Repression and Dissent in Contemporary Catalonia
An extensive literature in political science and sociology has analyzed how state repression shapes attempts by social movements to pursue political objectives. Less studied, however, is the effect that state repression of activists has on the broader public. Understanding public responses to repres...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of political science 2021-10, Vol.51 (4), p.1742-1750 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1750 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1742 |
container_title | British journal of political science |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Balcells, Laia Dorsey, Spencer Tellez, Juan F. |
description | An extensive literature in political science and sociology has analyzed how state repression shapes attempts by social movements to pursue political objectives. Less studied, however, is the effect that state repression of activists has on the broader public. Understanding public responses to repression is important, as both states and social movements take action with an eye toward (de)mobilizing broader constituencies. This letter analyzes this dynamic in the context of contemporary Catalonia, where the Spanish state cracked down on efforts by Catalan activists to hold a public referendum on independence. Matching poll respondents in the months before and after the crackdown in late 2017, the study finds that repression increased public sympathy for independence for a short period, and heightened animosity towards actors perceived to be associated or complicit with the Spanish state. The findings speak to the potential for state repression of nonviolent movements to create windows of opportunity for broader mobilization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007123420000307 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2571853884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007123420000307</cupid><sourcerecordid>2571853884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f8f96507a424c1bf87f3287597423a9cdf55dd657ed4a2ca3f5bc7660693feae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UElLxDAUDqJgHf0B3gqeq3lZmvQodYUBweUc0izSYZrUpHPw39syAx7E03uPb3t8CF0CvgYM4uYNYyyAUEbmBVMsjlABrG4qAkCOUbHA1YKforOcN_MpqYQC4Vc3JpdzH0Opgy3v-pxdmMo-lG0MkxvGmHT6Lls96W0MvT5HJ15vs7s4zBX6eLh_b5-q9cvjc3u7rgwFMVVe-qbmWGhGmIHOS-EpkYI3ghGqG2M959bWXDjLNDGaet4ZUde4bqh32tEVutr7jil-7Vye1CbuUpgjFeECJKdSspkFe5ZJMefkvBpTP8wPK8BqKUb9KWbW0INGD13q7af7tf5f9QPyy2NU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571853884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repression and Dissent in Contemporary Catalonia</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Balcells, Laia ; Dorsey, Spencer ; Tellez, Juan F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balcells, Laia ; Dorsey, Spencer ; Tellez, Juan F.</creatorcontrib><description>An extensive literature in political science and sociology has analyzed how state repression shapes attempts by social movements to pursue political objectives. Less studied, however, is the effect that state repression of activists has on the broader public. Understanding public responses to repression is important, as both states and social movements take action with an eye toward (de)mobilizing broader constituencies. This letter analyzes this dynamic in the context of contemporary Catalonia, where the Spanish state cracked down on efforts by Catalan activists to hold a public referendum on independence. Matching poll respondents in the months before and after the crackdown in late 2017, the study finds that repression increased public sympathy for independence for a short period, and heightened animosity towards actors perceived to be associated or complicit with the Spanish state. The findings speak to the potential for state repression of nonviolent movements to create windows of opportunity for broader mobilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007123420000307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Activists ; Animosity ; Constituents ; Dissent ; Independence ; Letter ; Mobilization ; Nonviolence ; Oppression ; Political activism ; Political science ; Polls & surveys ; Public opinion surveys ; Referendums ; Respondents ; Secession ; Social activism ; Social movements ; Social networks ; Sociodemographics ; Sympathy ; Victimization ; Violence</subject><ispartof>British journal of political science, 2021-10, Vol.51 (4), p.1742-1750</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f8f96507a424c1bf87f3287597423a9cdf55dd657ed4a2ca3f5bc7660693feae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f8f96507a424c1bf87f3287597423a9cdf55dd657ed4a2ca3f5bc7660693feae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0237-7410 ; 0000-0003-2922-4123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123420000307/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balcells, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorsey, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tellez, Juan F.</creatorcontrib><title>Repression and Dissent in Contemporary Catalonia</title><title>British journal of political science</title><addtitle>Brit. J. Polit. Sci</addtitle><description>An extensive literature in political science and sociology has analyzed how state repression shapes attempts by social movements to pursue political objectives. Less studied, however, is the effect that state repression of activists has on the broader public. Understanding public responses to repression is important, as both states and social movements take action with an eye toward (de)mobilizing broader constituencies. This letter analyzes this dynamic in the context of contemporary Catalonia, where the Spanish state cracked down on efforts by Catalan activists to hold a public referendum on independence. Matching poll respondents in the months before and after the crackdown in late 2017, the study finds that repression increased public sympathy for independence for a short period, and heightened animosity towards actors perceived to be associated or complicit with the Spanish state. The findings speak to the potential for state repression of nonviolent movements to create windows of opportunity for broader mobilization.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Activists</subject><subject>Animosity</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Dissent</subject><subject>Independence</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Nonviolence</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Secession</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0007-1234</issn><issn>1469-2112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UElLxDAUDqJgHf0B3gqeq3lZmvQodYUBweUc0izSYZrUpHPw39syAx7E03uPb3t8CF0CvgYM4uYNYyyAUEbmBVMsjlABrG4qAkCOUbHA1YKforOcN_MpqYQC4Vc3JpdzH0Opgy3v-pxdmMo-lG0MkxvGmHT6Lls96W0MvT5HJ15vs7s4zBX6eLh_b5-q9cvjc3u7rgwFMVVe-qbmWGhGmIHOS-EpkYI3ghGqG2M959bWXDjLNDGaet4ZUde4bqh32tEVutr7jil-7Vye1CbuUpgjFeECJKdSspkFe5ZJMefkvBpTP8wPK8BqKUb9KWbW0INGD13q7af7tf5f9QPyy2NU</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Balcells, Laia</creator><creator>Dorsey, Spencer</creator><creator>Tellez, Juan F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-7410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-4123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Repression and Dissent in Contemporary Catalonia</title><author>Balcells, Laia ; Dorsey, Spencer ; Tellez, Juan F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f8f96507a424c1bf87f3287597423a9cdf55dd657ed4a2ca3f5bc7660693feae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Activists</topic><topic>Animosity</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Dissent</topic><topic>Independence</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Nonviolence</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Secession</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balcells, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorsey, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tellez, Juan F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Military Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balcells, Laia</au><au>Dorsey, Spencer</au><au>Tellez, Juan F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repression and Dissent in Contemporary Catalonia</atitle><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Brit. J. Polit. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1742</spage><epage>1750</epage><pages>1742-1750</pages><issn>0007-1234</issn><eissn>1469-2112</eissn><abstract>An extensive literature in political science and sociology has analyzed how state repression shapes attempts by social movements to pursue political objectives. Less studied, however, is the effect that state repression of activists has on the broader public. Understanding public responses to repression is important, as both states and social movements take action with an eye toward (de)mobilizing broader constituencies. This letter analyzes this dynamic in the context of contemporary Catalonia, where the Spanish state cracked down on efforts by Catalan activists to hold a public referendum on independence. Matching poll respondents in the months before and after the crackdown in late 2017, the study finds that repression increased public sympathy for independence for a short period, and heightened animosity towards actors perceived to be associated or complicit with the Spanish state. The findings speak to the potential for state repression of nonviolent movements to create windows of opportunity for broader mobilization.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0007123420000307</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-7410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-4123</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1234 |
ispartof | British journal of political science, 2021-10, Vol.51 (4), p.1742-1750 |
issn | 0007-1234 1469-2112 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2571853884 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Activism Activists Animosity Constituents Dissent Independence Letter Mobilization Nonviolence Oppression Political activism Political science Polls & surveys Public opinion surveys Referendums Respondents Secession Social activism Social movements Social networks Sociodemographics Sympathy Victimization Violence |
title | Repression and Dissent in Contemporary Catalonia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A13%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repression%20and%20Dissent%20in%20Contemporary%20Catalonia&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Balcells,%20Laia&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1742&rft.epage=1750&rft.pages=1742-1750&rft.issn=0007-1234&rft.eissn=1469-2112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007123420000307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2571853884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571853884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007123420000307&rfr_iscdi=true |