Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute

Research on public attitudes toward the death penalty has yet to systematically examine the role of race in the context of offense‐related attributes. This study uses a conjoint experiment randomly exposing a sample of 500 U.S. adults to different pairings of capital offenders to test the role of bo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science quarterly 2021-07, Vol.102 (4), p.1931-1946
1. Verfasser: Ramirez, Mark D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1946
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1931
container_title Social science quarterly
container_volume 102
creator Ramirez, Mark D.
description Research on public attitudes toward the death penalty has yet to systematically examine the role of race in the context of offense‐related attributes. This study uses a conjoint experiment randomly exposing a sample of 500 U.S. adults to different pairings of capital offenders to test the role of both offender and offense‐related attributes on beliefs about death penalty deservingness. The results show offense‐related factors play a significant role in who the public deems deserving of the death penalty, while the offender's race matters only for citizens holding prejudicial opinions towards Blacks or Latinos. Instrumental considerations typically outweigh racial considerations in death penalty judgments, although perceptions of those factors might be racialized as well. The results point to a potential disjuncture between the desires of citizens and the implementation of the death penalty.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ssqu.13051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2579363138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579363138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-84501ff2ad6d83d6eaf8059a7791c63011f167da0b38cd32812c34aea3d43a1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYvPsGCN2nqTnaTbLyV4j8oiNaew3Qzsalp0mY32HryNXw9n8TUeHYuw8A3P_h9jJ2DGEI7V9ZumiFIEcAB60GghBf6MjpkPSGk9lSs4JidWLsUQihf6R6bz8oV2re8fOVuQXy0ojo3WPKU0C34mkos3K695ujomj-joQE3Velo6wYcy5Sb3OUfVNrvzy_-nhdFm1SStdxVnLZkGken7CjDwtLZ3-6z2e3Ny_jemzzePYxHE89IqcDTKhCQZT6mYaplGhJmWgQxRlEMJpQCIIMwSlHMpTap9DX4RioklKmSCCj77KLLXdfVpiHrkmXV1G0Bm_hBFMtQgtQtddlRpq6srSlL1nW-wnqXgEj2DpO9w-TXYQtDB7fNaPcPmUynT7Pu5wccnXVe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579363138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ramirez, Mark D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><description>Research on public attitudes toward the death penalty has yet to systematically examine the role of race in the context of offense‐related attributes. This study uses a conjoint experiment randomly exposing a sample of 500 U.S. adults to different pairings of capital offenders to test the role of both offender and offense‐related attributes on beliefs about death penalty deservingness. The results show offense‐related factors play a significant role in who the public deems deserving of the death penalty, while the offender's race matters only for citizens holding prejudicial opinions towards Blacks or Latinos. Instrumental considerations typically outweigh racial considerations in death penalty judgments, although perceptions of those factors might be racialized as well. The results point to a potential disjuncture between the desires of citizens and the implementation of the death penalty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adults ; Attributes ; Capital punishment ; Citizens ; Death &amp; dying ; Death attitudes ; death penalty ; Deservingness ; Offenders ; Public opinion ; Race ; racial politics</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2021-07, Vol.102 (4), p.1931-1946</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><rights>2021 Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-84501ff2ad6d83d6eaf8059a7791c63011f167da0b38cd32812c34aea3d43a1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-84501ff2ad6d83d6eaf8059a7791c63011f167da0b38cd32812c34aea3d43a1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0988-2746</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fssqu.13051$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fssqu.13051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><title>Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><description>Research on public attitudes toward the death penalty has yet to systematically examine the role of race in the context of offense‐related attributes. This study uses a conjoint experiment randomly exposing a sample of 500 U.S. adults to different pairings of capital offenders to test the role of both offender and offense‐related attributes on beliefs about death penalty deservingness. The results show offense‐related factors play a significant role in who the public deems deserving of the death penalty, while the offender's race matters only for citizens holding prejudicial opinions towards Blacks or Latinos. Instrumental considerations typically outweigh racial considerations in death penalty judgments, although perceptions of those factors might be racialized as well. The results point to a potential disjuncture between the desires of citizens and the implementation of the death penalty.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Attributes</subject><subject>Capital punishment</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Death &amp; dying</subject><subject>Death attitudes</subject><subject>death penalty</subject><subject>Deservingness</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>racial politics</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYvPsGCN2nqTnaTbLyV4j8oiNaew3Qzsalp0mY32HryNXw9n8TUeHYuw8A3P_h9jJ2DGEI7V9ZumiFIEcAB60GghBf6MjpkPSGk9lSs4JidWLsUQihf6R6bz8oV2re8fOVuQXy0ojo3WPKU0C34mkos3K695ujomj-joQE3Velo6wYcy5Sb3OUfVNrvzy_-nhdFm1SStdxVnLZkGken7CjDwtLZ3-6z2e3Ny_jemzzePYxHE89IqcDTKhCQZT6mYaplGhJmWgQxRlEMJpQCIIMwSlHMpTap9DX4RioklKmSCCj77KLLXdfVpiHrkmXV1G0Bm_hBFMtQgtQtddlRpq6srSlL1nW-wnqXgEj2DpO9w-TXYQtDB7fNaPcPmUynT7Pu5wccnXVe</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Ramirez, Mark D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-2746</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute</title><author>Ramirez, Mark D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-84501ff2ad6d83d6eaf8059a7791c63011f167da0b38cd32812c34aea3d43a1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Attributes</topic><topic>Capital punishment</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Death &amp; dying</topic><topic>Death attitudes</topic><topic>death penalty</topic><topic>Deservingness</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>racial politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramirez, Mark D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1931</spage><epage>1946</epage><pages>1931-1946</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><abstract>Research on public attitudes toward the death penalty has yet to systematically examine the role of race in the context of offense‐related attributes. This study uses a conjoint experiment randomly exposing a sample of 500 U.S. adults to different pairings of capital offenders to test the role of both offender and offense‐related attributes on beliefs about death penalty deservingness. The results show offense‐related factors play a significant role in who the public deems deserving of the death penalty, while the offender's race matters only for citizens holding prejudicial opinions towards Blacks or Latinos. Instrumental considerations typically outweigh racial considerations in death penalty judgments, although perceptions of those factors might be racialized as well. The results point to a potential disjuncture between the desires of citizens and the implementation of the death penalty.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ssqu.13051</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-2746</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4941
ispartof Social science quarterly, 2021-07, Vol.102 (4), p.1931-1946
issn 0038-4941
1540-6237
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2579363138
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adults
Attributes
Capital punishment
Citizens
Death & dying
Death attitudes
death penalty
Deservingness
Offenders
Public opinion
Race
racial politics
title Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A52%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unmasking%20the%20American%20death%20penalty%20debate:%20Race,%20context,%20and%20citizens%E2%80%99%20willingness%20to%20execute&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Ramirez,%20Mark%20D.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1931&rft.epage=1946&rft.pages=1931-1946&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ssqu.13051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579363138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579363138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true