Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence

ShakeMap is the tool to evaluate the ground motion effect of earthquakes in vast areas. It is useful to delimit the zones where the shaking is expected to have been most significant, for civil defense rapid response. From the earthquake engineering point of view, it can be used to infer the seismic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2021-10, Vol.19 (13), p.5391-5414
Hauptverfasser: Iervolino, Iunio, Cito, Pasquale, Felicetta, Chiara, Lanzano, Giovanni, Vitale, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5414
container_issue 13
container_start_page 5391
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 19
creator Iervolino, Iunio
Cito, Pasquale
Felicetta, Chiara
Lanzano, Giovanni
Vitale, Antonio
description ShakeMap is the tool to evaluate the ground motion effect of earthquakes in vast areas. It is useful to delimit the zones where the shaking is expected to have been most significant, for civil defense rapid response. From the earthquake engineering point of view, it can be used to infer the seismic actions on the built environment to calibrate vulnerability models or to define the reconstruction policies based on observed damage vs shaking. In the case of long-lasting seismic sequences, it can be useful to develop ShakeMap envelopes, that is, maps of the largest ground intensity among those from the ShakeMap of (selected) events of a seismic sequence, to delimit areas where the effects of the whole sequence have been of structural engineering relevance. This study introduces ShakeMap envelopes and discusses them for the central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. The specific goals of the study are: (i) to compare the envelopes and the ShakeMap of the main events of the sequence to make the case for sequence-based maps; (ii) to quantify the exceedance of design seismic actions based on the envelopes; (iii) to make envelopes available for further studies and the reconstruction planning; (iv) to gather insights on the (repeated) exceedance of design seismic actions at some sites. Results, which include considerations of uncertainty in ShakeMap, show that the sequence caused exceedance of design hazard in thousands of square kilometers. The most relevant effects of the sequence are, as expected, due to the mainshock, yet seismic actions larger than those enforced by the code for structural design are found also around the epicenters of the smaller magnitude events. At some locations, the succession of ground-shaking that has excited structures, provides insights on structural damage accumulation that has likely taken place; something that is not accounted for explicitly in modern seismic design. The envelopes developed are available as supplemental material.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-021-01192-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575666765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575666765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-e3df5b59b7fc91f96ac46e999660c53665ea672a432770a3a2e94ed1770a26d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqVwAVaWWBv8iO2aHaoKVCpiAUjsLDeZtClpEuyAaFdwBm7ISXAbEDtWY8_8D-lD6JjRU0apPguMSjYglDNCGTOcrHdQj0ktCEuk2t2-KdGKPe6jgxAWlHKpDe2hj9FbCpC5KgVc5ziDUMwq7NK2qKuAiwpDU6RQtd6V2Hlw4Twuo2beBpz7eonbOeC7uXuCG9dgqF6hrBuIt9pvT5wy9fX-GYfGvznj1pUrHOD5BWLtIdrLXRng6Gf20cPl6H54TSa3V-PhxYQ4MVAtAZHlcirNVOepYblRLk0UGGOUoqkUSklwSnOXCK41dcJxMAlkbPPhKhOij0663MbXsTm0dlG_-CpW2shCKqW0klHFO1Xq6xA85LbxxdL5lWXUblDbDrWNqO0WtV1Hk-hMIYqrGfi_6H9c3yvSgtk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575666765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Iervolino, Iunio ; Cito, Pasquale ; Felicetta, Chiara ; Lanzano, Giovanni ; Vitale, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, Iunio ; Cito, Pasquale ; Felicetta, Chiara ; Lanzano, Giovanni ; Vitale, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>ShakeMap is the tool to evaluate the ground motion effect of earthquakes in vast areas. It is useful to delimit the zones where the shaking is expected to have been most significant, for civil defense rapid response. From the earthquake engineering point of view, it can be used to infer the seismic actions on the built environment to calibrate vulnerability models or to define the reconstruction policies based on observed damage vs shaking. In the case of long-lasting seismic sequences, it can be useful to develop ShakeMap envelopes, that is, maps of the largest ground intensity among those from the ShakeMap of (selected) events of a seismic sequence, to delimit areas where the effects of the whole sequence have been of structural engineering relevance. This study introduces ShakeMap envelopes and discusses them for the central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. The specific goals of the study are: (i) to compare the envelopes and the ShakeMap of the main events of the sequence to make the case for sequence-based maps; (ii) to quantify the exceedance of design seismic actions based on the envelopes; (iii) to make envelopes available for further studies and the reconstruction planning; (iv) to gather insights on the (repeated) exceedance of design seismic actions at some sites. Results, which include considerations of uncertainty in ShakeMap, show that the sequence caused exceedance of design hazard in thousands of square kilometers. The most relevant effects of the sequence are, as expected, due to the mainshock, yet seismic actions larger than those enforced by the code for structural design are found also around the epicenters of the smaller magnitude events. At some locations, the succession of ground-shaking that has excited structures, provides insights on structural damage accumulation that has likely taken place; something that is not accounted for explicitly in modern seismic design. The envelopes developed are available as supplemental material.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01192-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Built environment ; Civil defense ; Civil Engineering ; Damage accumulation ; Design ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake engineering ; Earthquakes ; Envelopes ; Environment models ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Motion effects ; Original Article ; Reconstruction ; Seismic activity ; Seismic design ; Seismic engineering ; Sequencing ; Shaking ; Structural damage ; Structural design ; Structural engineering ; Structural Geology ; Urban environments ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-10, Vol.19 (13), p.5391-5414</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-e3df5b59b7fc91f96ac46e999660c53665ea672a432770a3a2e94ed1770a26d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-e3df5b59b7fc91f96ac46e999660c53665ea672a432770a3a2e94ed1770a26d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4076-2718</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-021-01192-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-021-01192-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, Iunio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cito, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felicetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>ShakeMap is the tool to evaluate the ground motion effect of earthquakes in vast areas. It is useful to delimit the zones where the shaking is expected to have been most significant, for civil defense rapid response. From the earthquake engineering point of view, it can be used to infer the seismic actions on the built environment to calibrate vulnerability models or to define the reconstruction policies based on observed damage vs shaking. In the case of long-lasting seismic sequences, it can be useful to develop ShakeMap envelopes, that is, maps of the largest ground intensity among those from the ShakeMap of (selected) events of a seismic sequence, to delimit areas where the effects of the whole sequence have been of structural engineering relevance. This study introduces ShakeMap envelopes and discusses them for the central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. The specific goals of the study are: (i) to compare the envelopes and the ShakeMap of the main events of the sequence to make the case for sequence-based maps; (ii) to quantify the exceedance of design seismic actions based on the envelopes; (iii) to make envelopes available for further studies and the reconstruction planning; (iv) to gather insights on the (repeated) exceedance of design seismic actions at some sites. Results, which include considerations of uncertainty in ShakeMap, show that the sequence caused exceedance of design hazard in thousands of square kilometers. The most relevant effects of the sequence are, as expected, due to the mainshock, yet seismic actions larger than those enforced by the code for structural design are found also around the epicenters of the smaller magnitude events. At some locations, the succession of ground-shaking that has excited structures, provides insights on structural damage accumulation that has likely taken place; something that is not accounted for explicitly in modern seismic design. The envelopes developed are available as supplemental material.</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Civil defense</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Damage accumulation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake engineering</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Envelopes</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Motion effects</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Shaking</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>Structural design</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqVwAVaWWBv8iO2aHaoKVCpiAUjsLDeZtClpEuyAaFdwBm7ISXAbEDtWY8_8D-lD6JjRU0apPguMSjYglDNCGTOcrHdQj0ktCEuk2t2-KdGKPe6jgxAWlHKpDe2hj9FbCpC5KgVc5ziDUMwq7NK2qKuAiwpDU6RQtd6V2Hlw4Twuo2beBpz7eonbOeC7uXuCG9dgqF6hrBuIt9pvT5wy9fX-GYfGvznj1pUrHOD5BWLtIdrLXRng6Gf20cPl6H54TSa3V-PhxYQ4MVAtAZHlcirNVOepYblRLk0UGGOUoqkUSklwSnOXCK41dcJxMAlkbPPhKhOij0663MbXsTm0dlG_-CpW2shCKqW0klHFO1Xq6xA85LbxxdL5lWXUblDbDrWNqO0WtV1Hk-hMIYqrGfi_6H9c3yvSgtk</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Iervolino, Iunio</creator><creator>Cito, Pasquale</creator><creator>Felicetta, Chiara</creator><creator>Lanzano, Giovanni</creator><creator>Vitale, Antonio</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-2718</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence</title><author>Iervolino, Iunio ; Cito, Pasquale ; Felicetta, Chiara ; Lanzano, Giovanni ; Vitale, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-e3df5b59b7fc91f96ac46e999660c53665ea672a432770a3a2e94ed1770a26d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Civil defense</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Damage accumulation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake engineering</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Envelopes</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Motion effects</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Shaking</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>Structural design</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, Iunio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cito, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felicetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iervolino, Iunio</au><au>Cito, Pasquale</au><au>Felicetta, Chiara</au><au>Lanzano, Giovanni</au><au>Vitale, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>5391</spage><epage>5414</epage><pages>5391-5414</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>ShakeMap is the tool to evaluate the ground motion effect of earthquakes in vast areas. It is useful to delimit the zones where the shaking is expected to have been most significant, for civil defense rapid response. From the earthquake engineering point of view, it can be used to infer the seismic actions on the built environment to calibrate vulnerability models or to define the reconstruction policies based on observed damage vs shaking. In the case of long-lasting seismic sequences, it can be useful to develop ShakeMap envelopes, that is, maps of the largest ground intensity among those from the ShakeMap of (selected) events of a seismic sequence, to delimit areas where the effects of the whole sequence have been of structural engineering relevance. This study introduces ShakeMap envelopes and discusses them for the central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. The specific goals of the study are: (i) to compare the envelopes and the ShakeMap of the main events of the sequence to make the case for sequence-based maps; (ii) to quantify the exceedance of design seismic actions based on the envelopes; (iii) to make envelopes available for further studies and the reconstruction planning; (iv) to gather insights on the (repeated) exceedance of design seismic actions at some sites. Results, which include considerations of uncertainty in ShakeMap, show that the sequence caused exceedance of design hazard in thousands of square kilometers. The most relevant effects of the sequence are, as expected, due to the mainshock, yet seismic actions larger than those enforced by the code for structural design are found also around the epicenters of the smaller magnitude events. At some locations, the succession of ground-shaking that has excited structures, provides insights on structural damage accumulation that has likely taken place; something that is not accounted for explicitly in modern seismic design. The envelopes developed are available as supplemental material.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-021-01192-z</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-2718</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-10, Vol.19 (13), p.5391-5414
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2575666765
source SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Built environment
Civil defense
Civil Engineering
Damage accumulation
Design
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake damage
Earthquake engineering
Earthquakes
Envelopes
Environment models
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Ground motion
Hydrogeology
Motion effects
Original Article
Reconstruction
Seismic activity
Seismic design
Seismic engineering
Sequencing
Shaking
Structural damage
Structural design
Structural engineering
Structural Geology
Urban environments
Vulnerability
title Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exceedance%20of%20design%20actions%20in%20epicentral%20areas:%20insights%20from%20the%20ShakeMap%20envelopes%20for%20the%202016%E2%80%932017%20central%20Italy%20sequence&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Iervolino,%20Iunio&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=5391&rft.epage=5414&rft.pages=5391-5414&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-021-01192-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575666765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575666765&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true