Evaluation of thermal comfort and building form attributes in different semi-outdoor environments in a high-density tropical setting

In highly dense tropical cities, a semi-outdoor space (SOS) is frequently used as a social space within tall building forms where people can interact and connect. Thermal comfort in SOSs within tall buildings, however, may vary depending on the type and form attributes that define it. This study cla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2021-11, Vol.205, p.108255, Article 108255
Hauptverfasser: Gamero-Salinas, Juan, Kishnani, Nirmal, Monge-Barrio, Aurora, López-Fidalgo, Jesús, Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108255
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 205
creator Gamero-Salinas, Juan
Kishnani, Nirmal
Monge-Barrio, Aurora
López-Fidalgo, Jesús
Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana
description In highly dense tropical cities, a semi-outdoor space (SOS) is frequently used as a social space within tall building forms where people can interact and connect. Thermal comfort in SOSs within tall buildings, however, may vary depending on the type and form attributes that define it. This study classifies 63 SOSs in four tall buildings of Singapore into five types based on literature review: perimeter buffers, sky terraces, horizontal breezeways, breezeway atria and vertical breezeways. Findings suggest that the five SOS types perform differently in terms of thermal comfort (based on PMV*), environmental parameters (air temperature, mean radiant temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity), and building form attributes (height-to-depth ratio, open space ratio, and green plot ratio). Of these five, vertical breezeways and horizontal breezeways are the most thermally comfortable for all activities during a typically warm hour. It is postulated that higher thermal comfort levels in these SOS types are linked to form attributes that enhance air velocity. This study examines the pros and cons of each SOS type in terms of thermal comfort in their role as communal spaces in tall buildings situated within a highly dense tropical city. •5 types of semi-outdoor space were evaluated in tall buildings of Singapore.•Verticalbreezeways and horizontal breezeways achieve the highest levels of thermal comfort.•Perimeter buffers and breezeway atria achieve the lowest levels of thermal comfort.•Thermal comfort is linked to building form attributes that enhance air velocity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108255
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2582436453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132321006557</els_id><sourcerecordid>2582436453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-c654ab38cca1fe0b033148497c69c945a597f5f7059f806ec869af1a6382d0a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJg_fgLEvC8Ndl8NHtTxC8QvCh4C2n2xaZ0k5pkC9794aatnj09mDczb94gdEHJlBIqr5bT-ehXPYTNtCUtraBqhThAE6pmrJGKvx-iCWGSNJS17Bid5LwkVdgxPkHfdxuzGk3xMeDocFlAGswK2zi4mAo2occ7dx8-cEUGbEpJfj4WyNgH3HvnIEEoOMPgmziWPsaEaxafYhjqYkczeOE_Fk3NmH35wiXFtbf1TIZSqvMZOnJmleH8d56it_u719vH5vnl4en25rmxXPDSWCm4mTNlraEOyJwwRrni3czKznZcGNHNnHAzIjqniASrZGccNZKptiemY6focu-7TvFzhFz0Mo4p1JO6FarlTHLBKkvuWTbFnBM4vU5-MOlLU6K3jeul_mtcbxvX-8ar8HovhPrDxkPS2XoIFnqfwBbdR_-fxQ84eZBS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582436453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of thermal comfort and building form attributes in different semi-outdoor environments in a high-density tropical setting</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gamero-Salinas, Juan ; Kishnani, Nirmal ; Monge-Barrio, Aurora ; López-Fidalgo, Jesús ; Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Gamero-Salinas, Juan ; Kishnani, Nirmal ; Monge-Barrio, Aurora ; López-Fidalgo, Jesús ; Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>In highly dense tropical cities, a semi-outdoor space (SOS) is frequently used as a social space within tall building forms where people can interact and connect. Thermal comfort in SOSs within tall buildings, however, may vary depending on the type and form attributes that define it. This study classifies 63 SOSs in four tall buildings of Singapore into five types based on literature review: perimeter buffers, sky terraces, horizontal breezeways, breezeway atria and vertical breezeways. Findings suggest that the five SOS types perform differently in terms of thermal comfort (based on PMV*), environmental parameters (air temperature, mean radiant temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity), and building form attributes (height-to-depth ratio, open space ratio, and green plot ratio). Of these five, vertical breezeways and horizontal breezeways are the most thermally comfortable for all activities during a typically warm hour. It is postulated that higher thermal comfort levels in these SOS types are linked to form attributes that enhance air velocity. This study examines the pros and cons of each SOS type in terms of thermal comfort in their role as communal spaces in tall buildings situated within a highly dense tropical city. •5 types of semi-outdoor space were evaluated in tall buildings of Singapore.•Verticalbreezeways and horizontal breezeways achieve the highest levels of thermal comfort.•Perimeter buffers and breezeway atria achieve the lowest levels of thermal comfort.•Thermal comfort is linked to building form attributes that enhance air velocity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Breezeway atria ; Horizontal breezeway ; Literature reviews ; Relative humidity ; Sky garden ; Sky terrace ; Tall buildings ; Temperature ; Thermal comfort ; Velocity ; Veranda ; Vertical breezeway</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2021-11, Vol.205, p.108255, Article 108255</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-c654ab38cca1fe0b033148497c69c945a597f5f7059f806ec869af1a6382d0a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-c654ab38cca1fe0b033148497c69c945a597f5f7059f806ec869af1a6382d0a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gamero-Salinas, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishnani, Nirmal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge-Barrio, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Fidalgo, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of thermal comfort and building form attributes in different semi-outdoor environments in a high-density tropical setting</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>In highly dense tropical cities, a semi-outdoor space (SOS) is frequently used as a social space within tall building forms where people can interact and connect. Thermal comfort in SOSs within tall buildings, however, may vary depending on the type and