Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review
Recent studies on safety in various fields use the concept of safety climate to explain the causes of safety accidents. Many studies attempt to measure the safety climates and identify the causes for accidents in the high-risk construction industry. Studies have shown that the higher the level of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2021-10, Vol.13 (19), p.10603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 10603 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Han, Bumjin Son, Seunghyun Kim, Sunkuk |
description | Recent studies on safety in various fields use the concept of safety climate to explain the causes of safety accidents. Many studies attempt to measure the safety climates and identify the causes for accidents in the high-risk construction industry. Studies have shown that the higher the level of the safety climate, the lower the accident rate at construction sites. Methods of measuring safety climate, including the NOSACQ-50 survey, have been presented. Studies on the methodology of measuring safety climate should be continued to improve reliability and precision. Although many studies have been conducted to measure safety climate, such as questionnaires, regression analysis, and suggestions for safety climate measurement methods, there are few studies on a systematic literature review of them. This requires a systematic literature review (SLR) of the studies conducted so far. This study conducted an SLR on the definition and measurement methods of safety climate in the construction industry published since 2000, when safety climate’s impact on accidents began to be established. This review study utilized the PRISMA method, analyzed 735 studies, and selected 57 papers finally. SLR was carried out for selected research works, and the results were summarized. There are three methods to measure safety climate: literature survey, questionnaire, and data analysis. Factor analysis, development of measuring model, development of questionnaire, statistical analysis, and machine learning were investigated as their sub-methods. This study’s results can be used as fundamental sources for improving existing methods and developing new methods of measuring safety climate in the construction industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su131910603 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2581053613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581053613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d828b0db4dd2bc3e7caeb77a6fabe91021a23bf9445d7e3c00cd8d7e61ab1a313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLA0EQhAdRMMSc_AMDHmV1ZjrZh7ewaAxEBGPOyzx6dULcjfNQ9t87IR7Sl66Cj26qCLnm7A6gYvc-cuAVZzmDMzISrOAZZzN2fqIvycT7LUsDBzQfkc0LSh-d7T7oWrYYBlrv7JcMSG1HwyfSuu98cFEH23d02ZmY3PBA53Q9-ICJtJqubEAnQ3RI3_DH4u8VuWjlzuPkf4_J5unxvX7OVq-LZT1fZVpUZchMKUrFjJoaI5QGLLREVRQyb6XClERwKUC11XQ6MwWCZkybMqmcS8UlcBiTm-Pdveu_I_rQbPvouvSyEbMyJYacQ6Juj5R2vfcO22bvUkY3NJw1h-qak-rgDxrvYcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581053613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Han, Bumjin ; Son, Seunghyun ; Kim, Sunkuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Bumjin ; Son, Seunghyun ; Kim, Sunkuk</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies on safety in various fields use the concept of safety climate to explain the causes of safety accidents. Many studies attempt to measure the safety climates and identify the causes for accidents in the high-risk construction industry. Studies have shown that the higher the level of the safety climate, the lower the accident rate at construction sites. Methods of measuring safety climate, including the NOSACQ-50 survey, have been presented. Studies on the methodology of measuring safety climate should be continued to improve reliability and precision. Although many studies have been conducted to measure safety climate, such as questionnaires, regression analysis, and suggestions for safety climate measurement methods, there are few studies on a systematic literature review of them. This requires a systematic literature review (SLR) of the studies conducted so far. This study conducted an SLR on the definition and measurement methods of safety climate in the construction industry published since 2000, when safety climate’s impact on accidents began to be established. This review study utilized the PRISMA method, analyzed 735 studies, and selected 57 papers finally. SLR was carried out for selected research works, and the results were summarized. There are three methods to measure safety climate: literature survey, questionnaire, and data analysis. Factor analysis, development of measuring model, development of questionnaire, statistical analysis, and machine learning were investigated as their sub-methods. This study’s results can be used as fundamental sources for improving existing methods and developing new methods of measuring safety climate in the construction industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su131910603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Climate ; Construction industry ; Construction site accidents ; Factor analysis ; Fatalities ; Learning algorithms ; Literature reviews ; Mathematical models ; Measurement methods ; Methods ; Mortality ; Patient safety ; Polls & surveys ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Safety ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-10, Vol.13 (19), p.10603</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d828b0db4dd2bc3e7caeb77a6fabe91021a23bf9445d7e3c00cd8d7e61ab1a313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d828b0db4dd2bc3e7caeb77a6fabe91021a23bf9445d7e3c00cd8d7e61ab1a313</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1349-5586 ; 0000-0002-7350-4483</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Bumjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Seunghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunkuk</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Recent studies on safety in various fields use the concept of safety climate to explain the causes of safety accidents. Many studies attempt to measure the safety climates and identify the causes for accidents in the high-risk construction industry. Studies have shown that the higher the level of the safety climate, the lower the accident rate at construction sites. Methods of measuring safety climate, including the NOSACQ-50 survey, have been presented. Studies on the methodology of measuring safety climate should be continued to improve reliability and precision. Although many studies have been conducted to measure safety climate, such as questionnaires, regression analysis, and suggestions for safety climate measurement methods, there are few studies on a systematic literature review of them. This requires a systematic literature review (SLR) of the studies conducted so far. This study conducted an SLR on the definition and measurement methods of safety climate in the construction industry published since 2000, when safety climate’s impact on accidents began to be established. This review study utilized the PRISMA method, analyzed 735 studies, and selected 57 papers finally. SLR was carried out for selected research works, and the results were summarized. There are three methods to measure safety climate: literature survey, questionnaire, and data analysis. Factor analysis, development of measuring model, development of questionnaire, statistical analysis, and machine learning were investigated as their sub-methods. This study’s results can be used as fundamental sources for improving existing methods and developing new methods of measuring safety climate in the construction industry.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Construction site accidents</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLA0EQhAdRMMSc_AMDHmV1ZjrZh7ewaAxEBGPOyzx6dULcjfNQ9t87IR7Sl66Cj26qCLnm7A6gYvc-cuAVZzmDMzISrOAZZzN2fqIvycT7LUsDBzQfkc0LSh-d7T7oWrYYBlrv7JcMSG1HwyfSuu98cFEH23d02ZmY3PBA53Q9-ICJtJqubEAnQ3RI3_DH4u8VuWjlzuPkf4_J5unxvX7OVq-LZT1fZVpUZchMKUrFjJoaI5QGLLREVRQyb6XClERwKUC11XQ6MwWCZkybMqmcS8UlcBiTm-Pdveu_I_rQbPvouvSyEbMyJYacQ6Juj5R2vfcO22bvUkY3NJw1h-qak-rgDxrvYcI</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Han, Bumjin</creator><creator>Son, Seunghyun</creator><creator>Kim, Sunkuk</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-5586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-4483</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review</title><author>Han, Bumjin ; Son, Seunghyun ; Kim, Sunkuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d828b0db4dd2bc3e7caeb77a6fabe91021a23bf9445d7e3c00cd8d7e61ab1a313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Construction site accidents</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Bumjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Seunghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunkuk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Bumjin</au><au>Son, Seunghyun</au><au>Kim, Sunkuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>10603</spage><pages>10603-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Recent studies on safety in various fields use the concept of safety climate to explain the causes of safety accidents. Many studies attempt to measure the safety climates and identify the causes for accidents in the high-risk construction industry. Studies have shown that the higher the level of the safety climate, the lower the accident rate at construction sites. Methods of measuring safety climate, including the NOSACQ-50 survey, have been presented. Studies on the methodology of measuring safety climate should be continued to improve reliability and precision. Although many studies have been conducted to measure safety climate, such as questionnaires, regression analysis, and suggestions for safety climate measurement methods, there are few studies on a systematic literature review of them. This requires a systematic literature review (SLR) of the studies conducted so far. This study conducted an SLR on the definition and measurement methods of safety climate in the construction industry published since 2000, when safety climate’s impact on accidents began to be established. This review study utilized the PRISMA method, analyzed 735 studies, and selected 57 papers finally. SLR was carried out for selected research works, and the results were summarized. There are three methods to measure safety climate: literature survey, questionnaire, and data analysis. Factor analysis, development of measuring model, development of questionnaire, statistical analysis, and machine learning were investigated as their sub-methods. This study’s results can be used as fundamental sources for improving existing methods and developing new methods of measuring safety climate in the construction industry.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su131910603</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-5586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-4483</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2021-10, Vol.13 (19), p.10603 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2581053613 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accidents Climate Construction industry Construction site accidents Factor analysis Fatalities Learning algorithms Literature reviews Mathematical models Measurement methods Methods Mortality Patient safety Polls & surveys Questionnaires Regression analysis Safety Statistical analysis Sustainability Systematic review |
title | Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Safety%20Climate%20in%20the%20Construction%20Industry:%20A%20Systematic%20Literature%20Review&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Han,%20Bumjin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=10603&rft.pages=10603-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su131910603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581053613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581053613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |