Antifiction Fictions

This essay focuses on the curious phenomenon of antifiction fictions, novels that rail against fiction in the form of fiction, through various examples from the early Republic such as William Hill Brown's The Power of Sympathy (1789) and Tabitha Gilman Tenney's Female Quixotism (1801). A c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Early American literature 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.731-754
1. Verfasser: SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 754
container_issue 3
container_start_page 731
container_title Early American literature
container_volume 56
creator SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP
description This essay focuses on the curious phenomenon of antifiction fictions, novels that rail against fiction in the form of fiction, through various examples from the early Republic such as William Hill Brown's The Power of Sympathy (1789) and Tabitha Gilman Tenney's Female Quixotism (1801). A critical engagement with Catherine Gallagher's claim that, in the early Republic, fictionality was "but faintly understood" leads me to argue that these novels' antifiction stances are anything but anxious defense strategies in the face of a powerful antifiction movement. Instead, they constitute fictionality signals that function as a major site for the early American novel's reflection on its own fictionality—and thus its modernity. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's contention that modernization is first and foremost a process of functional differentiation that was still underway in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, this essay reads antifiction fictions as expressions of a transitional phase in the development of the novel into an autonomous genre within what systems theorists call "the system of art." The antifiction novelists being discussed were caught up in this process just as fellow writers of their generation were, but by self-reflexively flaunting the internal contradictions resulting from the production of fiction that rejects fiction, it is they who carve out a space for the novel to be explicit about what it does best: deceive its readers, if only for the duration of the reading process, into mistaking made-up worlds for the real thing.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/eal.2021.0065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2582855958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697175146</galeid><jstor_id>27081955</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A697175146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-a8461a4de9a5fb4fe351ed51a13b293f1e29b8287790b1de1ba6a3c99b69f9de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1LxDAQxYMouH7c9CgKnjx0zSRN2xyXxS9Y9KCCt5Cmk6VLt9UkC_rfm1pRFhYxOQwMvzcz8B4hx0DHwAW_RN2MGWUwpjQTW2QEgqcJpPnLNhlRCiwpIOO7ZM_7BY2PiWxEjiZtqG1tQt21Z9dD9Qdkx-rG4-F33SfP11dP09tk9nBzN53MEiMYD4ku0gx0WqHUwpapRS4AKwEaeMkkt4BMlgUr8lzSEiqEUmeaGynLTFpZId8n58PcV9e9rdAHtehWro0rFRNRKIQURaROB2quG1SNM3O98l5NMplDLiDNfud8EXVru-C0WdberFPJBmqOLTrddC3aOrbX-PEGPv4Kl7XZKLhYE0Qm4HsYzr17vP83W9zM_jr8mzVd0-AcVbRk-rCRN67z3qFVr65eavehgKo-KSomRfVJUX1SIp_-2LBAE5Yrj79OFDxCoB77NPVhYhAbVPAoOxlkCx8697OD5bQAKQT_BFo7wms</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582855958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antifiction Fictions</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</creatorcontrib><description>This essay focuses on the curious phenomenon of antifiction fictions, novels that rail against fiction in the form of fiction, through various examples from the early Republic such as William Hill Brown's The Power of Sympathy (1789) and Tabitha Gilman Tenney's Female Quixotism (1801). A critical engagement with Catherine Gallagher's claim that, in the early Republic, fictionality was "but faintly understood" leads me to argue that these novels' antifiction stances are anything but anxious defense strategies in the face of a powerful antifiction movement. Instead, they constitute fictionality signals that function as a major site for the early American novel's reflection on its own fictionality—and thus its modernity. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's contention that modernization is first and foremost a process of functional differentiation that was still underway in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, this essay reads antifiction fictions as expressions of a transitional phase in the development of the novel into an autonomous genre within what systems theorists call "the system of art." The antifiction novelists being discussed were caught up in this process just as fellow writers of their generation were, but by self-reflexively flaunting the internal contradictions resulting from the production of fiction that rejects fiction, it is they who carve out a space for the novel to be explicit about what it does best: deceive its readers, if only for the duration of the reading process, into mistaking made-up worlds for the real thing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-8163</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1534-147X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-147X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/eal.2021.0065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press</publisher><subject>1783-1850 ; 19th century ; American literature ; American literature (Early national period) ; Authorship ; Biographies ; Brown, William Hill ; Criticism and interpretation ; Fate ; Fiction ; Foster, Hannah Webster (1759-1840) ; Heroism &amp; heroes ; Literary characters ; Literary criticism ; Literary devices ; Literary influences ; Literature ; Logic ; Morality ; Narratives ; Novelists ; Novels ; Plot (Narrative) ; Power ; Readers ; Reading ; Reading processes ; Sympathy ; System theory ; Tenney, Tabitha ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Early American literature, 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.731-754</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The University of North Carolina Press.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 University of North Carolina Press</rights><rights>Copyright The University of North Carolina Press 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27081955$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27081955$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</creatorcontrib><title>Antifiction Fictions</title><title>Early American literature</title><addtitle>Early American Literature</addtitle><description>This essay focuses on the curious phenomenon of antifiction fictions, novels that rail against fiction in the form of fiction, through various examples from the early Republic such as William Hill Brown's The Power of Sympathy (1789) and Tabitha Gilman Tenney's Female Quixotism (1801). A critical engagement with Catherine Gallagher's claim that, in the early Republic, fictionality was "but faintly understood" leads me to argue that these novels' antifiction stances are anything but anxious defense strategies in the face of a powerful antifiction movement. Instead, they constitute fictionality signals that function as a major site for the early American novel's reflection on its own fictionality—and thus its modernity. