Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques
•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies planning and futures studies, 2021-08, Vol.131, p.102760, Article 102760 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102760 |
container_title | Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Kostakis, Vasilis Vragoteris, Vangelis Acharja, Indra Lal |
description | •Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change.
Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572611334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A664844538</galeid><els_id>S0016328721000690</els_id><sourcerecordid>A664844538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQgI3rbma3fTUynFLxC86MVLSJNJTambmmTV-utN2d49DTM8M8P7IHRJyYQS2tysJ67PfYQ0YYTRMmNtQ47QiMqWVw1v5TEakQJWnMn2FJ2ltC4trwkbobeF7vAWIOJtDLY32YcOW_gIJursfwFnMO9d2ITVDuvO4hSMh7yb4Tk20Wdv9AZH-PLwjYPD-R2G8WcP6RydOL1JcHGoY_R6d_uyeKienu8fF_Onygha52rpwApOWG3dkhEjBHOCt4QthZ5KagkI6uyU2hLESUfb2jk5pZIvydRBYzkfo6vhbkmw_5vVOvSxKy8Vq1vWUMq5KNT1QK30BpTvTOgy_OSV7lNSat40QgpRc1nAegBNDClFcGob_YeOO0WJ2vtWa3Xwrfa-1eC77M2GPShZi5CoUlHVGbA-gsnKBv_PhT8Xw4uv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572611334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kostakis, Vasilis ; Vragoteris, Vangelis ; Acharja, Indra Lal</creator><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Vasilis ; Vragoteris, Vangelis ; Acharja, Indra Lal</creatorcontrib><description>•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change.
Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-3287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Climatic changes ; Commons ; Democratization ; Digital society ; Gender equality ; Hierarchies ; Inequality ; Peer production ; Peer review ; Sharing economy ; Social networks ; Studies ; Technology and civilization</subject><ispartof>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2021-08, Vol.131, p.102760, Article 102760</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7319-4588 ; 0000-0002-3206-2041 ; 0000-0002-3276-9282</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Vasilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vragoteris, Vangelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharja, Indra Lal</creatorcontrib><title>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</title><title>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</title><description>•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change.
Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Commons</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Digital society</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Peer production</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Sharing economy</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology and civilization</subject><issn>0016-3287</issn><issn>1873-6378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQgI3rbma3fTUynFLxC86MVLSJNJTambmmTV-utN2d49DTM8M8P7IHRJyYQS2tysJ67PfYQ0YYTRMmNtQ47QiMqWVw1v5TEakQJWnMn2FJ2ltC4trwkbobeF7vAWIOJtDLY32YcOW_gIJursfwFnMO9d2ITVDuvO4hSMh7yb4Tk20Wdv9AZH-PLwjYPD-R2G8WcP6RydOL1JcHGoY_R6d_uyeKienu8fF_Onygha52rpwApOWG3dkhEjBHOCt4QthZ5KagkI6uyU2hLESUfb2jk5pZIvydRBYzkfo6vhbkmw_5vVOvSxKy8Vq1vWUMq5KNT1QK30BpTvTOgy_OSV7lNSat40QgpRc1nAegBNDClFcGob_YeOO0WJ2vtWa3Xwrfa-1eC77M2GPShZi5CoUlHVGbA-gsnKBv_PhT8Xw4uv</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Kostakis, Vasilis</creator><creator>Vragoteris, Vangelis</creator><creator>Acharja, Indra Lal</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-4588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-2041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-9282</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</title><author>Kostakis, Vasilis ; Vragoteris, Vangelis ; Acharja, Indra Lal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bfed43025dfb20c442f43702b4a981d0e41fd91d637f8f175ff89183b09fe6d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Commons</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Digital society</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Peer production</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Sharing economy</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology and civilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Vasilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vragoteris, Vangelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharja, Indra Lal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kostakis, Vasilis</au><au>Vragoteris, Vangelis</au><au>Acharja, Indra Lal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques</atitle><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><spage>102760</spage><pages>102760-</pages><artnum>102760</artnum><issn>0016-3287</issn><eissn>1873-6378</eissn><abstract>•Peer production has been hailed as a pathway towards post-capitalist futures.•Peer production suffers from rigid hierarchies, power asymmetries and gender imbalances.•Peer production may democratize technology when centered around the commons.•Through scaling-wide or -out, peer production projects may address their organizational issues and tackle climate change.
Over the last decade, a discussion about the limits of peer production has opened. On the one hand, some scholars consider peer production as a new path of value creation that could lead to an alternative form of social organization. On the other, critics claim that peer production is not emancipatory, but in fact suffers from rigid hierarchies, participation inequality, power asymmetries, and gender imbalance. Moreover, they argue that peer production depends on the capitalist economy for its reproduction and thus that its post-capitalist potential is very limited. This article summarizes and reviews the criticism against the emancipatory potential of peer production and proposes ways in which peer production could still democratize technology and society.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-4588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-2041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-9282</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-3287 |
ispartof | Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2021-08, Vol.131, p.102760, Article 102760 |
issn | 0016-3287 1873-6378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2572611334 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Capitalism Climatic changes Commons Democratization Digital society Gender equality Hierarchies Inequality Peer production Peer review Sharing economy Social networks Studies Technology and civilization |
title | Can peer production democratize technology and society? A critical review of the critiques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A14%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20peer%20production%20democratize%20technology%20and%20society?%20A%20critical%20review%20of%20the%20critiques&rft.jtitle=Futures%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20policy,%20planning%20and%20futures%20studies&rft.au=Kostakis,%20Vasilis&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=131&rft.spage=102760&rft.pages=102760-&rft.artnum=102760&rft.issn=0016-3287&rft.eissn=1873-6378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102760&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA664844538%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572611334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A664844538&rft_els_id=S0016328721000690&rfr_iscdi=true |