Range restriction leads to narrower ecological niches and greater extinction risk in Australian freshwater fish
Human-induced environmental changes are accelerating biodiversity loss. Identifying which life-history traits increase extinction risk is important to inform proactive conservation. While geographically or numerically rare species are typically more vulnerable, ecological specialization may also inc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2021-09, Vol.30 (11), p.2955-2976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2976 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2955 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Le Feuvre, Matthew C. Dempster, Tim Shelley, James J. Davis, Aaron M. Swearer, Stephen E. |
description | Human-induced environmental changes are accelerating biodiversity loss. Identifying which life-history traits increase extinction risk is important to inform proactive conservation. While geographically or numerically rare species are typically more vulnerable, ecological specialization may also increase extinction risk particularly when associated with rarity. We investigate whether regionally endemic freshwater fishes have more specialized diets and habitat requirements than more widely distributed, closely related species. We then use this information to assess extinction risk. Using closely-related widespread and endemic congeneric pairings from the Kimberley region of north-western Australia, we investigate whether there are ontogenetic diet shifts in 13 species and if some of these ontogenetic trophic units (OTUs) have narrow dietary niches. Using qualitative measures of habitat and presence/absence data, we also assess habitat specialization in 32 species. Overall, range-restricted species had narrower ecological niches. Ontogenetic diet shifts existed in 12 of 13 species and range-restricted species were more specialized for some or all of their OTUs compared to their widespread congenerics. Endemic species had a higher degree of variance in habitat use compared to their widespread congenerics, showing they had more specialized habitat requirements. As specialization is linked to extinction risk, the narrow niche breadth of small-ranged endemic fishes makes them more vulnerable to extinction than more cosmopolitan species. As many endemics from the Kimberley region have small ranges and/or low abundances, they may have an increased risk of extinction. By identifying which endemic species have narrow ecological niches, our study provides essential information for targeting proactive conservation efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-021-02229-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568399824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727331972</galeid><sourcerecordid>A727331972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8ecc4b43de3c15f2f3f635817f161ff602b7e5c96e522cf2569ea2a03af689e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXA9dQ8mslkWYovKAii65BmbtrUaVKTKdV_b-oI7iSEQO75zr3JQeiakgklRN5mSgSnFWHHzZiqyAkaUSFZpSQlp2hEVE0qTqk4Rxc5b0iBRE1HKL6YsAKcIPfJ297HgDswbcZ9xMGkFA-QMNjYxZW3psPB2zVkbEKLVwlMf6x-9j4MaPL5HfuAZ_tiZzpvAnbFen34ETqf15fozJkuw9XvOUZv93ev88dq8fzwNJ8tKstF01cNWDtdTnkL3FLhmOOuLgUqHa2pczVhSwnCqhoEY9YxUSswzBBuXN0oEHyMbgbfXYof-_I6vYn7FEpLXcQNV6ph06KaDKqV6UD74GIZ25bVwtbbGMD5cj-TTHJOlWQFYANgU8w5gdO75LcmfWlK9DEJPSShSxL6JwlNCsQHKBdx-e30N8s_1DdY0I0s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568399824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Range restriction leads to narrower ecological niches and greater extinction risk in Australian freshwater fish</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Le Feuvre, Matthew C. ; Dempster, Tim ; Shelley, James J. ; Davis, Aaron M. ; Swearer, Stephen E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Feuvre, Matthew C. ; Dempster, Tim ; Shelley, James J. ; Davis, Aaron M. ; Swearer, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><description>Human-induced environmental changes are accelerating biodiversity loss. Identifying which life-history traits increase extinction risk is important to inform proactive conservation. While geographically or numerically rare species are typically more vulnerable, ecological specialization may also increase extinction risk particularly when associated with rarity. We investigate whether regionally endemic freshwater fishes have more specialized diets and habitat requirements than more widely distributed, closely related species. We then use this information to assess extinction risk. Using closely-related widespread and endemic congeneric pairings from the Kimberley region of north-western Australia, we investigate whether there are ontogenetic diet shifts in 13 species and if some of these ontogenetic trophic units (OTUs) have narrow dietary niches. Using qualitative measures of habitat and presence/absence data, we also assess habitat specialization in 32 species. Overall, range-restricted species had narrower ecological niches. Ontogenetic diet shifts existed in 12 of 13 species and range-restricted species were more specialized for some or all of their OTUs compared to their widespread congenerics. Endemic species had a higher degree of variance in habitat use compared to their widespread congenerics, showing they had more specialized habitat requirements. As specialization is linked to extinction risk, the narrow niche breadth of small-ranged endemic fishes makes them more vulnerable to extinction than more cosmopolitan species. As many endemics from the Kimberley region have small ranges and/or low abundances, they may have an increased risk of extinction. By identifying which endemic species have narrow ecological niches, our study provides essential information for targeting proactive conservation efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02229-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Biological diversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Cosmopolitan species ; Diet ; Ecological distribution ; Ecological niches ; Ecology ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered species ; Endemic animals ; Endemic species ; Environmental changes ; Extinction ; Extinction (Biology) ; Fish ; Fish as food ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater fish ; Freshwater fishes ; Habitat selection ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Human influences ; Inland water environment ; Life history ; Life Sciences ; Man-induced effects ; Niche (Ecology) ; Niche breadth ; Niches ; Ontogeny ; Original Paper ; Qualitative analysis ; Rare species ; Specialization ; Species extinction ; Threatened species</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2021-09, Vol.30 (11), p.2955-2976</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8ecc4b43de3c15f2f3f635817f161ff602b7e5c96e522cf2569ea2a03af689e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8ecc4b43de3c15f2f3f635817f161ff602b7e5c96e522cf2569ea2a03af689e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8278-9599 ; 0000-0002-2181-5888 ; 0000-0001-6381-9943 ; 0000-0001-9592-5927 ; 0000-0001-8041-426X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-021-02229-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-021-02229-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Feuvre, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempster, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelley, James J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Aaron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swearer, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><title>Range restriction leads to narrower ecological niches and greater extinction risk in Australian freshwater fish</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>Human-induced environmental changes are accelerating biodiversity loss. Identifying which life-history traits increase extinction risk is important to inform proactive conservation. While geographically or numerically rare species are typically more vulnerable, ecological specialization may also increase extinction risk particularly when associated with rarity. We investigate whether regionally endemic freshwater fishes have more specialized diets and habitat requirements than more widely distributed, closely related species. We then use this information to assess extinction risk. Using closely-related widespread and endemic congeneric pairings from the Kimberley region of north-western Australia, we investigate whether there are ontogenetic diet shifts in 13 species and if some of these ontogenetic trophic units (OTUs) have narrow dietary niches. Using qualitative measures of habitat and presence/absence data, we also assess habitat specialization in 32 species. Overall, range-restricted species had narrower ecological niches. Ontogenetic diet shifts existed in 12 of 13 species and range-restricted species were more specialized for some or all of their OTUs compared to their widespread congenerics. Endemic species had a higher degree of variance in habitat use compared to their widespread congenerics, showing they had more specialized habitat requirements. As specialization is linked to extinction risk, the narrow niche breadth of small-ranged endemic fishes makes them more vulnerable to extinction than more cosmopolitan species. As many endemics from the Kimberley region have small ranges and/or low abundances, they may have an increased risk of extinction. By identifying which endemic species have narrow ecological niches, our study provides essential information for targeting proactive conservation efforts.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Cosmopolitan species</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecological distribution</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Endemic animals</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Extinction (Biology)</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish as food</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Man-induced effects</subject><subject>Niche (Ecology)</subject><subject>Niche breadth</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXA9dQ8mslkWYovKAii65BmbtrUaVKTKdV_b-oI7iSEQO75zr3JQeiakgklRN5mSgSnFWHHzZiqyAkaUSFZpSQlp2hEVE0qTqk4Rxc5b0iBRE1HKL6YsAKcIPfJ297HgDswbcZ9xMGkFA-QMNjYxZW3psPB2zVkbEKLVwlMf6x-9j4MaPL5HfuAZ_tiZzpvAnbFen34ETqf15fozJkuw9XvOUZv93ev88dq8fzwNJ8tKstF01cNWDtdTnkL3FLhmOOuLgUqHa2pczVhSwnCqhoEY9YxUSswzBBuXN0oEHyMbgbfXYof-_I6vYn7FEpLXcQNV6ph06KaDKqV6UD74GIZ25bVwtbbGMD5cj-TTHJOlWQFYANgU8w5gdO75LcmfWlK9DEJPSShSxL6JwlNCsQHKBdx-e30N8s_1DdY0I0s</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Le Feuvre, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Dempster, Tim</creator><creator>Shelley, James J.</creator><creator>Davis, Aaron M.</creator><creator>Swearer, Stephen E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-5888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6381-9943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-5927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8041-426X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Range restriction leads to narrower ecological niches and greater extinction risk in Australian freshwater fish</title><author>Le Feuvre, Matthew C. ; Dempster, Tim ; Shelley, James J. ; Davis, Aaron M. ; Swearer, Stephen E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8ecc4b43de3c15f2f3f635817f161ff602b7e5c96e522cf2569ea2a03af689e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Cosmopolitan species</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecological distribution</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Endemic animals</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Extinction (Biology)</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish as food</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Man-induced effects</topic><topic>Niche (Ecology)</topic><topic>Niche breadth</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Feuvre, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempster, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelley, James J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Aaron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swearer, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Feuvre, Matthew C.</au><au>Dempster, Tim</au><au>Shelley, James J.</au><au>Davis, Aaron M.</au><au>Swearer, Stephen E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Range restriction leads to narrower ecological niches and greater extinction risk in Australian freshwater fish</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2955</spage><epage>2976</epage><pages>2955-2976</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Human-induced environmental changes are accelerating biodiversity loss. Identifying which life-history traits increase extinction risk is important to inform proactive conservation. While geographically or numerically rare species are typically more vulnerable, ecological specialization may also increase extinction risk particularly when associated with rarity. We investigate whether regionally endemic freshwater fishes have more specialized diets and habitat requirements than more widely distributed, closely related species. We then use this information to assess extinction risk. Using closely-related widespread and endemic congeneric pairings from the Kimberley region of north-western Australia, we investigate whether there are ontogenetic diet shifts in 13 species and if some of these ontogenetic trophic units (OTUs) have narrow dietary niches. Using qualitative measures of habitat and presence/absence data, we also assess habitat specialization in 32 species. Overall, range-restricted species had narrower ecological niches. Ontogenetic diet shifts existed in 12 of 13 species and range-restricted species were more specialized for some or all of their OTUs compared to their widespread congenerics. Endemic species had a higher degree of variance in habitat use compared to their widespread congenerics, showing they had more specialized habitat requirements. As specialization is linked to extinction risk, the narrow niche breadth of small-ranged endemic fishes makes them more vulnerable to extinction than more cosmopolitan species. As many endemics from the Kimberley region have small ranges and/or low abundances, they may have an increased risk of extinction. By identifying which endemic species have narrow ecological niches, our study provides essential information for targeting proactive conservation efforts.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-021-02229-0</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-5888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6381-9943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-5927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8041-426X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2021-09, Vol.30 (11), p.2955-2976 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2568399824 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Biological diversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Cosmopolitan species Diet Ecological distribution Ecological niches Ecology Endangered & extinct species Endangered species Endemic animals Endemic species Environmental changes Extinction Extinction (Biology) Fish Fish as food Fresh water Freshwater Freshwater fish Freshwater fishes Habitat selection Habitat utilization Habitats Human influences Inland water environment Life history Life Sciences Man-induced effects Niche (Ecology) Niche breadth Niches Ontogeny Original Paper Qualitative analysis Rare species Specialization Species extinction Threatened species |
title | Range restriction leads to narrower ecological niches and greater extinction risk in Australian freshwater fish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A56%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Range%20restriction%20leads%20to%20narrower%20ecological%20niches%20and%20greater%20extinction%20risk%20in%20Australian%20freshwater%20fish&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Le%20Feuvre,%20Matthew%20C.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2955&rft.epage=2976&rft.pages=2955-2976&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-021-02229-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA727331972%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568399824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727331972&rfr_iscdi=true |