Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados
[Display omitted] •Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy conversion and management 2021-10, Vol.245, p.114605, Article 114605 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 114605 |
container_title | Energy conversion and management |
container_volume | 245 |
creator | Thompson, Terrell M. Ramin, Pedram Udugama, Isuru Young, Brent R. Gernaey, Krist V. Baroutian, Saeid |
description | [Display omitted]
•Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security.
Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2581543500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890421007810</els_id><sourcerecordid>2636805060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EEkvpX6gs9cIl27ETO1lOlAraSpU4UM6WY49brxI72MlK_S382TpduHDpaaTRe5_95hFyxmDLgMmL_RaDiWHUYcuBsy1jjQTxhmxY1-4qznn7lmyA7WTV7aB5Tz7kvAeAWoDckD_3aB5DrLAQ4ugN1cFSDAefChHDrAfqx0mbmeqcMed1R6OjvY8POtMpRbuY2cfwYnSYZj_4jImmQjxgeqIuxZFOOOiHQv-pU7HlZfxML1dGQufDqirPG5xm6mKiX3XqtY35I3nn9JDx9O88Ib--f7u_uqnuflzfXl3eVaZu67kyvW4la4StQdi2TGYEtB23KGpgKJteSG5AOwOSWye6rtPW9CCwcRIc1Cfk05Fb0vxeMM9q9NngMOiAccmKy1p2UM61Ss__k-7jkkL5neKiY6IpV11V8qgyKeZcMqop-VGnJ8VArZ2pvfrXmVo7U8fOivHL0Ygl7sFjUtn4okTryz1nZaN_DfEMCtOmXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581543500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thompson, Terrell M. ; Ramin, Pedram ; Udugama, Isuru ; Young, Brent R. ; Gernaey, Krist V. ; Baroutian, Saeid</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Terrell M. ; Ramin, Pedram ; Udugama, Isuru ; Young, Brent R. ; Gernaey, Krist V. ; Baroutian, Saeid</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security.
Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>administrative management ; Agricultural economics ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural wastes ; Algae ; Alternative energy sources ; Anaerobic digestion ; Anaerobic processes ; Barbados ; Biogas ; Bioprocessing ; Biorefineries ; biorefining ; Cogeneration ; Commercialization ; Economics ; Electricity ; energy conversion ; Energy demand ; Energy recovery ; environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact analysis ; Environmental impact assessment ; Feasibility studies ; feedstocks ; Fertilizers ; Food security ; Food waste ; Fresh water ; freshwater ; gas production (biological) ; heat ; Hydrothermal pretreatment ; Impact analysis ; income ; Landfill ; Landfills ; liquids ; macroalgae ; Net losses ; Pelagic Sargassum ; Profitability ; profits and margins ; Raw materials ; Refining ; Resource recovery ; Sargassum ; Seasonal variations ; Seaweeds ; Techno-economic assessment ; value added ; Waste disposal sites ; Water demand</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2021-10, Vol.245, p.114605, Article 114605</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4872-0210 ; 0000-0002-5947-955X ; 0000-0002-0364-1773</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Terrell M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramin, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udugama, Isuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Brent R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernaey, Krist V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baroutian, Saeid</creatorcontrib><title>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>[Display omitted]
•Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security.
Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.</description><subject>administrative management</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobic processes</subject><subject>Barbados</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Bioprocessing</subject><subject>Biorefineries</subject><subject>biorefining</subject><subject>Cogeneration</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>energy conversion</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact analysis</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>feedstocks</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>gas production (biological)</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Hydrothermal pretreatment</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>income</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>liquids</subject><subject>macroalgae</subject><subject>Net losses</subject><subject>Pelagic Sargassum</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>profits and margins</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Refining</subject><subject>Resource recovery</subject><subject>Sargassum</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Techno-economic assessment</subject><subject>value added</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><subject>Water demand</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EEkvpX6gs9cIl27ETO1lOlAraSpU4UM6WY49brxI72MlK_S382TpduHDpaaTRe5_95hFyxmDLgMmL_RaDiWHUYcuBsy1jjQTxhmxY1-4qznn7lmyA7WTV7aB5Tz7kvAeAWoDckD_3aB5DrLAQ4ugN1cFSDAefChHDrAfqx0mbmeqcMed1R6OjvY8POtMpRbuY2cfwYnSYZj_4jImmQjxgeqIuxZFOOOiHQv-pU7HlZfxML1dGQufDqirPG5xm6mKiX3XqtY35I3nn9JDx9O88Ib--f7u_uqnuflzfXl3eVaZu67kyvW4la4StQdi2TGYEtB23KGpgKJteSG5AOwOSWye6rtPW9CCwcRIc1Cfk05Fb0vxeMM9q9NngMOiAccmKy1p2UM61Ss__k-7jkkL5neKiY6IpV11V8qgyKeZcMqop-VGnJ8VArZ2pvfrXmVo7U8fOivHL0Ygl7sFjUtn4okTryz1nZaN_DfEMCtOmXw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Thompson, Terrell M.</creator><creator>Ramin, Pedram</creator><creator>Udugama, Isuru</creator><creator>Young, Brent R.</creator><creator>Gernaey, Krist V.</creator><creator>Baroutian, Saeid</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-0210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-1773</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</title><author>Thompson, Terrell M. ; Ramin, Pedram ; Udugama, Isuru ; Young, Brent R. ; Gernaey, Krist V. ; Baroutian, Saeid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>administrative management</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobic processes</topic><topic>Barbados</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Bioprocessing</topic><topic>Biorefineries</topic><topic>biorefining</topic><topic>Cogeneration</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>energy conversion</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact analysis</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>feedstocks</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>gas production (biological)</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Hydrothermal pretreatment</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>income</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>liquids</topic><topic>macroalgae</topic><topic>Net losses</topic><topic>Pelagic Sargassum</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>profits and margins</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Refining</topic><topic>Resource recovery</topic><topic>Sargassum</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Techno-economic assessment</topic><topic>value added</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><topic>Water demand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Terrell M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramin, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udugama, Isuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Brent R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernaey, Krist V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baroutian, Saeid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Terrell M.</au><au>Ramin, Pedram</au><au>Udugama, Isuru</au><au>Young, Brent R.</au><au>Gernaey, Krist V.</au><au>Baroutian, Saeid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>245</volume><spage>114605</spage><pages>114605-</pages><artnum>114605</artnum><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security.
Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-0210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-1773</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-8904 |
ispartof | Energy conversion and management, 2021-10, Vol.245, p.114605, Article 114605 |
issn | 0196-8904 1879-2227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2581543500 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | administrative management Agricultural economics Agricultural practices Agricultural wastes Algae Alternative energy sources Anaerobic digestion Anaerobic processes Barbados Biogas Bioprocessing Biorefineries biorefining Cogeneration Commercialization Economics Electricity energy conversion Energy demand Energy recovery environmental assessment Environmental impact Environmental impact analysis Environmental impact assessment Feasibility studies feedstocks Fertilizers Food security Food waste Fresh water freshwater gas production (biological) heat Hydrothermal pretreatment Impact analysis income Landfill Landfills liquids macroalgae Net losses Pelagic Sargassum Profitability profits and margins Raw materials Refining Resource recovery Sargassum Seasonal variations Seaweeds Techno-economic assessment value added Waste disposal sites Water demand |
title | Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A02%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techno-economic%20and%20environmental%20impact%20assessment%20of%20biogas%20production%20and%20fertiliser%20recovery%20from%20pelagic%20Sargassum:%20A%20biorefinery%20concept%20for%20Barbados&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Thompson,%20Terrell%20M.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=245&rft.spage=114605&rft.pages=114605-&rft.artnum=114605&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636805060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581543500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890421007810&rfr_iscdi=true |