In vitro biomechanical comparison of clamped suture knot techniques as a model of extra-capsular stabilization of canine cruciate ligament repair

Six clamped suture knot techniques were compared to identify the effects on the biomechanic properties used as a model of extra-capsular stabilization. Six clamped suture knot techniques included square knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-TM), non-toothed mosqui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wētchasān sattawaphāet 2021-09, Vol.51 (3), p.423-429
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jung-Jin, Kim, Mu-Young, Yoon, Hun-Young
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 429
container_issue 3
container_start_page 423
container_title Wētchasān sattawaphāet
container_volume 51
creator Lee, Jung-Jin
Kim, Mu-Young
Yoon, Hun-Young
description Six clamped suture knot techniques were compared to identify the effects on the biomechanic properties used as a model of extra-capsular stabilization. Six clamped suture knot techniques included square knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-NTM), or needle holder (SQ-NH) and surgeon's knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SG-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SG-NTM), or needle holder (SG-NH). Monotonic loading test was performed on each suture-loop. Initial loop tension, ultimate load, load at 3 mm elongation, elongation at failure, stiffness, and failure mode were compared among techniques. Clamping with NTM or NH achieved greater initial loop tension than clamping with TM when tying SQ (P < 0.05), whereas clamping with NH led to more loosening of the loops than clamping with NTM when tying SG (P < 0.05). SG-NTM had the highest ultimate load (P < 0.05). In failure mode, the possibility of knot slippage was six times more likely to occur in SQ than SG (P < 0.05). In conclusion, SG resulted in less knot slippage and NTM was able to maintain initial loop tension more effectively. SG-NTM technique is expected to show less risk of suture failure and better clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.14456/tjvm.2021.53
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2576699850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576699850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-d0b249e1265222540e5d13901e35464c7538e77c974c70a2730ddbc8c86ec5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01Lw0AYhPegYKk9el_wnLrfSY5S_CgUvOi5vNm81Y3JbtzdFPFf-I9NsTAwc3iYYQi54WzNldLmLnfHYS2Y4GstL8iCcaELo2p-RVYpdYwxzrRiUizI79bTo8sx0MaFAe0HeGehpzYMI0SXgqfhQG0Pw4gtTVOeItJPHzLNM-zd14SJwiw6hBb7E4zfOUJhYUxTD5GmDI3r3Q9kdy6bJzxSGyfrICPt3TsM6DONOIKL1-TyAH3C1dmX5O3x4XXzXOxenrab-10x8krmomWNUDVyYbQQYn6DuuWyZhylVkbZUssKy9LW5ZwZiFKytm1sZSuDVlsml-T2v3eM4fQi77swRT9P7oUujanrSjP5B48AaCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576699850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro biomechanical comparison of clamped suture knot techniques as a model of extra-capsular stabilization of canine cruciate ligament repair</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lee, Jung-Jin ; Kim, Mu-Young ; Yoon, Hun-Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung-Jin ; Kim, Mu-Young ; Yoon, Hun-Young</creatorcontrib><description>Six clamped suture knot techniques were compared to identify the effects on the biomechanic properties used as a model of extra-capsular stabilization. Six clamped suture knot techniques included square knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-NTM), or needle holder (SQ-NH) and surgeon's knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SG-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SG-NTM), or needle holder (SG-NH). Monotonic loading test was performed on each suture-loop. Initial loop tension, ultimate load, load at 3 mm elongation, elongation at failure, stiffness, and failure mode were compared among techniques. Clamping with NTM or NH achieved greater initial loop tension than clamping with TM when tying SQ (P &lt; 0.05), whereas clamping with NH led to more loosening of the loops than clamping with NTM when tying SG (P &lt; 0.05). SG-NTM had the highest ultimate load (P &lt; 0.05). In failure mode, the possibility of knot slippage was six times more likely to occur in SQ than SG (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, SG resulted in less knot slippage and NTM was able to maintain initial loop tension more effectively. SG-NTM technique is expected to show less risk of suture failure and better clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0125-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14456/tjvm.2021.53</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Veterinary Science</publisher><subject>Elongation ; Mechanical properties ; Mosquitoes ; Orthopedics ; Polyesters ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Surgeons ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Wētchasān sattawaphāet, 2021-09, Vol.51 (3), p.423-429</ispartof><rights>Copyright Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Veterinary Science Sep 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Mu-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Hun-Young</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro biomechanical comparison of clamped suture knot techniques as a model of extra-capsular stabilization of canine cruciate ligament repair</title><title>Wētchasān sattawaphāet</title><description>Six clamped suture knot techniques were compared to identify the effects on the biomechanic properties used as a model of extra-capsular stabilization. Six clamped suture knot techniques included square knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-NTM), or needle holder (SQ-NH) and surgeon's knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SG-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SG-NTM), or needle holder (SG-NH). Monotonic loading test was performed on each suture-loop. Initial loop tension, ultimate load, load at 3 mm elongation, elongation at failure, stiffness, and failure mode were compared among techniques. Clamping with NTM or NH achieved greater initial loop tension than clamping with TM when tying SQ (P &lt; 0.05), whereas clamping with NH led to more loosening of the loops than clamping with NTM when tying SG (P &lt; 0.05). SG-NTM had the highest ultimate load (P &lt; 0.05). In failure mode, the possibility of knot slippage was six times more likely to occur in SQ than SG (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, SG resulted in less knot slippage and NTM was able to maintain initial loop tension more effectively. SG-NTM technique is expected to show less risk of suture failure and better clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>0125-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01Lw0AYhPegYKk9el_wnLrfSY5S_CgUvOi5vNm81Y3JbtzdFPFf-I9NsTAwc3iYYQi54WzNldLmLnfHYS2Y4GstL8iCcaELo2p-RVYpdYwxzrRiUizI79bTo8sx0MaFAe0HeGehpzYMI0SXgqfhQG0Pw4gtTVOeItJPHzLNM-zd14SJwiw6hBb7E4zfOUJhYUxTD5GmDI3r3Q9kdy6bJzxSGyfrICPt3TsM6DONOIKL1-TyAH3C1dmX5O3x4XXzXOxenrab-10x8krmomWNUDVyYbQQYn6DuuWyZhylVkbZUssKy9LW5ZwZiFKytm1sZSuDVlsml-T2v3eM4fQi77swRT9P7oUujanrSjP5B48AaCU</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Lee, Jung-Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Mu-Young</creator><creator>Yoon, Hun-Young</creator><general>Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Veterinary Science</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>In vitro biomechanical comparison of clamped suture knot techniques as a model of extra-capsular stabilization of canine cruciate ligament repair</title><author>Lee, Jung-Jin ; Kim, Mu-Young ; Yoon, Hun-Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-d0b249e1265222540e5d13901e35464c7538e77c974c70a2730ddbc8c86ec5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Mu-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Hun-Young</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Wētchasān sattawaphāet</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jung-Jin</au><au>Kim, Mu-Young</au><au>Yoon, Hun-Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro biomechanical comparison of clamped suture knot techniques as a model of extra-capsular stabilization of canine cruciate ligament repair</atitle><jtitle>Wētchasān sattawaphāet</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>423-429</pages><issn>0125-6491</issn><abstract>Six clamped suture knot techniques were compared to identify the effects on the biomechanic properties used as a model of extra-capsular stabilization. Six clamped suture knot techniques included square knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SQ-NTM), or needle holder (SQ-NH) and surgeon's knot formed by clamping the first throw with toothed mosquito forceps (SG-TM), non-toothed mosquito forceps (SG-NTM), or needle holder (SG-NH). Monotonic loading test was performed on each suture-loop. Initial loop tension, ultimate load, load at 3 mm elongation, elongation at failure, stiffness, and failure mode were compared among techniques. Clamping with NTM or NH achieved greater initial loop tension than clamping with TM when tying SQ (P &lt; 0.05), whereas clamping with NH led to more loosening of the loops than clamping with NTM when tying SG (P &lt; 0.05). SG-NTM had the highest ultimate load (P &lt; 0.05). In failure mode, the possibility of knot slippage was six times more likely to occur in SQ than SG (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, SG resulted in less knot slippage and NTM was able to maintain initial loop tension more effectively. SG-NTM technique is expected to show less risk of suture failure and better clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>Bangkok</cop><pub>Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Veterinary Science</pub><doi>10.14456/tjvm.2021.53</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0125-6491
ispartof Wētchasān sattawaphāet, 2021-09, Vol.51 (3), p.423-429
issn 0125-6491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2576699850
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Elongation
Mechanical properties
Mosquitoes
Orthopedics
Polyesters
Software
Statistical analysis
Surgeons
Sutures
title In vitro biomechanical comparison of clamped suture knot techniques as a model of extra-capsular stabilization of canine cruciate ligament repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A02%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20biomechanical%20comparison%20of%20clamped%20suture%20knot%20techniques%20as%20a%20model%20of%20extra-capsular%20stabilization%20of%20canine%20cruciate%20ligament%20repair&rft.jtitle=W%C4%93tchas%C4%81n%20sattawaph%C4%81et&rft.au=Lee,%20Jung-Jin&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=423-429&rft.issn=0125-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.14456/tjvm.2021.53&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2576699850%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576699850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true