Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection
Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passiv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources management 2021-09, Vol.35 (11), p.3737-3753 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3753 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 3737 |
| container_title | Water resources management |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Štirbanović, Zoran Gardić, Vojka Stanujkić, Dragiša Marković, Radmila Sokolović, Jovica Stevanović, Zoran |
| description | Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passive treatment method, sequential neutralization, ion exchange, adsorption process based on low cost adsorbents, adsorption process based on natural zeolits, electrodialysis, filtration with nanofiltration membranes, and reverse osmosis, were evaluated by the following MCDM methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOOSRA, WASPAS, and CoCoSo. Criteria used for the evaluation were: efficiency in the metal ions removal and the quality of the purified water, necessity of pre-treatment and / or post-treatment of treated water, possibility of using the generated waste, capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, needed area, and sensitivity of the method. The results of the MCDM analysis showed that sequential neutralization was the most appropriate method for this wastewater, while passive treatment system and ion exchange were ranked as second and third, respectively.
After the selection of AMD treatment method, neutralization tests with lime were carried out with the water sample from Robule Lake. The results of sequential neutralization testing showed that concentration of Fe ions could be lowered to 1 mg/L at pH 4. The values of Cu, Zn, and Ni ions concentration obtained at pH 7 were 0.04, 0.65, and 0.21 mg/L, respectively, while the values of Mn and Cd ions concentration of 0.01 and 0.0001 mg/L, were obtained at pH 10. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2571336520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2571336520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-102b2d0c5d1f8624885cd5ffd9b258d895aef4d7ce44933a97a379eaea773e4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKuA6-idVyYDbkrqCxpcWNfDNLmjKW1SZ6ZC_72jEdy5uJzN-Q6Xj5BLCtcUQN0ESlmhc2A0naYi50dkQqXiOS0kHJMJaAa5UIKekrMQ1gAJ0zAht9Ww3VlvY_eJWV3N62zW280hdCFzg89m9TxberRxi33MaozvQ5u94Aab2A39OTlxdhPw4jen5PX-blk95ovnh6dqtsgbXvCYU2Ar1kIjW-rKgomylE0rnWv1ismyLbW06ESrGhRCc261slxptGiV4iiQT8nVuLvzw8ceQzTrYe_Tn8EwqSjnhWSQWmxsNX4IwaMzO99trT8YCubbkhktmWTJ_FgyPEF8hEIq92_o_6b_ob4AzJloxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571336520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Štirbanović, Zoran ; Gardić, Vojka ; Stanujkić, Dragiša ; Marković, Radmila ; Sokolović, Jovica ; Stevanović, Zoran</creator><creatorcontrib>Štirbanović, Zoran ; Gardić, Vojka ; Stanujkić, Dragiša ; Marković, Radmila ; Sokolović, Jovica ; Stevanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><description>Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passive treatment method, sequential neutralization, ion exchange, adsorption process based on low cost adsorbents, adsorption process based on natural zeolits, electrodialysis, filtration with nanofiltration membranes, and reverse osmosis, were evaluated by the following MCDM methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOOSRA, WASPAS, and CoCoSo. Criteria used for the evaluation were: efficiency in the metal ions removal and the quality of the purified water, necessity of pre-treatment and / or post-treatment of treated water, possibility of using the generated waste, capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, needed area, and sensitivity of the method. The results of the MCDM analysis showed that sequential neutralization was the most appropriate method for this wastewater, while passive treatment system and ion exchange were ranked as second and third, respectively.
After the selection of AMD treatment method, neutralization tests with lime were carried out with the water sample from Robule Lake. The results of sequential neutralization testing showed that concentration of Fe ions could be lowered to 1 mg/L at pH 4. The values of Cu, Zn, and Ni ions concentration obtained at pH 7 were 0.04, 0.65, and 0.21 mg/L, respectively, while the values of Mn and Cd ions concentration of 0.01 and 0.0001 mg/L, were obtained at pH 10.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-4741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acid mine drainage ; Adsorption ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Cadmium ; Capital costs ; Civil Engineering ; Copper ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electrodialysis ; Environment ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Heavy metals ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Ion exchange ; Iron ; Lakes ; Maintenance costs ; Manganese ; Membranes ; Metal ions ; Methods ; Mine drainage ; Nanofiltration ; Nanotechnology ; Neutralization ; Nickel ; Operating costs ; pH effects ; Reverse osmosis ; Treated water ; Waste materials ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water analysis ; Water pollution ; Water purification ; Water quality ; Water sampling ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Water resources management, 2021-09, Vol.35 (11), p.3737-3753</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-102b2d0c5d1f8624885cd5ffd9b258d895aef4d7ce44933a97a379eaea773e4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-102b2d0c5d1f8624885cd5ffd9b258d895aef4d7ce44933a97a379eaea773e4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7571-2844 ; 0000-0001-9865-3939 ; 0000-0001-5317-6884 ; 0000-0002-6846-3074 ; 0000-0001-9754-1150 ; 0000-0002-2003-1141</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Štirbanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardić, Vojka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanujkić, Dragiša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marković, Radmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokolović, Jovica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection</title><title>Water resources management</title><addtitle>Water Resour Manage</addtitle><description>Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passive treatment method, sequential neutralization, ion exchange, adsorption process based on low cost adsorbents, adsorption process based on natural zeolits, electrodialysis, filtration with nanofiltration membranes, and reverse osmosis, were evaluated by the following MCDM methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOOSRA, WASPAS, and CoCoSo. Criteria used for the evaluation were: efficiency in the metal ions removal and the quality of the purified water, necessity of pre-treatment and / or post-treatment of treated water, possibility of using the generated waste, capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, needed area, and sensitivity of the method. The results of the MCDM analysis showed that sequential neutralization was the most appropriate method for this wastewater, while passive treatment system and ion exchange were ranked as second and third, respectively.
After the selection of AMD treatment method, neutralization tests with lime were carried out with the water sample from Robule Lake. The results of sequential neutralization testing showed that concentration of Fe ions could be lowered to 1 mg/L at pH 4. The values of Cu, Zn, and Ni ions concentration obtained at pH 7 were 0.04, 0.65, and 0.21 mg/L, respectively, while the values of Mn and Cd ions concentration of 0.01 and 0.0001 mg/L, were obtained at pH 10.</description><subject>Acid mine drainage</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electrodialysis</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Ion exchange</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Maintenance costs</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Metal ions</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mine drainage</subject><subject>Nanofiltration</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Reverse osmosis</subject><subject>Treated water</subject><subject>Waste materials</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0920-4741</issn><issn>1573-1650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKuA6-idVyYDbkrqCxpcWNfDNLmjKW1SZ6ZC_72jEdy5uJzN-Q6Xj5BLCtcUQN0ESlmhc2A0naYi50dkQqXiOS0kHJMJaAa5UIKekrMQ1gAJ0zAht9Ww3VlvY_eJWV3N62zW280hdCFzg89m9TxberRxi33MaozvQ5u94Aab2A39OTlxdhPw4jen5PX-blk95ovnh6dqtsgbXvCYU2Ar1kIjW-rKgomylE0rnWv1ismyLbW06ESrGhRCc261slxptGiV4iiQT8nVuLvzw8ceQzTrYe_Tn8EwqSjnhWSQWmxsNX4IwaMzO99trT8YCubbkhktmWTJ_FgyPEF8hEIq92_o_6b_ob4AzJloxQ</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Štirbanović, Zoran</creator><creator>Gardić, Vojka</creator><creator>Stanujkić, Dragiša</creator><creator>Marković, Radmila</creator><creator>Sokolović, Jovica</creator><creator>Stevanović, Zoran</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-2844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-3939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-6884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6846-3074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-1150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-1141</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection</title><author>Štirbanović, Zoran ; Gardić, Vojka ; Stanujkić, Dragiša ; Marković, Radmila ; Sokolović, Jovica ; Stevanović, Zoran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-102b2d0c5d1f8624885cd5ffd9b258d895aef4d7ce44933a97a379eaea773e4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acid mine drainage</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electrodialysis</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Ion exchange</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Maintenance costs</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Metal ions</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mine drainage</topic><topic>Nanofiltration</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Reverse osmosis</topic><topic>Treated water</topic><topic>Waste materials</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Štirbanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardić, Vojka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanujkić, Dragiša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marković, Radmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokolović, Jovica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Štirbanović, Zoran</au><au>Gardić, Vojka</au><au>Stanujkić, Dragiša</au><au>Marković, Radmila</au><au>Sokolović, Jovica</au><au>Stevanović, Zoran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection</atitle><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour Manage</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3737</spage><epage>3753</epage><pages>3737-3753</pages><issn>0920-4741</issn><eissn>1573-1650</eissn><abstract>Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passive treatment method, sequential neutralization, ion exchange, adsorption process based on low cost adsorbents, adsorption process based on natural zeolits, electrodialysis, filtration with nanofiltration membranes, and reverse osmosis, were evaluated by the following MCDM methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOOSRA, WASPAS, and CoCoSo. Criteria used for the evaluation were: efficiency in the metal ions removal and the quality of the purified water, necessity of pre-treatment and / or post-treatment of treated water, possibility of using the generated waste, capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, needed area, and sensitivity of the method. The results of the MCDM analysis showed that sequential neutralization was the most appropriate method for this wastewater, while passive treatment system and ion exchange were ranked as second and third, respectively.
After the selection of AMD treatment method, neutralization tests with lime were carried out with the water sample from Robule Lake. The results of sequential neutralization testing showed that concentration of Fe ions could be lowered to 1 mg/L at pH 4. The values of Cu, Zn, and Ni ions concentration obtained at pH 7 were 0.04, 0.65, and 0.21 mg/L, respectively, while the values of Mn and Cd ions concentration of 0.01 and 0.0001 mg/L, were obtained at pH 10.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-2844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-3939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-6884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6846-3074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-1150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-1141</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0920-4741 |
| ispartof | Water resources management, 2021-09, Vol.35 (11), p.3737-3753 |
| issn | 0920-4741 1573-1650 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2571336520 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Acid mine drainage Adsorption Atmospheric Sciences Cadmium Capital costs Civil Engineering Copper Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Electrodialysis Environment Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Heavy metals Hydrogeology Hydrology/Water Resources Ion exchange Iron Lakes Maintenance costs Manganese Membranes Metal ions Methods Mine drainage Nanofiltration Nanotechnology Neutralization Nickel Operating costs pH effects Reverse osmosis Treated water Waste materials Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water analysis Water pollution Water purification Water quality Water sampling Zinc |
| title | Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20MCDM%20Analysis%20for%20AMD%20Treatment%20Method%20Selection&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20management&rft.au=%C5%A0tirbanovi%C4%87,%20Zoran&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3737&rft.epage=3753&rft.pages=3737-3753&rft.issn=0920-4741&rft.eissn=1573-1650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2571336520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571336520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |