Differentiating retirement age to compensate for health differences

Population aging in Europe calls for an overall rise in the age of retirement. However, most observers agree that the latter should be differentiated to account for different individuals' heterogeneous health when they grow older. This paper explores the relevance of this idea using the Europea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IZA journal of labor policy 2021-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1-34
1. Verfasser: Vandenberghe, Vincent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title IZA journal of labor policy
container_volume 11
creator Vandenberghe, Vincent
description Population aging in Europe calls for an overall rise in the age of retirement. However, most observers agree that the latter should be differentiated to account for different individuals' heterogeneous health when they grow older. This paper explores the relevance of this idea using the European Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) panel data. It first quantifies the health gradient across and within each of the European countries across sociodemographic groups (i.e., Gender × Education) at typical retirement age. It then estimates the degree of retirement age differentiation that would be needed to equalize expected health at the moment of retirement. Results point at the need for a very high degree of differentiation to equalize expected health, both across and within, European countries. But the paper also shows that systematic retirement age differentiation would fail to match a significant portion of the full distribution of health status. In a world synonymous with systematic health-based retirement age differentiation, there would still be a lot of what health economists call F-mistakes ([F]ailure of treatment, i.e., no retirement for people in poor health) and E-mistakes ([E]xcessive treatment, i.e., people in good health going for retirement).
doi_str_mv 10.2478/izajolp-2021-0002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575546000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575546000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-50b1440826acc5994a968037d109573a258f8ed676049ed82bc29ab34f3630953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gAch4Hk1n7sJeJH6CQUveg5pdrbd0m5qkiL115tlC9WDpxmG551550XokpIbJip1237blV9vC0YYLQgh7ASNGNW80ISI01_9OZrEuMoEJZRxJUdo-tA2DQToUmtT2y1wgNQG2OQBtgvAyWPnN1vook2AGx_wEuw6LXF90DmIF-issesIk0Mdo4-nx_fpSzF7e36d3s8KJxRNhSRzKgRRrLTOSa2F1aUivKop0bLilknVKKjLqiRCQ63Y3DFt51w0vOQZ4WN0PezdBv-5g5jMyu9Cl08aJispRZk_yxQdKBd8jAEasw3txoa9ocT0cZlDXKaPy_RxZQ0eNOB818ajInvRtKokz8jdgHzl9yHUsAi7fW6OHv5dTynN8qs_F_oSkw-GaVWVnP8AyCeGkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575546000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiating retirement age to compensate for health differences</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vandenberghe, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Vandenberghe, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Population aging in Europe calls for an overall rise in the age of retirement. However, most observers agree that the latter should be differentiated to account for different individuals' heterogeneous health when they grow older. This paper explores the relevance of this idea using the European Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) panel data. It first quantifies the health gradient across and within each of the European countries across sociodemographic groups (i.e., Gender × Education) at typical retirement age. It then estimates the degree of retirement age differentiation that would be needed to equalize expected health at the moment of retirement. Results point at the need for a very high degree of differentiation to equalize expected health, both across and within, European countries. But the paper also shows that systematic retirement age differentiation would fail to match a significant portion of the full distribution of health status. In a world synonymous with systematic health-based retirement age differentiation, there would still be a lot of what health economists call F-mistakes ([F]ailure of treatment, i.e., no retirement for people in poor health) and E-mistakes ([E]xcessive treatment, i.e., people in good health going for retirement).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-9004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-9004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/izajolp-2021-0002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warsaw: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Age ; Aging ; Differentiation ; ex ante vs ex post egalitarianism ; Health ; Health economics ; J14 ; J26 ; Panel data ; Population aging ; Retirement ; retirement policy</subject><ispartof>IZA journal of labor policy, 2021-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1-34</ispartof><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-50b1440826acc5994a968037d109573a258f8ed676049ed82bc29ab34f3630953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-50b1440826acc5994a968037d109573a258f8ed676049ed82bc29ab34f3630953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/izajolp-2021-0002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/izajolp-2021-0002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,75906,75907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vandenberghe, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiating retirement age to compensate for health differences</title><title>IZA journal of labor policy</title><description>Population aging in Europe calls for an overall rise in the age of retirement. However, most observers agree that the latter should be differentiated to account for different individuals' heterogeneous health when they grow older. This paper explores the relevance of this idea using the European Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) panel data. It first quantifies the health gradient across and within each of the European countries across sociodemographic groups (i.e., Gender × Education) at typical retirement age. It then estimates the degree of retirement age differentiation that would be needed to equalize expected health at the moment of retirement. Results point at the need for a very high degree of differentiation to equalize expected health, both across and within, European countries. But the paper also shows that systematic retirement age differentiation would fail to match a significant portion of the full distribution of health status. In a world synonymous with systematic health-based retirement age differentiation, there would still be a lot of what health economists call F-mistakes ([F]ailure of treatment, i.e., no retirement for people in poor health) and E-mistakes ([E]xcessive treatment, i.e., people in good health going for retirement).</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>ex ante vs ex post egalitarianism</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>J14</subject><subject>J26</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Population aging</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>retirement policy</subject><issn>2193-9004</issn><issn>2193-9004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gAch4Hk1n7sJeJH6CQUveg5pdrbd0m5qkiL115tlC9WDpxmG551550XokpIbJip1237blV9vC0YYLQgh7ASNGNW80ISI01_9OZrEuMoEJZRxJUdo-tA2DQToUmtT2y1wgNQG2OQBtgvAyWPnN1vook2AGx_wEuw6LXF90DmIF-issesIk0Mdo4-nx_fpSzF7e36d3s8KJxRNhSRzKgRRrLTOSa2F1aUivKop0bLilknVKKjLqiRCQ63Y3DFt51w0vOQZ4WN0PezdBv-5g5jMyu9Cl08aJispRZk_yxQdKBd8jAEasw3txoa9ocT0cZlDXKaPy_RxZQ0eNOB818ajInvRtKokz8jdgHzl9yHUsAi7fW6OHv5dTynN8qs_F_oSkw-GaVWVnP8AyCeGkA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Vandenberghe, Vincent</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Differentiating retirement age to compensate for health differences</title><author>Vandenberghe, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-50b1440826acc5994a968037d109573a258f8ed676049ed82bc29ab34f3630953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>ex ante vs ex post egalitarianism</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>J14</topic><topic>J26</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Population aging</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>retirement policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vandenberghe, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>IZA journal of labor policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vandenberghe, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiating retirement age to compensate for health differences</atitle><jtitle>IZA journal of labor policy</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>1-34</pages><issn>2193-9004</issn><eissn>2193-9004</eissn><abstract>Population aging in Europe calls for an overall rise in the age of retirement. However, most observers agree that the latter should be differentiated to account for different individuals' heterogeneous health when they grow older. This paper explores the relevance of this idea using the European Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) panel data. It first quantifies the health gradient across and within each of the European countries across sociodemographic groups (i.e., Gender × Education) at typical retirement age. It then estimates the degree of retirement age differentiation that would be needed to equalize expected health at the moment of retirement. Results point at the need for a very high degree of differentiation to equalize expected health, both across and within, European countries. But the paper also shows that systematic retirement age differentiation would fail to match a significant portion of the full distribution of health status. In a world synonymous with systematic health-based retirement age differentiation, there would still be a lot of what health economists call F-mistakes ([F]ailure of treatment, i.e., no retirement for people in poor health) and E-mistakes ([E]xcessive treatment, i.e., people in good health going for retirement).</abstract><cop>Warsaw</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/izajolp-2021-0002</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-9004
ispartof IZA journal of labor policy, 2021-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1-34
issn 2193-9004
2193-9004
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2575546000
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Age
Aging
Differentiation
ex ante vs ex post egalitarianism
Health
Health economics
J14
J26
Panel data
Population aging
Retirement
retirement policy
title Differentiating retirement age to compensate for health differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A40%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiating%20retirement%20age%20to%20compensate%20for%20health%20differences&rft.jtitle=IZA%20journal%20of%20labor%20policy&rft.au=Vandenberghe,%20Vincent&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=1-34&rft.issn=2193-9004&rft.eissn=2193-9004&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/izajolp-2021-0002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575546000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575546000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true