Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques

•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies planning and futures studies, 2021-08, Vol.131, p.102760, Article 102760
Hauptverfasser: Kostakis, Vasilis, Vragoteris, Vangelis, Acharja, Indra Lal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102760
container_title Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies
container_volume 131
creator Kostakis, Vasilis
Vragoteris, Vangelis
Acharja, Indra Lal
description •Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change. Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572611334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A664844538</galeid><els_id>S0016328721000690</els_id><sourcerecordid>A664844538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQgI3rbma3fTUynFLxC86MVLSJNJTambmmTV-utN2d49DTM8M8P7IHRJyYQS2tysJ67PfYQ0YYTRMmNtQ47QiMqWVw1v5TEakQJWnMn2FJ2ltC4trwkbobeF7vAWIOJtDLY32YcOW_gIJursfwFnMO9d2ITVDuvO4hSMh7yb4Tk20Wdv9AZH-PLwjYPD-R2G8WcP6RydOL1JcHGoY_R6d_uyeKienu8fF_Onygha52rpwApOWG3dkhEjBHOCt4QthZ5KagkI6uyU2hLESUfb2jk5pZIvydRBYzkfo6vhbkmw_5vVOvSxKy8Vq1vWUMq5KNT1QK30BpTvTOgy_OSV7lNSat40QgpRc1nAegBNDClFcGob_YeOO0WJ2vtWa3Xwrfa-1eC77M2GPShZi5CoUlHVGbA-gsnKBv_PhT8Xw4uv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572611334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kostakis, Vasilis ; Vragoteris, Vangelis ; Acharja, Indra Lal</creator><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Vasilis ; Vragoteris, Vangelis ; Acharja, Indra Lal</creatorcontrib><description>•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change. Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-3287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Climatic changes ; Commons ; Democratization ; Digital society ; Gender equality ; Hierarchies ; Inequality ; Peer production ; Peer review ; Sharing economy ; Social networks ; Studies ; Technology and civilization</subject><ispartof>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2021-08, Vol.131, p.102760, Article 102760</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7319-4588 ; 0000-0002-3206-2041 ; 0000-0002-3276-9282</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Vasilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vragoteris, Vangelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharja, Indra Lal</creatorcontrib><title>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</title><title>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</title><description>•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change. Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Commons</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Digital society</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Peer production</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Sharing economy</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology and civilization</subject><issn>0016-3287</issn><issn>1873-6378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQgI3rbma3fTUynFLxC86MVLSJNJTambmmTV-utN2d49DTM8M8P7IHRJyYQS2tysJ67PfYQ0YYTRMmNtQ47QiMqWVw1v5TEakQJWnMn2FJ2ltC4trwkbobeF7vAWIOJtDLY32YcOW_gIJursfwFnMO9d2ITVDuvO4hSMh7yb4Tk20Wdv9AZH-PLwjYPD-R2G8WcP6RydOL1JcHGoY_R6d_uyeKienu8fF_Onygha52rpwApOWG3dkhEjBHOCt4QthZ5KagkI6uyU2hLESUfb2jk5pZIvydRBYzkfo6vhbkmw_5vVOvSxKy8Vq1vWUMq5KNT1QK30BpTvTOgy_OSV7lNSat40QgpRc1nAegBNDClFcGob_YeOO0WJ2vtWa3Xwrfa-1eC77M2GPShZi5CoUlHVGbA-gsnKBv_PhT8Xw4uv</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Kostakis, Vasilis</creator><creator>Vragoteris, Vangelis</creator><creator>Acharja, Indra Lal</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-4588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-2041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-9282</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</title><author>Kostakis, Vasilis ; Vragoteris, Vangelis ; Acharja, Indra Lal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Commons</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Digital society</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Peer production</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Sharing economy</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology and civilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Vasilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vragoteris, Vangelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharja, Indra Lal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kostakis, Vasilis</au><au>Vragoteris, Vangelis</au><au>Acharja, Indra Lal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</atitle><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><spage>102760</spage><pages>102760-</pages><artnum>102760</artnum><issn>0016-3287</issn><eissn>1873-6378</eissn><abstract>•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change. Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-4588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-2041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-9282</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-3287
ispartof Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2021-08, Vol.131, p.102760, Article 102760
issn 0016-3287
1873-6378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2572611334
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Capitalism
Climatic changes
Commons
Democratization
Digital society
Gender equality
Hierarchies
Inequality
Peer production
Peer review
Sharing economy
Social networks
Studies
Technology and civilization
title Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A14%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20peer%20production%20democratize%20technology%20and%20society?%20A%20critical%20review%20of%20the%20critiques&rft.jtitle=Futures%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20policy,%20planning%20and%20futures%20studies&rft.au=Kostakis,%20Vasilis&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=131&rft.spage=102760&rft.pages=102760-&rft.artnum=102760&rft.issn=0016-3287&rft.eissn=1873-6378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA664844538%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572611334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A664844538&rft_els_id=S0016328721000690&rfr_iscdi=true