Voice in adolescents' informational writing

Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Literacy (Oxford, England) England), 2021-09, Vol.55 (3), p.191-200
Hauptverfasser: Park, Jungyoung, Fang, Zhihui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue 3
container_start_page 191
container_title Literacy (Oxford, England)
container_volume 55
creator Park, Jungyoung
Fang, Zhihui
description Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/lit.12244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575634847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1309944</ericid><sourcerecordid>2575634847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHP4BQ8CAi22byZ5McpVStFLxUryHNZiVlu6nJSum3N3alN-cyM7wfj8dD6BrwGPJMGt-NgRDGTtAABIOC0VKdHm-Oz9FFSmuMiSwZH6CHj-CtG_l2ZKrQuGRd26W7_NchbkznQ2ua0S76zrefl-isNk1yV397iN6fZsvpS7F4e55PHxeFpaBYoUpFJauUJGwlTEVNxSnhRlgmDa5MzQ0IzgFjbKRcrUpKmYEKciILAiyhQ3Tb-25j-Pp2qdPr8B1zkKQJF7ykTDKRqfuesjGkFF2tt9FvTNxrwPq3C5270IcuMnvTsy56e-Rmr0CxUgd90us737j9_0Z6MV_2jj-UKmdF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575634847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Park, Jungyoung ; Fang, Zhihui</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Jungyoung ; Fang, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><description>Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-4350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-4369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lit.12244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; advanced literacy ; composition ; epistemic stance ; Expository Writing ; Grade 7 ; Grade 9 ; informational writing ; Language Usage ; Linguistics ; middle level writing ; Public Schools ; Rhetoric ; Statistical Analysis ; student writing ; Teenagers ; Value Judgment ; voice ; Writing ; writing pedagogy</subject><ispartof>Literacy (Oxford, England), 2021-09, Vol.55 (3), p.191-200</ispartof><rights>2021 UKLA. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 101 Station Landing, Medford, MA 02155, USA.</rights><rights>2021 UKLA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1466-680X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Flit.12244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Flit.12244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1309944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Jungyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><title>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</title><title>Literacy (Oxford, England)</title><description>Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>advanced literacy</subject><subject>composition</subject><subject>epistemic stance</subject><subject>Expository Writing</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>informational writing</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>middle level writing</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>student writing</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Value Judgment</subject><subject>voice</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>writing pedagogy</subject><issn>1741-4350</issn><issn>1741-4369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHP4BQ8CAi22byZ5McpVStFLxUryHNZiVlu6nJSum3N3alN-cyM7wfj8dD6BrwGPJMGt-NgRDGTtAABIOC0VKdHm-Oz9FFSmuMiSwZH6CHj-CtG_l2ZKrQuGRd26W7_NchbkznQ2ua0S76zrefl-isNk1yV397iN6fZsvpS7F4e55PHxeFpaBYoUpFJauUJGwlTEVNxSnhRlgmDa5MzQ0IzgFjbKRcrUpKmYEKciILAiyhQ3Tb-25j-Pp2qdPr8B1zkKQJF7ykTDKRqfuesjGkFF2tt9FvTNxrwPq3C5270IcuMnvTsy56e-Rmr0CxUgd90us737j9_0Z6MV_2jj-UKmdF</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Park, Jungyoung</creator><creator>Fang, Zhihui</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-680X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</title><author>Park, Jungyoung ; Fang, Zhihui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3194-969384d9824b7ad3ad5325a7c48a0daf5a17551000a88bb6334a1d1028c171c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>advanced literacy</topic><topic>composition</topic><topic>epistemic stance</topic><topic>Expository Writing</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>informational writing</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>middle level writing</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>student writing</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Value Judgment</topic><topic>voice</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>writing pedagogy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Jungyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Literacy (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Jungyoung</au><au>Fang, Zhihui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1309944</ericid><atitle>Voice in adolescents' informational writing</atitle><jtitle>Literacy (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>191-200</pages><issn>1741-4350</issn><eissn>1741-4369</eissn><abstract>Voice is a key component of interpersonal meaning that denotes a writer's value judgement or personal feelings. An important aspect of voice in informational writing is epistemic stance, which indicates a writer's judgement of the information presented. This exploratory study examined adolescents' use of hedges and boosters to convey epistemic stance in their informational writing. Ninety‐three seventh‐grade and ninth‐grade students from one American public school were asked to write a science report on crocodilia for a peer audience. The writing corpus was coded for the presence of linguistic markers of hedges and boosters. Statistical analysis reveals that the students as a whole used significantly more boosters than hedges and that there was no significant difference between the two grade levels in the use of hedges or boosters. Moreover, the students drew heavily on everyday language resources to instantiate either hedges or boosters, and there was a lack of lexical diversity in their linguistic choices. These findings suggest that adolescent learners were able to infuse voice in their informational writing but needed to expand their linguistic repertoires for instantiating voice in order to develop advanced literacy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/lit.12244</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-680X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-4350
ispartof Literacy (Oxford, England), 2021-09, Vol.55 (3), p.191-200
issn 1741-4350
1741-4369
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2575634847
source Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescents
advanced literacy
composition
epistemic stance
Expository Writing
Grade 7
Grade 9
informational writing
Language Usage
Linguistics
middle level writing
Public Schools
Rhetoric
Statistical Analysis
student writing
Teenagers
Value Judgment
voice
Writing
writing pedagogy
title Voice in adolescents' informational writing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A30%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voice%20in%20adolescents'%20informational%20writing&rft.jtitle=Literacy%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Park,%20Jungyoung&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=191-200&rft.issn=1741-4350&rft.eissn=1741-4369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lit.12244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575634847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575634847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1309944&rfr_iscdi=true