How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey
Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of social issues 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.374-392 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 392 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 374 |
container_title | The Australian journal of social issues |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Webster, Kim Ward, Andrew Diemer, Kristin Flood, Michael Honey, Nikki Morgan, Jenny Politof, Violetta Powell, Anastasia Stubbs, Julie |
description | Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajs4.158 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568454964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2568454964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9KAzEQBvAgCpYq-AgBL15Wk2yym5ykiPUPBQ_qeUmT2ZKym7TJbkvx4iP4jD6JW-vV08DMj2_gQ-iCkmtKCLvRy8SvqZBHaERlrjJeCHGMRoSKMityRk_ReUpuTlghFJeCjdDHY9hiHQEvwFuI2HlY97px3Q5rb_HGhQa8AawX2vnU4W1oweMIje7A3uKp89b5RcJ1DC3WeBVW_XBywX9_fjWwgQab0La9_w3sOtf1FhJOfdzA7gyd1LpJcP43x-h9ev9295jNXh6e7iazzOSCy4zXOSlqK8m8tIZYpqDMdQncEFooUfO5UrVhSpY1tTkb9oaUlAmtmLFSapGP0eUhdxXDuofUVcvQRz-8rJgoJBdcFXxQVwdlYkgpQl2tomt13FWUVPt2q3271dDuQLMD3boGdv-6avL8yvf-B9QofmY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568454964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Webster, Kim ; Ward, Andrew ; Diemer, Kristin ; Flood, Michael ; Honey, Nikki ; Morgan, Jenny ; Politof, Violetta ; Powell, Anastasia ; Stubbs, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Webster, Kim ; Ward, Andrew ; Diemer, Kristin ; Flood, Michael ; Honey, Nikki ; Morgan, Jenny ; Politof, Violetta ; Powell, Anastasia ; Stubbs, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-6321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-4655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Equality ; Female roles ; gender equality ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Gender roles ; Gender-based violence ; Hostility ; Polls & surveys ; Private sphere ; surveys ; theories ; Violence ; Violence against women</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of social issues, 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.374-392</ispartof><rights>2021 Australian Social Policy Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Australian Social Policy Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2138-5929 ; 0000-0002-0495-0770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajs4.158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajs4.158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webster, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemer, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honey, Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politof, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbs, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</title><title>The Australian journal of social issues</title><description>Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Female roles</subject><subject>gender equality</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Private sphere</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>theories</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><issn>0157-6321</issn><issn>1839-4655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9KAzEQBvAgCpYq-AgBL15Wk2yym5ykiPUPBQ_qeUmT2ZKym7TJbkvx4iP4jD6JW-vV08DMj2_gQ-iCkmtKCLvRy8SvqZBHaERlrjJeCHGMRoSKMityRk_ReUpuTlghFJeCjdDHY9hiHQEvwFuI2HlY97px3Q5rb_HGhQa8AawX2vnU4W1oweMIje7A3uKp89b5RcJ1DC3WeBVW_XBywX9_fjWwgQab0La9_w3sOtf1FhJOfdzA7gyd1LpJcP43x-h9ev9295jNXh6e7iazzOSCy4zXOSlqK8m8tIZYpqDMdQncEFooUfO5UrVhSpY1tTkb9oaUlAmtmLFSapGP0eUhdxXDuofUVcvQRz-8rJgoJBdcFXxQVwdlYkgpQl2tomt13FWUVPt2q3271dDuQLMD3boGdv-6avL8yvf-B9QofmY</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Webster, Kim</creator><creator>Ward, Andrew</creator><creator>Diemer, Kristin</creator><creator>Flood, Michael</creator><creator>Honey, Nikki</creator><creator>Morgan, Jenny</creator><creator>Politof, Violetta</creator><creator>Powell, Anastasia</creator><creator>Stubbs, Julie</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-5929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-0770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</title><author>Webster, Kim ; Ward, Andrew ; Diemer, Kristin ; Flood, Michael ; Honey, Nikki ; Morgan, Jenny ; Politof, Violetta ; Powell, Anastasia ; Stubbs, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Female roles</topic><topic>gender equality</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Private sphere</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>theories</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webster, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemer, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honey, Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politof, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbs, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webster, Kim</au><au>Ward, Andrew</au><au>Diemer, Kristin</au><au>Flood, Michael</au><au>Honey, Nikki</au><au>Morgan, Jenny</au><au>Politof, Violetta</au><au>Powell, Anastasia</au><au>Stubbs, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>374-392</pages><issn>0157-6321</issn><eissn>1839-4655</eissn><abstract>Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ajs4.158</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-5929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-0770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0157-6321 |
ispartof | The Australian journal of social issues, 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.374-392 |
issn | 0157-6321 1839-4655 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2568454964 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Attitudes Equality Female roles gender equality Gender equity Gender inequality Gender roles Gender-based violence Hostility Polls & surveys Private sphere surveys theories Violence Violence against women |
title | How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20gender%20inequality%20and%20violence%20against%20women%20related?%20Findings%20from%20a%20population%E2%80%90level%20community%20attitudes%20survey&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20social%20issues&rft.au=Webster,%20Kim&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=374-392&rft.issn=0157-6321&rft.eissn=1839-4655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajs4.158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2568454964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568454964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |