Semisupervised dynamic soft sensor based on complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition and deep learning
•CEEMD and Isomap are combined to eliminate noise and redundancy in the data.•A new semisupervised dynamic soft sensor model named SSDGRU-CNN is proposed.•The soft sensor methodology has good dynamic performance and prediction accuracy.•The effectiveness is proven by measuring the rotor deformation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2021-10, Vol.183, p.109788, Article 109788 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •CEEMD and Isomap are combined to eliminate noise and redundancy in the data.•A new semisupervised dynamic soft sensor model named SSDGRU-CNN is proposed.•The soft sensor methodology has good dynamic performance and prediction accuracy.•The effectiveness is proven by measuring the rotor deformation of an air preheater.
Noise, redundancy, and dynamic characteristics in industrial process data have been regarded as the key factors that affect the measurement accuracy of data-driven soft sensors. In this paper, a semi-supervised dynamic soft sensor is proposed to capture the dynamic characteristics of data while removing noise and redundancy within the data, thus ensuring improved accuracy. Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition and isometric feature mapping are combined to reduce noise and redundancy. A semi-supervised deep learning model is designed to capture the dynamic characteristics. Compared with traditional soft sensors, the effectiveness and superiority of this method are verified via an experiment using an air preheater of a power boiler. The proposed method achieves the lowest MAE of 0.1745 and the highest correlation coefficient of 0.9969. Compared to methods without data preprocessing, the MAE of the preprocessed soft sensor decreases by 22.28% on average, while the correlation coefficient increases by 0.24% on average. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0263-2241 1873-412X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109788 |