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's contention that modernization is first and foremost a process of functional differentiation that was still underway in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, this essay reads antifiction fictions as expressions of a transitional phase in the development of the novel into an autonomous genre within what systems theorists call "the system of art." The antifiction novelists being discussed were caught up in this process just as fellow writers of their generation were, but by self-reflexively flaunting the internal contradictions resulting from the production of fiction that rejects fiction, it is they who carve out a space for the novel to be explicit about what it does best: deceive its readers, if only for the duration of the reading process, into mistaking made-up worlds for the real thing.</description><subject>1783-1850</subject><subject>19th century</subject><subject>American literature</subject><subject>American literature (Early national period)</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Biographies</subject><subject>Brown, William Hill</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>Fate</subject><subject>Fiction</subject><subject>Foster, Hannah Webster (1759-1840)</subject><subject>Heroism &amp; heroes</subject><subject>Literary characters</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Literary devices</subject><subject>Literary influences</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Novelists</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Plot (Narrative)</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading processes</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Tenney, Tabitha</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0012-8163</issn><issn>1534-147X</issn><issn>1534-147X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1LxDAQxYMouH7c9CgKnjx0zSRN2xyXxS9Y9KCCt5Cmk6VLt9UkC_rfm1pRFhYxOQwMvzcz8B4hx0DHwAW_RN2MGWUwpjQTW2QEgqcJpPnLNhlRCiwpIOO7ZM_7BY2PiWxEjiZtqG1tQt21Z9dD9Qdkx-rG4-F33SfP11dP09tk9nBzN53MEiMYD4ku0gx0WqHUwpapRS4AKwEaeMkkt4BMlgUr8lzSEiqEUmeaGynLTFpZId8n58PcV9e9rdAHtehWro0rFRNRKIQURaROB2quG1SNM3O98l5NMplDLiDNfud8EXVru-C0WdberFPJBmqOLTrddC3aOrbX-PEGPv4Kl7XZKLhYE0Qm4HsYzr17vP83W9zM_jr8mzVd0-AcVbRk-rCRN67z3qFVr65eavehgKo-KSomRfVJUX1SIp_-2LBAE5Yrj79OFDxCoB77NPVhYhAbVPAoOxlkCx8697OD5bQAKQT_BFo7wms</recordid><startdate>20210922</startdate><enddate>20210922</enddate><creator>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</creator><general>University of North Carolina Press</general><general>The University of North Carolina Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210922</creationdate><title>Antifiction Fictions</title><author>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-a8461a4de9a5fb4fe351ed51a13b293f1e29b8287790b1de1ba6a3c99b69f9de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>1783-1850</topic><topic>19th century</topic><topic>American literature</topic><topic>American literature (Early national period)</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Biographies</topic><topic>Brown, William Hill</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>Fate</topic><topic>Fiction</topic><topic>Foster, Hannah Webster (1759-1840)</topic><topic>Heroism &amp; heroes</topic><topic>Literary characters</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Literary devices</topic><topic>Literary influences</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Novelists</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Plot (Narrative)</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading processes</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Tenney, Tabitha</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Early American literature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHWEIGHAUSER, PHILIPP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antifiction Fictions</atitle><jtitle>Early American literature</jtitle><addtitle>Early American Literature</addtitle><date>2021-09-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>731-754</pages><issn>0012-8163</issn><issn>1534-147X</issn><eissn>1534-147X</eissn><abstract>This essay focuses on the curious phenomenon of antifiction fictions, novels that rail against fiction in the form of fiction, through various examples from the early Republic such as William Hill Brown's The Power of Sympathy (1789) and Tabitha Gilman Tenney's Female Quixotism (1801). A critical engagement with Catherine Gallagher's claim that, in the early Republic, fictionality was "but faintly understood" leads me to argue that these novels' antifiction stances are anything but anxious defense strategies in the face of a powerful antifiction movement. Instead, they constitute fictionality signals that function as a major site for the early American novel's reflection on its own fictionality—and thus its modernity. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's contention that modernization is first and foremost a process of functional differentiation that was still underway in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, this essay reads antifiction fictions as expressions of a transitional phase in the development of the novel into an autonomous genre within what systems theorists call "the system of art." The antifiction novelists being discussed were caught up in this process just as fellow writers of their generation were, but by self-reflexively flaunting the internal contradictions resulting from the production of fiction that rejects fiction, it is they who carve out a space for the novel to be explicit about what it does best: deceive its readers, if only for the duration of the reading process, into mistaking made-up worlds for the real thing.</abstract><cop>Chapel Hill</cop><pub>University of North Carolina Press</pub><doi>10.1353/eal.2021.0065</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-8163
ispartof Early American literature, 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.731-754
issn 0012-8163
1534-147X
1534-147X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2582855958
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects 1783-1850
19th century
American literature
American literature (Early national period)
Authorship
Biographies
Brown, William Hill
Criticism and interpretation
Fate
Fiction
Foster, Hannah Webster (1759-1840)
Heroism & heroes
Literary characters
Literary criticism
Literary devices
Literary influences
Literature
Logic
Morality
Narratives
Novelists
Novels
Plot (Narrative)
Power
Readers
Reading
Reading processes
Sympathy
System theory
Tenney, Tabitha
Writers
title Antifiction Fictions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A10%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antifiction%20Fictions&rft.jtitle=Early%20American%20literature&rft.au=SCHWEIGHAUSER,%20PHILIPP&rft.date=2021-09-22&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=731-754&rft.issn=0012-8163&rft.eissn=1534-147X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/eal.2021.0065&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA697175146%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582855958&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A697175146&rft_jstor_id=27081955&rfr_iscdi=true