Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya
Identification and assessment of socio-cultural values of ecosystem services are increasingly important for the planning and management of forest resources. Key information necessary is how different forest user groups perceive and prioritize different ecosystem services based on their local setting...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2250 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2250 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Dorji, Tshewang Brookes, Justin Facelli, José Sears, Robin Norbu, Tshewang Dorji, Kuenzang Chhetri, Yog Baral, Himlal |
description | Identification and assessment of socio-cultural values of ecosystem services are increasingly important for the planning and management of forest resources. Key information necessary is how different forest user groups perceive and prioritize different ecosystem services based on their local setting. We assessed the socio-cultural values of ecosystem services of high-altitude oak forests in Western Bhutan using participatory approaches with two important forest users: local communities and forest experts. We found that these forests serve as a pool of 22 ecosystem services under four MEA categories of provisioning (9), regulating (8), supporting (2), and cultural (3) services. Fresh water was unanimously identified as the most valuable service, as well as the most vulnerable, by both the groups. The priorities of local communities inclined towards provisioning and cultural services due to their dependence on these services for their livelihood and wellbeing. Forest experts’ priorities were more evenly spread over three categories of services: provisioning, regulating, and supporting services, reflecting their broader interest in resource management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change mitigation. Several regulating and supporting services were not easily identified by many villagers, suggesting that bridging the priorities of local interests with broader national forestry goals may require public partnerships and integrated decision-making about the entire suite of ecosystem services. Several management interventions proposed by the groups were presented for consideration by local users, scientists, and policy makers. For all ongoing and future ecosystem service assessments, we recommend the integration of socio-cultural values with biophysical and monetary assessments to fully value the benefits from the high-altitude oak forests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11082250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2574338506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574338506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-3189492ca18223ea44bbb6e3c074bd4e92abd2ea02bb9e8e72e4a2d99df2f0473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNRe_AUL3oTo7Eea7FFKa4VCD61ew-xmgqlpt-4mQv-9KxV0LjMMDzMPL2O3Ah6UMvAYByGglDKHCzaSUIhMQA6X_-ZrNolxB6mUEkZMR2y78a712Wzo-iFgx9-wGyhy3_C58_EUe9rzDYWv1qVtE_yer_GDL3yg2EfeHnj_TnyOiQsHvmz32OEJb9hVg12kyW8fs9fFfDtbZqv188vsaZU5afI-U6I02kiHIkkrQq2ttVNSDgpta01Goq0lIUhrDZVUSNIoa2PqRjagCzVmd-e7x-A_k3Zf7fwQDullJfNCK1XmME3U_ZlywccYqKmOIYmGUyWg-gmu-gtOfQMjTV_C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574338506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dorji, Tshewang ; Brookes, Justin ; Facelli, José ; Sears, Robin ; Norbu, Tshewang ; Dorji, Kuenzang ; Chhetri, Yog ; Baral, Himlal</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Tshewang ; Brookes, Justin ; Facelli, José ; Sears, Robin ; Norbu, Tshewang ; Dorji, Kuenzang ; Chhetri, Yog ; Baral, Himlal</creatorcontrib><description>Identification and assessment of socio-cultural values of ecosystem services are increasingly important for the planning and management of forest resources. Key information necessary is how different forest user groups perceive and prioritize different ecosystem services based on their local setting. We assessed the socio-cultural values of ecosystem services of high-altitude oak forests in Western Bhutan using participatory approaches with two important forest users: local communities and forest experts. We found that these forests serve as a pool of 22 ecosystem services under four MEA categories of provisioning (9), regulating (8), supporting (2), and cultural (3) services. Fresh water was unanimously identified as the most valuable service, as well as the most vulnerable, by both the groups. The priorities of local communities inclined towards provisioning and cultural services due to their dependence on these services for their livelihood and wellbeing. Forest experts’ priorities were more evenly spread over three categories of services: provisioning, regulating, and supporting services, reflecting their broader interest in resource management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change mitigation. Several regulating and supporting services were not easily identified by many villagers, suggesting that bridging the priorities of local interests with broader national forestry goals may require public partnerships and integrated decision-making about the entire suite of ecosystem services. Several management interventions proposed by the groups were presented for consideration by local users, scientists, and policy makers. For all ongoing and future ecosystem service assessments, we recommend the integration of socio-cultural values with biophysical and monetary assessments to fully value the benefits from the high-altitude oak forests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11082250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Biodiversity ; Carbon offsets ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Community ; Cultural values ; Decision making ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forest resources ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fresh water ; High altitude ; High-altitude environments ; Local communities ; Oak ; Perceptions ; Priorities ; Provisioning ; Resource management ; Rural areas ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Timber ; User groups ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2250</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-3189492ca18223ea44bbb6e3c074bd4e92abd2ea02bb9e8e72e4a2d99df2f0473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-3189492ca18223ea44bbb6e3c074bd4e92abd2ea02bb9e8e72e4a2d99df2f0473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5107-3117</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Tshewang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookes, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facelli, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norbu, Tshewang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Kuenzang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhetri, Yog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Himlal</creatorcontrib><title>Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Identification and assessment of socio-cultural values of ecosystem services are increasingly important for the planning and management of forest resources. Key information necessary is how different forest user groups perceive and prioritize different ecosystem services based on their local setting. We assessed the socio-cultural values of ecosystem services of high-altitude oak forests in Western Bhutan using participatory approaches with two important forest users: local communities and forest experts. We found that these forests serve as a pool of 22 ecosystem services under four MEA categories of provisioning (9), regulating (8), supporting (2), and cultural (3) services. Fresh water was unanimously identified as the most valuable service, as well as the most vulnerable, by both the groups. The priorities of local communities inclined towards provisioning and cultural services due to their dependence on these services for their livelihood and wellbeing. Forest experts’ priorities were more evenly spread over three categories of services: provisioning, regulating, and supporting services, reflecting their broader interest in resource management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change mitigation. Several regulating and supporting services were not easily identified by many villagers, suggesting that bridging the priorities of local interests with broader national forestry goals may require public partnerships and integrated decision-making about the entire suite of ecosystem services. Several management interventions proposed by the groups were presented for consideration by local users, scientists, and policy makers. For all ongoing and future ecosystem service assessments, we recommend the integration of socio-cultural values with biophysical and monetary assessments to fully value the benefits from the high-altitude oak forests.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Carbon offsets</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest resources</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>High altitude</subject><subject>High-altitude environments</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Oak</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Provisioning</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>User groups</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNRe_AUL3oTo7Eea7FFKa4VCD61ew-xmgqlpt-4mQv-9KxV0LjMMDzMPL2O3Ah6UMvAYByGglDKHCzaSUIhMQA6X_-ZrNolxB6mUEkZMR2y78a712Wzo-iFgx9-wGyhy3_C58_EUe9rzDYWv1qVtE_yer_GDL3yg2EfeHnj_TnyOiQsHvmz32OEJb9hVg12kyW8fs9fFfDtbZqv188vsaZU5afI-U6I02kiHIkkrQq2ttVNSDgpta01Goq0lIUhrDZVUSNIoa2PqRjagCzVmd-e7x-A_k3Zf7fwQDullJfNCK1XmME3U_ZlywccYqKmOIYmGUyWg-gmu-gtOfQMjTV_C</recordid><startdate>20190415</startdate><enddate>20190415</enddate><creator>Dorji, Tshewang</creator><creator>Brookes, Justin</creator><creator>Facelli, José</creator><creator>Sears, Robin</creator><creator>Norbu, Tshewang</creator><creator>Dorji, Kuenzang</creator><creator>Chhetri, Yog</creator><creator>Baral, Himlal</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-3117</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190415</creationdate><title>Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya</title><author>Dorji, Tshewang ; Brookes, Justin ; Facelli, José ; Sears, Robin ; Norbu, Tshewang ; Dorji, Kuenzang ; Chhetri, Yog ; Baral, Himlal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-3189492ca18223ea44bbb6e3c074bd4e92abd2ea02bb9e8e72e4a2d99df2f0473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Carbon offsets</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest resources</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>High altitude</topic><topic>High-altitude environments</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Oak</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Provisioning</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>User groups</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Tshewang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookes, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facelli, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norbu, Tshewang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Kuenzang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhetri, Yog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Himlal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorji, Tshewang</au><au>Brookes, Justin</au><au>Facelli, José</au><au>Sears, Robin</au><au>Norbu, Tshewang</au><au>Dorji, Kuenzang</au><au>Chhetri, Yog</au><au>Baral, Himlal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-04-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2250</spage><pages>2250-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Identification and assessment of socio-cultural values of ecosystem services are increasingly important for the planning and management of forest resources. Key information necessary is how different forest user groups perceive and prioritize different ecosystem services based on their local setting. We assessed the socio-cultural values of ecosystem services of high-altitude oak forests in Western Bhutan using participatory approaches with two important forest users: local communities and forest experts. We found that these forests serve as a pool of 22 ecosystem services under four MEA categories of provisioning (9), regulating (8), supporting (2), and cultural (3) services. Fresh water was unanimously identified as the most valuable service, as well as the most vulnerable, by both the groups. The priorities of local communities inclined towards provisioning and cultural services due to their dependence on these services for their livelihood and wellbeing. Forest experts’ priorities were more evenly spread over three categories of services: provisioning, regulating, and supporting services, reflecting their broader interest in resource management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change mitigation. Several regulating and supporting services were not easily identified by many villagers, suggesting that bridging the priorities of local interests with broader national forestry goals may require public partnerships and integrated decision-making about the entire suite of ecosystem services. Several management interventions proposed by the groups were presented for consideration by local users, scientists, and policy makers. For all ongoing and future ecosystem service assessments, we recommend the integration of socio-cultural values with biophysical and monetary assessments to fully value the benefits from the high-altitude oak forests.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11082250</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-3117</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2250 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2574338506 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Assessments Biodiversity Carbon offsets Climate change Climate change mitigation Community Cultural values Decision making Ecosystem services Ecosystems Forest ecosystems Forest management Forest resources Forestry Forests Fresh water High altitude High-altitude environments Local communities Oak Perceptions Priorities Provisioning Resource management Rural areas Stakeholders Sustainability Timber User groups Valuation |
title | Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A48%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socio-Cultural%20Values%20of%20Ecosystem%20Services%20from%20Oak%20Forests%20in%20the%20Eastern%20Himalaya&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Dorji,%20Tshewang&rft.date=2019-04-15&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2250&rft.pages=2250-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11082250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574338506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574338506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |