An investigation on behavior of RC frames with non-interacting infill wall

•In-plane behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill was studied experimentally.•Behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill compared with bare and fully infilled frames.•The non-interacting wall got minor damage even in extreme displacements.•In-plane behavior was improved.•Numerical F...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering structures 2021-10, Vol.245, p.112920, Article 112920
Hauptverfasser: Bikçe, M., Emsen, E., Erdem, M.M., Bayrak, O.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 112920
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 245
creator Bikçe, M.
Emsen, E.
Erdem, M.M.
Bayrak, O.F.
description •In-plane behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill was studied experimentally.•Behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill compared with bare and fully infilled frames.•The non-interacting wall got minor damage even in extreme displacements.•In-plane behavior was improved.•Numerical FE models were validated by the experimental behavior. Infill walls, which are generally assumed as dead loads in building design, affect the lateral resistance, stiffness, and energy consumption of the frames. Investigations conducted after earthquakes show that the infill walls, whose effects are neglected in the design, can change the earthquake behavior of the structure and cause unforeseen damages in the buildings and even collapses in some cases. In order to match the behavior of designed and built frames, the technique of isolating the infill wall from the RC frame with non-interacting infill was adopted. In this study, in-plane behavior of bare, traditionally infilled frames and a frame with non-interacting infill wall were investigated experimentally under reversed cycling loads, then their numerical models were calibrated. As a result, in contrast to the traditionally infilled frame, it has been seen that the frame with non-interacting infill behaves close to the bare frame in the initial drifts and maintains its lateral resistance without a damage until further drifts. Therefore, it has been found that constructing the infill wall with non-interacting joint improves the in-plane behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112920
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2581543676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029621010683</els_id><sourcerecordid>2581543676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-52c1fde5b3ea3b5809c0407b85a7d2f83a6c7f184dfc4c731dba4406570eb0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKufwYDnXSfJZpMeS_EvBUH0HLLZpM2yzdZk2-K3N6XiVRiYy3tv5v0QuiVQEiD1fVfasEpj3JmxpEBJSQidUThDEyIFKwSj7BxNgFSkADqrL9FVSh0AUClhgl7nAfuwt2n0Kz36IeA8jV3rvR8iHhx-X2AX9cYmfPDjGochFD6MNmoz-rDKXuf7Hh9031-jC6f7ZG9-9xR9Pj58LJ6L5dvTy2K-LAyr2FhwaohrLW-Y1azhEmYGKhCN5Fq01EmmayMckVXrTGUEI22jqwpqLsA2wDmbortT7jYOX7v8ueqGXQz5pKJcEl6xWtRZJU4qE4eUonVqG_1Gx29FQB3BqU79gVNHcOoELjvnJ6fNJfbeRpWMt8HY1kebte3g_834Ab20exA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581543676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An investigation on behavior of RC frames with non-interacting infill wall</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bikçe, M. ; Emsen, E. ; Erdem, M.M. ; Bayrak, O.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bikçe, M. ; Emsen, E. ; Erdem, M.M. ; Bayrak, O.F.</creatorcontrib><description>•In-plane behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill was studied experimentally.•Behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill compared with bare and fully infilled frames.•The non-interacting wall got minor damage even in extreme displacements.•In-plane behavior was improved.•Numerical FE models were validated by the experimental behavior. Infill walls, which are generally assumed as dead loads in building design, affect the lateral resistance, stiffness, and energy consumption of the frames. Investigations conducted after earthquakes show that the infill walls, whose effects are neglected in the design, can change the earthquake behavior of the structure and cause unforeseen damages in the buildings and even collapses in some cases. In order to match the behavior of designed and built frames, the technique of isolating the infill wall from the RC frame with non-interacting infill was adopted. In this study, in-plane behavior of bare, traditionally infilled frames and a frame with non-interacting infill wall were investigated experimentally under reversed cycling loads, then their numerical models were calibrated. As a result, in contrast to the traditionally infilled frame, it has been seen that the frame with non-interacting infill behaves close to the bare frame in the initial drifts and maintains its lateral resistance without a damage until further drifts. Therefore, it has been found that constructing the infill wall with non-interacting joint improves the in-plane behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Autoclaved aerated concrete ; Building design ; Cyclic loading ; Dead loads ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Energy consumption ; Finite element simulation ; Infill wall ; Infilled frames ; Mathematical models ; Non-interacting infill wall ; Numerical models ; RC frame ; Seismic activity ; Static loads ; Stiffness</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2021-10, Vol.245, p.112920, Article 112920</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-52c1fde5b3ea3b5809c0407b85a7d2f83a6c7f184dfc4c731dba4406570eb0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-52c1fde5b3ea3b5809c0407b85a7d2f83a6c7f184dfc4c731dba4406570eb0553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112920$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bikçe, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emsen, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayrak, O.F.</creatorcontrib><title>An investigation on behavior of RC frames with non-interacting infill wall</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•In-plane behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill was studied experimentally.•Behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill compared with bare and fully infilled frames.•The non-interacting wall got minor damage even in extreme displacements.•In-plane behavior was improved.•Numerical FE models were validated by the experimental behavior. Infill walls, which are generally assumed as dead loads in building design, affect the lateral resistance, stiffness, and energy consumption of the frames. Investigations conducted after earthquakes show that the infill walls, whose effects are neglected in the design, can change the earthquake behavior of the structure and cause unforeseen damages in the buildings and even collapses in some cases. In order to match the behavior of designed and built frames, the technique of isolating the infill wall from the RC frame with non-interacting infill was adopted. In this study, in-plane behavior of bare, traditionally infilled frames and a frame with non-interacting infill wall were investigated experimentally under reversed cycling loads, then their numerical models were calibrated. As a result, in contrast to the traditionally infilled frame, it has been seen that the frame with non-interacting infill behaves close to the bare frame in the initial drifts and maintains its lateral resistance without a damage until further drifts. Therefore, it has been found that constructing the infill wall with non-interacting joint improves the in-plane behavior.</description><subject>Autoclaved aerated concrete</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>Cyclic loading</subject><subject>Dead loads</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Finite element simulation</subject><subject>Infill wall</subject><subject>Infilled frames</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Non-interacting infill wall</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>RC frame</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Static loads</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKufwYDnXSfJZpMeS_EvBUH0HLLZpM2yzdZk2-K3N6XiVRiYy3tv5v0QuiVQEiD1fVfasEpj3JmxpEBJSQidUThDEyIFKwSj7BxNgFSkADqrL9FVSh0AUClhgl7nAfuwt2n0Kz36IeA8jV3rvR8iHhx-X2AX9cYmfPDjGochFD6MNmoz-rDKXuf7Hh9031-jC6f7ZG9-9xR9Pj58LJ6L5dvTy2K-LAyr2FhwaohrLW-Y1azhEmYGKhCN5Fq01EmmayMckVXrTGUEI22jqwpqLsA2wDmbortT7jYOX7v8ueqGXQz5pKJcEl6xWtRZJU4qE4eUonVqG_1Gx29FQB3BqU79gVNHcOoELjvnJ6fNJfbeRpWMt8HY1kebte3g_834Ab20exA</recordid><startdate>20211015</startdate><enddate>20211015</enddate><creator>Bikçe, M.</creator><creator>Emsen, E.</creator><creator>Erdem, M.M.</creator><creator>Bayrak, O.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211015</creationdate><title>An investigation on behavior of RC frames with non-interacting infill wall</title><author>Bikçe, M. ; Emsen, E. ; Erdem, M.M. ; Bayrak, O.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-52c1fde5b3ea3b5809c0407b85a7d2f83a6c7f184dfc4c731dba4406570eb0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Autoclaved aerated concrete</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>Cyclic loading</topic><topic>Dead loads</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Finite element simulation</topic><topic>Infill wall</topic><topic>Infilled frames</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Non-interacting infill wall</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>RC frame</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Static loads</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bikçe, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emsen, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayrak, O.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bikçe, M.</au><au>Emsen, E.</au><au>Erdem, M.M.</au><au>Bayrak, O.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An investigation on behavior of RC frames with non-interacting infill wall</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2021-10-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>245</volume><spage>112920</spage><pages>112920-</pages><artnum>112920</artnum><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•In-plane behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill was studied experimentally.•Behavior of the frame with non-interacting infill compared with bare and fully infilled frames.•The non-interacting wall got minor damage even in extreme displacements.•In-plane behavior was improved.•Numerical FE models were validated by the experimental behavior. Infill walls, which are generally assumed as dead loads in building design, affect the lateral resistance, stiffness, and energy consumption of the frames. Investigations conducted after earthquakes show that the infill walls, whose effects are neglected in the design, can change the earthquake behavior of the structure and cause unforeseen damages in the buildings and even collapses in some cases. In order to match the behavior of designed and built frames, the technique of isolating the infill wall from the RC frame with non-interacting infill was adopted. In this study, in-plane behavior of bare, traditionally infilled frames and a frame with non-interacting infill wall were investigated experimentally under reversed cycling loads, then their numerical models were calibrated. As a result, in contrast to the traditionally infilled frame, it has been seen that the frame with non-interacting infill behaves close to the bare frame in the initial drifts and maintains its lateral resistance without a damage until further drifts. Therefore, it has been found that constructing the infill wall with non-interacting joint improves the in-plane behavior.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112920</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2021-10, Vol.245, p.112920, Article 112920
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2581543676
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Autoclaved aerated concrete
Building design
Cyclic loading
Dead loads
Earthquake damage
Earthquakes
Energy consumption
Finite element simulation
Infill wall
Infilled frames
Mathematical models
Non-interacting infill wall
Numerical models
RC frame
Seismic activity
Static loads
Stiffness
title An investigation on behavior of RC frames with non-interacting infill wall
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20investigation%20on%20behavior%20of%20RC%20frames%20with%20non-interacting%20infill%20wall&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Bik%C3%A7e,%20M.&rft.date=2021-10-15&rft.volume=245&rft.spage=112920&rft.pages=112920-&rft.artnum=112920&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112920&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581543676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581543676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029621010683&rfr_iscdi=true