Babbling brook to thunderous torrent: Using sound to monitor river stage
The passive, ambient sound above the water from a river has previously untapped potential for determining flow characteristics such as stage. Measuring sub‐aerial sound could provide a new, efficient way to continuously monitor river stage, without the need for in‐stream infrastructure. Previous pub...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth surface processes and landforms 2021-10, Vol.46 (13), p.2656-2670 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2670 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2656 |
container_title | Earth surface processes and landforms |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Osborne, Wm. Alexander Hodge, Rebecca A. Love, Gordon D. Hawkin, Peter Hawkin, Ruth E. |
description | The passive, ambient sound above the water from a river has previously untapped potential for determining flow characteristics such as stage. Measuring sub‐aerial sound could provide a new, efficient way to continuously monitor river stage, without the need for in‐stream infrastructure. Previous published work has suggested that there might be a relationship between sound and river stage, but the analysis has been restricted to a narrow range of flow conditions and river morphologies. We present a method to determine site suitability and the process of how to record and analyse sound. Data collected along a 500 m length of the River Washburn during July 2019 is used to determine what makes a site suitable for sound monitoring. We found that sound is controlled by roughness elements in the channel, such as a boulder or weir, which influences the sound produced. On the basis of these findings, we collect audio recordings from six sites around the northeast of England, covering a range of flow conditions and different roughness elements, since 2019. We use data from those sites collected during storms Ciara and Dennis to produce a relationship between this sound and river stage. Our analysis has shown a positive relationship between an R2 of 0.73 and 0.99 in all rivers, but requires careful site selection and data processing to achieve the best results. We introduce a filter that is capable of isolating a river's sound from other environmental sound. Future work in examining the role of these roughness elements is required to understand the full extent of this technique. By demonstrating that sound can operate as a hydrometric tool, we suggest that sound monitoring could be used to provide cost‐effective monitoring devices, either to detect relative change in a river or, after more research, a reliable stage measurement.
Imagine being beside a river, what do you hear? In this study we propose that sound can be used as an alternative method to calculate river stage and track flood peaks. The use of sound is based upon the assumption that a river gets louder as its depth increases, such as a babbling brook becoming a thunderous torrent, generating a soundscape that is dependent on river condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/esp.5199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2579292450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579292450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3509-7137e66767c2442fa419781f1f12f3bc6b1e1ec5cc8bcaedcad5fb9359acd2b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCtYp-CcUfPGlMz-apvFNx3TCQEH3HJL0Oju3piatsv_e1PkqeTjCfbg7vghdEjwlGNMbCN2UEymPUEKwLDJZMnGMEkykyCRj4hSdhbDBmJC8lAla3Gtjtk27To137iPtXdq_D20F3g0h_ryHtr9NV2EkwcXOSHaubWIv9c0X-DT0eg3n6KTW2wAXf3WCVg_zt9kiWz4_Ps3ulplmHMtMECagKEQhLM1zWus8HlaSOj5aM2MLQ4CA5daWxmqorK54bSTjUtuKmpxN0NVhbufd5wChVxs3-DauVJQLSSXNOY7q-qCsdyF4qFXnm532e0WwGnNSMSc15hRpdqDfzRb2_zo1f3359T-jh2oC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579292450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Babbling brook to thunderous torrent: Using sound to monitor river stage</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Osborne, Wm. Alexander ; Hodge, Rebecca A. ; Love, Gordon D. ; Hawkin, Peter ; Hawkin, Ruth E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Wm. Alexander ; Hodge, Rebecca A. ; Love, Gordon D. ; Hawkin, Peter ; Hawkin, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><description>The passive, ambient sound above the water from a river has previously untapped potential for determining flow characteristics such as stage. Measuring sub‐aerial sound could provide a new, efficient way to continuously monitor river stage, without the need for in‐stream infrastructure. Previous published work has suggested that there might be a relationship between sound and river stage, but the analysis has been restricted to a narrow range of flow conditions and river morphologies. We present a method to determine site suitability and the process of how to record and analyse sound. Data collected along a 500 m length of the River Washburn during July 2019 is used to determine what makes a site suitable for sound monitoring. We found that sound is controlled by roughness elements in the channel, such as a boulder or weir, which influences the sound produced. On the basis of these findings, we collect audio recordings from six sites around the northeast of England, covering a range of flow conditions and different roughness elements, since 2019. We use data from those sites collected during storms Ciara and Dennis to produce a relationship between this sound and river stage. Our analysis has shown a positive relationship between an R2 of 0.73 and 0.99 in all rivers, but requires careful site selection and data processing to achieve the best results. We introduce a filter that is capable of isolating a river's sound from other environmental sound. Future work in examining the role of these roughness elements is required to understand the full extent of this technique. By demonstrating that sound can operate as a hydrometric tool, we suggest that sound monitoring could be used to provide cost‐effective monitoring devices, either to detect relative change in a river or, after more research, a reliable stage measurement.
Imagine being beside a river, what do you hear? In this study we propose that sound can be used as an alternative method to calculate river stage and track flood peaks. The use of sound is based upon the assumption that a river gets louder as its depth increases, such as a babbling brook becoming a thunderous torrent, generating a soundscape that is dependent on river condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.5199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ambient noise ; Background noise ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; FFT ; flood ; flood monitoring ; Flow characteristics ; Monitoring ; Morphology ; River discharge ; river sound ; river stage ; Rivers ; Roughness ; Site selection ; sonohydrograph ; Sound ; Storm Ciara ; Storm Dennis ; Storms ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2021-10, Vol.46 (13), p.2656-2670</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3509-7137e66767c2442fa419781f1f12f3bc6b1e1ec5cc8bcaedcad5fb9359acd2b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3509-7137e66767c2442fa419781f1f12f3bc6b1e1ec5cc8bcaedcad5fb9359acd2b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2168-8102 ; 0000-0002-8792-8949 ; 0000-0001-5137-9434</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.5199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.5199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Wm. Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Gordon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkin, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkin, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><title>Babbling brook to thunderous torrent: Using sound to monitor river stage</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>The passive, ambient sound above the water from a river has previously untapped potential for determining flow characteristics such as stage. Measuring sub‐aerial sound could provide a new, efficient way to continuously monitor river stage, without the need for in‐stream infrastructure. Previous published work has suggested that there might be a relationship between sound and river stage, but the analysis has been restricted to a narrow range of flow conditions and river morphologies. We present a method to determine site suitability and the process of how to record and analyse sound. Data collected along a 500 m length of the River Washburn during July 2019 is used to determine what makes a site suitable for sound monitoring. We found that sound is controlled by roughness elements in the channel, such as a boulder or weir, which influences the sound produced. On the basis of these findings, we collect audio recordings from six sites around the northeast of England, covering a range of flow conditions and different roughness elements, since 2019. We use data from those sites collected during storms Ciara and Dennis to produce a relationship between this sound and river stage. Our analysis has shown a positive relationship between an R2 of 0.73 and 0.99 in all rivers, but requires careful site selection and data processing to achieve the best results. We introduce a filter that is capable of isolating a river's sound from other environmental sound. Future work in examining the role of these roughness elements is required to understand the full extent of this technique. By demonstrating that sound can operate as a hydrometric tool, we suggest that sound monitoring could be used to provide cost‐effective monitoring devices, either to detect relative change in a river or, after more research, a reliable stage measurement.
Imagine being beside a river, what do you hear? In this study we propose that sound can be used as an alternative method to calculate river stage and track flood peaks. The use of sound is based upon the assumption that a river gets louder as its depth increases, such as a babbling brook becoming a thunderous torrent, generating a soundscape that is dependent on river condition.</description><subject>Ambient noise</subject><subject>Background noise</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>FFT</subject><subject>flood</subject><subject>flood monitoring</subject><subject>Flow characteristics</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>River discharge</subject><subject>river sound</subject><subject>river stage</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>sonohydrograph</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Storm Ciara</subject><subject>Storm Dennis</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCtYp-CcUfPGlMz-apvFNx3TCQEH3HJL0Oju3piatsv_e1PkqeTjCfbg7vghdEjwlGNMbCN2UEymPUEKwLDJZMnGMEkykyCRj4hSdhbDBmJC8lAla3Gtjtk27To137iPtXdq_D20F3g0h_ryHtr9NV2EkwcXOSHaubWIv9c0X-DT0eg3n6KTW2wAXf3WCVg_zt9kiWz4_Ps3ulplmHMtMECagKEQhLM1zWus8HlaSOj5aM2MLQ4CA5daWxmqorK54bSTjUtuKmpxN0NVhbufd5wChVxs3-DauVJQLSSXNOY7q-qCsdyF4qFXnm532e0WwGnNSMSc15hRpdqDfzRb2_zo1f3359T-jh2oC</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Osborne, Wm. Alexander</creator><creator>Hodge, Rebecca A.</creator><creator>Love, Gordon D.</creator><creator>Hawkin, Peter</creator><creator>Hawkin, Ruth E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-8102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-8949</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-9434</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Babbling brook to thunderous torrent: Using sound to monitor river stage</title><author>Osborne, Wm. Alexander ; Hodge, Rebecca A. ; Love, Gordon D. ; Hawkin, Peter ; Hawkin, Ruth E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3509-7137e66767c2442fa419781f1f12f3bc6b1e1ec5cc8bcaedcad5fb9359acd2b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambient noise</topic><topic>Background noise</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>FFT</topic><topic>flood</topic><topic>flood monitoring</topic><topic>Flow characteristics</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>River discharge</topic><topic>river sound</topic><topic>river stage</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>sonohydrograph</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Storm Ciara</topic><topic>Storm Dennis</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Wm. Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Gordon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkin, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkin, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osborne, Wm. Alexander</au><au>Hodge, Rebecca A.</au><au>Love, Gordon D.</au><au>Hawkin, Peter</au><au>Hawkin, Ruth E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Babbling brook to thunderous torrent: Using sound to monitor river stage</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2656</spage><epage>2670</epage><pages>2656-2670</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>The passive, ambient sound above the water from a river has previously untapped potential for determining flow characteristics such as stage. Measuring sub‐aerial sound could provide a new, efficient way to continuously monitor river stage, without the need for in‐stream infrastructure. Previous published work has suggested that there might be a relationship between sound and river stage, but the analysis has been restricted to a narrow range of flow conditions and river morphologies. We present a method to determine site suitability and the process of how to record and analyse sound. Data collected along a 500 m length of the River Washburn during July 2019 is used to determine what makes a site suitable for sound monitoring. We found that sound is controlled by roughness elements in the channel, such as a boulder or weir, which influences the sound produced. On the basis of these findings, we collect audio recordings from six sites around the northeast of England, covering a range of flow conditions and different roughness elements, since 2019. We use data from those sites collected during storms Ciara and Dennis to produce a relationship between this sound and river stage. Our analysis has shown a positive relationship between an R2 of 0.73 and 0.99 in all rivers, but requires careful site selection and data processing to achieve the best results. We introduce a filter that is capable of isolating a river's sound from other environmental sound. Future work in examining the role of these roughness elements is required to understand the full extent of this technique. By demonstrating that sound can operate as a hydrometric tool, we suggest that sound monitoring could be used to provide cost‐effective monitoring devices, either to detect relative change in a river or, after more research, a reliable stage measurement.
Imagine being beside a river, what do you hear? In this study we propose that sound can be used as an alternative method to calculate river stage and track flood peaks. The use of sound is based upon the assumption that a river gets louder as its depth increases, such as a babbling brook becoming a thunderous torrent, generating a soundscape that is dependent on river condition.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.5199</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-8102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-8949</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-9434</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-9337 |
ispartof | Earth surface processes and landforms, 2021-10, Vol.46 (13), p.2656-2670 |
issn | 0197-9337 1096-9837 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2579292450 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Ambient noise Background noise Data analysis Data processing FFT flood flood monitoring Flow characteristics Monitoring Morphology River discharge river sound river stage Rivers Roughness Site selection sonohydrograph Sound Storm Ciara Storm Dennis Storms Weirs |
title | Babbling brook to thunderous torrent: Using sound to monitor river stage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Babbling%20brook%20to%20thunderous%20torrent:%20Using%20sound%20to%20monitor%20river%20stage&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Osborne,%20Wm.%20Alexander&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2656&rft.epage=2670&rft.pages=2656-2670&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.5199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579292450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579292450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |