Voice in adolescents' informational writing
Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Literacy (Oxford, England) England), 2021-09, Vol.55 (3), p.191-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 200 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Literacy (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Park, Jungyoung Fang, Zhihui |
description | Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/lit.12244 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575634847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1309944</ericid><sourcerecordid>2575634847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHP4BQ8CAi22byZ5McpVStFLxUryHNZiVlu6nJSum3N3alN-cyM7wfj8dD6BrwGPJMGt-NgRDGTtAABIOC0VKdHm-Oz9FFSmuMiSwZH6CHj-CtG_l2ZKrQuGRd26W7_NchbkznQ2ua0S76zrefl-isNk1yV397iN6fZsvpS7F4e55PHxeFpaBYoUpFJauUJGwlTEVNxSnhRlgmDa5MzQ0IzgFjbKRcrUpKmYEKciILAiyhQ3Tb-25j-Pp2qdPr8B1zkKQJF7ykTDKRqfuesjGkFF2tt9FvTNxrwPq3C5270IcuMnvTsy56e-Rmr0CxUgd90us737j9_0Z6MV_2jj-UKmdF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575634847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Park, Jungyoung ; Fang, Zhihui</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Jungyoung ; Fang, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><description>Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-4350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-4369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lit.12244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; advanced literacy ; composition ; epistemic stance ; Expository Writing ; Grade 7 ; Grade 9 ; informational writing ; Language Usage ; Linguistics ; middle level writing ; Public Schools ; Rhetoric ; Statistical Analysis ; student writing ; Teenagers ; Value Judgment ; voice ; Writing ; writing pedagogy</subject><ispartof>Literacy (Oxford, England), 2021-09, Vol.55 (3), p.191-200</ispartof><rights>2021 UKLA. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 101 Station Landing, Medford, MA 02155, USA.</rights><rights>2021 UKLA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1466-680X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Flit.12244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Flit.12244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1309944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Jungyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><title>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</title><title>Literacy (Oxford, England)</title><description>Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>advanced literacy</subject><subject>composition</subject><subject>epistemic stance</subject><subject>Expository Writing</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>informational writing</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>middle level writing</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>student writing</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Value Judgment</subject><subject>voice</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>writing pedagogy</subject><issn>1741-4350</issn><issn>1741-4369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHP4BQ8CAi22byZ5McpVStFLxUryHNZiVlu6nJSum3N3alN-cyM7wfj8dD6BrwGPJMGt-NgRDGTtAABIOC0VKdHm-Oz9FFSmuMiSwZH6CHj-CtG_l2ZKrQuGRd26W7_NchbkznQ2ua0S76zrefl-isNk1yV397iN6fZsvpS7F4e55PHxeFpaBYoUpFJauUJGwlTEVNxSnhRlgmDa5MzQ0IzgFjbKRcrUpKmYEKciILAiyhQ3Tb-25j-Pp2qdPr8B1zkKQJF7ykTDKRqfuesjGkFF2tt9FvTNxrwPq3C5270IcuMnvTsy56e-Rmr0CxUgd90us737j9_0Z6MV_2jj-UKmdF</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Park, Jungyoung</creator><creator>Fang, Zhihui</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-680X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</title><author>Park, Jungyoung ; Fang, Zhihui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>advanced literacy</topic><topic>composition</topic><topic>epistemic stance</topic><topic>Expository Writing</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>informational writing</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>middle level writing</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>student writing</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Value Judgment</topic><topic>voice</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>writing pedagogy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Jungyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Literacy (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Jungyoung</au><au>Fang, Zhihui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1309944</ericid><atitle>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</atitle><jtitle>Literacy (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>191-200</pages><issn>1741-4350</issn><eissn>1741-4369</eissn><abstract>Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/lit.12244</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-680X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-4350 |
ispartof | Literacy (Oxford, England), 2021-09, Vol.55 (3), p.191-200 |
issn | 1741-4350 1741-4369 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2575634847 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescents advanced literacy composition epistemic stance Expository Writing Grade 7 Grade 9 informational writing Language Usage Linguistics middle level writing Public Schools Rhetoric Statistical Analysis student writing Teenagers Value Judgment voice Writing writing pedagogy |
title | Voice in adolescents' informational writing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A30%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voice%20in%20adolescents'%20informational%20writing&rft.jtitle=Literacy%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Park,%20Jungyoung&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=191-200&rft.issn=1741-4350&rft.eissn=1741-4369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lit.12244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575634847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575634847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1309944&rfr_iscdi=true |