Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making
Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals compreh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.2927-2937 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2937 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2927 |
container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Peng, Jiaxi Cao, Fei Zhang, Yan Cao, Yunfei Zhang, Yu Zhu, Xia Miao, Danmin |
description | Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2580025613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A666289514</galeid><sourcerecordid>A666289514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFvFCEUhSdGE2v1D_hEYmLiAxWGGRh8q422TZqYVH0mlLlMaRmowHTdfy_bNambbBrDA1z4zgVOTtO8peSIEiI-ZtrSrsOESkxISwVePWsOqGQcd4Kx53VNOo4po-Rl8yrnG0Ko4FIeNPoSrAdTXAwZxYDmWNy93pSf0FlcoQTT4nWJaY1sNEtGLli_QDCQUQZvsU16dmFCOowouXy7RiMYl92ml76tJ6-bF1b7DG_-zofNz69ffpyc4Ytvp-cnxxfY9D0tWFoJ2tRnEjN0V8JSEMSMWrb9yBkhUlyRnksGo4ZBg2HadJYLzokw3A6csMPm3bbvXYq_FshF3cQlhXqlavuhutJzyp6kql-D7IQUj9SkPaj65ViSNrPLRh1zzttB9rSrFN5DTRAgaR8DWFe3d_ijPXwdI8zO7BV82BFUpsDvMuklZ3X-_fL_2c-nu-z7f9hr0L5c5-iXhxTsgu0WNCnmnMCqu-RmndaKErUJntoGT9XgqYfgqVUVsa0oVzhMkB4tfkL1B2Js16E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193894797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Peng, Jiaxi ; Cao, Fei ; Zhang, Yan ; Cao, Yunfei ; Zhang, Yu ; Zhu, Xia ; Miao, Danmin</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jiaxi ; Cao, Fei ; Zhang, Yan ; Cao, Yunfei ; Zhang, Yu ; Zhu, Xia ; Miao, Danmin</creatorcontrib><description>Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Decision making ; Motivation (Psychology) ; Psychological research ; Psychology ; Risk-taking (Psychology) ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.2927-2937</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Current Psychology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8191-4618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jiaxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Danmin</creatorcontrib><title>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Motivation (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Risk-taking (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFvFCEUhSdGE2v1D_hEYmLiAxWGGRh8q422TZqYVH0mlLlMaRmowHTdfy_bNambbBrDA1z4zgVOTtO8peSIEiI-ZtrSrsOESkxISwVePWsOqGQcd4Kx53VNOo4po-Rl8yrnG0Ko4FIeNPoSrAdTXAwZxYDmWNy93pSf0FlcoQTT4nWJaY1sNEtGLli_QDCQUQZvsU16dmFCOowouXy7RiMYl92ml76tJ6-bF1b7DG_-zofNz69ffpyc4Ytvp-cnxxfY9D0tWFoJ2tRnEjN0V8JSEMSMWrb9yBkhUlyRnksGo4ZBg2HadJYLzokw3A6csMPm3bbvXYq_FshF3cQlhXqlavuhutJzyp6kql-D7IQUj9SkPaj65ViSNrPLRh1zzttB9rSrFN5DTRAgaR8DWFe3d_ijPXwdI8zO7BV82BFUpsDvMuklZ3X-_fL_2c-nu-z7f9hr0L5c5-iXhxTsgu0WNCnmnMCqu-RmndaKErUJntoGT9XgqYfgqVUVsa0oVzhMkB4tfkL1B2Js16E</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Peng, Jiaxi</creator><creator>Cao, Fei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yan</creator><creator>Cao, Yunfei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu</creator><creator>Zhu, Xia</creator><creator>Miao, Danmin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-4618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</title><author>Peng, Jiaxi ; Cao, Fei ; Zhang, Yan ; Cao, Yunfei ; Zhang, Yu ; Zhu, Xia ; Miao, Danmin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Motivation (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Risk-taking (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jiaxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Danmin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Jiaxi</au><au>Cao, Fei</au><au>Zhang, Yan</au><au>Cao, Yunfei</au><au>Zhang, Yu</au><au>Zhu, Xia</au><au>Miao, Danmin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2927</spage><epage>2937</epage><pages>2927-2937</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-4618</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.2927-2937 |
issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2580025613 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Decision making Motivation (Psychology) Psychological research Psychology Risk-taking (Psychology) Social Sciences |
title | Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reflections%20on%20motivation:%20How%20regulatory%20focus%20influences%20self-framing%20and%20risky%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Peng,%20Jiaxi&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2927&rft.epage=2937&rft.pages=2927-2937&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA666289514%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193894797&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A666289514&rfr_iscdi=true |