The influence of students' score by compare learning model auditory intelectually repetition and visualization auditory kinestetic of wave and vibration materials in SMP Negeri 33 Bandar Lampung

This research aims to know the influence of students' score comparison in the cognitive and affective aspect, using AIR and VAK learning model. This sample research is VIII-A, with using VAK learning model as experimental class 1 and VIII-B using AIR learning model meanwhile sampling technique...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2020-06, Vol.1572 (1), p.12078
Hauptverfasser: Latifah, S, Anggraini, W, Tamara, O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This research aims to know the influence of students' score comparison in the cognitive and affective aspect, using AIR and VAK learning model. This sample research is VIII-A, with using VAK learning model as experimental class 1 and VIII-B using AIR learning model meanwhile sampling technique that is using pursosive sampling technique. This researcher used quasy eksperimental research. The design that researcher use is (control group pretest-posttest design). The data is being analyze by using normalized gain used microsoft excel program that aim to know improvement of students' score. Then the data tested statistically to pretest and postest students' score by doing normality test, homogeneity and t-test by using microsoft excel program. The average value in the cognitive aspect, the N-gain score of AIR class is fair category, the N-gain score of VAK class is high category. In the affective aspect VAK class is better of the VAK class. The result of statistical test calculated tcount > ttabel its mean that Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted. The result of this research showing that the magnitude of effectiveness AIR and VAK model is the fair category. VAK model more effective than AIR model.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012078