Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making

Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals compreh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.2927-2937
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Jiaxi, Cao, Fei, Zhang, Yan, Cao, Yunfei, Zhang, Yu, Zhu, Xia, Miao, Danmin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2937
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2927
container_title Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)
container_volume 40
creator Peng, Jiaxi
Cao, Fei
Zhang, Yan
Cao, Yunfei
Zhang, Yu
Zhu, Xia
Miao, Danmin
description Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2580025613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A666289514</galeid><sourcerecordid>A666289514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFvFCEUhSdGE2v1D_hEYmLiAxWGGRh8q422TZqYVH0mlLlMaRmowHTdfy_bNambbBrDA1z4zgVOTtO8peSIEiI-ZtrSrsOESkxISwVePWsOqGQcd4Kx53VNOo4po-Rl8yrnG0Ko4FIeNPoSrAdTXAwZxYDmWNy93pSf0FlcoQTT4nWJaY1sNEtGLli_QDCQUQZvsU16dmFCOowouXy7RiMYl92ml76tJ6-bF1b7DG_-zofNz69ffpyc4Ytvp-cnxxfY9D0tWFoJ2tRnEjN0V8JSEMSMWrb9yBkhUlyRnksGo4ZBg2HadJYLzokw3A6csMPm3bbvXYq_FshF3cQlhXqlavuhutJzyp6kql-D7IQUj9SkPaj65ViSNrPLRh1zzttB9rSrFN5DTRAgaR8DWFe3d_ijPXwdI8zO7BV82BFUpsDvMuklZ3X-_fL_2c-nu-z7f9hr0L5c5-iXhxTsgu0WNCnmnMCqu-RmndaKErUJntoGT9XgqYfgqVUVsa0oVzhMkB4tfkL1B2Js16E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193894797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Peng, Jiaxi ; Cao, Fei ; Zhang, Yan ; Cao, Yunfei ; Zhang, Yu ; Zhu, Xia ; Miao, Danmin</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jiaxi ; Cao, Fei ; Zhang, Yan ; Cao, Yunfei ; Zhang, Yu ; Zhu, Xia ; Miao, Danmin</creatorcontrib><description>Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Decision making ; Motivation (Psychology) ; Psychological research ; Psychology ; Risk-taking (Psychology) ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.2927-2937</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Current Psychology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8191-4618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jiaxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Danmin</creatorcontrib><title>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Motivation (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Risk-taking (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFvFCEUhSdGE2v1D_hEYmLiAxWGGRh8q422TZqYVH0mlLlMaRmowHTdfy_bNambbBrDA1z4zgVOTtO8peSIEiI-ZtrSrsOESkxISwVePWsOqGQcd4Kx53VNOo4po-Rl8yrnG0Ko4FIeNPoSrAdTXAwZxYDmWNy93pSf0FlcoQTT4nWJaY1sNEtGLli_QDCQUQZvsU16dmFCOowouXy7RiMYl92ml76tJ6-bF1b7DG_-zofNz69ffpyc4Ytvp-cnxxfY9D0tWFoJ2tRnEjN0V8JSEMSMWrb9yBkhUlyRnksGo4ZBg2HadJYLzokw3A6csMPm3bbvXYq_FshF3cQlhXqlavuhutJzyp6kql-D7IQUj9SkPaj65ViSNrPLRh1zzttB9rSrFN5DTRAgaR8DWFe3d_ijPXwdI8zO7BV82BFUpsDvMuklZ3X-_fL_2c-nu-z7f9hr0L5c5-iXhxTsgu0WNCnmnMCqu-RmndaKErUJntoGT9XgqYfgqVUVsa0oVzhMkB4tfkL1B2Js16E</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Peng, Jiaxi</creator><creator>Cao, Fei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yan</creator><creator>Cao, Yunfei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu</creator><creator>Zhu, Xia</creator><creator>Miao, Danmin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-4618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</title><author>Peng, Jiaxi ; Cao, Fei ; Zhang, Yan ; Cao, Yunfei ; Zhang, Yu ; Zhu, Xia ; Miao, Danmin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f9eac1040c84b7f1e70cda925d630097b05693edae8aec3ac4f676607c6f8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Motivation (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Risk-taking (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jiaxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Danmin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Jiaxi</au><au>Cao, Fei</au><au>Zhang, Yan</au><au>Cao, Yunfei</au><au>Zhang, Yu</au><au>Zhu, Xia</au><au>Miao, Danmin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2927</spage><epage>2937</epage><pages>2927-2937</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Regulatory focus theory is a new motivation theory that surpasses the hedonic principle of approaching pleasure and avoiding pain to uncover how individuals approach positive goals and avoid negative goals. This study explores (1) how regulatory focus influences the ways in which individuals comprehend and process decision making and form different self-frames and (2) how regulatory focus and self-framing affect risky decision making. Results of Studies 1 and 2 suggest that chronic and situational regulatory focus exert similar effects on self-framing: promotion-focused individuals were more willing to use positive words to describe ambiguous decision-making information and created more positive self-frames compared with prevention-focused individuals. The effects of regulatory focus and self-framing on decision making were each significant. Additionally, self-framing was found to suppress the effect of regulatory focus on decision making. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-4618</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1046-1310
ispartof Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.2927-2937
issn 1046-1310
1936-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2580025613
source Springer Nature
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Decision making
Motivation (Psychology)
Psychological research
Psychology
Risk-taking (Psychology)
Social Sciences
title Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reflections%20on%20motivation:%20How%20regulatory%20focus%20influences%20self-framing%20and%20risky%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Peng,%20Jiaxi&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2927&rft.epage=2937&rft.pages=2927-2937&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA666289514%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193894797&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A666289514&rfr_iscdi=true