Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA

Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient resear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2449
Hauptverfasser: Keeley, Keefe O, Wolz, Kevin J, Adams, Kaitie I, Richards, Jeannine H, Hannum, Erin, Severine von Tscharner Fleming, Ventura, Stephen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2449
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
creator Keeley, Keefe O
Wolz, Kevin J
Adams, Kaitie I
Richards, Jeannine H
Hannum, Erin
Severine von Tscharner Fleming
Ventura, Stephen J
description Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su11082449
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2574338407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574338407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvxFwR8E6pfmjZpfStjm8KGgvVRSpqmW8fWzC8psn9vxgT9Xr6DO-6OI-SWwQPnOTy6gTHI4iTJL8goBskiBilc_sPXZOLcFsJxznImRuRzNex8F70p9EdarNG2Fo3zeHyis73Btek9LQ4HtEpvjKPe0hJNAKpvaGn6AQ21PZ0r3Dva9dRvDF11zXewoB_vxQ25atXOmcnvH5NyPiunz9HydfEyLZaRjvPURzI_FdJCpZILJYSum0yYRDAFta5Bt4loOK8bEfhYQ5ZLJkE3bZYJmabAx-TubBt6fg0hu9raAfuQWMWpTDjPEpBBdX9WabTOoWmrA3Z7hceKQXUasPobkP8A-8NhLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574338407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Keeley, Keefe O ; Wolz, Kevin J ; Adams, Kaitie I ; Richards, Jeannine H ; Hannum, Erin ; Severine von Tscharner Fleming ; Ventura, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Keefe O ; Wolz, Kevin J ; Adams, Kaitie I ; Richards, Jeannine H ; Hannum, Erin ; Severine von Tscharner Fleming ; Ventura, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11082449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Case studies ; Cooperation ; Crops ; Farmers ; Farms ; Infrastructure ; Interviews ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Landowners ; Leases ; Nonprofit organizations ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Sustainability ; Tenure ; Trees ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2449</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0248-2800</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Keefe O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolz, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kaitie I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jeannine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannum, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Leases</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvxFwR8E6pfmjZpfStjm8KGgvVRSpqmW8fWzC8psn9vxgT9Xr6DO-6OI-SWwQPnOTy6gTHI4iTJL8goBskiBilc_sPXZOLcFsJxznImRuRzNex8F70p9EdarNG2Fo3zeHyis73Btek9LQ4HtEpvjKPe0hJNAKpvaGn6AQ21PZ0r3Dva9dRvDF11zXewoB_vxQ25atXOmcnvH5NyPiunz9HydfEyLZaRjvPURzI_FdJCpZILJYSum0yYRDAFta5Bt4loOK8bEfhYQ5ZLJkE3bZYJmabAx-TubBt6fg0hu9raAfuQWMWpTDjPEpBBdX9WabTOoWmrA3Z7hceKQXUasPobkP8A-8NhLA</recordid><startdate>20190425</startdate><enddate>20190425</enddate><creator>Keeley, Keefe O</creator><creator>Wolz, Kevin J</creator><creator>Adams, Kaitie I</creator><creator>Richards, Jeannine H</creator><creator>Hannum, Erin</creator><creator>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</creator><creator>Ventura, Stephen J</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-2800</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190425</creationdate><title>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</title><author>Keeley, Keefe O ; Wolz, Kevin J ; Adams, Kaitie I ; Richards, Jeannine H ; Hannum, Erin ; Severine von Tscharner Fleming ; Ventura, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Leases</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Keefe O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolz, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kaitie I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jeannine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannum, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keeley, Keefe O</au><au>Wolz, Kevin J</au><au>Adams, Kaitie I</au><au>Richards, Jeannine H</au><au>Hannum, Erin</au><au>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</au><au>Ventura, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-04-25</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2449</spage><pages>2449-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11082449</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-2800</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2449
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2574338407
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural land
Agriculture
Agroforestry
Case studies
Cooperation
Crops
Farmers
Farms
Infrastructure
Interviews
Land degradation
Land use
Landowners
Leases
Nonprofit organizations
R&D
Research & development
Sustainability
Tenure
Trees
Verbal communication
title Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A31%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Party%20Agroforestry:%20Emergent%20Approaches%20to%20Trees%20and%20Tenure%20on%20Farms%20in%20the%20Midwest%20USA&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Keeley,%20Keefe%20O&rft.date=2019-04-25&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2449&rft.pages=2449-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11082449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574338407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574338407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true