Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus
A state's coercive apparatus can be strong in some ways and weak in others. Using interview data from security personnel in China, this study expands current conceptualizations of authoritarian durability and coercive capacity to consider a wide range of security activities. While protest respo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative politics 2021-01, Vol.53 (2), p.309-330 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 330 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 309 |
| container_title | Comparative politics |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | Scoggins, Suzanne E. |
| description | A state's coercive apparatus can be strong in some ways and weak in others. Using interview data from security personnel in China, this study expands current conceptualizations of authoritarian durability and coercive capacity to consider a wide range of security activities. While protest
response in China is centrally controlled and strong, other types of crime control are decentralized and systematically inadequate in ways that compromise the state's coercive power and may ultimately feed back into protest. Considering security activities beyond protest control exposes cracks
in China's authoritarian system of control-an area where it is typically perceived to thrive-and calls into question our understanding of regime resilience as well as our current approach to assessing the role coercive capacity plays in authoritarian resilience elsewhere. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5129/001041521X15895755803929 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575237619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>cuny/cp/2021/00000053/00000002/art00007</ingid><jstor_id>26976055</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26976055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d24c512861d4b97c105016d3226742652e8d50bc8848a4cee5e32b72ed7aec0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVIIU7anxBY6HlbabT6urQY07SB0EJooTcha8exHFe7kbSB9NdX7prkFF00w7zzzOgVIQ2jHwQD85FSRjsmgP1mQhuhhNCUGzAnZAFMsFYCqFOyOMjaqjNn5DznXU072ekF-XSLZRvifYh3zXIq2yGF4lJwsbnFHPYBo8fGxb4pW2xWAyYfHrFZjqNLrkz5LXmzcfuM7473Bfl19eXn6lt78-Pr9Wp503ouZWl76HzdVkvWd2ujPKOCMtlzAKk6kAJQ94Kuvdaddp1HFMhhrQB75dBT5Bfk_cwd0_AwYS52N0wp1pEW6puBK8lMVelZ5dOQc8KNHVP449KTZdQe3LKvuVVbL-fWXS5Deu4DaZSkQtT657lejcJY3Mt8P8Un60cLFFjlH47gx4CCdakcAlUJ318hBD9DjssZ-yh4hP9Aaqi2DDi3PW7ctC-2_o69-2uz4v8AFUSTew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575237619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus</title><source>IngentaConnect</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><description>A state's coercive apparatus can be strong in some ways and weak in others. Using interview data from security personnel in China, this study expands current conceptualizations of authoritarian durability and coercive capacity to consider a wide range of security activities. While protest
response in China is centrally controlled and strong, other types of crime control are decentralized and systematically inadequate in ways that compromise the state's coercive power and may ultimately feed back into protest. Considering security activities beyond protest control exposes cracks
in China's authoritarian system of control-an area where it is typically perceived to thrive-and calls into question our understanding of regime resilience as well as our current approach to assessing the role coercive capacity plays in authoritarian resilience elsewhere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-6227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5129/001041521X15895755803929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Brunswick: City University of New York</publisher><subject>Authoritarian Resilience ; Authoritarianism ; China ; Coercion ; Coercive Capacity ; Crime ; Crime prevention ; Decentralization ; Policing ; Protest ; Resilience ; Security ; Security personnel ; State power</subject><ispartof>Comparative politics, 2021-01, Vol.53 (2), p.309-330</ispartof><rights>Copyright Transaction Inc. Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d24c512861d4b97c105016d3226742652e8d50bc8848a4cee5e32b72ed7aec0e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26976055$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26976055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>289,314,780,784,803,27915,27916,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus</title><title>Comparative politics</title><addtitle>Comp Politics</addtitle><description>A state's coercive apparatus can be strong in some ways and weak in others. Using interview data from security personnel in China, this study expands current conceptualizations of authoritarian durability and coercive capacity to consider a wide range of security activities. While protest
response in China is centrally controlled and strong, other types of crime control are decentralized and systematically inadequate in ways that compromise the state's coercive power and may ultimately feed back into protest. Considering security activities beyond protest control exposes cracks
in China's authoritarian system of control-an area where it is typically perceived to thrive-and calls into question our understanding of regime resilience as well as our current approach to assessing the role coercive capacity plays in authoritarian resilience elsewhere.</description><subject>Authoritarian Resilience</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Coercive Capacity</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Policing</subject><subject>Protest</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Security personnel</subject><subject>State power</subject><issn>0010-4159</issn><issn>2151-6227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVIIU7anxBY6HlbabT6urQY07SB0EJooTcha8exHFe7kbSB9NdX7prkFF00w7zzzOgVIQ2jHwQD85FSRjsmgP1mQhuhhNCUGzAnZAFMsFYCqFOyOMjaqjNn5DznXU072ekF-XSLZRvifYh3zXIq2yGF4lJwsbnFHPYBo8fGxb4pW2xWAyYfHrFZjqNLrkz5LXmzcfuM7473Bfl19eXn6lt78-Pr9Wp503ouZWl76HzdVkvWd2ujPKOCMtlzAKk6kAJQ94Kuvdaddp1HFMhhrQB75dBT5Bfk_cwd0_AwYS52N0wp1pEW6puBK8lMVelZ5dOQc8KNHVP449KTZdQe3LKvuVVbL-fWXS5Deu4DaZSkQtT657lejcJY3Mt8P8Un60cLFFjlH47gx4CCdakcAlUJ318hBD9DjssZ-yh4hP9Aaqi2DDi3PW7ctC-2_o69-2uz4v8AFUSTew</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</creator><general>City University of New York</general><general>Comparative Politics, Ph.D. Programs in Political Science, City University of New York</general><general>Transaction Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus</title><author>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d24c512861d4b97c105016d3226742652e8d50bc8848a4cee5e32b72ed7aec0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Authoritarian Resilience</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Coercive Capacity</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Policing</topic><topic>Protest</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Security personnel</topic><topic>State power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scoggins, Suzanne E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus</atitle><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle><stitle>Comp Politics</stitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>309-330</pages><issn>0010-4159</issn><eissn>2151-6227</eissn><abstract>A state's coercive apparatus can be strong in some ways and weak in others. Using interview data from security personnel in China, this study expands current conceptualizations of authoritarian durability and coercive capacity to consider a wide range of security activities. While protest
response in China is centrally controlled and strong, other types of crime control are decentralized and systematically inadequate in ways that compromise the state's coercive power and may ultimately feed back into protest. Considering security activities beyond protest control exposes cracks
in China's authoritarian system of control-an area where it is typically perceived to thrive-and calls into question our understanding of regime resilience as well as our current approach to assessing the role coercive capacity plays in authoritarian resilience elsewhere.</abstract><cop>New Brunswick</cop><pub>City University of New York</pub><doi>10.5129/001041521X15895755803929</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0010-4159 |
| ispartof | Comparative politics, 2021-01, Vol.53 (2), p.309-330 |
| issn | 0010-4159 2151-6227 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2575237619 |
| source | IngentaConnect; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Authoritarian Resilience Authoritarianism China Coercion Coercive Capacity Crime Crime prevention Decentralization Policing Protest Resilience Security Security personnel State power |
| title | Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20Authoritarian%20Resilience%20and%20the%20Coercive%20Apparatus&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20politics&rft.au=Scoggins,%20Suzanne%20E.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=309-330&rft.issn=0010-4159&rft.eissn=2151-6227&rft_id=info:doi/10.5129/001041521X15895755803929&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26976055%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575237619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=cuny/cp/2021/00000053/00000002/art00007&rft_jstor_id=26976055&rfr_iscdi=true |