form attributes that define it. This study classifies 63 SOSs in four tall buildings of Singapore into five types based on literature review: perimeter buffers, sky terraces, horizontal breezeways, breezeway atria and vertical breezeways. Findings suggest that the five SOS types perform differently in terms of thermal comfort (based on PMV*), environmental parameters (air temperature, mean radiant temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity), and building form attributes (height-to-depth ratio, open space ratio, and green plot ratio). Of these five, vertical breezeways and horizontal breezeways are the most thermally comfortable for all activities during a typically warm hour. It is postulated that higher thermal comfort levels in these SOS types are linked to form attributes that enhance air velocity. This study examines the pros and cons of each SOS type in terms of thermal comfort in their role as communal spaces in tall buildings situated within a highly dense tropical city. •5 types of semi-outdoor space were evaluated in tall buildings of Singapore.•Verticalbreezeways and horizontal breezeways achieve the highest levels of thermal comfort.•Perimeter buffers and breezeway atria achieve the lowest levels of thermal comfort.•Thermal comfort is linked to building form attributes that enhance air velocity.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Breezeway atria</subject><subject>Horizontal breezeway</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Sky garden</subject><subject>Sky terrace</subject><subject>Tall buildings</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermal comfort</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Veranda</subject><subject>Vertical breezeway</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJg_fgLEvC8Ndl8NHtTxC8QvCh4C2n2xaZ0k5pkC9794aatnj09mDczb94gdEHJlBIqr5bT-ehXPYTNtCUtraBqhThAE6pmrJGKvx-iCWGSNJS17Bid5LwkVdgxPkHfdxuzGk3xMeDocFlAGswK2zi4mAo2occ7dx8-cEUGbEpJfj4WyNgH3HvnIEEoOMPgmziWPsaEaxafYhjqYkczeOE_Fk3NmH35wiXFtbf1TIZSqvMZOnJmleH8d56it_u719vH5vnl4en25rmxXPDSWCm4mTNlraEOyJwwRrni3czKznZcGNHNnHAzIjqniASrZGccNZKptiemY6focu-7TvFzhFz0Mo4p1JO6FarlTHLBKkvuWTbFnBM4vU5-MOlLU6K3jeul_mtcbxvX-8ar8HovhPrDxkPS2XoIFnqfwBbdR_-fxQ84eZBS</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Gamero-Salinas, Juan</creator><creator>Kishnani, Nirmal</creator><creator>Monge-Barrio, Aurora</creator><creator>López-Fidalgo, Jesús</creator><creator>Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Evaluation of thermal comfort and building form attributes in different semi-outdoor environments in a high-density tropical setting</title><author>Gamero-Salinas, Juan ; Kishnani, Nirmal ; Monge-Barrio, Aurora ; López-Fidalgo, Jesús ; Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-c654ab38cca1fe0b033148497c69c945a597f5f7059f806ec869af1a6382d0a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Breezeway atria</topic><topic>Horizontal breezeway</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Sky garden</topic><topic>Sky terrace</topic><topic>Tall buildings</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermal comfort</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Veranda</topic><topic>Vertical breezeway</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gamero-Salinas, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishnani, Nirmal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge-Barrio, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Fidalgo, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gamero-Salinas, Juan</au><au>Kishnani, Nirmal</au><au>Monge-Barrio, Aurora</au><au>López-Fidalgo, Jesús</au><au>Sánchez-Ostiz, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of thermal comfort and building form attributes in different semi-outdoor environments in a high-density tropical setting</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>205</volume><spage>108255</spage><pages>108255-</pages><artnum>108255</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>In highly dense tropical cities, a semi-outdoor space (SOS) is frequently used as a social space within tall building forms where people can interact and connect. Thermal comfort in SOSs within tall buildings, however, may vary depending on the type and form attributes that define it. This study classifies 63 SOSs in four tall buildings of Singapore into five types based on literature review: perimeter buffers, sky terraces, horizontal breezeways, breezeway atria and vertical breezeways. Findings suggest that the five SOS types perform differently in terms of thermal comfort (based on PMV*), environmental parameters (air temperature, mean radiant temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity), and building form attributes (height-to-depth ratio, open space ratio, and green plot ratio). Of these five, vertical breezeways and horizontal breezeways are the most thermally comfortable for all activities during a typically warm hour. It is postulated that higher thermal comfort levels in these SOS types are linked to form attributes that enhance air velocity. This study examines the pros and cons of each SOS type in terms of thermal comfort in their role as communal spaces in tall buildings situated within a highly dense tropical city. •5 types of semi-outdoor space were evaluated in tall buildings of Singapore.•Verticalbreezeways and horizontal breezeways achieve the highest levels of thermal comfort.•Perimeter buffers and breezeway atria achieve the lowest levels of thermal comfort.•Thermal comfort is linked to building form attributes that enhance air velocity.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108255</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2021-11, Vol.205, p.108255, Article 108255
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2582436453
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air temperature
Breezeway atria
Horizontal breezeway
Literature reviews
Relative humidity
Sky garden
Sky terrace
Tall buildings
Temperature
Thermal comfort
Velocity
Veranda
Vertical breezeway
title Evaluation of thermal comfort and building form attributes in different semi-outdoor environments in a high-density tropical setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20thermal%20comfort%20and%20building%20form%20attributes%20in%20different%20semi-outdoor%20environments%20in%20a%20high-density%20tropical%20setting&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Gamero-Salinas,%20Juan&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=205&rft.spage=108255&rft.pages=108255-&rft.artnum=108255&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2582436453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582436453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132321006557&rfr_iscdi=true