Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science
In light of the complex social context surrounding modern science issues (Scheufele, 2013), this study explores the nature of public opinion dynamics surrounding three distinct issues. We build upon the research showing that individuals’ sociocultural (demographics and education) and informational c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of public opinion research 2021-08, Vol.33 (2), p.422-431 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 431 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 422 |
| container_title | International journal of public opinion research |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Akin, Heather Cacciatore, Michael A. Yeo, Sara K. Brossard, Dominique Scheufele, Dietram A. Xenos, Michael A. |
| description | In light of the complex social context surrounding modern science issues (Scheufele, 2013), this study explores the nature of public opinion dynamics surrounding three distinct issues. We build upon the research showing that individuals’ sociocultural (demographics and education) and informational characteristics (media use, knowledge, self-reported knowledge, or familiarity) as well as personal values (deference to science, religiosity, political ideology) contribute to assessments of science issues. In this study, we look at how these characteristics are applied across the three scientific issues. Specifically, we explore the following questions: How do publics use education, information sources, and knowledge (factual and perceived) to assess support of emerging and established technologies? How do personal values influence individuals’ perceptions? We conclude by highlighting the implications of our findings for the future of science policy and science communication. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ijpor/edaa010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572569063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ijpor/edaa010</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2572569063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c3acb97fef34c67b4913ebc10cde6a489c7413b308ba51bef674043a0d5ae03a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQxi0EEqUwsltiYQk9x84fj6gUqKigUmGOHOcCKSEOdlLExmvwejwJJu3Ocqc7_b7vTh8hpwwuGEg-qdatsRMslAIGe2TERMKCWILcJyOQkQjCVIaH5Mi5NQBEkLIRscs-ryvtfr6-6apvvUFHS2PpvdlgTVVT0JnrlEfcCxZ0pStsNNK5cz06uqiaV7_tDF2i1Vht_HDXmI8ai2ccxFdYoh0kHtqpj8lBqWqHJ7s-Jk_Xs8fpbbB4uJlPLxeB5jzpfFU6l0mJJRc6TnIhGcdcM9AFxkqkUieC8ZxDmquI5VjGiQDBFRSRQuCKj8nZ1re15t2_22Vr09vGn8zCKAkjn0zMPRVsKW2NcxbLrLXVm7KfGYPsL9ZsiDXbxer58y1v-vYf9BcpTHzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572569063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Akin, Heather ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Yeo, Sara K. ; Brossard, Dominique ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Xenos, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akin, Heather ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Yeo, Sara K. ; Brossard, Dominique ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Xenos, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>In light of the complex social context surrounding modern science issues (Scheufele, 2013), this study explores the nature of public opinion dynamics surrounding three distinct issues. We build upon the research showing that individuals’ sociocultural (demographics and education) and informational characteristics (media use, knowledge, self-reported knowledge, or familiarity) as well as personal values (deference to science, religiosity, political ideology) contribute to assessments of science issues. In this study, we look at how these characteristics are applied across the three scientific issues. Specifically, we explore the following questions: How do publics use education, information sources, and knowledge (factual and perceived) to assess support of emerging and established technologies? How do personal values influence individuals’ perceptions? We conclude by highlighting the implications of our findings for the future of science policy and science communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edaa010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Deference ; Familiarity ; Information sources ; Knowledge ; Mass media ; Political communication ; Political ideologies ; Public opinion ; Religiosity ; Science policy ; Social environment ; Sociocultural factors ; Values</subject><ispartof>International journal of public opinion research, 2021-08, Vol.33 (2), p.422-431</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c3acb97fef34c67b4913ebc10cde6a489c7413b308ba51bef674043a0d5ae03a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c3acb97fef34c67b4913ebc10cde6a489c7413b308ba51bef674043a0d5ae03a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1215-6347 ; 0000-0002-2043-8400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1583,27915,27916,33765</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akin, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciatore, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brossard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheufele, Dietram A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xenos, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science</title><title>International journal of public opinion research</title><description>In light of the complex social context surrounding modern science issues (Scheufele, 2013), this study explores the nature of public opinion dynamics surrounding three distinct issues. We build upon the research showing that individuals’ sociocultural (demographics and education) and informational characteristics (media use, knowledge, self-reported knowledge, or familiarity) as well as personal values (deference to science, religiosity, political ideology) contribute to assessments of science issues. In this study, we look at how these characteristics are applied across the three scientific issues. Specifically, we explore the following questions: How do publics use education, information sources, and knowledge (factual and perceived) to assess support of emerging and established technologies? How do personal values influence individuals’ perceptions? We conclude by highlighting the implications of our findings for the future of science policy and science communication.</description><subject>Deference</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political ideologies</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Science policy</subject><subject>Social environment</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0954-2892</issn><issn>1471-6909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQxi0EEqUwsltiYQk9x84fj6gUqKigUmGOHOcCKSEOdlLExmvwejwJJu3Ocqc7_b7vTh8hpwwuGEg-qdatsRMslAIGe2TERMKCWILcJyOQkQjCVIaH5Mi5NQBEkLIRscs-ryvtfr6-6apvvUFHS2PpvdlgTVVT0JnrlEfcCxZ0pStsNNK5cz06uqiaV7_tDF2i1Vht_HDXmI8ai2ccxFdYoh0kHtqpj8lBqWqHJ7s-Jk_Xs8fpbbB4uJlPLxeB5jzpfFU6l0mJJRc6TnIhGcdcM9AFxkqkUieC8ZxDmquI5VjGiQDBFRSRQuCKj8nZ1re15t2_22Vr09vGn8zCKAkjn0zMPRVsKW2NcxbLrLXVm7KfGYPsL9ZsiDXbxer58y1v-vYf9BcpTHzw</recordid><startdate>20210817</startdate><enddate>20210817</enddate><creator>Akin, Heather</creator><creator>Cacciatore, Michael A.</creator><creator>Yeo, Sara K.</creator><creator>Brossard, Dominique</creator><creator>Scheufele, Dietram A.</creator><creator>Xenos, Michael A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-6347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-8400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210817</creationdate><title>Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science</title><author>Akin, Heather ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Yeo, Sara K. ; Brossard, Dominique ; Scheufele, Dietram A. ; Xenos, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c3acb97fef34c67b4913ebc10cde6a489c7413b308ba51bef674043a0d5ae03a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Deference</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political ideologies</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Science policy</topic><topic>Social environment</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akin, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciatore, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brossard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheufele, Dietram A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xenos, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of public opinion research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akin, Heather</au><au>Cacciatore, Michael A.</au><au>Yeo, Sara K.</au><au>Brossard, Dominique</au><au>Scheufele, Dietram A.</au><au>Xenos, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science</atitle><jtitle>International journal of public opinion research</jtitle><date>2021-08-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>431</epage><pages>422-431</pages><issn>0954-2892</issn><eissn>1471-6909</eissn><abstract>In light of the complex social context surrounding modern science issues (Scheufele, 2013), this study explores the nature of public opinion dynamics surrounding three distinct issues. We build upon the research showing that individuals’ sociocultural (demographics and education) and informational characteristics (media use, knowledge, self-reported knowledge, or familiarity) as well as personal values (deference to science, religiosity, political ideology) contribute to assessments of science issues. In this study, we look at how these characteristics are applied across the three scientific issues. Specifically, we explore the following questions: How do publics use education, information sources, and knowledge (factual and perceived) to assess support of emerging and established technologies? How do personal values influence individuals’ perceptions? We conclude by highlighting the implications of our findings for the future of science policy and science communication.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijpor/edaa010</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-6347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-8400</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0954-2892 |
| ispartof | International journal of public opinion research, 2021-08, Vol.33 (2), p.422-431 |
| issn | 0954-2892 1471-6909 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2572569063 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Deference Familiarity Information sources Knowledge Mass media Political communication Political ideologies Public opinion Religiosity Science policy Social environment Sociocultural factors Values |
| title | Publics’ Support for Novel and Established Science Issues Linked to Perceived Knowledge and Deference to Science |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A07%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Publics%E2%80%99%20Support%20for%20Novel%20and%20Established%20Science%20Issues%20Linked%20to%20Perceived%20Knowledge%20and%20Deference%20to%20Science&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20public%20opinion%20research&rft.au=Akin,%20Heather&rft.date=2021-08-17&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=431&rft.pages=422-431&rft.issn=0954-2892&rft.eissn=1471-6909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edaa010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572569063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572569063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ijpor/edaa010&rfr_iscdi=true |