Blast behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich panel: Experiment and numerical simulation
•Blast performances of the SCS, CSC and RC slabs are experimentally and numerically studied.•Damage mode and maximum deflections of SCS, CSC and RC panels are summarized.•Two types of failure modes in the SCS, CSC and RC panels are defined.•Empirical formulas are proposed to predict the midspan defl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2021-11, Vol.246, p.112998, Article 112998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112998 |
container_title | Engineering structures |
container_volume | 246 |
creator | Zhao, Chunfeng He, Kaicheng Zhi, Lunhai Lu, Xin Pan, Rong Gautam, Avinash Wang, Jingfeng Li, Xiaojie |
description | •Blast performances of the SCS, CSC and RC slabs are experimentally and numerically studied.•Damage mode and maximum deflections of SCS, CSC and RC panels are summarized.•Two types of failure modes in the SCS, CSC and RC panels are defined.•Empirical formulas are proposed to predict the midspan deflection of the SCS and CSC panels.
As a lateral resisting element, the steel–concrete composite structure has been gradually employed in the anti-seismic and the anti-explosion design of structures due to the favorable capacity of energy dissipation and impact resistance. The blast capacities of steel–concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich, concrete-steel–concrete (CSC), and reinforced concrete (RC) slabs were investigated by experiment and numerical simulation. The effects of the explosive charge, concrete grade, steel plate thickness, and length of shear studs on the blast behaviors of the composite slabs were studied by parametric analysis. The failure modes and dynamic responses of the specimens were investigated and compared. Simultaneously, the empirical formulas for mid-span deflection of the SCS and CSC slabs were proposed by using a multiple nonlinear regression analysis method. The results indicated that the three specimens exhibit different failure modes, in terms of local damage, spallation of concrete, and punching failure. And the steel plate takes a dominant role against the blast loads, which can provide a robust protective capacity to prevent the slab from damage due to the high tensile strength of steel. The SCS sandwich slab has the smallest damaged area on the front steel plate with a smaller mid-span displacement, maintains the integrity, and owns bearing capacity after the blast test compared with the CSC and RC members. The proposed empirical formula can well fit the relation among the deflection of the composite slabs, explosive charge, and thickness of steel plate, which can reasonably predict the midspan displacements of the composite slabs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112998 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2581868643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014102962101141X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2581868643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2c8dfd9c5f668db3c8b1cd2ef196b02fc81c1f37014e3cb8ae0ecb1c24ad85ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDURineBHmjjsSlUeUiU2sGFjOZMJdZU6xXYK_D0uQWxZjUZz5s7cS8gloxmjrLjeZGjffHADhIxTzjLGeFXJIzJhshRpKbg4JhPKcpZSXhWn5Mz7DaWUS0kn5PW20z4kNa713vQu6dvEB8Quhd6Cw4DpT5t4bZsPA-tkpy12N8nyc4fObNGGJE4SO2xjCzqCZjt0OpjenpOTVnceL37rlLzcLZ8XD-nq6f5xMV-lIHIRUg6yaZsKZm1RyKYWIGsGDceWVUVNeQuSAWtFGR2ggFpqpAgR4blu5AxQTMnVqLtz_fuAPqhNPzgbTyo-k0wWsshFpMqRAtd777BVu_i_dl-KUXUIUm3UX5DqEKQag4yb83ETo4m9Qac8GLSAjXEY2aY3_2p8A733gzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581868643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blast behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich panel: Experiment and numerical simulation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zhao, Chunfeng ; He, Kaicheng ; Zhi, Lunhai ; Lu, Xin ; Pan, Rong ; Gautam, Avinash ; Wang, Jingfeng ; Li, Xiaojie</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chunfeng ; He, Kaicheng ; Zhi, Lunhai ; Lu, Xin ; Pan, Rong ; Gautam, Avinash ; Wang, Jingfeng ; Li, Xiaojie</creatorcontrib><description>•Blast performances of the SCS, CSC and RC slabs are experimentally and numerically studied.•Damage mode and maximum deflections of SCS, CSC and RC panels are summarized.•Two types of failure modes in the SCS, CSC and RC panels are defined.•Empirical formulas are proposed to predict the midspan deflection of the SCS and CSC panels.
As a lateral resisting element, the steel–concrete composite structure has been gradually employed in the anti-seismic and the anti-explosion design of structures due to the favorable capacity of energy dissipation and impact resistance. The blast capacities of steel–concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich, concrete-steel–concrete (CSC), and reinforced concrete (RC) slabs were investigated by experiment and numerical simulation. The effects of the explosive charge, concrete grade, steel plate thickness, and length of shear studs on the blast behaviors of the composite slabs were studied by parametric analysis. The failure modes and dynamic responses of the specimens were investigated and compared. Simultaneously, the empirical formulas for mid-span deflection of the SCS and CSC slabs were proposed by using a multiple nonlinear regression analysis method. The results indicated that the three specimens exhibit different failure modes, in terms of local damage, spallation of concrete, and punching failure. And the steel plate takes a dominant role against the blast loads, which can provide a robust protective capacity to prevent the slab from damage due to the high tensile strength of steel. The SCS sandwich slab has the smallest damaged area on the front steel plate with a smaller mid-span displacement, maintains the integrity, and owns bearing capacity after the blast test compared with the CSC and RC members. The proposed empirical formula can well fit the relation among the deflection of the composite slabs, explosive charge, and thickness of steel plate, which can reasonably predict the midspan displacements of the composite slabs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112998</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anti-explosion capacity ; Bearing capacity ; Blast loads ; Blast resistance ; Composite materials ; Composite structures ; Concrete ; Concrete slabs ; Contact explosion ; Damage prevention ; Deflection ; Earthquake damage ; Empirical analysis ; Empirical formula ; Energy dissipation ; Explosions ; Explosive plating ; Failure analysis ; Failure mode ; Failure modes ; Impact resistance ; Mathematical models ; Parametric analysis ; Regression analysis ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Sandwich panels ; Simulation ; Slabs ; Spallation ; Steel ; Steel structures ; Steel-concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich panel ; Tensile strength ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2021-11, Vol.246, p.112998, Article 112998</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2c8dfd9c5f668db3c8b1cd2ef196b02fc81c1f37014e3cb8ae0ecb1c24ad85ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2c8dfd9c5f668db3c8b1cd2ef196b02fc81c1f37014e3cb8ae0ecb1c24ad85ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Kaicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhi, Lunhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautam, Avinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaojie</creatorcontrib><title>Blast behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich panel: Experiment and numerical simulation</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•Blast performances of the SCS, CSC and RC slabs are experimentally and numerically studied.•Damage mode and maximum deflections of SCS, CSC and RC panels are summarized.•Two types of failure modes in the SCS, CSC and RC panels are defined.•Empirical formulas are proposed to predict the midspan deflection of the SCS and CSC panels.
As a lateral resisting element, the steel–concrete composite structure has been gradually employed in the anti-seismic and the anti-explosion design of structures due to the favorable capacity of energy dissipation and impact resistance. The blast capacities of steel–concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich, concrete-steel–concrete (CSC), and reinforced concrete (RC) slabs were investigated by experiment and numerical simulation. The effects of the explosive charge, concrete grade, steel plate thickness, and length of shear studs on the blast behaviors of the composite slabs were studied by parametric analysis. The failure modes and dynamic responses of the specimens were investigated and compared. Simultaneously, the empirical formulas for mid-span deflection of the SCS and CSC slabs were proposed by using a multiple nonlinear regression analysis method. The results indicated that the three specimens exhibit different failure modes, in terms of local damage, spallation of concrete, and punching failure. And the steel plate takes a dominant role against the blast loads, which can provide a robust protective capacity to prevent the slab from damage due to the high tensile strength of steel. The SCS sandwich slab has the smallest damaged area on the front steel plate with a smaller mid-span displacement, maintains the integrity, and owns bearing capacity after the blast test compared with the CSC and RC members. The proposed empirical formula can well fit the relation among the deflection of the composite slabs, explosive charge, and thickness of steel plate, which can reasonably predict the midspan displacements of the composite slabs.</description><subject>Anti-explosion capacity</subject><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Blast loads</subject><subject>Blast resistance</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite structures</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete slabs</subject><subject>Contact explosion</subject><subject>Damage prevention</subject><subject>Deflection</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empirical formula</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Explosive plating</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Failure mode</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Impact resistance</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parametric analysis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Sandwich panels</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Slabs</subject><subject>Spallation</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel structures</subject><subject>Steel-concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich panel</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDURineBHmjjsSlUeUiU2sGFjOZMJdZU6xXYK_D0uQWxZjUZz5s7cS8gloxmjrLjeZGjffHADhIxTzjLGeFXJIzJhshRpKbg4JhPKcpZSXhWn5Mz7DaWUS0kn5PW20z4kNa713vQu6dvEB8Quhd6Cw4DpT5t4bZsPA-tkpy12N8nyc4fObNGGJE4SO2xjCzqCZjt0OpjenpOTVnceL37rlLzcLZ8XD-nq6f5xMV-lIHIRUg6yaZsKZm1RyKYWIGsGDceWVUVNeQuSAWtFGR2ggFpqpAgR4blu5AxQTMnVqLtz_fuAPqhNPzgbTyo-k0wWsshFpMqRAtd777BVu_i_dl-KUXUIUm3UX5DqEKQag4yb83ETo4m9Qac8GLSAjXEY2aY3_2p8A733gzg</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Zhao, Chunfeng</creator><creator>He, Kaicheng</creator><creator>Zhi, Lunhai</creator><creator>Lu, Xin</creator><creator>Pan, Rong</creator><creator>Gautam, Avinash</creator><creator>Wang, Jingfeng</creator><creator>Li, Xiaojie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Blast behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich panel: Experiment and numerical simulation</title><author>Zhao, Chunfeng ; He, Kaicheng ; Zhi, Lunhai ; Lu, Xin ; Pan, Rong ; Gautam, Avinash ; Wang, Jingfeng ; Li, Xiaojie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2c8dfd9c5f668db3c8b1cd2ef196b02fc81c1f37014e3cb8ae0ecb1c24ad85ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anti-explosion capacity</topic><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Blast loads</topic><topic>Blast resistance</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite structures</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete slabs</topic><topic>Contact explosion</topic><topic>Damage prevention</topic><topic>Deflection</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empirical formula</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Explosive plating</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Failure mode</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Impact resistance</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parametric analysis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Sandwich panels</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Slabs</topic><topic>Spallation</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel structures</topic><topic>Steel-concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich panel</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Kaicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhi, Lunhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautam, Avinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaojie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Chunfeng</au><au>He, Kaicheng</au><au>Zhi, Lunhai</au><au>Lu, Xin</au><au>Pan, Rong</au><au>Gautam, Avinash</au><au>Wang, Jingfeng</au><au>Li, Xiaojie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blast behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich panel: Experiment and numerical simulation</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>246</volume><spage>112998</spage><pages>112998-</pages><artnum>112998</artnum><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•Blast performances of the SCS, CSC and RC slabs are experimentally and numerically studied.•Damage mode and maximum deflections of SCS, CSC and RC panels are summarized.•Two types of failure modes in the SCS, CSC and RC panels are defined.•Empirical formulas are proposed to predict the midspan deflection of the SCS and CSC panels.
As a lateral resisting element, the steel–concrete composite structure has been gradually employed in the anti-seismic and the anti-explosion design of structures due to the favorable capacity of energy dissipation and impact resistance. The blast capacities of steel–concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich, concrete-steel–concrete (CSC), and reinforced concrete (RC) slabs were investigated by experiment and numerical simulation. The effects of the explosive charge, concrete grade, steel plate thickness, and length of shear studs on the blast behaviors of the composite slabs were studied by parametric analysis. The failure modes and dynamic responses of the specimens were investigated and compared. Simultaneously, the empirical formulas for mid-span deflection of the SCS and CSC slabs were proposed by using a multiple nonlinear regression analysis method. The results indicated that the three specimens exhibit different failure modes, in terms of local damage, spallation of concrete, and punching failure. And the steel plate takes a dominant role against the blast loads, which can provide a robust protective capacity to prevent the slab from damage due to the high tensile strength of steel. The SCS sandwich slab has the smallest damaged area on the front steel plate with a smaller mid-span displacement, maintains the integrity, and owns bearing capacity after the blast test compared with the CSC and RC members. The proposed empirical formula can well fit the relation among the deflection of the composite slabs, explosive charge, and thickness of steel plate, which can reasonably predict the midspan displacements of the composite slabs.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112998</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0296 |
ispartof | Engineering structures, 2021-11, Vol.246, p.112998, Article 112998 |
issn | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2581868643 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Anti-explosion capacity Bearing capacity Blast loads Blast resistance Composite materials Composite structures Concrete Concrete slabs Contact explosion Damage prevention Deflection Earthquake damage Empirical analysis Empirical formula Energy dissipation Explosions Explosive plating Failure analysis Failure mode Failure modes Impact resistance Mathematical models Parametric analysis Regression analysis Reinforced concrete Reinforcing steels Robustness (mathematics) Sandwich panels Simulation Slabs Spallation Steel Steel structures Steel-concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich panel Tensile strength Thickness |
title | Blast behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich panel: Experiment and numerical simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A29%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blast%20behavior%20of%20steel-concrete-steel%20sandwich%20panel:%20Experiment%20and%20numerical%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Zhao,%20Chunfeng&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=246&rft.spage=112998&rft.pages=112998-&rft.artnum=112998&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581868643%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581868643&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S014102962101141X&rfr_iscdi=true |