Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary
The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integrat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | History of political economy 2021-06, Vol.53 (3), p.551-569 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 569 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 551 |
container_title | History of political economy |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Szántay, Antal |
description | The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1215/00182702-8993400 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578715823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578715823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ed8c5059dfc9ec2ba8be00be76dd8a380b970ec7bd903d5c5bb32eb0f73f5fcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqGwM0ZiNn1t17U9oggIUhELzJY_21RNUuxk6L8nUct0w53uTg9CjwSeCSV8CUAkFUCxVIqtAK5QQTgVmCiirlEx23j2b9FdznsAUCu-LtCyMm1I5tDktmy6ctiFsjY22zFty8--M8ntTqXpfFmP3dak0z26ieaQw8NFF-jn7fW7qvHm6_2jetlgR6UacPDSceDKR6eCo9ZIGwBsEGvvpWESrBIQnLBeAfPccWsZDRaiYJFH59kCPZ17j6n_HUMe9L4fUzdNasqFFIRLyqYUnFMu9TmnEPUxNe10UxPQMxb9j0VfsLA_xnxUaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578715823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Szántay, Antal</creator><creatorcontrib>Szántay, Antal</creatorcontrib><description>The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1919</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/00182702-8993400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: Duke University Press, NC & IL</publisher><subject>17th century ; 18th century ; Bureaucracy ; Central government ; Centralization ; Higher education ; Institutionalization ; Monarchy ; Public administration ; Reforms ; Regulation ; Succession ; Taxation ; Uniformity</subject><ispartof>History of political economy, 2021-06, Vol.53 (3), p.551-569</ispartof><rights>Copyright Duke University Press, NC & IL Jun 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ed8c5059dfc9ec2ba8be00be76dd8a380b970ec7bd903d5c5bb32eb0f73f5fcd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szántay, Antal</creatorcontrib><title>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</title><title>History of political economy</title><description>The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.</description><subject>17th century</subject><subject>18th century</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Monarchy</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Succession</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Uniformity</subject><issn>0018-2702</issn><issn>1527-1919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqGwM0ZiNn1t17U9oggIUhELzJY_21RNUuxk6L8nUct0w53uTg9CjwSeCSV8CUAkFUCxVIqtAK5QQTgVmCiirlEx23j2b9FdznsAUCu-LtCyMm1I5tDktmy6ctiFsjY22zFty8--M8ntTqXpfFmP3dak0z26ieaQw8NFF-jn7fW7qvHm6_2jetlgR6UacPDSceDKR6eCo9ZIGwBsEGvvpWESrBIQnLBeAfPccWsZDRaiYJFH59kCPZ17j6n_HUMe9L4fUzdNasqFFIRLyqYUnFMu9TmnEPUxNe10UxPQMxb9j0VfsLA_xnxUaw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Szántay, Antal</creator><general>Duke University Press, NC & IL</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</title><author>Szántay, Antal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ed8c5059dfc9ec2ba8be00be76dd8a380b970ec7bd903d5c5bb32eb0f73f5fcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>17th century</topic><topic>18th century</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Monarchy</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Succession</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Uniformity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szántay, Antal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>History of political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szántay, Antal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</atitle><jtitle>History of political economy</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>551-569</pages><issn>0018-2702</issn><eissn>1527-1919</eissn><abstract>The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>Duke University Press, NC & IL</pub><doi>10.1215/00182702-8993400</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-2702 |
ispartof | History of political economy, 2021-06, Vol.53 (3), p.551-569 |
issn | 0018-2702 1527-1919 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2578715823 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete |
subjects | 17th century 18th century Bureaucracy Central government Centralization Higher education Institutionalization Monarchy Public administration Reforms Regulation Succession Taxation Uniformity |
title | Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cameralism%20in%20the%20Habsburg%20Monarchy%20and%20Hungary&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20political%20economy&rft.au=Sz%C3%A1ntay,%20Antal&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=551-569&rft.issn=0018-2702&rft.eissn=1527-1919&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/00182702-8993400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578715823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578715823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |