Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados

[Display omitted] •Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2021-10, Vol.245, p.114605, Article 114605
Hauptverfasser: Thompson, Terrell M., Ramin, Pedram, Udugama, Isuru, Young, Brent R., Gernaey, Krist V., Baroutian, Saeid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 114605
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 245
creator Thompson, Terrell M.
Ramin, Pedram
Udugama, Isuru
Young, Brent R.
Gernaey, Krist V.
Baroutian, Saeid
description [Display omitted] •Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security. Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2581543500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890421007810</els_id><sourcerecordid>2636805060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EEkvpX6gs9cIl27ETO1lOlAraSpU4UM6WY49brxI72MlK_S382TpduHDpaaTRe5_95hFyxmDLgMmL_RaDiWHUYcuBsy1jjQTxhmxY1-4qznn7lmyA7WTV7aB5Tz7kvAeAWoDckD_3aB5DrLAQ4ugN1cFSDAefChHDrAfqx0mbmeqcMed1R6OjvY8POtMpRbuY2cfwYnSYZj_4jImmQjxgeqIuxZFOOOiHQv-pU7HlZfxML1dGQufDqirPG5xm6mKiX3XqtY35I3nn9JDx9O88Ib--f7u_uqnuflzfXl3eVaZu67kyvW4la4StQdi2TGYEtB23KGpgKJteSG5AOwOSWye6rtPW9CCwcRIc1Cfk05Fb0vxeMM9q9NngMOiAccmKy1p2UM61Ss__k-7jkkL5neKiY6IpV11V8qgyKeZcMqop-VGnJ8VArZ2pvfrXmVo7U8fOivHL0Ygl7sFjUtn4okTryz1nZaN_DfEMCtOmXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581543500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thompson, Terrell M. ; Ramin, Pedram ; Udugama, Isuru ; Young, Brent R. ; Gernaey, Krist V. ; Baroutian, Saeid</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Terrell M. ; Ramin, Pedram ; Udugama, Isuru ; Young, Brent R. ; Gernaey, Krist V. ; Baroutian, Saeid</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security. Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>administrative management ; Agricultural economics ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural wastes ; Algae ; Alternative energy sources ; Anaerobic digestion ; Anaerobic processes ; Barbados ; Biogas ; Bioprocessing ; Biorefineries ; biorefining ; Cogeneration ; Commercialization ; Economics ; Electricity ; energy conversion ; Energy demand ; Energy recovery ; environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact analysis ; Environmental impact assessment ; Feasibility studies ; feedstocks ; Fertilizers ; Food security ; Food waste ; Fresh water ; freshwater ; gas production (biological) ; heat ; Hydrothermal pretreatment ; Impact analysis ; income ; Landfill ; Landfills ; liquids ; macroalgae ; Net losses ; Pelagic Sargassum ; Profitability ; profits and margins ; Raw materials ; Refining ; Resource recovery ; Sargassum ; Seasonal variations ; Seaweeds ; Techno-economic assessment ; value added ; Waste disposal sites ; Water demand</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2021-10, Vol.245, p.114605, Article 114605</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4872-0210 ; 0000-0002-5947-955X ; 0000-0002-0364-1773</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Terrell M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramin, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udugama, Isuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Brent R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernaey, Krist V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baroutian, Saeid</creatorcontrib><title>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>[Display omitted] •Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security. Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.</description><subject>administrative management</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobic processes</subject><subject>Barbados</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Bioprocessing</subject><subject>Biorefineries</subject><subject>biorefining</subject><subject>Cogeneration</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>energy conversion</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact analysis</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>feedstocks</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>gas production (biological)</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Hydrothermal pretreatment</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>income</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>liquids</subject><subject>macroalgae</subject><subject>Net losses</subject><subject>Pelagic Sargassum</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>profits and margins</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Refining</subject><subject>Resource recovery</subject><subject>Sargassum</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Techno-economic assessment</subject><subject>value added</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><subject>Water demand</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EEkvpX6gs9cIl27ETO1lOlAraSpU4UM6WY49brxI72MlK_S382TpduHDpaaTRe5_95hFyxmDLgMmL_RaDiWHUYcuBsy1jjQTxhmxY1-4qznn7lmyA7WTV7aB5Tz7kvAeAWoDckD_3aB5DrLAQ4ugN1cFSDAefChHDrAfqx0mbmeqcMed1R6OjvY8POtMpRbuY2cfwYnSYZj_4jImmQjxgeqIuxZFOOOiHQv-pU7HlZfxML1dGQufDqirPG5xm6mKiX3XqtY35I3nn9JDx9O88Ib--f7u_uqnuflzfXl3eVaZu67kyvW4la4StQdi2TGYEtB23KGpgKJteSG5AOwOSWye6rtPW9CCwcRIc1Cfk05Fb0vxeMM9q9NngMOiAccmKy1p2UM61Ss__k-7jkkL5neKiY6IpV11V8qgyKeZcMqop-VGnJ8VArZ2pvfrXmVo7U8fOivHL0Ygl7sFjUtn4okTryz1nZaN_DfEMCtOmXw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Thompson, Terrell M.</creator><creator>Ramin, Pedram</creator><creator>Udugama, Isuru</creator><creator>Young, Brent R.</creator><creator>Gernaey, Krist V.</creator><creator>Baroutian, Saeid</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-0210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-1773</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</title><author>Thompson, Terrell M. ; Ramin, Pedram ; Udugama, Isuru ; Young, Brent R. ; Gernaey, Krist V. ; Baroutian, Saeid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cba76145d305d745d1c50782de5301e64b562c0afc062df5888adcb05e4f60f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>administrative management</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobic processes</topic><topic>Barbados</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Bioprocessing</topic><topic>Biorefineries</topic><topic>biorefining</topic><topic>Cogeneration</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>energy conversion</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact analysis</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>feedstocks</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>gas production (biological)</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Hydrothermal pretreatment</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>income</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>liquids</topic><topic>macroalgae</topic><topic>Net losses</topic><topic>Pelagic Sargassum</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>profits and margins</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Refining</topic><topic>Resource recovery</topic><topic>Sargassum</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Techno-economic assessment</topic><topic>value added</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><topic>Water demand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Terrell M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramin, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udugama, Isuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Brent R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernaey, Krist V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baroutian, Saeid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Terrell M.</au><au>Ramin, Pedram</au><au>Udugama, Isuru</au><au>Young, Brent R.</au><au>Gernaey, Krist V.</au><au>Baroutian, Saeid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>245</volume><spage>114605</spage><pages>114605-</pages><artnum>114605</artnum><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Economic assessment of a Sargassum biogas plant with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP).•Sargassum harvesting and HTP increase the overall process operation cost.•Maximum income derived from pretreated Sargassum/raw food waste blend (25:75).•Process environmental impact is nearly 10-fold lower than direct landfill disposal.•Local electricity and digestate consumption can promote energy and food security. Pelagic Sargassum inundation of coastlines across the North Atlantic is an ongoing challenge but presents new opportunities for value-added resource recovery. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of utilising these invasive brown seaweed, and food waste as feedstock for energy production and fertiliser recovery in Barbados. The biorefinery concept evaluated was designed with hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) and anaerobic digestion (AD) technologies. Financial analyses of four varied feedstock and process scenarios (S1-S4) established a linear relationship between profitability and the sale of products (electricity and fertiliser). In all cases, simple sale of power generated to the national grid resulted in a negative cash flow and required the introduction of fertiliser sales to achieve positive cash flows. Moreover, the net loss in the electricity only scenarios exceeded that of the landfill disposal, the present operation employed on the island for Sargassum management. The addition of the solid digestate to the revenue stream increased the profit margin and financial attractiveness of the process. Maximum income generation could be attained through 100% supply of the digestate to international markets. However, this approach provides zero support to local food security. The preferred option involves the 50/50 split utilisation of the solid digestate in local and international agricultural practice. While HTP is energy-intensive technology, the recirculation of waste heat generated by a combined heat and power unit for HTP reduced the input energy demand. It also lowered the potential environmental impact by more than 10-fold, relative to landfill disposal. Recycling of the liquid digestate also reduced the fresh water demand and its associated costs. Despite the promising results, process scale-up and commercialisation remain a main challenge, primarily due to the seasonality and variability of Sargassum seaweed for continuous bioprocessing.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-0210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-1773</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2021-10, Vol.245, p.114605, Article 114605
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2581543500
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects administrative management
Agricultural economics
Agricultural practices
Agricultural wastes
Algae
Alternative energy sources
Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic processes
Barbados
Biogas
Bioprocessing
Biorefineries
biorefining
Cogeneration
Commercialization
Economics
Electricity
energy conversion
Energy demand
Energy recovery
environmental assessment
Environmental impact
Environmental impact analysis
Environmental impact assessment
Feasibility studies
feedstocks
Fertilizers
Food security
Food waste
Fresh water
freshwater
gas production (biological)
heat
Hydrothermal pretreatment
Impact analysis
income
Landfill
Landfills
liquids
macroalgae
Net losses
Pelagic Sargassum
Profitability
profits and margins
Raw materials
Refining
Resource recovery
Sargassum
Seasonal variations
Seaweeds
Techno-economic assessment
value added
Waste disposal sites
Water demand
title Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of biogas production and fertiliser recovery from pelagic Sargassum: A biorefinery concept for Barbados
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A02%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techno-economic%20and%20environmental%20impact%20assessment%20of%20biogas%20production%20and%20fertiliser%20recovery%20from%20pelagic%20Sargassum:%20A%20biorefinery%20concept%20for%20Barbados&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Thompson,%20Terrell%20M.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=245&rft.spage=114605&rft.pages=114605-&rft.artnum=114605&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636805060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581543500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890421007810&rfr_iscdi=true