Developing, Implementing and Critiquing an Evaluation Framework to Assess the Extent to Which a Child’s Right to be Heard is Embedded at an Organisational Level

The national Child and Family Agency in Ireland, in 2015, undertook an ambitious three-year programme of work to embed a child’s right to be heard in its culture and operations. In parallel to its implementation, the authors of this paper were tasked with evaluating to what extent this intended outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child indicators research 2021-10, Vol.14 (5), p.1931-1948
Hauptverfasser: Kennan, Danielle, Brady, Bernadine, Forkan, Cormac, Tierney, Edel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1948
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1931
container_title Child indicators research
container_volume 14
creator Kennan, Danielle
Brady, Bernadine
Forkan, Cormac
Tierney, Edel
description The national Child and Family Agency in Ireland, in 2015, undertook an ambitious three-year programme of work to embed a child’s right to be heard in its culture and operations. In parallel to its implementation, the authors of this paper were tasked with evaluating to what extent this intended outcome, that a child’s right to be heard was embedded in the government agency’s culture and operations, was achieved. The overarching evaluation design was a mixed methods baseline and follow up study. This paper reports on the development and implementation of the evaluation framework guiding the study. The framework comprised seven structural and process indicators adapted from the Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool and five outcome indicators informed by the Lundy Model of participation. As well as reporting on the evaluation process, the paper critiques the value of the framework, its benefits, challenges and the pitfalls along the way to inform future evaluations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12187-021-09842-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568818048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2568818048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-64e02bb5b9e6c74b25eb4ef94aae917617ac540b0a56ae6c9cbed130696ad4313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctO3DAUjaoilUJ_oKsrdUta23EcZ4mmQ0EaCQmBYGfdJHcmpnkMtoe2rPob3fJpfAmeCaI7Vvd1Hlc6SfKZs6-cseKb54LrImWCp6zUUqQP75L9uJGpLrV-_9oXNx-Sj97fMqY4E2I_efxO99SNazusjuCsX3fU0xDiBDg0MHM22LvNNML8HrsNBjsOcOKwp1-j-wlhhGPvyXsILcH8d4j07fK6tXULCLPWds3T338eLuyq3Z0qglNC14D1MO8rahpqAMPW4tytcLB-Z4IdLLbPHSZ7S-w8fXqpB8nVyfxydpouzn-czY4XaZ2pLKRKEhNVlVclqbqQlcipkrQsJSKVvFC8wDqXrGKYK4yQso7OPGOqVNjIjGcHyZdJd-3Guw35YG7HjYtveCNypTXXTOqIEhOqdqP3jpZm7WyP7o_hzGyzMFMWJmZhdlmYh0jKJpKP4GFF7r_0G6xn0umQUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568818048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing, Implementing and Critiquing an Evaluation Framework to Assess the Extent to Which a Child’s Right to be Heard is Embedded at an Organisational Level</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kennan, Danielle ; Brady, Bernadine ; Forkan, Cormac ; Tierney, Edel</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennan, Danielle ; Brady, Bernadine ; Forkan, Cormac ; Tierney, Edel</creatorcontrib><description>The national Child and Family Agency in Ireland, in 2015, undertook an ambitious three-year programme of work to embed a child’s right to be heard in its culture and operations. In parallel to its implementation, the authors of this paper were tasked with evaluating to what extent this intended outcome, that a child’s right to be heard was embedded in the government agency’s culture and operations, was achieved. The overarching evaluation design was a mixed methods baseline and follow up study. This paper reports on the development and implementation of the evaluation framework guiding the study. The framework comprised seven structural and process indicators adapted from the Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool and five outcome indicators informed by the Lundy Model of participation. As well as reporting on the evaluation process, the paper critiques the value of the framework, its benefits, challenges and the pitfalls along the way to inform future evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12187-021-09842-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Ambition ; Child and School Psychology ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Culture ; Decision making ; Early Childhood Education ; Government agencies ; Program Evaluation ; Quality of Life Research ; Social Sciences ; Social Work ; Youth participation</subject><ispartof>Child indicators research, 2021-10, Vol.14 (5), p.1931-1948</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-64e02bb5b9e6c74b25eb4ef94aae917617ac540b0a56ae6c9cbed130696ad4313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-64e02bb5b9e6c74b25eb4ef94aae917617ac540b0a56ae6c9cbed130696ad4313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3198-3295 ; 0000-0001-6139-1824 ; 0000-0001-6393-8539 ; 0000-0002-5404-0759</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12187-021-09842-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-021-09842-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27924,27925,30999,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennan, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, Bernadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forkan, Cormac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Edel</creatorcontrib><title>Developing, Implementing and Critiquing an Evaluation Framework to Assess the Extent to Which a Child’s Right to be Heard is Embedded at an Organisational Level</title><title>Child indicators research</title><addtitle>Child Ind Res</addtitle><description>The national Child and Family Agency in Ireland, in 2015, undertook an ambitious three-year programme of work to embed a child’s right to be heard in its culture and operations. In parallel to its implementation, the authors of this paper were tasked with evaluating to what extent this intended outcome, that a child’s right to be heard was embedded in the government agency’s culture and operations, was achieved. The overarching evaluation design was a mixed methods baseline and follow up study. This paper reports on the development and implementation of the evaluation framework guiding the study. The framework comprised seven structural and process indicators adapted from the Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool and five outcome indicators informed by the Lundy Model of participation. As well as reporting on the evaluation process, the paper critiques the value of the framework, its benefits, challenges and the pitfalls along the way to inform future evaluations.</description><subject>Ambition</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Youth participation</subject><issn>1874-897X</issn><issn>1874-8988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctO3DAUjaoilUJ_oKsrdUta23EcZ4mmQ0EaCQmBYGfdJHcmpnkMtoe2rPob3fJpfAmeCaI7Vvd1Hlc6SfKZs6-cseKb54LrImWCp6zUUqQP75L9uJGpLrV-_9oXNx-Sj97fMqY4E2I_efxO99SNazusjuCsX3fU0xDiBDg0MHM22LvNNML8HrsNBjsOcOKwp1-j-wlhhGPvyXsILcH8d4j07fK6tXULCLPWds3T338eLuyq3Z0qglNC14D1MO8rahpqAMPW4tytcLB-Z4IdLLbPHSZ7S-w8fXqpB8nVyfxydpouzn-czY4XaZ2pLKRKEhNVlVclqbqQlcipkrQsJSKVvFC8wDqXrGKYK4yQso7OPGOqVNjIjGcHyZdJd-3Guw35YG7HjYtveCNypTXXTOqIEhOqdqP3jpZm7WyP7o_hzGyzMFMWJmZhdlmYh0jKJpKP4GFF7r_0G6xn0umQUw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Kennan, Danielle</creator><creator>Brady, Bernadine</creator><creator>Forkan, Cormac</creator><creator>Tierney, Edel</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-3295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6139-1824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6393-8539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-0759</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Developing, Implementing and Critiquing an Evaluation Framework to Assess the Extent to Which a Child’s Right to be Heard is Embedded at an Organisational Level</title><author>Kennan, Danielle ; Brady, Bernadine ; Forkan, Cormac ; Tierney, Edel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-64e02bb5b9e6c74b25eb4ef94aae917617ac540b0a56ae6c9cbed130696ad4313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambition</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Youth participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennan, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, Bernadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forkan, Cormac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Edel</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennan, Danielle</au><au>Brady, Bernadine</au><au>Forkan, Cormac</au><au>Tierney, Edel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing, Implementing and Critiquing an Evaluation Framework to Assess the Extent to Which a Child’s Right to be Heard is Embedded at an Organisational Level</atitle><jtitle>Child indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Child Ind Res</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1931</spage><epage>1948</epage><pages>1931-1948</pages><issn>1874-897X</issn><eissn>1874-8988</eissn><abstract>The national Child and Family Agency in Ireland, in 2015, undertook an ambitious three-year programme of work to embed a child’s right to be heard in its culture and operations. In parallel to its implementation, the authors of this paper were tasked with evaluating to what extent this intended outcome, that a child’s right to be heard was embedded in the government agency’s culture and operations, was achieved. The overarching evaluation design was a mixed methods baseline and follow up study. This paper reports on the development and implementation of the evaluation framework guiding the study. The framework comprised seven structural and process indicators adapted from the Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool and five outcome indicators informed by the Lundy Model of participation. As well as reporting on the evaluation process, the paper critiques the value of the framework, its benefits, challenges and the pitfalls along the way to inform future evaluations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12187-021-09842-z</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-3295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6139-1824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6393-8539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-0759</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1874-897X
ispartof Child indicators research, 2021-10, Vol.14 (5), p.1931-1948
issn 1874-897X
1874-8988
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2568818048
source SpringerNature Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Ambition
Child and School Psychology
Children
Children & youth
Culture
Decision making
Early Childhood Education
Government agencies
Program Evaluation
Quality of Life Research
Social Sciences
Social Work
Youth participation
title Developing, Implementing and Critiquing an Evaluation Framework to Assess the Extent to Which a Child’s Right to be Heard is Embedded at an Organisational Level
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A17%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing,%20Implementing%20and%20Critiquing%20an%20Evaluation%20Framework%20to%20Assess%20the%20Extent%20to%20Which%20a%20Child%E2%80%99s%20Right%20to%20be%20Heard%20is%20Embedded%20at%20an%20Organisational%20Level&rft.jtitle=Child%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Kennan,%20Danielle&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1931&rft.epage=1948&rft.pages=1931-1948&rft.issn=1874-897X&rft.eissn=1874-8988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12187-021-09842-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2568818048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568818048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true