeQBOd30jjG8zZgm9Rrm6PNJJaARTVtWsskpsUnZGFKK2KsxukHHteJMfYhWG9Eqi1afolWZoZOv6tlkGT_It9YckJtAyl9-gfH39j-17x8gidU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582894638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Doloff, Joshua C. ; Veiseh, Omid ; de Mezerville, Roberto ; Sforza, Marcos ; Perry, Tracy Ann ; Haupt, Jennifer ; Jamiel, Morgan ; Chambers, Courtney ; Nash, Amanda ; Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira ; Stelzel, Jessica L. ; Bauer, Stuart J. ; Neshat, Sarah Y. ; Hancock, John ; Romero, Natalia Araujo ; Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo ; Leiva, Isaac Mora ; Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Bayat, Ardeshir ; Kinney, Brian M. ; Hodges, H. Courtney ; Miranda, Roberto N. ; Clemens, Mark W. ; Langer, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Doloff, Joshua C. ; Veiseh, Omid ; de Mezerville, Roberto ; Sforza, Marcos ; Perry, Tracy Ann ; Haupt, Jennifer ; Jamiel, Morgan ; Chambers, Courtney ; Nash, Amanda ; Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira ; Stelzel, Jessica L. ; Bauer, Stuart J. ; Neshat, Sarah Y. ; Hancock, John ; Romero, Natalia Araujo ; Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo ; Leiva, Isaac Mora ; Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Bayat, Ardeshir ; Kinney, Brian M. ; Hodges, H. Courtney ; Miranda, Roberto N. ; Clemens, Mark W. ; Langer, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Silicone is widely used in chronic implants and is generally perceived to be safe. However, textured breast implants have been associated with immune-related complications, including malignancies. Here, by examining for up to one year the foreign body response and capsular fibrosis triggered by miniaturized or full-scale clinically approved breast implants with different surface topography (average roughness, 0–90 μm) placed in the mammary fat pads of mice or rabbits, respectively, we show that surface topography mediates immune responses to the implants. We also show that the surface surrounding human breast implants collected during revision surgeries also differentially alters the individual’s immune responses to the implant. Moreover, miniaturized implants with an average roughness of 4 μm can largely suppress the foreign body response and fibrosis (but not in T-cell-deficient mice), and that tissue surrounding these implants displayed higher levels of immunosuppressive FOXP3
+
regulatory T cells. Our findings suggest that, amongst the topographies investigated, implants with an average roughness of 4 μm provoke the least amount of inflammation and foreign body response.
The surface topography of breast implants mediates the immune responses to them, and implants with an average roughness of 4 μm largely suppress foreign body response and fibrosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2157-846X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2157-846X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34155355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>13/31 ; 13/51 ; 14/1 ; 14/19 ; 14/28 ; 14/63 ; 631/250/256/2515 ; 631/61/54/993 ; 639/166/985 ; 64/60 ; 692/308/575 ; 96/47 ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology ; Biomedicine ; Breast ; Breast Implantation - adverse effects ; Breast implants ; Breast Implants - adverse effects ; Fibrosis ; Foreign Bodies ; Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology ; Foxp3 protein ; Humans ; Immunoregulation ; Implants ; Lymphocytes ; Lymphocytes T ; Mice ; Rabbits ; Roughness ; Silicone resins ; Silicones ; Silicones - adverse effects ; Topography</subject><ispartof>Nature biomedical engineering, 2021-10, Vol.5 (10), p.1115-1130</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-959567372650531f7b55d0fc3ee8520a50ec6d33ba2bfba8c1b06cd4e5d674a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-959567372650531f7b55d0fc3ee8520a50ec6d33ba2bfba8c1b06cd4e5d674a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8467-5464 ; 0000-0003-4441-497X ; 0000-0003-4255-0492 ; 0000-0002-5644-9240 ; 0000-0003-1153-8079 ; 0000-0001-9261-8278 ; 0000-0002-4323-3264 ; 0000-0001-7849-5603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doloff, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veiseh, Omid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mezerville, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sforza, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Tracy Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haupt, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamiel, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelzel, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neshat, Sarah Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiva, Isaac Mora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Ardeshir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, H. Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Roberto N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans</title><title>Nature biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Nat Biomed Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Biomed Eng</addtitle><description>Silicone is widely used in chronic implants and is generally perceived to be safe. However, textured breast implants have been associated with immune-related complications, including malignancies. Here, by examining for up to one year the foreign body response and capsular fibrosis triggered by miniaturized or full-scale clinically approved breast implants with different surface topography (average roughness, 0–90 μm) placed in the mammary fat pads of mice or rabbits, respectively, we show that surface topography mediates immune responses to the implants. We also show that the surface surrounding human breast implants collected during revision surgeries also differentially alters the individual’s immune responses to the implant. Moreover, miniaturized implants with an average roughness of 4 μm can largely suppress the foreign body response and fibrosis (but not in T-cell-deficient mice), and that tissue surrounding these implants displayed higher levels of immunosuppressive FOXP3
+
regulatory T cells. Our findings suggest that, amongst the topographies investigated, implants with an average roughness of 4 μm provoke the least amount of inflammation and foreign body response.
The surface topography of breast implants mediates the immune responses to them, and implants with an average roughness of 4 μm largely suppress foreign body response and fibrosis.</description><subject>13/31</subject><subject>13/51</subject><subject>14/1</subject><subject>14/19</subject><subject>14/28</subject><subject>14/63</subject><subject>631/250/256/2515</subject><subject>631/61/54/993</subject><subject>639/166/985</subject><subject>64/60</subject><subject>692/308/575</subject><subject>96/47</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Breast implants</subject><subject>Breast Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology</subject><subject>Foxp3 protein</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoregulation</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Silicone resins</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Silicones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Topography</subject><issn>2157-846X</issn><issn>2157-846X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoKuoPuJCAW1vz6OrHUsQXCG4U3IUkXT0TmU7apHsxf290fK1cFCnIPbfgEHLM2TlnsrlIJQfgBRN5WC3botwi-4JDXTRl9bL9Z98jRym9MsZ4K8u2hl2yJz9gCbBP3p6WSNMce22RTmEMi6jH5ZqGnia3cjZ4pCaiThN1w7jSfkp0wM7pCROdMtuHiG7hqQndmkZMY_AJqfN0cBbPaNTGuMxo39HlPGifDslOr1cJj77eA_J8c_10dVc8PN7eX10-FFbWMBUttFDVshYVMJC8rw1Ax3orERsQTANDW3VSGi1Mb3RjuWGV7UqErqpLLeQBOd30jjG8zZgm9Rrm6PNJJaARTVtWsskpsUnZGFKK2KsxukHHteJMfYhWG9Eqi1afolWZoZOv6tlkGT_It9YckJtAyl9-gfH39j-17x8gidU</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Doloff, Joshua C.</creator><creator>Veiseh, Omid</creator><creator>de Mezerville, Roberto</creator><creator>Sforza, Marcos</creator><creator>Perry, Tracy Ann</creator><creator>Haupt, Jennifer</creator><creator>Jamiel, Morgan</creator><creator>Chambers, Courtney</creator><creator>Nash, Amanda</creator><creator>Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira</creator><creator>Stelzel, Jessica L.</creator><creator>Bauer, Stuart J.</creator><creator>Neshat, Sarah Y.</creator><creator>Hancock, John</creator><creator>Romero, Natalia Araujo</creator><creator>Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo</creator><creator>Leiva, Isaac Mora</creator><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creator><creator>Bayat, Ardeshir</creator><creator>Kinney, Brian M.</creator><creator>Hodges, H. Courtney</creator><creator>Miranda, Roberto N.</creator><creator>Clemens, Mark W.</creator><creator>Langer, Robert</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-5464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-497X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-0492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-9240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-8079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-8278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-3264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-5603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans</title><author>Doloff, Joshua C. ; Veiseh, Omid ; de Mezerville, Roberto ; Sforza, Marcos ; Perry, Tracy Ann ; Haupt, Jennifer ; Jamiel, Morgan ; Chambers, Courtney ; Nash, Amanda ; Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira ; Stelzel, Jessica L. ; Bauer, Stuart J. ; Neshat, Sarah Y. ; Hancock, John ; Romero, Natalia Araujo ; Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo ; Leiva, Isaac Mora ; Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça ; Bayat, Ardeshir ; Kinney, Brian M. ; Hodges, H. Courtney ; Miranda, Roberto N. ; Clemens, Mark W. ; Langer, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-959567372650531f7b55d0fc3ee8520a50ec6d33ba2bfba8c1b06cd4e5d674a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>13/31</topic><topic>13/51</topic><topic>14/1</topic><topic>14/19</topic><topic>14/28</topic><topic>14/63</topic><topic>631/250/256/2515</topic><topic>631/61/54/993</topic><topic>639/166/985</topic><topic>64/60</topic><topic>692/308/575</topic><topic>96/47</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Breast implants</topic><topic>Breast Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology</topic><topic>Foxp3 protein</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoregulation</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Silicone resins</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Silicones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Topography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doloff, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veiseh, Omid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mezerville, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sforza, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Tracy Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haupt, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamiel, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelzel, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neshat, Sarah Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiva, Isaac Mora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Ardeshir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, H. Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Roberto N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Nature biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doloff, Joshua C.</au><au>Veiseh, Omid</au><au>de Mezerville, Roberto</au><au>Sforza, Marcos</au><au>Perry, Tracy Ann</au><au>Haupt, Jennifer</au><au>Jamiel, Morgan</au><au>Chambers, Courtney</au><au>Nash, Amanda</au><au>Aghlara-Fotovat, Samira</au><au>Stelzel, Jessica L.</au><au>Bauer, Stuart J.</au><au>Neshat, Sarah Y.</au><au>Hancock, John</au><au>Romero, Natalia Araujo</au><au>Hidalgo, Yessica Elizondo</au><au>Leiva, Isaac Mora</au><au>Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonça</au><au>Bayat, Ardeshir</au><au>Kinney, Brian M.</au><au>Hodges, H. Courtney</au><au>Miranda, Roberto N.</au><au>Clemens, Mark W.</au><au>Langer, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans</atitle><jtitle>Nature biomedical engineering</jtitle><stitle>Nat Biomed Eng</stitle><addtitle>Nat Biomed Eng</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1115</spage><epage>1130</epage><pages>1115-1130</pages><issn>2157-846X</issn><eissn>2157-846X</eissn><abstract>Silicone is widely used in chronic implants and is generally perceived to be safe. However, textured breast implants have been associated with immune-related complications, including malignancies. Here, by examining for up to one year the foreign body response and capsular fibrosis triggered by miniaturized or full-scale clinically approved breast implants with different surface topography (average roughness, 0–90 μm) placed in the mammary fat pads of mice or rabbits, respectively, we show that surface topography mediates immune responses to the implants. We also show that the surface surrounding human breast implants collected during revision surgeries also differentially alters the individual’s immune responses to the implant. Moreover, miniaturized implants with an average roughness of 4 μm can largely suppress the foreign body response and fibrosis (but not in T-cell-deficient mice), and that tissue surrounding these implants displayed higher levels of immunosuppressive FOXP3
+
regulatory T cells. Our findings suggest that, amongst the topographies investigated, implants with an average roughness of 4 μm provoke the least amount of inflammation and foreign body response.
The surface topography of breast implants mediates the immune responses to them, and implants with an average roughness of 4 μm largely suppress foreign body response and fibrosis.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>34155355</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-5464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-497X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-0492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-9240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-8079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-8278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-3264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-5603</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2157-846X |
ispartof | Nature biomedical engineering, 2021-10, Vol.5 (10), p.1115-1130 |
issn | 2157-846X 2157-846X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2582894638 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 13/31 13/51 14/1 14/19 14/28 14/63 631/250/256/2515 631/61/54/993 639/166/985 64/60 692/308/575 96/47 Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology Biomedicine Breast Breast Implantation - adverse effects Breast implants Breast Implants - adverse effects Fibrosis Foreign Bodies Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology Foxp3 protein Humans Immunoregulation Implants Lymphocytes Lymphocytes T Mice Rabbits Roughness Silicone resins Silicones Silicones - adverse effects Topography |
title | The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20surface%20topography%20of%20silicone%20breast%20implants%20mediates%20the%20foreign%20body%20response%20in%20mice,%20rabbits%20and%20humans&rft.jtitle=Nature%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Doloff,%20Joshua%20C.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1115&rft.epage=1130&rft.pages=1115-1130&rft.issn=2157-846X&rft.eissn=2157-846X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2582894638%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582894638&rft_id=info:pmid/34155355&rfr_iscdi=true |