How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey

Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of social issues 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.374-392
Hauptverfasser: Webster, Kim, Ward, Andrew, Diemer, Kristin, Flood, Michael, Honey, Nikki, Morgan, Jenny, Politof, Violetta, Powell, Anastasia, Stubbs, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 3
container_start_page 374
container_title The Australian journal of social issues
container_volume 56
creator Webster, Kim
Ward, Andrew
Diemer, Kristin
Flood, Michael
Honey, Nikki
Morgan, Jenny
Politof, Violetta
Powell, Anastasia
Stubbs, Julie
description Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajs4.158
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568454964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2568454964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9KAzEQBvAgCpYq-AgBL15Wk2yym5ykiPUPBQ_qeUmT2ZKym7TJbkvx4iP4jD6JW-vV08DMj2_gQ-iCkmtKCLvRy8SvqZBHaERlrjJeCHGMRoSKMityRk_ReUpuTlghFJeCjdDHY9hiHQEvwFuI2HlY97px3Q5rb_HGhQa8AawX2vnU4W1oweMIje7A3uKp89b5RcJ1DC3WeBVW_XBywX9_fjWwgQab0La9_w3sOtf1FhJOfdzA7gyd1LpJcP43x-h9ev9295jNXh6e7iazzOSCy4zXOSlqK8m8tIZYpqDMdQncEFooUfO5UrVhSpY1tTkb9oaUlAmtmLFSapGP0eUhdxXDuofUVcvQRz-8rJgoJBdcFXxQVwdlYkgpQl2tomt13FWUVPt2q3271dDuQLMD3boGdv-6avL8yvf-B9QofmY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568454964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Webster, Kim ; Ward, Andrew ; Diemer, Kristin ; Flood, Michael ; Honey, Nikki ; Morgan, Jenny ; Politof, Violetta ; Powell, Anastasia ; Stubbs, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Webster, Kim ; Ward, Andrew ; Diemer, Kristin ; Flood, Michael ; Honey, Nikki ; Morgan, Jenny ; Politof, Violetta ; Powell, Anastasia ; Stubbs, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-6321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-4655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Equality ; Female roles ; gender equality ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Gender roles ; Gender-based violence ; Hostility ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Private sphere ; surveys ; theories ; Violence ; Violence against women</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of social issues, 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.374-392</ispartof><rights>2021 Australian Social Policy Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Australian Social Policy Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2138-5929 ; 0000-0002-0495-0770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajs4.158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajs4.158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webster, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemer, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honey, Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politof, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbs, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</title><title>The Australian journal of social issues</title><description>Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Female roles</subject><subject>gender equality</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Private sphere</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>theories</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><issn>0157-6321</issn><issn>1839-4655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9KAzEQBvAgCpYq-AgBL15Wk2yym5ykiPUPBQ_qeUmT2ZKym7TJbkvx4iP4jD6JW-vV08DMj2_gQ-iCkmtKCLvRy8SvqZBHaERlrjJeCHGMRoSKMityRk_ReUpuTlghFJeCjdDHY9hiHQEvwFuI2HlY97px3Q5rb_HGhQa8AawX2vnU4W1oweMIje7A3uKp89b5RcJ1DC3WeBVW_XBywX9_fjWwgQab0La9_w3sOtf1FhJOfdzA7gyd1LpJcP43x-h9ev9295jNXh6e7iazzOSCy4zXOSlqK8m8tIZYpqDMdQncEFooUfO5UrVhSpY1tTkb9oaUlAmtmLFSapGP0eUhdxXDuofUVcvQRz-8rJgoJBdcFXxQVwdlYkgpQl2tomt13FWUVPt2q3271dDuQLMD3boGdv-6avL8yvf-B9QofmY</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Webster, Kim</creator><creator>Ward, Andrew</creator><creator>Diemer, Kristin</creator><creator>Flood, Michael</creator><creator>Honey, Nikki</creator><creator>Morgan, Jenny</creator><creator>Politof, Violetta</creator><creator>Powell, Anastasia</creator><creator>Stubbs, Julie</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-5929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-0770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</title><author>Webster, Kim ; Ward, Andrew ; Diemer, Kristin ; Flood, Michael ; Honey, Nikki ; Morgan, Jenny ; Politof, Violetta ; Powell, Anastasia ; Stubbs, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-4f306fd80b7dc0d29e73a7e4c01695f4b99fc2987f1d32e4cc07125a92cd88a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Female roles</topic><topic>gender equality</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Private sphere</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>theories</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webster, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemer, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honey, Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politof, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbs, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webster, Kim</au><au>Ward, Andrew</au><au>Diemer, Kristin</au><au>Flood, Michael</au><au>Honey, Nikki</au><au>Morgan, Jenny</au><au>Politof, Violetta</au><au>Powell, Anastasia</au><au>Stubbs, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>374-392</pages><issn>0157-6321</issn><eissn>1839-4655</eissn><abstract>Low support for gender equality (GE) predicts attitudes supporting violence against women (VAW). However, little is known about the influence of attitudes toward different manifestations of GE. This study extends knowledge by assessing the relative strength of attitudes to GE across seven theoretically derived dimensions, and their association with attitudes toward VAW. 17,542 Australians participated in the 2017 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey. Population means were calculated for the following scales formed from survey questions: the Community Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women Scale (CASVAWS), the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale (GEAS) and measures within the GEAS representing the theoretical dimensions. There was variation in support for GE between the measures. The lower the support for GE, the higher the support for VAW. Although all GEAS measures included in regression modelling contributed to variance in the CASVAWS, two accounted for more than half. The study suggests benefits in using a multidimensional model of GE to mitigate cultural support for VAW, with emphasis on the private sphere and countering hostility toward women and rigid gender roles and identities.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ajs4.158</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-5929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-0770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0157-6321
ispartof The Australian journal of social issues, 2021-09, Vol.56 (3), p.374-392
issn 0157-6321
1839-4655
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2568454964
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Attitudes
Equality
Female roles
gender equality
Gender equity
Gender inequality
Gender roles
Gender-based violence
Hostility
Polls & surveys
Private sphere
surveys
theories
Violence
Violence against women
title How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population‐level community attitudes survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20gender%20inequality%20and%20violence%20against%20women%20related?%20Findings%20from%20a%20population%E2%80%90level%20community%20attitudes%20survey&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20social%20issues&rft.au=Webster,%20Kim&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=374-392&rft.issn=0157-6321&rft.eissn=1839-4655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajs4.158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2568454964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568454964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true