Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA
Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient resear...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2449 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Keeley, Keefe O Wolz, Kevin J Adams, Kaitie I Richards, Jeannine H Hannum, Erin Severine von Tscharner Fleming Ventura, Stephen J |
description | Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11082449 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2574338407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574338407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvxFwR8E6pfmjZpfStjm8KGgvVRSpqmW8fWzC8psn9vxgT9Xr6DO-6OI-SWwQPnOTy6gTHI4iTJL8goBskiBilc_sPXZOLcFsJxznImRuRzNex8F70p9EdarNG2Fo3zeHyis73Btek9LQ4HtEpvjKPe0hJNAKpvaGn6AQ21PZ0r3Dva9dRvDF11zXewoB_vxQ25atXOmcnvH5NyPiunz9HydfEyLZaRjvPURzI_FdJCpZILJYSum0yYRDAFta5Bt4loOK8bEfhYQ5ZLJkE3bZYJmabAx-TubBt6fg0hu9raAfuQWMWpTDjPEpBBdX9WabTOoWmrA3Z7hceKQXUasPobkP8A-8NhLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574338407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Keeley, Keefe O ; Wolz, Kevin J ; Adams, Kaitie I ; Richards, Jeannine H ; Hannum, Erin ; Severine von Tscharner Fleming ; Ventura, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Keefe O ; Wolz, Kevin J ; Adams, Kaitie I ; Richards, Jeannine H ; Hannum, Erin ; Severine von Tscharner Fleming ; Ventura, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11082449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Case studies ; Cooperation ; Crops ; Farmers ; Farms ; Infrastructure ; Interviews ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Landowners ; Leases ; Nonprofit organizations ; R&D ; Research & development ; Sustainability ; Tenure ; Trees ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2449</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0248-2800</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Keefe O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolz, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kaitie I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jeannine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannum, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Leases</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUFFLwzAYDKLgmHvxFwR8E6pfmjZpfStjm8KGgvVRSpqmW8fWzC8psn9vxgT9Xr6DO-6OI-SWwQPnOTy6gTHI4iTJL8goBskiBilc_sPXZOLcFsJxznImRuRzNex8F70p9EdarNG2Fo3zeHyis73Btek9LQ4HtEpvjKPe0hJNAKpvaGn6AQ21PZ0r3Dva9dRvDF11zXewoB_vxQ25atXOmcnvH5NyPiunz9HydfEyLZaRjvPURzI_FdJCpZILJYSum0yYRDAFta5Bt4loOK8bEfhYQ5ZLJkE3bZYJmabAx-TubBt6fg0hu9raAfuQWMWpTDjPEpBBdX9WabTOoWmrA3Z7hceKQXUasPobkP8A-8NhLA</recordid><startdate>20190425</startdate><enddate>20190425</enddate><creator>Keeley, Keefe O</creator><creator>Wolz, Kevin J</creator><creator>Adams, Kaitie I</creator><creator>Richards, Jeannine H</creator><creator>Hannum, Erin</creator><creator>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</creator><creator>Ventura, Stephen J</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-2800</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190425</creationdate><title>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</title><author>Keeley, Keefe O ; Wolz, Kevin J ; Adams, Kaitie I ; Richards, Jeannine H ; Hannum, Erin ; Severine von Tscharner Fleming ; Ventura, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-790033c6a5736a66cbd86e461a0bcb0cf46d33bd65732c0897170cdf88675503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Leases</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Keefe O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolz, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kaitie I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jeannine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannum, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keeley, Keefe O</au><au>Wolz, Kevin J</au><au>Adams, Kaitie I</au><au>Richards, Jeannine H</au><au>Hannum, Erin</au><au>Severine von Tscharner Fleming</au><au>Ventura, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-04-25</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2449</spage><pages>2449-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Agroforestry represents a solution to land degradation by agriculture, but social barriers to wider application of agroforestry persist. More than half of all cropland in the USA is leased rather than owner-operated, and the short terms of most leases preclude agroforestry. Given insufficient research on tenure models appropriate for agroforestry in the USA, the primary objective of this study was to identify examples of farmers practicing agroforestry on land they do not own. We conducted interviews with these farmers, and, in several cases, with landowners, in order to document their tenure arrangements. In some cases, additional parties also played a role, such as farmland investors, a farmer operating an integrated enterprise, and non-profit organizations or public agencies. Our findings include eleven case studies involving diverse entities and forms of cooperation in multi-party agroforestry (MA). MA generally emerged from shared objectives and intensive planning. MA appears to be adaptable to private, investor, institutional, and public landowners, as well as beginning farmers and others seeking land access without ownership. We identify limitations and strategies for further research and development of MA.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11082449</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-2800</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2449 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2574338407 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural land Agriculture Agroforestry Case studies Cooperation Crops Farmers Farms Infrastructure Interviews Land degradation Land use Landowners Leases Nonprofit organizations R&D Research & development Sustainability Tenure Trees Verbal communication |
title | Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A31%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Party%20Agroforestry:%20Emergent%20Approaches%20to%20Trees%20and%20Tenure%20on%20Farms%20in%20the%20Midwest%20USA&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Keeley,%20Keefe%20O&rft.date=2019-04-25&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2449&rft.pages=2449-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11082449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574338407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574338407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |