Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy

In the process of rapid urbanization, rural areas have undergone substantial transformations. Although changes from the internal villages, rural actors as masters of the village respond to the implementation of top-down policy and planning passively. It results in the village short of vitality and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2021-09, Vol.108, p.105545, Article 105545
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Yongyuan, Shui, Wei, Li, Zhipan, Huang, Shan, Wu, Kexin, Sun, Xiaorui, Liang, Jingchen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105545
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 108
creator Lin, Yongyuan
Shui, Wei
Li, Zhipan
Huang, Shan
Wu, Kexin
Sun, Xiaorui
Liang, Jingchen
description In the process of rapid urbanization, rural areas have undergone substantial transformations. Although changes from the internal villages, rural actors as masters of the village respond to the implementation of top-down policy and planning passively. It results in the village short of vitality and cohesion and the mismatch between policy and actual situations. It is necessary to incorporate ecosystem services knowledge into the village planning and policy-making in order to provide more supports for the implementation of local government policies. This article proposes a process for interactive participation to optimize green space in the peri-urban village from the demand-side perspective. In this contribution, rural stakeholders’ interactive participation can make green infrastructure optimization more impartial. In addition, cultural squares play an important role in strolling outwards, fitness, and being close to nature, as well as promoting recreation. Both higher access frequency and closer distance from home to the green infrastructure generate climatic benefits, community and social benefits, and place attachment. We propose that village planning should include infrastructure sector planning in the high-density villages with bottom-up interactive participation and a top-down rural homestead system. It is an important way to make land use policy and realize rural revitalization and transformation in similar human settlements in the world. [Display omitted] •A process for interactive participation including public stakeholders to prioritize land use in peri-urban areas was proposed.•Hydrophilic areas including coastal parks have the more social value for ecosystem services.•Impartial configuration of green infrastructure is an important way for rural vitality.•Case study of participatory mapping methods is an exploratory technology demonstration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105545
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2577528663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837721002684</els_id><sourcerecordid>2577528663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-71e5e77be591da77c503dbc044b0da1b75ef3a19142c95ac66dd3c13ad11ba0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFPwyAUhYnRxDn9DyQ-d0Ip0Pqmi84lM77oM6FAJ00HFeiS-etFZ-KjTze595zz5R4AIEYLjDC76ReDdHqKZvTDokQlzmtKK3oCZrjmpKCcVqdghkpWFTXh_BxcxNgjhFiDyxl4XgVjHIyjVAb6Mdmd_ZTJegc7H2CYghzg3iY52HS4hWsX7fY9xZ_jmMHOui3MfJjpVh0uwVknh2iufuccvD0-vC6fis3Lar282xSKVCwVHBtqOG8NbbCWnCuKiG4VqqoWaYlbTk1HJG5wVaqGSsWY1kRhIjXGrUSSzMH1MXcM_mMyMYneT8FlpCgp57SsGSNZVR9VKvgYg-nEGOxOhoPASHyXJ3rxV574Lk8cy8vW-6PV5C_21gQRlTVOGW2DUUlob_8P-QIk3X5p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577528663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Lin, Yongyuan ; Shui, Wei ; Li, Zhipan ; Huang, Shan ; Wu, Kexin ; Sun, Xiaorui ; Liang, Jingchen</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yongyuan ; Shui, Wei ; Li, Zhipan ; Huang, Shan ; Wu, Kexin ; Sun, Xiaorui ; Liang, Jingchen</creatorcontrib><description>In the process of rapid urbanization, rural areas have undergone substantial transformations. Although changes from the internal villages, rural actors as masters of the village respond to the implementation of top-down policy and planning passively. It results in the village short of vitality and cohesion and the mismatch between policy and actual situations. It is necessary to incorporate ecosystem services knowledge into the village planning and policy-making in order to provide more supports for the implementation of local government policies. This article proposes a process for interactive participation to optimize green space in the peri-urban village from the demand-side perspective. In this contribution, rural stakeholders’ interactive participation can make green infrastructure optimization more impartial. In addition, cultural squares play an important role in strolling outwards, fitness, and being close to nature, as well as promoting recreation. Both higher access frequency and closer distance from home to the green infrastructure generate climatic benefits, community and social benefits, and place attachment. We propose that village planning should include infrastructure sector planning in the high-density villages with bottom-up interactive participation and a top-down rural homestead system. It is an important way to make land use policy and realize rural revitalization and transformation in similar human settlements in the world. [Display omitted] •A process for interactive participation including public stakeholders to prioritize land use in peri-urban areas was proposed.•Hydrophilic areas including coastal parks have the more social value for ecosystem services.•Impartial configuration of green infrastructure is an important way for rural vitality.•Case study of participatory mapping methods is an exploratory technology demonstration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ecosystem services ; Green infrastructure ; High density ; Human settlements ; Infrastructure ; Land use ; Local government ; Optimization ; Participation ; Participatory mapping ; Peri-urban ; Planning ; Policy and planning ; Policy making ; Public policy ; Recreation ; Regeneration ; Residential density ; Rural areas ; Rural land policy ; Rural land use ; Social interactions ; Urbanization ; Village planning ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2021-09, Vol.108, p.105545, Article 105545</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-71e5e77be591da77c503dbc044b0da1b75ef3a19142c95ac66dd3c13ad11ba0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-71e5e77be591da77c503dbc044b0da1b75ef3a19142c95ac66dd3c13ad11ba0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105545$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shui, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhipan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Kexin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Xiaorui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jingchen</creatorcontrib><title>Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>In the process of rapid urbanization, rural areas have undergone substantial transformations. Although changes from the internal villages, rural actors as masters of the village respond to the implementation of top-down policy and planning passively. It results in the village short of vitality and cohesion and the mismatch between policy and actual situations. It is necessary to incorporate ecosystem services knowledge into the village planning and policy-making in order to provide more supports for the implementation of local government policies. This article proposes a process for interactive participation to optimize green space in the peri-urban village from the demand-side perspective. In this contribution, rural stakeholders’ interactive participation can make green infrastructure optimization more impartial. In addition, cultural squares play an important role in strolling outwards, fitness, and being close to nature, as well as promoting recreation. Both higher access frequency and closer distance from home to the green infrastructure generate climatic benefits, community and social benefits, and place attachment. We propose that village planning should include infrastructure sector planning in the high-density villages with bottom-up interactive participation and a top-down rural homestead system. It is an important way to make land use policy and realize rural revitalization and transformation in similar human settlements in the world. [Display omitted] •A process for interactive participation including public stakeholders to prioritize land use in peri-urban areas was proposed.•Hydrophilic areas including coastal parks have the more social value for ecosystem services.•Impartial configuration of green infrastructure is an important way for rural vitality.•Case study of participatory mapping methods is an exploratory technology demonstration.</description><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Green infrastructure</subject><subject>High density</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Participatory mapping</subject><subject>Peri-urban</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Policy and planning</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Residential density</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural land policy</subject><subject>Rural land use</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Village planning</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFPwyAUhYnRxDn9DyQ-d0Ip0Pqmi84lM77oM6FAJ00HFeiS-etFZ-KjTze595zz5R4AIEYLjDC76ReDdHqKZvTDokQlzmtKK3oCZrjmpKCcVqdghkpWFTXh_BxcxNgjhFiDyxl4XgVjHIyjVAb6Mdmd_ZTJegc7H2CYghzg3iY52HS4hWsX7fY9xZ_jmMHOui3MfJjpVh0uwVknh2iufuccvD0-vC6fis3Lar282xSKVCwVHBtqOG8NbbCWnCuKiG4VqqoWaYlbTk1HJG5wVaqGSsWY1kRhIjXGrUSSzMH1MXcM_mMyMYneT8FlpCgp57SsGSNZVR9VKvgYg-nEGOxOhoPASHyXJ3rxV574Lk8cy8vW-6PV5C_21gQRlTVOGW2DUUlob_8P-QIk3X5p</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Lin, Yongyuan</creator><creator>Shui, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Zhipan</creator><creator>Huang, Shan</creator><creator>Wu, Kexin</creator><creator>Sun, Xiaorui</creator><creator>Liang, Jingchen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy</title><author>Lin, Yongyuan ; Shui, Wei ; Li, Zhipan ; Huang, Shan ; Wu, Kexin ; Sun, Xiaorui ; Liang, Jingchen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-71e5e77be591da77c503dbc044b0da1b75ef3a19142c95ac66dd3c13ad11ba0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Green infrastructure</topic><topic>High density</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Participatory mapping</topic><topic>Peri-urban</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Policy and planning</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Residential density</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural land policy</topic><topic>Rural land use</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Village planning</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shui, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhipan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Kexin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Xiaorui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jingchen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Yongyuan</au><au>Shui, Wei</au><au>Li, Zhipan</au><au>Huang, Shan</au><au>Wu, Kexin</au><au>Sun, Xiaorui</au><au>Liang, Jingchen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>105545</spage><pages>105545-</pages><artnum>105545</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>In the process of rapid urbanization, rural areas have undergone substantial transformations. Although changes from the internal villages, rural actors as masters of the village respond to the implementation of top-down policy and planning passively. It results in the village short of vitality and cohesion and the mismatch between policy and actual situations. It is necessary to incorporate ecosystem services knowledge into the village planning and policy-making in order to provide more supports for the implementation of local government policies. This article proposes a process for interactive participation to optimize green space in the peri-urban village from the demand-side perspective. In this contribution, rural stakeholders’ interactive participation can make green infrastructure optimization more impartial. In addition, cultural squares play an important role in strolling outwards, fitness, and being close to nature, as well as promoting recreation. Both higher access frequency and closer distance from home to the green infrastructure generate climatic benefits, community and social benefits, and place attachment. We propose that village planning should include infrastructure sector planning in the high-density villages with bottom-up interactive participation and a top-down rural homestead system. It is an important way to make land use policy and realize rural revitalization and transformation in similar human settlements in the world. [Display omitted] •A process for interactive participation including public stakeholders to prioritize land use in peri-urban areas was proposed.•Hydrophilic areas including coastal parks have the more social value for ecosystem services.•Impartial configuration of green infrastructure is an important way for rural vitality.•Case study of participatory mapping methods is an exploratory technology demonstration.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105545</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2021-09, Vol.108, p.105545, Article 105545
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2577528663
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Ecosystem services
Green infrastructure
High density
Human settlements
Infrastructure
Land use
Local government
Optimization
Participation
Participatory mapping
Peri-urban
Planning
Policy and planning
Policy making
Public policy
Recreation
Regeneration
Residential density
Rural areas
Rural land policy
Rural land use
Social interactions
Urbanization
Village planning
Villages
title Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Green%20space%20optimization%20for%20rural%20vitality:%20Insights%20for%20planning%20and%20policy&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Lin,%20Yongyuan&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=105545&rft.pages=105545-&rft.artnum=105545&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2577528663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577528663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837721002684&rfr_iscdi=true