Human thermal comfort under dynamic conditions: An experimental study

Although thermal comfort has been a research topic since the 1960s, some knowledge gaps still affect understanding of the human response to changing thermal environments. To enhance knowledge in this regard, an exploratory study is presented, which aims to understand human response to monotonic ther...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2021-10, Vol.204, p.108144, Article 108144
Hauptverfasser: Favero, Matteo, Sartori, Igor, Carlucci, Salvatore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108144
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 204
creator Favero, Matteo
Sartori, Igor
Carlucci, Salvatore
description Although thermal comfort has been a research topic since the 1960s, some knowledge gaps still affect understanding of the human response to changing thermal environments. To enhance knowledge in this regard, an exploratory study is presented, which aims to understand human response to monotonic thermal variations by describing its relationship with covariates of interest. Thirty-eight participants (29 females, 9 males) worked in an office-like climate chamber and were exposed to dynamic and controlled heating and cooling ramps of the operative temperature with different speeds. Participants' perception, evaluation, preference and acceptability of the indoor thermal environment were recorded by filling in dedicated questionnaires. Additionally, participants could indicate when an uncomfortable event occurred during these temperature ramps by clicking a digital button on a dedicated app. This discomfort event was defined in behavioural terms as the decision to “take action to restore a comfort condition”. Survival analysis was used to study participants’ reactions to the dynamic thermal stimuli. It showed that two distinct mechanisms caused discomfort events due to overheating and undercooling: warm discomfort is driven by the absolute value of the achieved operative temperature, while the relative change in operative temperature mainly causes cold discomfort. Compared to the current recommendations regarding temperature cycles, drifts and ramps, this result shows that current standard recommendations underestimate the risk of thermal discomfort during a cooling process while overestimating it during a heating one. The new knowledge of human reaction to a dynamic thermal environment can lead to more energy-efficient and satisfactory building control strategies. [Display omitted] •An experiment in two office-like climate chambers was conducted on 38 participants.•In winter conditions, the limits for temperature drifts and ramps are not symmetric.•Warm discomfort is triggered by the absolute value of the reached operative temperature.•Cold discomfort is triggered by the relative change in operative temperature.•Standards underestimate thermal discomfort risk during cooling and overestimating it during heating.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108144
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2580729211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036013232100545X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2580729211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-cb1f983be7be223ef33c08e99db9393c73a03b10e267ba593dd0ed1532bca12d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QRY8b00y292NJ0upVih4UfAWsskspnSzNckW--9NWT17Gni8783MI-SW0RmjrLzfzprB7gy6w4xTzpJYs6I4IxNWV5CXdfFxTiYUSpoz4HBJrkLY0gQKKCZktR465bL4ib5Tu0z3Xdv7mA3OoM_M0anO6qQ6Y6PtXXjIFi7D7z1626GLiQhxMMdrctGqXcCb3zkl70-rt-U637w-vywXm1xDXcdcN6wVNTRYNcg5YAugaY1CmEaAAF2BotAwirysGjUXYAxFw-bAG60YNzAld2Pu3vdfA4Yot_3gXVop-bymFRecseQqR5f2fQgeW7lP5yp_lIzKU2VyK_8qk6fK5FhZAh9HENMPB4teBm3RaTTWo47S9Pa_iB9hanjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580729211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human thermal comfort under dynamic conditions: An experimental study</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Favero, Matteo ; Sartori, Igor ; Carlucci, Salvatore</creator><creatorcontrib>Favero, Matteo ; Sartori, Igor ; Carlucci, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><description>Although thermal comfort has been a research topic since the 1960s, some knowledge gaps still affect understanding of the human response to changing thermal environments. To enhance knowledge in this regard, an exploratory study is presented, which aims to understand human response to monotonic thermal variations by describing its relationship with covariates of interest. Thirty-eight participants (29 females, 9 males) worked in an office-like climate chamber and were exposed to dynamic and controlled heating and cooling ramps of the operative temperature with different speeds. Participants' perception, evaluation, preference and acceptability of the indoor thermal environment were recorded by filling in dedicated questionnaires. Additionally, participants could indicate when an uncomfortable event occurred during these temperature ramps by clicking a digital button on a dedicated app. This discomfort event was defined in behavioural terms as the decision to “take action to restore a comfort condition”. Survival analysis was used to study participants’ reactions to the dynamic thermal stimuli. It showed that two distinct mechanisms caused discomfort events due to overheating and undercooling: warm discomfort is driven by the absolute value of the achieved operative temperature, while the relative change in operative temperature mainly causes cold discomfort. Compared to the current recommendations regarding temperature cycles, drifts and ramps, this result shows that current standard recommendations underestimate the risk of thermal discomfort during a cooling process while overestimating it during a heating one. The new knowledge of human reaction to a dynamic thermal environment can lead to more energy-efficient and satisfactory building control strategies. [Display omitted] •An experiment in two office-like climate chambers was conducted on 38 participants.•In winter conditions, the limits for temperature drifts and ramps are not symmetric.•Warm discomfort is triggered by the absolute value of the reached operative temperature.•Cold discomfort is triggered by the relative change in operative temperature.•Standards underestimate thermal discomfort risk during cooling and overestimating it during heating.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Building control ; Cooling ; Cooling rate ; Decision analysis ; Discomfort ; Dynamic and non-uniform thermal environments ; Energy efficiency ; Experimental study ; Heating ; Human response ; Indoor environments ; Overheating ; Ramps ; Supercooling ; Survival analysis ; Temperature perception ; Temperature preferences ; Temperature ramps ; Thermal comfort ; Thermal environments ; Thermal stimuli</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2021-10, Vol.204, p.108144, Article 108144</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-cb1f983be7be223ef33c08e99db9393c73a03b10e267ba593dd0ed1532bca12d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-cb1f983be7be223ef33c08e99db9393c73a03b10e267ba593dd0ed1532bca12d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3853-2585 ; 0000-0002-4239-3039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Favero, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartori, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlucci, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><title>Human thermal comfort under dynamic conditions: An experimental study</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Although thermal comfort has been a research topic since the 1960s, some knowledge gaps still affect understanding of the human response to changing thermal environments. To enhance knowledge in this regard, an exploratory study is presented, which aims to understand human response to monotonic thermal variations by describing its relationship with covariates of interest. Thirty-eight participants (29 females, 9 males) worked in an office-like climate chamber and were exposed to dynamic and controlled heating and cooling ramps of the operative temperature with different speeds. Participants' perception, evaluation, preference and acceptability of the indoor thermal environment were recorded by filling in dedicated questionnaires. Additionally, participants could indicate when an uncomfortable event occurred during these temperature ramps by clicking a digital button on a dedicated app. This discomfort event was defined in behavioural terms as the decision to “take action to restore a comfort condition”. Survival analysis was used to study participants’ reactions to the dynamic thermal stimuli. It showed that two distinct mechanisms caused discomfort events due to overheating and undercooling: warm discomfort is driven by the absolute value of the achieved operative temperature, while the relative change in operative temperature mainly causes cold discomfort. Compared to the current recommendations regarding temperature cycles, drifts and ramps, this result shows that current standard recommendations underestimate the risk of thermal discomfort during a cooling process while overestimating it during a heating one. The new knowledge of human reaction to a dynamic thermal environment can lead to more energy-efficient and satisfactory building control strategies. [Display omitted] •An experiment in two office-like climate chambers was conducted on 38 participants.•In winter conditions, the limits for temperature drifts and ramps are not symmetric.•Warm discomfort is triggered by the absolute value of the reached operative temperature.•Cold discomfort is triggered by the relative change in operative temperature.•Standards underestimate thermal discomfort risk during cooling and overestimating it during heating.</description><subject>Building control</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling rate</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Dynamic and non-uniform thermal environments</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Experimental study</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Human response</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Overheating</subject><subject>Ramps</subject><subject>Supercooling</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Temperature perception</subject><subject>Temperature preferences</subject><subject>Temperature ramps</subject><subject>Thermal comfort</subject><subject>Thermal environments</subject><subject>Thermal stimuli</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QRY8b00y292NJ0upVih4UfAWsskspnSzNckW--9NWT17Gni8783MI-SW0RmjrLzfzprB7gy6w4xTzpJYs6I4IxNWV5CXdfFxTiYUSpoz4HBJrkLY0gQKKCZktR465bL4ib5Tu0z3Xdv7mA3OoM_M0anO6qQ6Y6PtXXjIFi7D7z1626GLiQhxMMdrctGqXcCb3zkl70-rt-U637w-vywXm1xDXcdcN6wVNTRYNcg5YAugaY1CmEaAAF2BotAwirysGjUXYAxFw-bAG60YNzAld2Pu3vdfA4Yot_3gXVop-bymFRecseQqR5f2fQgeW7lP5yp_lIzKU2VyK_8qk6fK5FhZAh9HENMPB4teBm3RaTTWo47S9Pa_iB9hanjQ</recordid><startdate>20211015</startdate><enddate>20211015</enddate><creator>Favero, Matteo</creator><creator>Sartori, Igor</creator><creator>Carlucci, Salvatore</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-2585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-3039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211015</creationdate><title>Human thermal comfort under dynamic conditions: An experimental study</title><author>Favero, Matteo ; Sartori, Igor ; Carlucci, Salvatore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-cb1f983be7be223ef33c08e99db9393c73a03b10e267ba593dd0ed1532bca12d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Building control</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling rate</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Dynamic and non-uniform thermal environments</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Experimental study</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Human response</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Overheating</topic><topic>Ramps</topic><topic>Supercooling</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Temperature perception</topic><topic>Temperature preferences</topic><topic>Temperature ramps</topic><topic>Thermal comfort</topic><topic>Thermal environments</topic><topic>Thermal stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Favero, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartori, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlucci, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Favero, Matteo</au><au>Sartori, Igor</au><au>Carlucci, Salvatore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human thermal comfort under dynamic conditions: An experimental study</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2021-10-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>108144</spage><pages>108144-</pages><artnum>108144</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Although thermal comfort has been a research topic since the 1960s, some knowledge gaps still affect understanding of the human response to changing thermal environments. To enhance knowledge in this regard, an exploratory study is presented, which aims to understand human response to monotonic thermal variations by describing its relationship with covariates of interest. Thirty-eight participants (29 females, 9 males) worked in an office-like climate chamber and were exposed to dynamic and controlled heating and cooling ramps of the operative temperature with different speeds. Participants' perception, evaluation, preference and acceptability of the indoor thermal environment were recorded by filling in dedicated questionnaires. Additionally, participants could indicate when an uncomfortable event occurred during these temperature ramps by clicking a digital button on a dedicated app. This discomfort event was defined in behavioural terms as the decision to “take action to restore a comfort condition”. Survival analysis was used to study participants’ reactions to the dynamic thermal stimuli. It showed that two distinct mechanisms caused discomfort events due to overheating and undercooling: warm discomfort is driven by the absolute value of the achieved operative temperature, while the relative change in operative temperature mainly causes cold discomfort. Compared to the current recommendations regarding temperature cycles, drifts and ramps, this result shows that current standard recommendations underestimate the risk of thermal discomfort during a cooling process while overestimating it during a heating one. The new knowledge of human reaction to a dynamic thermal environment can lead to more energy-efficient and satisfactory building control strategies. [Display omitted] •An experiment in two office-like climate chambers was conducted on 38 participants.•In winter conditions, the limits for temperature drifts and ramps are not symmetric.•Warm discomfort is triggered by the absolute value of the reached operative temperature.•Cold discomfort is triggered by the relative change in operative temperature.•Standards underestimate thermal discomfort risk during cooling and overestimating it during heating.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108144</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-2585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-3039</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2021-10, Vol.204, p.108144, Article 108144
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2580729211
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Building control
Cooling
Cooling rate
Decision analysis
Discomfort
Dynamic and non-uniform thermal environments
Energy efficiency
Experimental study
Heating
Human response
Indoor environments
Overheating
Ramps
Supercooling
Survival analysis
Temperature perception
Temperature preferences
Temperature ramps
Thermal comfort
Thermal environments
Thermal stimuli
title Human thermal comfort under dynamic conditions: An experimental study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A58%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20thermal%20comfort%20under%20dynamic%20conditions:%20An%20experimental%20study&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Favero,%20Matteo&rft.date=2021-10-15&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=108144&rft.pages=108144-&rft.artnum=108144&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580729211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580729211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S036013232100545X&rfr_iscdi=true