Improving Middle School Students' Quantitative Literacy through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation

The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of metacognitive strategies learning based Vee Diagram through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation toward students' quantitative literacy. This study compared two treatments on learning activity in middle school. The metacognitive strateg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2017-02, Vol.812 (1), p.12096
Hauptverfasser: Aisya, N S M, Supriatno, B, Saefudin, Anggraeni, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12096
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 812
creator Aisya, N S M
Supriatno, B
Saefudin
Anggraeni, S
description The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of metacognitive strategies learning based Vee Diagram through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation toward students' quantitative literacy. This study compared two treatments on learning activity in middle school. The metacognitive strategies have applied to the content of environmental pollution at 7th grade. This study used a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental method. The research sample were the 7th grade students, involves 27 students in the experimental through Inquiry Lab and 27 students in the experimental through Group Investigation. The instruments that used in this research were pretest and posttest quantitative literacy skills, learning step observation sheets, and the questionnaire of teachers and students responses. As the result, N-gain average of pretest and posttest increased in both experimental groups. The average of posttest score was 61,11 for the Inquiry Lab and 54,01 to the Group Investigation. The average score of N-gain quantitative literacy skill of Inquiry Lab class was 0,492 and Group Investigation class was 0,426. Both classes of experiments showed an average N-gain in the medium category. The data has been analyzed statistically by using SPSS ver.23 and the results showed that although both the learning model can develop quantitative literacy, but there is not significantly different of improving students' quantitative literacy between Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation in environmental pollution material.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012096
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2573862955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2573862955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6413fbf283d35ae2db04200cadddfb41e5e023c8f190ccdc248eec2640c49c1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQJeiBe1-WqXXsrQOZmoTK9DmqRbxtbUNB3s35tRmQiCuUk4eZ9zOA8AlxjdYsR5ikeMJHlW5CnHJMUpwgQV-REYHD6OD2_OT8FZ264QovGMBkBNN413W1sv4LPVem3gXC2dW8N56LSpQ3sN3zpZBxtksFsDZzYYL9UOhqV33WIJp_VnZ_0OzmQJZa3hJJabWN2aNthFhFx9Dk4quW7Nxfc9BB8P9-_jx2T2MpmO72aJYoiHJGeYVmVFONU0k4boEjGCkJJa66pk2GQGEap4hQuklFaEcWMUyRlSrFDY0CG46vvGjT67OF-sXOfrOFKQbER5Toosi6m8Tynv2tabSjTebqTfCYzEXqjYuxJ7byIKFVj0QiNIetC65qfzv9DNH9DT63j-KycaXdEvjpuGlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2573862955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Middle School Students' Quantitative Literacy through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Aisya, N S M ; Supriatno, B ; Saefudin ; Anggraeni, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Aisya, N S M ; Supriatno, B ; Saefudin ; Anggraeni, S</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of metacognitive strategies learning based Vee Diagram through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation toward students' quantitative literacy. This study compared two treatments on learning activity in middle school. The metacognitive strategies have applied to the content of environmental pollution at 7th grade. This study used a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental method. The research sample were the 7th grade students, involves 27 students in the experimental through Inquiry Lab and 27 students in the experimental through Group Investigation. The instruments that used in this research were pretest and posttest quantitative literacy skills, learning step observation sheets, and the questionnaire of teachers and students responses. As the result, N-gain average of pretest and posttest increased in both experimental groups. The average of posttest score was 61,11 for the Inquiry Lab and 54,01 to the Group Investigation. The average score of N-gain quantitative literacy skill of Inquiry Lab class was 0,492 and Group Investigation class was 0,426. Both classes of experiments showed an average N-gain in the medium category. The data has been analyzed statistically by using SPSS ver.23 and the results showed that although both the learning model can develop quantitative literacy, but there is not significantly different of improving students' quantitative literacy between Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation in environmental pollution material.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Learning ; Literacy ; Metacognition ; Middle schools ; Physics ; Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2017-02, Vol.812 (1), p.12096</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6413fbf283d35ae2db04200cadddfb41e5e023c8f190ccdc248eec2640c49c1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6413fbf283d35ae2db04200cadddfb41e5e023c8f190ccdc248eec2640c49c1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012096/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,38859,38881,53831,53858</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aisya, N S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supriatno, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saefudin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anggraeni, S</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Middle School Students' Quantitative Literacy through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of metacognitive strategies learning based Vee Diagram through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation toward students' quantitative literacy. This study compared two treatments on learning activity in middle school. The metacognitive strategies have applied to the content of environmental pollution at 7th grade. This study used a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental method. The research sample were the 7th grade students, involves 27 students in the experimental through Inquiry Lab and 27 students in the experimental through Group Investigation. The instruments that used in this research were pretest and posttest quantitative literacy skills, learning step observation sheets, and the questionnaire of teachers and students responses. As the result, N-gain average of pretest and posttest increased in both experimental groups. The average of posttest score was 61,11 for the Inquiry Lab and 54,01 to the Group Investigation. The average score of N-gain quantitative literacy skill of Inquiry Lab class was 0,492 and Group Investigation class was 0,426. Both classes of experiments showed an average N-gain in the medium category. The data has been analyzed statistically by using SPSS ver.23 and the results showed that although both the learning model can develop quantitative literacy, but there is not significantly different of improving students' quantitative literacy between Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation in environmental pollution material.</description><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Middle schools</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQJeiBe1-WqXXsrQOZmoTK9DmqRbxtbUNB3s35tRmQiCuUk4eZ9zOA8AlxjdYsR5ikeMJHlW5CnHJMUpwgQV-REYHD6OD2_OT8FZ264QovGMBkBNN413W1sv4LPVem3gXC2dW8N56LSpQ3sN3zpZBxtksFsDZzYYL9UOhqV33WIJp_VnZ_0OzmQJZa3hJJabWN2aNthFhFx9Dk4quW7Nxfc9BB8P9-_jx2T2MpmO72aJYoiHJGeYVmVFONU0k4boEjGCkJJa66pk2GQGEap4hQuklFaEcWMUyRlSrFDY0CG46vvGjT67OF-sXOfrOFKQbER5Toosi6m8Tynv2tabSjTebqTfCYzEXqjYuxJ7byIKFVj0QiNIetC65qfzv9DNH9DT63j-KycaXdEvjpuGlw</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Aisya, N S M</creator><creator>Supriatno, B</creator><creator>Saefudin</creator><creator>Anggraeni, S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Improving Middle School Students' Quantitative Literacy through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation</title><author>Aisya, N S M ; Supriatno, B ; Saefudin ; Anggraeni, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6413fbf283d35ae2db04200cadddfb41e5e023c8f190ccdc248eec2640c49c1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Middle schools</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aisya, N S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supriatno, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saefudin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anggraeni, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aisya, N S M</au><au>Supriatno, B</au><au>Saefudin</au><au>Anggraeni, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Middle School Students' Quantitative Literacy through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>812</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12096</spage><pages>12096-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of metacognitive strategies learning based Vee Diagram through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation toward students' quantitative literacy. This study compared two treatments on learning activity in middle school. The metacognitive strategies have applied to the content of environmental pollution at 7th grade. This study used a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental method. The research sample were the 7th grade students, involves 27 students in the experimental through Inquiry Lab and 27 students in the experimental through Group Investigation. The instruments that used in this research were pretest and posttest quantitative literacy skills, learning step observation sheets, and the questionnaire of teachers and students responses. As the result, N-gain average of pretest and posttest increased in both experimental groups. The average of posttest score was 61,11 for the Inquiry Lab and 54,01 to the Group Investigation. The average score of N-gain quantitative literacy skill of Inquiry Lab class was 0,492 and Group Investigation class was 0,426. Both classes of experiments showed an average N-gain in the medium category. The data has been analyzed statistically by using SPSS ver.23 and the results showed that although both the learning model can develop quantitative literacy, but there is not significantly different of improving students' quantitative literacy between Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation in environmental pollution material.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012096</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6588
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2017-02, Vol.812 (1), p.12096
issn 1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2573862955
source Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Learning
Literacy
Metacognition
Middle schools
Physics
Students
title Improving Middle School Students' Quantitative Literacy through Inquiry Lab and Group Investigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A05%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Middle%20School%20Students'%20Quantitative%20Literacy%20through%20Inquiry%20Lab%20and%20Group%20Investigation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Aisya,%20N%20S%20M&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=812&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12096&rft.pages=12096-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2573862955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2573862955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true