Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary

The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integrat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:History of political economy 2021-06, Vol.53 (3), p.551-569
1. Verfasser: Szántay, Antal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 569
container_issue 3
container_start_page 551
container_title History of political economy
container_volume 53
creator Szántay, Antal
description The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.
doi_str_mv 10.1215/00182702-8993400
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578715823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578715823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ed8c5059dfc9ec2ba8be00be76dd8a380b970ec7bd903d5c5bb32eb0f73f5fcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqGwM0ZiNn1t17U9oggIUhELzJY_21RNUuxk6L8nUct0w53uTg9CjwSeCSV8CUAkFUCxVIqtAK5QQTgVmCiirlEx23j2b9FdznsAUCu-LtCyMm1I5tDktmy6ctiFsjY22zFty8--M8ntTqXpfFmP3dak0z26ieaQw8NFF-jn7fW7qvHm6_2jetlgR6UacPDSceDKR6eCo9ZIGwBsEGvvpWESrBIQnLBeAfPccWsZDRaiYJFH59kCPZ17j6n_HUMe9L4fUzdNasqFFIRLyqYUnFMu9TmnEPUxNe10UxPQMxb9j0VfsLA_xnxUaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578715823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Szántay, Antal</creator><creatorcontrib>Szántay, Antal</creatorcontrib><description>The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1919</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/00182702-8993400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: Duke University Press, NC &amp; IL</publisher><subject>17th century ; 18th century ; Bureaucracy ; Central government ; Centralization ; Higher education ; Institutionalization ; Monarchy ; Public administration ; Reforms ; Regulation ; Succession ; Taxation ; Uniformity</subject><ispartof>History of political economy, 2021-06, Vol.53 (3), p.551-569</ispartof><rights>Copyright Duke University Press, NC &amp; IL Jun 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ed8c5059dfc9ec2ba8be00be76dd8a380b970ec7bd903d5c5bb32eb0f73f5fcd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szántay, Antal</creatorcontrib><title>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</title><title>History of political economy</title><description>The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.</description><subject>17th century</subject><subject>18th century</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Monarchy</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Succession</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Uniformity</subject><issn>0018-2702</issn><issn>1527-1919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqGwM0ZiNn1t17U9oggIUhELzJY_21RNUuxk6L8nUct0w53uTg9CjwSeCSV8CUAkFUCxVIqtAK5QQTgVmCiirlEx23j2b9FdznsAUCu-LtCyMm1I5tDktmy6ctiFsjY22zFty8--M8ntTqXpfFmP3dak0z26ieaQw8NFF-jn7fW7qvHm6_2jetlgR6UacPDSceDKR6eCo9ZIGwBsEGvvpWESrBIQnLBeAfPccWsZDRaiYJFH59kCPZ17j6n_HUMe9L4fUzdNasqFFIRLyqYUnFMu9TmnEPUxNe10UxPQMxb9j0VfsLA_xnxUaw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Szántay, Antal</creator><general>Duke University Press, NC &amp; IL</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</title><author>Szántay, Antal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ed8c5059dfc9ec2ba8be00be76dd8a380b970ec7bd903d5c5bb32eb0f73f5fcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>17th century</topic><topic>18th century</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Monarchy</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Succession</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Uniformity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szántay, Antal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>History of political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szántay, Antal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary</atitle><jtitle>History of political economy</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>551-569</pages><issn>0018-2702</issn><eissn>1527-1919</eissn><abstract>The article argues that Cameralism and the Habsburg Monarchy were in strong mutual interchange during the eighteenth century. After the Great Turkish War and the War of the Spanish Succession, the Habsburg Monarchy had to incorporate vast territories into the monarchy’s governmental system. Integration, unification, and centralization were on the agenda. Viennese government circles relied on Cameralism as the leading theory of state, economy, and society, while Cameralism rose, broadened, and became institutionalized in administration and higher education. The most important works of late-seventeenth-century Cameralism were formulated in the service of Emperor Leopold I. Cameralism with different branches of knowledge serviceable for the state became fully institutionalized in the higher education in the Habsburg Monarchy—including Hungary. Cameralism, specifically the ideas of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, can be linked to the fundamental administrative reforms of Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz under Maria Theresa in the 1740s and of Emperor Joseph II in the 1780s. Justi developed an idea of government characterized by centralization, uniformity, and bureaucracy, which became a priority goal of Joseph II’s reforms. Finally, Cameralism was the backbone of policies in finances, taxation, and trade regulations though more openminded toward rising economic ideas.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>Duke University Press, NC &amp; IL</pub><doi>10.1215/00182702-8993400</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-2702
ispartof History of political economy, 2021-06, Vol.53 (3), p.551-569
issn 0018-2702
1527-1919
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2578715823
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete
subjects 17th century
18th century
Bureaucracy
Central government
Centralization
Higher education
Institutionalization
Monarchy
Public administration
Reforms
Regulation
Succession
Taxation
Uniformity
title Cameralism in the Habsburg Monarchy and Hungary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cameralism%20in%20the%20Habsburg%20Monarchy%20and%20Hungary&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20political%20economy&rft.au=Sz%C3%A1ntay,%20Antal&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=551-569&rft.issn=0018-2702&rft.eissn=1527-1919&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/00182702-8993400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578715823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578715823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true