Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration

Using a modified Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) framework, this paper assesses progress towards sustainability over time with a case study of the demersal trawl fishery of Oman, which has been transformed and turned into the coastal fishery after the trawl ban. A multi-criteria decision...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.16283-16303
Hauptverfasser: Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh, Bose, Shekar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16303
container_issue 11
container_start_page 16283
container_title Environment, development and sustainability
container_volume 23
creator Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh
Bose, Shekar
description Using a modified Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) framework, this paper assesses progress towards sustainability over time with a case study of the demersal trawl fishery of Oman, which has been transformed and turned into the coastal fishery after the trawl ban. A multi-criteria decision analysis method is used for ranking the years and deciding on the best performing year under five alternative scenarios related to the core components involving humans and the environment. Under the environment component, the year 2001 stood out as the best across all scenarios. The combined results also echoed the same in four out of five scenarios. With reference to progress towards sustainability during the study period, no clear positive year-to-year trend was observed from the overall results. The analysis of the S2 scenario revealed that the closed fishing season during 1998–2001 yielded a positive spill-over effect on the local economy. The results from a comparative analysis indicated that the strengths (weaknesses) of the year 2001 were predominantly associated with the environment (human) component, and thereby, reflecting a comparatively higher conservation outcome in the year 2001. The findings from the comparative analysis would guide fishery managers in designing appropriate strategies for improving weaknesses of the preferred option and reducing the inter-scenario risk by combining positive features of the second-best option. The framework outlined in the present paper can be used to guide the sustainability assessment of other local fisheries (for instance, the lobster, abalone, and shrimp fisheries) including the recently developed coastal fishery.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2581633437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581633437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1d1487014e75eb18c413b3ac8f03670b9e42c04888cbe48fdeb26f52f60923db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMouK5-AU8Fz9H8a5N6k8VVYcWLgreQtKlm6aZrXlbotze7Fbx5egNvfsMwCF1Sck0JkTdASVUpTBjFhHIhsTxCM1pKjlkty-OsuZK4VOX7KToDWBPCSM2qGXpeevh00TsoYAfJ-GCs730aCwPgADYupMKEtgAXwCf_fXgF04_g4Tarwvd9BqNJfgjn6KQzPbiL3ztHb8v718UjXr08PC3uVrjhtE6YtlQoSahwsnSWqkZQbrlpVEd4JYmtnWANEUqpxjqhutZZVnUl66pcmreWz9HVlLuNw9fOQdLrYRdzK9CsVLTiXHCZXWxyNXEAiK7T2-g3Jo6aEr2fTU-z6TybPsym9xCfIMjm8OHiX_Q_1A8y9XFD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581633437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh ; Bose, Shekar</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh ; Bose, Shekar</creatorcontrib><description>Using a modified Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) framework, this paper assesses progress towards sustainability over time with a case study of the demersal trawl fishery of Oman, which has been transformed and turned into the coastal fishery after the trawl ban. A multi-criteria decision analysis method is used for ranking the years and deciding on the best performing year under five alternative scenarios related to the core components involving humans and the environment. Under the environment component, the year 2001 stood out as the best across all scenarios. The combined results also echoed the same in four out of five scenarios. With reference to progress towards sustainability during the study period, no clear positive year-to-year trend was observed from the overall results. The analysis of the S2 scenario revealed that the closed fishing season during 1998–2001 yielded a positive spill-over effect on the local economy. The results from a comparative analysis indicated that the strengths (weaknesses) of the year 2001 were predominantly associated with the environment (human) component, and thereby, reflecting a comparatively higher conservation outcome in the year 2001. The findings from the comparative analysis would guide fishery managers in designing appropriate strategies for improving weaknesses of the preferred option and reducing the inter-scenario risk by combining positive features of the second-best option. The framework outlined in the present paper can be used to guide the sustainability assessment of other local fisheries (for instance, the lobster, abalone, and shrimp fisheries) including the recently developed coastal fishery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Coastal fisheries ; Comparative analysis ; Conservation ; Decision analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; Fishing ; Lobster ; Local economy ; Multiple criterion ; Sensitivity analysis ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.16283-16303</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1d1487014e75eb18c413b3ac8f03670b9e42c04888cbe48fdeb26f52f60923db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1d1487014e75eb18c413b3ac8f03670b9e42c04888cbe48fdeb26f52f60923db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3653-1781 ; 0000-0002-8180-2819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bose, Shekar</creatorcontrib><title>Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>Using a modified Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) framework, this paper assesses progress towards sustainability over time with a case study of the demersal trawl fishery of Oman, which has been transformed and turned into the coastal fishery after the trawl ban. A multi-criteria decision analysis method is used for ranking the years and deciding on the best performing year under five alternative scenarios related to the core components involving humans and the environment. Under the environment component, the year 2001 stood out as the best across all scenarios. The combined results also echoed the same in four out of five scenarios. With reference to progress towards sustainability during the study period, no clear positive year-to-year trend was observed from the overall results. The analysis of the S2 scenario revealed that the closed fishing season during 1998–2001 yielded a positive spill-over effect on the local economy. The results from a comparative analysis indicated that the strengths (weaknesses) of the year 2001 were predominantly associated with the environment (human) component, and thereby, reflecting a comparatively higher conservation outcome in the year 2001. The findings from the comparative analysis would guide fishery managers in designing appropriate strategies for improving weaknesses of the preferred option and reducing the inter-scenario risk by combining positive features of the second-best option. The framework outlined in the present paper can be used to guide the sustainability assessment of other local fisheries (for instance, the lobster, abalone, and shrimp fisheries) including the recently developed coastal fishery.</description><subject>Coastal fisheries</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Lobster</subject><subject>Local economy</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMouK5-AU8Fz9H8a5N6k8VVYcWLgreQtKlm6aZrXlbotze7Fbx5egNvfsMwCF1Sck0JkTdASVUpTBjFhHIhsTxCM1pKjlkty-OsuZK4VOX7KToDWBPCSM2qGXpeevh00TsoYAfJ-GCs730aCwPgADYupMKEtgAXwCf_fXgF04_g4Tarwvd9BqNJfgjn6KQzPbiL3ztHb8v718UjXr08PC3uVrjhtE6YtlQoSahwsnSWqkZQbrlpVEd4JYmtnWANEUqpxjqhutZZVnUl66pcmreWz9HVlLuNw9fOQdLrYRdzK9CsVLTiXHCZXWxyNXEAiK7T2-g3Jo6aEr2fTU-z6TybPsym9xCfIMjm8OHiX_Q_1A8y9XFD</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh</creator><creator>Bose, Shekar</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-1781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-2819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration</title><author>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh ; Bose, Shekar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1d1487014e75eb18c413b3ac8f03670b9e42c04888cbe48fdeb26f52f60923db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coastal fisheries</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Lobster</topic><topic>Local economy</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bose, Shekar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Masroori, Hussein Samh</au><au>Bose, Shekar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>16283</spage><epage>16303</epage><pages>16283-16303</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>Using a modified Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) framework, this paper assesses progress towards sustainability over time with a case study of the demersal trawl fishery of Oman, which has been transformed and turned into the coastal fishery after the trawl ban. A multi-criteria decision analysis method is used for ranking the years and deciding on the best performing year under five alternative scenarios related to the core components involving humans and the environment. Under the environment component, the year 2001 stood out as the best across all scenarios. The combined results also echoed the same in four out of five scenarios. With reference to progress towards sustainability during the study period, no clear positive year-to-year trend was observed from the overall results. The analysis of the S2 scenario revealed that the closed fishing season during 1998–2001 yielded a positive spill-over effect on the local economy. The results from a comparative analysis indicated that the strengths (weaknesses) of the year 2001 were predominantly associated with the environment (human) component, and thereby, reflecting a comparatively higher conservation outcome in the year 2001. The findings from the comparative analysis would guide fishery managers in designing appropriate strategies for improving weaknesses of the preferred option and reducing the inter-scenario risk by combining positive features of the second-best option. The framework outlined in the present paper can be used to guide the sustainability assessment of other local fisheries (for instance, the lobster, abalone, and shrimp fisheries) including the recently developed coastal fishery.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-1781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-2819</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-585X
ispartof Environment, development and sustainability, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.16283-16303
issn 1387-585X
1573-2975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2581633437
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Coastal fisheries
Comparative analysis
Conservation
Decision analysis
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Economic Geology
Economic Growth
Environment
Environmental Economics
Environmental Management
Fisheries
Fisheries management
Fishery management
Fishing
Lobster
Local economy
Multiple criterion
Sensitivity analysis
Sustainability
Sustainable Development
title Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fisheries%20sustainability%20assessment%20and%20sensitivity%20analysis:%20an%20illustration&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Al-Masroori,%20Hussein%20Samh&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=16283&rft.epage=16303&rft.pages=16283-16303&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581633437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581633437&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true