Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China
Prior literature documents puzzling evidence revealing that tax avoidance activities do not affect firm‐specific risk. Using an extended US sample, we find that lower cash effective tax rates (ETRs) are associated with higher future return volatility, supporting the traditional view of tax risk–retu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accounting and finance (Parkville) 2021-09, Vol.61 (3), p.4967-5000 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5000 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 4967 |
container_title | Accounting and finance (Parkville) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Cao, Yuqiang Feng, Zhuoan Lu, Meiting Shan, Yaowen |
description | Prior literature documents puzzling evidence revealing that tax avoidance activities do not affect firm‐specific risk. Using an extended US sample, we find that lower cash effective tax rates (ETRs) are associated with higher future return volatility, supporting the traditional view of tax risk–return trade‐off. In sharp contrast to the US evidence, our analysis of Chinese firms suggests that Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) with lower cash and GAAP ETRs tend to have lower future risk. In addition, we adopt a difference‐in‐differences approach based on the variations generated by two exogenous, anti‐tax avoidance regulations in China but find no evidence suggesting a causal relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between tax avoidance and risk varies across countries, sample periods and tax aggressiveness measures, and we highlight the importance of addressing the endogenous nature in future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acfi.12769 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568394194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2568394194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3019-27fb994ffbd22f8518f457880969f9a640ba6ab268f186c624e2b449d7cb35113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HAm7A1k83mw1tZrBYKXip4C8lugqnd3ZrYav-9u65n5zIwPPO-8CB0DWQG_dyZyocZUMHVCZoA4yLjVL2eogmRQLIiV3COLlLaEEJAEDZBZG2-sTl0oTZt5bBpa-xDbHAM6f0eu0Oo3XD3sWtw-RZac4nOvNkmd_W3p-hl8bAun7LV8-OynK-yKiegMiq8VYp5b2tKvSxAelYIKYniyivDGbGGG0u59CB5xSlz1DKmalHZvADIp-hmzN3F7mPv0qfedPvY9pWaFlzmioFiPXU7UlXsUorO610MjYlHDUQPRvRgRP8a6WEY4a-wdcd_SD0vF8vx5wec0WCb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568394194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cao, Yuqiang ; Feng, Zhuoan ; Lu, Meiting ; Shan, Yaowen</creator><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yuqiang ; Feng, Zhuoan ; Lu, Meiting ; Shan, Yaowen</creatorcontrib><description>Prior literature documents puzzling evidence revealing that tax avoidance activities do not affect firm‐specific risk. Using an extended US sample, we find that lower cash effective tax rates (ETRs) are associated with higher future return volatility, supporting the traditional view of tax risk–return trade‐off. In sharp contrast to the US evidence, our analysis of Chinese firms suggests that Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) with lower cash and GAAP ETRs tend to have lower future risk. In addition, we adopt a difference‐in‐differences approach based on the variations generated by two exogenous, anti‐tax avoidance regulations in China but find no evidence suggesting a causal relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between tax avoidance and risk varies across countries, sample periods and tax aggressiveness measures, and we highlight the importance of addressing the endogenous nature in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0810-5391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-629X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Clayton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Effective tax rates ; Firm risk ; Tax avoidance ; Tax rates</subject><ispartof>Accounting and finance (Parkville), 2021-09, Vol.61 (3), p.4967-5000</ispartof><rights>2021 Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand</rights><rights>Accounting and Finance © 2021 AFAANZ</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3019-27fb994ffbd22f8518f457880969f9a640ba6ab268f186c624e2b449d7cb35113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3019-27fb994ffbd22f8518f457880969f9a640ba6ab268f186c624e2b449d7cb35113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2676-2391 ; 0000-0003-1798-5195 ; 0000-0003-2156-8722</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facfi.12769$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facfi.12769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yuqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Zhuoan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Meiting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Yaowen</creatorcontrib><title>Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China</title><title>Accounting and finance (Parkville)</title><description>Prior literature documents puzzling evidence revealing that tax avoidance activities do not affect firm‐specific risk. Using an extended US sample, we find that lower cash effective tax rates (ETRs) are associated with higher future return volatility, supporting the traditional view of tax risk–return trade‐off. In sharp contrast to the US evidence, our analysis of Chinese firms suggests that Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) with lower cash and GAAP ETRs tend to have lower future risk. In addition, we adopt a difference‐in‐differences approach based on the variations generated by two exogenous, anti‐tax avoidance regulations in China but find no evidence suggesting a causal relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between tax avoidance and risk varies across countries, sample periods and tax aggressiveness measures, and we highlight the importance of addressing the endogenous nature in future research.</description><subject>Effective tax rates</subject><subject>Firm risk</subject><subject>Tax avoidance</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><issn>0810-5391</issn><issn>1467-629X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HAm7A1k83mw1tZrBYKXip4C8lugqnd3ZrYav-9u65n5zIwPPO-8CB0DWQG_dyZyocZUMHVCZoA4yLjVL2eogmRQLIiV3COLlLaEEJAEDZBZG2-sTl0oTZt5bBpa-xDbHAM6f0eu0Oo3XD3sWtw-RZac4nOvNkmd_W3p-hl8bAun7LV8-OynK-yKiegMiq8VYp5b2tKvSxAelYIKYniyivDGbGGG0u59CB5xSlz1DKmalHZvADIp-hmzN3F7mPv0qfedPvY9pWaFlzmioFiPXU7UlXsUorO610MjYlHDUQPRvRgRP8a6WEY4a-wdcd_SD0vF8vx5wec0WCb</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Cao, Yuqiang</creator><creator>Feng, Zhuoan</creator><creator>Lu, Meiting</creator><creator>Shan, Yaowen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-2391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-5195</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-8722</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China</title><author>Cao, Yuqiang ; Feng, Zhuoan ; Lu, Meiting ; Shan, Yaowen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3019-27fb994ffbd22f8518f457880969f9a640ba6ab268f186c624e2b449d7cb35113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Effective tax rates</topic><topic>Firm risk</topic><topic>Tax avoidance</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yuqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Zhuoan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Meiting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Yaowen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Accounting and finance (Parkville)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cao, Yuqiang</au><au>Feng, Zhuoan</au><au>Lu, Meiting</au><au>Shan, Yaowen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Accounting and finance (Parkville)</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>4967</spage><epage>5000</epage><pages>4967-5000</pages><issn>0810-5391</issn><eissn>1467-629X</eissn><abstract>Prior literature documents puzzling evidence revealing that tax avoidance activities do not affect firm‐specific risk. Using an extended US sample, we find that lower cash effective tax rates (ETRs) are associated with higher future return volatility, supporting the traditional view of tax risk–return trade‐off. In sharp contrast to the US evidence, our analysis of Chinese firms suggests that Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) with lower cash and GAAP ETRs tend to have lower future risk. In addition, we adopt a difference‐in‐differences approach based on the variations generated by two exogenous, anti‐tax avoidance regulations in China but find no evidence suggesting a causal relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between tax avoidance and risk varies across countries, sample periods and tax aggressiveness measures, and we highlight the importance of addressing the endogenous nature in future research.</abstract><cop>Clayton</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/acfi.12769</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-2391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-5195</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-8722</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0810-5391 |
ispartof | Accounting and finance (Parkville), 2021-09, Vol.61 (3), p.4967-5000 |
issn | 0810-5391 1467-629X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2568394194 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Effective tax rates Firm risk Tax avoidance Tax rates |
title | Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tax%20avoidance%20and%20firm%20risk:%20evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20and%20finance%20(Parkville)&rft.au=Cao,%20Yuqiang&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=4967&rft.epage=5000&rft.pages=4967-5000&rft.issn=0810-5391&rft.eissn=1467-629X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acfi.12769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2568394194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568394194&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |