A comparative analysis of built environment and open terrain wind data by higher order statistics and performance evaluation of 5 kW HAWT using FAST
Small wind turbines (SWT) that are designed as per the IEC 61400-2 standard suffer structural and operational complexities when operating in the built environment, because such environments impose stochastic variations in wind speed and turbulence. The wind conditions in flat terrain of Östergarnsho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physics. Conference series 2018-06, Vol.1037 (7), p.72022 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 72022 |
container_title | Journal of physics. Conference series |
container_volume | 1037 |
creator | KC, A Whale, J Urmee, T Peinke, J Wächter, M |
description | Small wind turbines (SWT) that are designed as per the IEC 61400-2 standard suffer structural and operational complexities when operating in the built environment, because such environments impose stochastic variations in wind speed and turbulence. The wind conditions in flat terrain of Östergarnsholm (OG) Island, Sweden and built environment of Port Kennedy (PK), Australia are compared for turbulence intensity (TI) and intermittency. The TI of the PK wind field was 24% at mean wind speed of 15 m/s, which was higher than the Normal Turbulence Model (NTM) indicated in IEC 61400-2. The TI in the open terrain was below 18% for all mean wind speeds. Similarly, for three chosen wind speed bins within a SWT's operating range, the urban wind field had higher intermittency for smaller timescales but resulted in smaller intermittency as the time lag increased. The effect of these measured wind fields on the performance and loading of a turbine was studied at the three chosen wind speed bins using an aeroelastic model of a 5 kW SWT that was developed in FAST. The predicted output statistics using measured wind fields were compared with the assumed wind fields in the IEC 61400-2 standard. The rotor thrust and blade flapwise bending moment with PK wind data were higher than that of the IEC standard due to the increased turbulence in the inflowing wind indicating the inadequacy in the current wind standard applied for such SWTs for urban installations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572331283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572331283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-17eb9d0cb9327703b89d633d55a3a7104a5708942a5ef54005f61be7a08f85173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUd1KwzAYLaLgnD6DAe-E2fwsS3o5hnPKQMHJLkPaplvmltQknew9fGBTJxNBMBdfwnd-AuckySWCNwhyniLWx70BzQYpgoSlLIUMQ4yPks4BOT68OT9NzrxfQUjiYZ3kYwgKu6mlk0FvFZBGrndee2ArkDd6HYAyW-2s2SgTIloCWysDgnJOagPeddyUMkiQ78BSL5bKAevKOH2Ihj7own-pauUq6zbSFAqorVw3EbWm_YWC1zmYDOcz0HhtFmA8fJ6dJyeVXHt18X13k5fx7Ww06U0f7-5Hw2mvIBkPPcRUnpWwyDOCGYMk51k5IKSkVBLJEOxLyiDP-lhSVdE-hLQaoFwxCXnFKWKkm1ztfWtn3xrlg1jZxsUIvMCUYUIQ5iSy2J5VOOu9U5Wond5ItxMIirYC0YYr2qBFW4FgYl9BVJK9Utv6x_p_1fUfqoen0fNvoqjLinwCNc6WkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572331283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative analysis of built environment and open terrain wind data by higher order statistics and performance evaluation of 5 kW HAWT using FAST</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>KC, A ; Whale, J ; Urmee, T ; Peinke, J ; Wächter, M</creator><creatorcontrib>KC, A ; Whale, J ; Urmee, T ; Peinke, J ; Wächter, M</creatorcontrib><description>Small wind turbines (SWT) that are designed as per the IEC 61400-2 standard suffer structural and operational complexities when operating in the built environment, because such environments impose stochastic variations in wind speed and turbulence. The wind conditions in flat terrain of Östergarnsholm (OG) Island, Sweden and built environment of Port Kennedy (PK), Australia are compared for turbulence intensity (TI) and intermittency. The TI of the PK wind field was 24% at mean wind speed of 15 m/s, which was higher than the Normal Turbulence Model (NTM) indicated in IEC 61400-2. The TI in the open terrain was below 18% for all mean wind speeds. Similarly, for three chosen wind speed bins within a SWT's operating range, the urban wind field had higher intermittency for smaller timescales but resulted in smaller intermittency as the time lag increased. The effect of these measured wind fields on the performance and loading of a turbine was studied at the three chosen wind speed bins using an aeroelastic model of a 5 kW SWT that was developed in FAST. The predicted output statistics using measured wind fields were compared with the assumed wind fields in the IEC 61400-2 standard. The rotor thrust and blade flapwise bending moment with PK wind data were higher than that of the IEC standard due to the increased turbulence in the inflowing wind indicating the inadequacy in the current wind standard applied for such SWTs for urban installations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Bending moments ; Bins ; Built environment ; Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines ; Intermittency ; Mean ; Performance evaluation ; Physics ; Terrain ; Time lag ; Turbulence intensity ; Turbulence models ; Urban environments ; Wind effects ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2018-06, Vol.1037 (7), p.72022</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-17eb9d0cb9327703b89d633d55a3a7104a5708942a5ef54005f61be7a08f85173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072022/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KC, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whale, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urmee, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peinke, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wächter, M</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative analysis of built environment and open terrain wind data by higher order statistics and performance evaluation of 5 kW HAWT using FAST</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Small wind turbines (SWT) that are designed as per the IEC 61400-2 standard suffer structural and operational complexities when operating in the built environment, because such environments impose stochastic variations in wind speed and turbulence. The wind conditions in flat terrain of Östergarnsholm (OG) Island, Sweden and built environment of Port Kennedy (PK), Australia are compared for turbulence intensity (TI) and intermittency. The TI of the PK wind field was 24% at mean wind speed of 15 m/s, which was higher than the Normal Turbulence Model (NTM) indicated in IEC 61400-2. The TI in the open terrain was below 18% for all mean wind speeds. Similarly, for three chosen wind speed bins within a SWT's operating range, the urban wind field had higher intermittency for smaller timescales but resulted in smaller intermittency as the time lag increased. The effect of these measured wind fields on the performance and loading of a turbine was studied at the three chosen wind speed bins using an aeroelastic model of a 5 kW SWT that was developed in FAST. The predicted output statistics using measured wind fields were compared with the assumed wind fields in the IEC 61400-2 standard. The rotor thrust and blade flapwise bending moment with PK wind data were higher than that of the IEC standard due to the increased turbulence in the inflowing wind indicating the inadequacy in the current wind standard applied for such SWTs for urban installations.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Bending moments</subject><subject>Bins</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines</subject><subject>Intermittency</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Time lag</subject><subject>Turbulence intensity</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUd1KwzAYLaLgnD6DAe-E2fwsS3o5hnPKQMHJLkPaplvmltQknew9fGBTJxNBMBdfwnd-AuckySWCNwhyniLWx70BzQYpgoSlLIUMQ4yPks4BOT68OT9NzrxfQUjiYZ3kYwgKu6mlk0FvFZBGrndee2ArkDd6HYAyW-2s2SgTIloCWysDgnJOagPeddyUMkiQ78BSL5bKAevKOH2Ihj7own-pauUq6zbSFAqorVw3EbWm_YWC1zmYDOcz0HhtFmA8fJ6dJyeVXHt18X13k5fx7Ww06U0f7-5Hw2mvIBkPPcRUnpWwyDOCGYMk51k5IKSkVBLJEOxLyiDP-lhSVdE-hLQaoFwxCXnFKWKkm1ztfWtn3xrlg1jZxsUIvMCUYUIQ5iSy2J5VOOu9U5Wond5ItxMIirYC0YYr2qBFW4FgYl9BVJK9Utv6x_p_1fUfqoen0fNvoqjLinwCNc6WkA</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>KC, A</creator><creator>Whale, J</creator><creator>Urmee, T</creator><creator>Peinke, J</creator><creator>Wächter, M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>A comparative analysis of built environment and open terrain wind data by higher order statistics and performance evaluation of 5 kW HAWT using FAST</title><author>KC, A ; Whale, J ; Urmee, T ; Peinke, J ; Wächter, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-17eb9d0cb9327703b89d633d55a3a7104a5708942a5ef54005f61be7a08f85173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Bending moments</topic><topic>Bins</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines</topic><topic>Intermittency</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Time lag</topic><topic>Turbulence intensity</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KC, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whale, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urmee, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peinke, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wächter, M</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KC, A</au><au>Whale, J</au><au>Urmee, T</au><au>Peinke, J</au><au>Wächter, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative analysis of built environment and open terrain wind data by higher order statistics and performance evaluation of 5 kW HAWT using FAST</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>1037</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>72022</spage><pages>72022-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Small wind turbines (SWT) that are designed as per the IEC 61400-2 standard suffer structural and operational complexities when operating in the built environment, because such environments impose stochastic variations in wind speed and turbulence. The wind conditions in flat terrain of Östergarnsholm (OG) Island, Sweden and built environment of Port Kennedy (PK), Australia are compared for turbulence intensity (TI) and intermittency. The TI of the PK wind field was 24% at mean wind speed of 15 m/s, which was higher than the Normal Turbulence Model (NTM) indicated in IEC 61400-2. The TI in the open terrain was below 18% for all mean wind speeds. Similarly, for three chosen wind speed bins within a SWT's operating range, the urban wind field had higher intermittency for smaller timescales but resulted in smaller intermittency as the time lag increased. The effect of these measured wind fields on the performance and loading of a turbine was studied at the three chosen wind speed bins using an aeroelastic model of a 5 kW SWT that was developed in FAST. The predicted output statistics using measured wind fields were compared with the assumed wind fields in the IEC 61400-2 standard. The rotor thrust and blade flapwise bending moment with PK wind data were higher than that of the IEC standard due to the increased turbulence in the inflowing wind indicating the inadequacy in the current wind standard applied for such SWTs for urban installations.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072022</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6588 |
ispartof | Journal of physics. Conference series, 2018-06, Vol.1037 (7), p.72022 |
issn | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2572331283 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IOPscience extra; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aerodynamics Bending moments Bins Built environment Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Intermittency Mean Performance evaluation Physics Terrain Time lag Turbulence intensity Turbulence models Urban environments Wind effects Wind speed |
title | A comparative analysis of built environment and open terrain wind data by higher order statistics and performance evaluation of 5 kW HAWT using FAST |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T11%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20built%20environment%20and%20open%20terrain%20wind%20data%20by%20higher%20order%20statistics%20and%20performance%20evaluation%20of%205%20kW%20HAWT%20using%20FAST&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=KC,%20A&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=1037&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=72022&rft.pages=72022-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2572331283%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572331283&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |