Sensitivity analysis and optimization of a CO2 centrifugal compressor impeller with a vaneless diffuser
Fluid flow in centrifugal compressors is complex and turbulent, making it difficult to achieve a robust equipment design. In this work, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is conducted on the periodical domain of a CO 2 centrifugal compressor impeller and vaneless diffuser, with a 2.85:1 p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization 2021-09, Vol.64 (3), p.1607-1627 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1627 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1607 |
container_title | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Salviano, Leandro Oliveira Gasparin, Elóy Esteves Mattos, Vitor Cesar N. Barbizan, Bruno Saltara, Fábio de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista Dezan, Daniel Jonas Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo |
description | Fluid flow in centrifugal compressors is complex and turbulent, making it difficult to achieve a robust equipment design. In this work, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is conducted on the periodical domain of a CO
2
centrifugal compressor impeller and vaneless diffuser, with a 2.85:1 pressure ratio, using ANSYS CFX. The fluid flow is assumed to be steady state, turbulent, and three dimensional. Since polar angles are not considered in the traditional one-dimensional analysis, eight polar angles on hub and shroud were considered for modeling, sensitivity analysis, and optimization. After numerical verification and validation, a sequential sensitivity analysis (SA) was performed to identify non-influential variables. From the same design of experiment (DoE) used by the Morris qualitative SA, a response surface (RS) was trained to perform a quantitative SA by the smoothing spline ANOVA (SS-ANOVA) method. The Morris method was found to be more conservative than SS-ANOVA, keeping more variables as influent for the analysis. Both methods agreed on influential variables ranking. Low computational effort was required to submit the RS to a constrained optimization procedure using the NSGA-II method. The polytropic efficiency of the optimal centrifugal compressor configuration increased 0.7%, keeping the pressure ratio above 2.85, and the required power and outlet temperature below the base compressor. The impact of the polar angles at trailing edge on output variables is higher than leading edge. The optimal centrifugal compressor found is submitted to different mass flow rates and the overall performance for the optimal angles of the trailing edge and leading edge of the impeller was higher than the base compressor. The strategy adopted herein related to qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis coupled with response surface and the constrained optimization was shown to be robust, which can be applied to high-dimensional CFD models to reduce the computational cost with suitable results regarding fluid flow phenomena. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00158-021-02914-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2569483020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2569483020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b6e00198ce70c691071105f761f636704ebba46d3ef6402045ee4109c77ed19b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7-A54CnquTNk3aoyx-wcIeVPAW0nayZumXSbqy_vVGV_TmYZiBee_B-xFyzuCSAcgrD8DyIoGUxSkZT9IDMmOC5QnjRXH4e8uXY3Li_QYACuDljKwfsfc22K0NO6p73e689fFo6DAG29kPHezQ08FQTRerlNbYB2fNtNYtrYdudOj94KjtRmxbdPTdhtco3eoe2_iijTVm8uhOyZHRrceznz0nz7c3T4v7ZLm6e1hcL5M6Y2VIKoGxSVnUKKEWJQPJGORGCmZEJiRwrCrNRZOhERxS4DkiZ1DWUmLDyiqbk4t97uiGtwl9UJthcrGXV2kuSl5k0RVV6V5Vu8F7h0aNznba7RQD9QVU7YGqCFR9A1VpNGV7k4_ifo3uL_of1yflanlW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2569483020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity analysis and optimization of a CO2 centrifugal compressor impeller with a vaneless diffuser</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira ; Gasparin, Elóy Esteves ; Mattos, Vitor Cesar N. ; Barbizan, Bruno ; Saltara, Fábio ; de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista ; Dezan, Daniel Jonas ; Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</creator><creatorcontrib>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira ; Gasparin, Elóy Esteves ; Mattos, Vitor Cesar N. ; Barbizan, Bruno ; Saltara, Fábio ; de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista ; Dezan, Daniel Jonas ; Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</creatorcontrib><description>Fluid flow in centrifugal compressors is complex and turbulent, making it difficult to achieve a robust equipment design. In this work, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is conducted on the periodical domain of a CO
2
centrifugal compressor impeller and vaneless diffuser, with a 2.85:1 pressure ratio, using ANSYS CFX. The fluid flow is assumed to be steady state, turbulent, and three dimensional. Since polar angles are not considered in the traditional one-dimensional analysis, eight polar angles on hub and shroud were considered for modeling, sensitivity analysis, and optimization. After numerical verification and validation, a sequential sensitivity analysis (SA) was performed to identify non-influential variables. From the same design of experiment (DoE) used by the Morris qualitative SA, a response surface (RS) was trained to perform a quantitative SA by the smoothing spline ANOVA (SS-ANOVA) method. The Morris method was found to be more conservative than SS-ANOVA, keeping more variables as influent for the analysis. Both methods agreed on influential variables ranking. Low computational effort was required to submit the RS to a constrained optimization procedure using the NSGA-II method. The polytropic efficiency of the optimal centrifugal compressor configuration increased 0.7%, keeping the pressure ratio above 2.85, and the required power and outlet temperature below the base compressor. The impact of the polar angles at trailing edge on output variables is higher than leading edge. The optimal centrifugal compressor found is submitted to different mass flow rates and the overall performance for the optimal angles of the trailing edge and leading edge of the impeller was higher than the base compressor. The strategy adopted herein related to qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis coupled with response surface and the constrained optimization was shown to be robust, which can be applied to high-dimensional CFD models to reduce the computational cost with suitable results regarding fluid flow phenomena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-147X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-1488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02914-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Centrifugal compressors ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis ; Computing costs ; Design of experiments ; Dimensional analysis ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Fluid flow ; Impellers ; Industrial Application Paper ; Leading edges ; Mass flow rate ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Pressure ratio ; Qualitative analysis ; Response surface methodology ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Sensitivity analysis ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; Trailing edges ; Turbulent flow ; Vaneless diffusers ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2021-09, Vol.64 (3), p.1607-1627</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b6e00198ce70c691071105f761f636704ebba46d3ef6402045ee4109c77ed19b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b6e00198ce70c691071105f761f636704ebba46d3ef6402045ee4109c77ed19b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5005-9869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-021-02914-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-021-02914-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparin, Elóy Esteves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattos, Vitor Cesar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbizan, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltara, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dezan, Daniel Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity analysis and optimization of a CO2 centrifugal compressor impeller with a vaneless diffuser</title><title>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</title><addtitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</addtitle><description>Fluid flow in centrifugal compressors is complex and turbulent, making it difficult to achieve a robust equipment design. In this work, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is conducted on the periodical domain of a CO
2
centrifugal compressor impeller and vaneless diffuser, with a 2.85:1 pressure ratio, using ANSYS CFX. The fluid flow is assumed to be steady state, turbulent, and three dimensional. Since polar angles are not considered in the traditional one-dimensional analysis, eight polar angles on hub and shroud were considered for modeling, sensitivity analysis, and optimization. After numerical verification and validation, a sequential sensitivity analysis (SA) was performed to identify non-influential variables. From the same design of experiment (DoE) used by the Morris qualitative SA, a response surface (RS) was trained to perform a quantitative SA by the smoothing spline ANOVA (SS-ANOVA) method. The Morris method was found to be more conservative than SS-ANOVA, keeping more variables as influent for the analysis. Both methods agreed on influential variables ranking. Low computational effort was required to submit the RS to a constrained optimization procedure using the NSGA-II method. The polytropic efficiency of the optimal centrifugal compressor configuration increased 0.7%, keeping the pressure ratio above 2.85, and the required power and outlet temperature below the base compressor. The impact of the polar angles at trailing edge on output variables is higher than leading edge. The optimal centrifugal compressor found is submitted to different mass flow rates and the overall performance for the optimal angles of the trailing edge and leading edge of the impeller was higher than the base compressor. The strategy adopted herein related to qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis coupled with response surface and the constrained optimization was shown to be robust, which can be applied to high-dimensional CFD models to reduce the computational cost with suitable results regarding fluid flow phenomena.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Centrifugal compressors</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</subject><subject>Computing costs</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Impellers</subject><subject>Industrial Application Paper</subject><subject>Leading edges</subject><subject>Mass flow rate</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pressure ratio</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>Trailing edges</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Vaneless diffusers</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1615-147X</issn><issn>1615-1488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7-A54CnquTNk3aoyx-wcIeVPAW0nayZumXSbqy_vVGV_TmYZiBee_B-xFyzuCSAcgrD8DyIoGUxSkZT9IDMmOC5QnjRXH4e8uXY3Li_QYACuDljKwfsfc22K0NO6p73e689fFo6DAG29kPHezQ08FQTRerlNbYB2fNtNYtrYdudOj94KjtRmxbdPTdhtco3eoe2_iijTVm8uhOyZHRrceznz0nz7c3T4v7ZLm6e1hcL5M6Y2VIKoGxSVnUKKEWJQPJGORGCmZEJiRwrCrNRZOhERxS4DkiZ1DWUmLDyiqbk4t97uiGtwl9UJthcrGXV2kuSl5k0RVV6V5Vu8F7h0aNznba7RQD9QVU7YGqCFR9A1VpNGV7k4_ifo3uL_of1yflanlW</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira</creator><creator>Gasparin, Elóy Esteves</creator><creator>Mattos, Vitor Cesar N.</creator><creator>Barbizan, Bruno</creator><creator>Saltara, Fábio</creator><creator>de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista</creator><creator>Dezan, Daniel Jonas</creator><creator>Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-9869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Sensitivity analysis and optimization of a CO2 centrifugal compressor impeller with a vaneless diffuser</title><author>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira ; Gasparin, Elóy Esteves ; Mattos, Vitor Cesar N. ; Barbizan, Bruno ; Saltara, Fábio ; de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista ; Dezan, Daniel Jonas ; Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b6e00198ce70c691071105f761f636704ebba46d3ef6402045ee4109c77ed19b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Centrifugal compressors</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</topic><topic>Computing costs</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Impellers</topic><topic>Industrial Application Paper</topic><topic>Leading edges</topic><topic>Mass flow rate</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pressure ratio</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>Trailing edges</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Vaneless diffusers</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparin, Elóy Esteves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattos, Vitor Cesar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbizan, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saltara, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dezan, Daniel Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salviano, Leandro Oliveira</au><au>Gasparin, Elóy Esteves</au><au>Mattos, Vitor Cesar N.</au><au>Barbizan, Bruno</au><au>Saltara, Fábio</au><au>de Mello, Paulo Eduardo Batista</au><au>Dezan, Daniel Jonas</au><au>Yanagihara, Jurandir Itizo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity analysis and optimization of a CO2 centrifugal compressor impeller with a vaneless diffuser</atitle><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle><stitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1627</epage><pages>1607-1627</pages><issn>1615-147X</issn><eissn>1615-1488</eissn><abstract>Fluid flow in centrifugal compressors is complex and turbulent, making it difficult to achieve a robust equipment design. In this work, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is conducted on the periodical domain of a CO
2
centrifugal compressor impeller and vaneless diffuser, with a 2.85:1 pressure ratio, using ANSYS CFX. The fluid flow is assumed to be steady state, turbulent, and three dimensional. Since polar angles are not considered in the traditional one-dimensional analysis, eight polar angles on hub and shroud were considered for modeling, sensitivity analysis, and optimization. After numerical verification and validation, a sequential sensitivity analysis (SA) was performed to identify non-influential variables. From the same design of experiment (DoE) used by the Morris qualitative SA, a response surface (RS) was trained to perform a quantitative SA by the smoothing spline ANOVA (SS-ANOVA) method. The Morris method was found to be more conservative than SS-ANOVA, keeping more variables as influent for the analysis. Both methods agreed on influential variables ranking. Low computational effort was required to submit the RS to a constrained optimization procedure using the NSGA-II method. The polytropic efficiency of the optimal centrifugal compressor configuration increased 0.7%, keeping the pressure ratio above 2.85, and the required power and outlet temperature below the base compressor. The impact of the polar angles at trailing edge on output variables is higher than leading edge. The optimal centrifugal compressor found is submitted to different mass flow rates and the overall performance for the optimal angles of the trailing edge and leading edge of the impeller was higher than the base compressor. The strategy adopted herein related to qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis coupled with response surface and the constrained optimization was shown to be robust, which can be applied to high-dimensional CFD models to reduce the computational cost with suitable results regarding fluid flow phenomena.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00158-021-02914-2</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-9869</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-147X |
ispartof | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2021-09, Vol.64 (3), p.1607-1627 |
issn | 1615-147X 1615-1488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2569483020 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Centrifugal compressors Computational fluid dynamics Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis Computing costs Design of experiments Dimensional analysis Engineering Engineering Design Fluid flow Impellers Industrial Application Paper Leading edges Mass flow rate Mathematical models Optimization Pressure ratio Qualitative analysis Response surface methodology Robustness (mathematics) Sensitivity analysis Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Trailing edges Turbulent flow Vaneless diffusers Variance analysis |
title | Sensitivity analysis and optimization of a CO2 centrifugal compressor impeller with a vaneless diffuser |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A03%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20analysis%20and%20optimization%20of%20a%20CO2%20centrifugal%20compressor%20impeller%20with%20a%20vaneless%20diffuser&rft.jtitle=Structural%20and%20multidisciplinary%20optimization&rft.au=Salviano,%20Leandro%20Oliveira&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1627&rft.pages=1607-1627&rft.issn=1615-147X&rft.eissn=1615-1488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00158-021-02914-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2569483020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2569483020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |