Android vs. IOS: a comparative analysis over mobile operator infrastructures based on crowdsourced mobile dataset

User equipment (UE)’s operating system (OS) and category types are important factors that are affecting the end-user performance in a given mobile network operator (MNO)’s infrastructure. For this reason, fair and statistically accurate observed network performance differences of UE’s OSs based on c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Telecommunication systems 2021-11, Vol.78 (3), p.405-419
1. Verfasser: Zeydan, Engin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 3
container_start_page 405
container_title Telecommunication systems
container_volume 78
creator Zeydan, Engin
description User equipment (UE)’s operating system (OS) and category types are important factors that are affecting the end-user performance in a given mobile network operator (MNO)’s infrastructure. For this reason, fair and statistically accurate observed network performance differences of UE’s OSs based on category types, MNOs or locations can be of interest for mobile telecommunication ecosystem players. This paper’s focus is on performance comparisons of UE OSs (including Android, IOS (iPhone Operating System) and Windows phones) over different UE categories, MNOs and locations based on previously collected end-to-end nationwide crowd-sourced data measurements in Turkey. The analysis results performed in this paper uses statistical comparisons of unpaired observations due to imbalance between number of observations between all OSs and yield insight on how the mobile OS types’ network performances differ using some important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as downlink (DL) speed, latency, jitter and packet loss (PL). The outcome of the analysis indicate that Android devices perform better in terms of DL speed among all MNOs, whereas IOS devices are better in terms of latency values. On the other hand depending on the UE category, the performances of MNOs may vary when IOS and Android OSs are compared based on different KPIs. Additionally, IOS has shown better performance than Android in large geographical areas of Turkey. Finally, the business aspects of performing the proposed statistical OS comparisons from the perspectives of OS developers, MNOs, device manufacturers, and end-users are highlighted.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11235-021-00820-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2580186358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580186358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7d12c4f011565fc4a8efe0e2543401252ad3c2fe4e9b92377f00ea42ba3f653f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAc2o-98NbKX4UCj2o55DNJrKl3Wwzu5X996a24M3TZJj3GSYPQveMzhil-SMwxoUilDNCacEpGS_QhKmck1IqdpnelBVEFpm8RjcAG0qPWDlB-3lbx9DU-AAzvFy_P2GDbdh1Jpq-OThsWrMdoQEcDi7iXaiarcOhc2kcIm5aHw30cbD9EB3gyoCrcWixjeG7hjBEm_ozVZs-jftbdOXNFtzduU7R58vzx-KNrNavy8V8RazIRE_ymnErPWVMZcpbaQrnHXVcSSEp44qbWljunXRlVXKR555SZySvjPCZEl5M0cNpbxfDfnDQ6026J30HNFdF0pEJVaQUP6XSxQDRed3FZmfiqBnVR0f6pFYntfpXrR4TJE4QpHD75eLf6n-oH8fJfhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580186358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Android vs. IOS: a comparative analysis over mobile operator infrastructures based on crowdsourced mobile dataset</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zeydan, Engin</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeydan, Engin</creatorcontrib><description>User equipment (UE)’s operating system (OS) and category types are important factors that are affecting the end-user performance in a given mobile network operator (MNO)’s infrastructure. For this reason, fair and statistically accurate observed network performance differences of UE’s OSs based on category types, MNOs or locations can be of interest for mobile telecommunication ecosystem players. This paper’s focus is on performance comparisons of UE OSs (including Android, IOS (iPhone Operating System) and Windows phones) over different UE categories, MNOs and locations based on previously collected end-to-end nationwide crowd-sourced data measurements in Turkey. The analysis results performed in this paper uses statistical comparisons of unpaired observations due to imbalance between number of observations between all OSs and yield insight on how the mobile OS types’ network performances differ using some important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as downlink (DL) speed, latency, jitter and packet loss (PL). The outcome of the analysis indicate that Android devices perform better in terms of DL speed among all MNOs, whereas IOS devices are better in terms of latency values. On the other hand depending on the UE category, the performances of MNOs may vary when IOS and Android OSs are compared based on different KPIs. Additionally, IOS has shown better performance than Android in large geographical areas of Turkey. Finally, the business aspects of performing the proposed statistical OS comparisons from the perspectives of OS developers, MNOs, device manufacturers, and end-users are highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-4864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11235-021-00820-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Business and Management ; Computer Communication Networks ; Crowdsourcing ; IT in Business ; Mobile operating systems ; Network latency ; Operating systems ; Performance assessment ; Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes ; Smartphones ; Telecommunications systems ; Vibration ; Windows (computer programs)</subject><ispartof>Telecommunication systems, 2021-11, Vol.78 (3), p.405-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7d12c4f011565fc4a8efe0e2543401252ad3c2fe4e9b92377f00ea42ba3f653f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7d12c4f011565fc4a8efe0e2543401252ad3c2fe4e9b92377f00ea42ba3f653f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3329-0588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11235-021-00820-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-021-00820-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeydan, Engin</creatorcontrib><title>Android vs. IOS: a comparative analysis over mobile operator infrastructures based on crowdsourced mobile dataset</title><title>Telecommunication systems</title><addtitle>Telecommun Syst</addtitle><description>User equipment (UE)’s operating system (OS) and category types are important factors that are affecting the end-user performance in a given mobile network operator (MNO)’s infrastructure. For this reason, fair and statistically accurate observed network performance differences of UE’s OSs based on category types, MNOs or locations can be of interest for mobile telecommunication ecosystem players. This paper’s focus is on performance comparisons of UE OSs (including Android, IOS (iPhone Operating System) and Windows phones) over different UE categories, MNOs and locations based on previously collected end-to-end nationwide crowd-sourced data measurements in Turkey. The analysis results performed in this paper uses statistical comparisons of unpaired observations due to imbalance between number of observations between all OSs and yield insight on how the mobile OS types’ network performances differ using some important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as downlink (DL) speed, latency, jitter and packet loss (PL). The outcome of the analysis indicate that Android devices perform better in terms of DL speed among all MNOs, whereas IOS devices are better in terms of latency values. On the other hand depending on the UE category, the performances of MNOs may vary when IOS and Android OSs are compared based on different KPIs. Additionally, IOS has shown better performance than Android in large geographical areas of Turkey. Finally, the business aspects of performing the proposed statistical OS comparisons from the perspectives of OS developers, MNOs, device manufacturers, and end-users are highlighted.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Mobile operating systems</subject><subject>Network latency</subject><subject>Operating systems</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Telecommunications systems</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Windows (computer programs)</subject><issn>1018-4864</issn><issn>1572-9451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAc2o-98NbKX4UCj2o55DNJrKl3Wwzu5X996a24M3TZJj3GSYPQveMzhil-SMwxoUilDNCacEpGS_QhKmck1IqdpnelBVEFpm8RjcAG0qPWDlB-3lbx9DU-AAzvFy_P2GDbdh1Jpq-OThsWrMdoQEcDi7iXaiarcOhc2kcIm5aHw30cbD9EB3gyoCrcWixjeG7hjBEm_ozVZs-jftbdOXNFtzduU7R58vzx-KNrNavy8V8RazIRE_ymnErPWVMZcpbaQrnHXVcSSEp44qbWljunXRlVXKR555SZySvjPCZEl5M0cNpbxfDfnDQ6026J30HNFdF0pEJVaQUP6XSxQDRed3FZmfiqBnVR0f6pFYntfpXrR4TJE4QpHD75eLf6n-oH8fJfhs</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Zeydan, Engin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-0588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Android vs. IOS: a comparative analysis over mobile operator infrastructures based on crowdsourced mobile dataset</title><author>Zeydan, Engin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7d12c4f011565fc4a8efe0e2543401252ad3c2fe4e9b92377f00ea42ba3f653f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Mobile operating systems</topic><topic>Network latency</topic><topic>Operating systems</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Telecommunications systems</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Windows (computer programs)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeydan, Engin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Telecommunication systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeydan, Engin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Android vs. IOS: a comparative analysis over mobile operator infrastructures based on crowdsourced mobile dataset</atitle><jtitle>Telecommunication systems</jtitle><stitle>Telecommun Syst</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>405-419</pages><issn>1018-4864</issn><eissn>1572-9451</eissn><abstract>User equipment (UE)’s operating system (OS) and category types are important factors that are affecting the end-user performance in a given mobile network operator (MNO)’s infrastructure. For this reason, fair and statistically accurate observed network performance differences of UE’s OSs based on category types, MNOs or locations can be of interest for mobile telecommunication ecosystem players. This paper’s focus is on performance comparisons of UE OSs (including Android, IOS (iPhone Operating System) and Windows phones) over different UE categories, MNOs and locations based on previously collected end-to-end nationwide crowd-sourced data measurements in Turkey. The analysis results performed in this paper uses statistical comparisons of unpaired observations due to imbalance between number of observations between all OSs and yield insight on how the mobile OS types’ network performances differ using some important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as downlink (DL) speed, latency, jitter and packet loss (PL). The outcome of the analysis indicate that Android devices perform better in terms of DL speed among all MNOs, whereas IOS devices are better in terms of latency values. On the other hand depending on the UE category, the performances of MNOs may vary when IOS and Android OSs are compared based on different KPIs. Additionally, IOS has shown better performance than Android in large geographical areas of Turkey. Finally, the business aspects of performing the proposed statistical OS comparisons from the perspectives of OS developers, MNOs, device manufacturers, and end-users are highlighted.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11235-021-00820-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-0588</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1018-4864
ispartof Telecommunication systems, 2021-11, Vol.78 (3), p.405-419
issn 1018-4864
1572-9451
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2580186358
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Artificial Intelligence
Business and Management
Computer Communication Networks
Crowdsourcing
IT in Business
Mobile operating systems
Network latency
Operating systems
Performance assessment
Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes
Smartphones
Telecommunications systems
Vibration
Windows (computer programs)
title Android vs. IOS: a comparative analysis over mobile operator infrastructures based on crowdsourced mobile dataset
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Android%20vs.%20IOS:%20a%20comparative%20analysis%20over%20mobile%20operator%20infrastructures%20based%20on%20crowdsourced%20mobile%20dataset&rft.jtitle=Telecommunication%20systems&rft.au=Zeydan,%20Engin&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=405-419&rft.issn=1018-4864&rft.eissn=1572-9451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11235-021-00820-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580186358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580186358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true