The relationship between innovation promotion processes and small business success: the role of managers’ dominance

Many studies on small businesses have pointed to the central role of the manager and to his/her status as centralized pivot for knowledge transfer and decision-making, encompassing the spheres of strategy and resource management. The present study is concerned with an issue that, to date, has receiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of managerial science 2021-10, Vol.15 (7), p.1937-1960
Hauptverfasser: Harel, Ronen, Schwartz, Dafna, Kaufmann, Dan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1960
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1937
container_title Review of managerial science
container_volume 15
creator Harel, Ronen
Schwartz, Dafna
Kaufmann, Dan
description Many studies on small businesses have pointed to the central role of the manager and to his/her status as centralized pivot for knowledge transfer and decision-making, encompassing the spheres of strategy and resource management. The present study is concerned with an issue that, to date, has received little scholarly attention: the level of manager dominance in processes of innovation promotion, and the impact of that dominance on business innovation and growth. Manager dominance levels in innovation management are assessed in terms of dominance in implementing internal processes of collaboration and knowledge transfer, and in creating an organizational culture that promotes innovation, as well as in terms of manager involvement in the business’s processes of engagement with external entities through the utilization of open innovation tools. The empirical study encompassed a sample of 202 small businesses in various industry sectors. The research methodology was a structured, face-to-face interview conducted with the business manager. The study findings indicate, as expected, that manager dominance in innovation promotion processes is exceedingly high. However, contrary to expectations, it was found that manager dominance level has no effect on the business’s level of innovation for any of the four innovation types—product, process, marketing, and organization—or on the business’s growth rate. These findings may indicate that small business managers have not adjusted their managerial practices to reflect market changes in which innovation is becoming the leading factor in success and growth. They appear to view innovation activity as part of their managerial tasks and they maintain their dominance as in the past, when small businesses focused mainly on achieving operational efficiency. High managerial dominance appears not to guarantee success; in order to promote innovation in small businesses and ensure their growth, other factors are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11846-020-00409-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575656569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575656569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-70920a1a94d44f2909719777a7318d14efc988ad0c5bd5b8ce9fc3113ae07dbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO5TAMRSs0SDDAD7CKxLpgt2nTsEMIZpCQ2MA6SlMXitrkUbc8sZvf4Pf4EvIoDDuURSz73mvrJMkhwjECqBNGrGSZQgYpgASdrreSXazKPC1Ljb_-11W-k_xmfgQoM5RyN5lvH0iM1NupC54fupWoaVoTedF5H54_2mI1hiF8VY6YiYX1jeDB9r2oZ-58bAqe3WZ4KqZNZuhJhFYM1tt7Gvnt36towtB56x3tJ9ut7ZkOPv-95O7y4vb8b3p98-fq_Ow6dTIrplSBzsCi1bKRss00aIVaKWVVjlWDklqnq8o24Iq6KerKkW5djphbAtXUdb6XHC258e6nmXgyj2EefVxpskIV5ebpqMoWlRsD80itWY3dYMcXg2A2eM2C10S85gOvWUeTWEzkgu_42xLvwxIlYJTki4Tj0EcI39t_CH4HrBaLsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575656569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between innovation promotion processes and small business success: the role of managers’ dominance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Harel, Ronen ; Schwartz, Dafna ; Kaufmann, Dan</creator><creatorcontrib>Harel, Ronen ; Schwartz, Dafna ; Kaufmann, Dan</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies on small businesses have pointed to the central role of the manager and to his/her status as centralized pivot for knowledge transfer and decision-making, encompassing the spheres of strategy and resource management. The present study is concerned with an issue that, to date, has received little scholarly attention: the level of manager dominance in processes of innovation promotion, and the impact of that dominance on business innovation and growth. Manager dominance levels in innovation management are assessed in terms of dominance in implementing internal processes of collaboration and knowledge transfer, and in creating an organizational culture that promotes innovation, as well as in terms of manager involvement in the business’s processes of engagement with external entities through the utilization of open innovation tools. The empirical study encompassed a sample of 202 small businesses in various industry sectors. The research methodology was a structured, face-to-face interview conducted with the business manager. The study findings indicate, as expected, that manager dominance in innovation promotion processes is exceedingly high. However, contrary to expectations, it was found that manager dominance level has no effect on the business’s level of innovation for any of the four innovation types—product, process, marketing, and organization—or on the business’s growth rate. These findings may indicate that small business managers have not adjusted their managerial practices to reflect market changes in which innovation is becoming the leading factor in success and growth. They appear to view innovation activity as part of their managerial tasks and they maintain their dominance as in the past, when small businesses focused mainly on achieving operational efficiency. High managerial dominance appears not to guarantee success; in order to promote innovation in small businesses and ensure their growth, other factors are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-6683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-6691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00409-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accounting/Auditing ; Banking ; Business and Management ; Business Strategy/Leadership ; Marketing ; Original Paper ; Small business ; Success</subject><ispartof>Review of managerial science, 2021-10, Vol.15 (7), p.1937-1960</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-70920a1a94d44f2909719777a7318d14efc988ad0c5bd5b8ce9fc3113ae07dbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-70920a1a94d44f2909719777a7318d14efc988ad0c5bd5b8ce9fc3113ae07dbb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4047-2868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11846-020-00409-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-020-00409-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harel, Ronen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Dafna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Dan</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between innovation promotion processes and small business success: the role of managers’ dominance</title><title>Review of managerial science</title><addtitle>Rev Manag Sci</addtitle><description>Many studies on small businesses have pointed to the central role of the manager and to his/her status as centralized pivot for knowledge transfer and decision-making, encompassing the spheres of strategy and resource management. The present study is concerned with an issue that, to date, has received little scholarly attention: the level of manager dominance in processes of innovation promotion, and the impact of that dominance on business innovation and growth. Manager dominance levels in innovation management are assessed in terms of dominance in implementing internal processes of collaboration and knowledge transfer, and in creating an organizational culture that promotes innovation, as well as in terms of manager involvement in the business’s processes of engagement with external entities through the utilization of open innovation tools. The empirical study encompassed a sample of 202 small businesses in various industry sectors. The research methodology was a structured, face-to-face interview conducted with the business manager. The study findings indicate, as expected, that manager dominance in innovation promotion processes is exceedingly high. However, contrary to expectations, it was found that manager dominance level has no effect on the business’s level of innovation for any of the four innovation types—product, process, marketing, and organization—or on the business’s growth rate. These findings may indicate that small business managers have not adjusted their managerial practices to reflect market changes in which innovation is becoming the leading factor in success and growth. They appear to view innovation activity as part of their managerial tasks and they maintain their dominance as in the past, when small businesses focused mainly on achieving operational efficiency. High managerial dominance appears not to guarantee success; in order to promote innovation in small businesses and ensure their growth, other factors are needed.</description><subject>Accounting/Auditing</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Strategy/Leadership</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1863-6683</issn><issn>1863-6691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO5TAMRSs0SDDAD7CKxLpgt2nTsEMIZpCQ2MA6SlMXitrkUbc8sZvf4Pf4EvIoDDuURSz73mvrJMkhwjECqBNGrGSZQgYpgASdrreSXazKPC1Ljb_-11W-k_xmfgQoM5RyN5lvH0iM1NupC54fupWoaVoTedF5H54_2mI1hiF8VY6YiYX1jeDB9r2oZ-58bAqe3WZ4KqZNZuhJhFYM1tt7Gvnt36towtB56x3tJ9ut7ZkOPv-95O7y4vb8b3p98-fq_Ow6dTIrplSBzsCi1bKRss00aIVaKWVVjlWDklqnq8o24Iq6KerKkW5djphbAtXUdb6XHC258e6nmXgyj2EefVxpskIV5ebpqMoWlRsD80itWY3dYMcXg2A2eM2C10S85gOvWUeTWEzkgu_42xLvwxIlYJTki4Tj0EcI39t_CH4HrBaLsg</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Harel, Ronen</creator><creator>Schwartz, Dafna</creator><creator>Kaufmann, Dan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4047-2868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The relationship between innovation promotion processes and small business success: the role of managers’ dominance</title><author>Harel, Ronen ; Schwartz, Dafna ; Kaufmann, Dan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-70920a1a94d44f2909719777a7318d14efc988ad0c5bd5b8ce9fc3113ae07dbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accounting/Auditing</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Strategy/Leadership</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harel, Ronen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Dafna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Dan</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of managerial science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harel, Ronen</au><au>Schwartz, Dafna</au><au>Kaufmann, Dan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between innovation promotion processes and small business success: the role of managers’ dominance</atitle><jtitle>Review of managerial science</jtitle><stitle>Rev Manag Sci</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1937</spage><epage>1960</epage><pages>1937-1960</pages><issn>1863-6683</issn><eissn>1863-6691</eissn><abstract>Many studies on small businesses have pointed to the central role of the manager and to his/her status as centralized pivot for knowledge transfer and decision-making, encompassing the spheres of strategy and resource management. The present study is concerned with an issue that, to date, has received little scholarly attention: the level of manager dominance in processes of innovation promotion, and the impact of that dominance on business innovation and growth. Manager dominance levels in innovation management are assessed in terms of dominance in implementing internal processes of collaboration and knowledge transfer, and in creating an organizational culture that promotes innovation, as well as in terms of manager involvement in the business’s processes of engagement with external entities through the utilization of open innovation tools. The empirical study encompassed a sample of 202 small businesses in various industry sectors. The research methodology was a structured, face-to-face interview conducted with the business manager. The study findings indicate, as expected, that manager dominance in innovation promotion processes is exceedingly high. However, contrary to expectations, it was found that manager dominance level has no effect on the business’s level of innovation for any of the four innovation types—product, process, marketing, and organization—or on the business’s growth rate. These findings may indicate that small business managers have not adjusted their managerial practices to reflect market changes in which innovation is becoming the leading factor in success and growth. They appear to view innovation activity as part of their managerial tasks and they maintain their dominance as in the past, when small businesses focused mainly on achieving operational efficiency. High managerial dominance appears not to guarantee success; in order to promote innovation in small businesses and ensure their growth, other factors are needed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11846-020-00409-w</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4047-2868</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-6683
ispartof Review of managerial science, 2021-10, Vol.15 (7), p.1937-1960
issn 1863-6683
1863-6691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2575656569
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accounting/Auditing
Banking
Business and Management
Business Strategy/Leadership
Marketing
Original Paper
Small business
Success
title The relationship between innovation promotion processes and small business success: the role of managers’ dominance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A24%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20innovation%20promotion%20processes%20and%20small%20business%20success:%20the%20role%20of%20managers%E2%80%99%20dominance&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20managerial%20science&rft.au=Harel,%20Ronen&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1937&rft.epage=1960&rft.pages=1937-1960&rft.issn=1863-6683&rft.eissn=1863-6691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11846-020-00409-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575656569%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575656569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true