Comparison between cooling strategies for power electronic devices: fractal mini-channels and arrays of impinging submerged jets
Power electronic devices like Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) and diodes are often characterized by power densities and dimensions that could result in very high heat flux densities. In order to guarantee the expected performance and lifetime for these components, dedicated active cooling...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physics. Conference series 2019-05, Vol.1224 (1), p.12014 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12014 |
container_title | Journal of physics. Conference series |
container_volume | 1224 |
creator | Baraldi, N Fregni, A Sabato, M Stalio, E Brusiani, F Tranchero, M Baritaud, T |
description | Power electronic devices like Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) and diodes are often characterized by power densities and dimensions that could result in very high heat flux densities. In order to guarantee the expected performance and lifetime for these components, dedicated active cooling devices are usually adopted. In the present paper, the comparison between two different cooling strategies for power electronics is presented: fractal-channel design and submerged impinging jets. Each cooling strategy is tested on two different geometrical configurations. Water is used as coolant in all cases. Assessment of the considered cooling methods is done through application of the selected configuration in a simplified system composed by a rectangular chip (heat source) separated from the coolant by a solid block. Three-dimensional conjugated heat transfer simulations are performed by using RANS solver implemented in OpenFOAM and two-equations turbulence models, resolving also the viscous sublayer. Numerical results allow to compare the cooling strategies in terms of maximum chip temperature, overall chip-to-coolant thermal resistance, and pumping power required. In summary, the fractal-channel design shows limitations in guaranteeing low chip temperatures at an affordable pumping power. The submerged impinging jets approach shows very high local heat transfer coefficient by which it is possible to tailor the cooling effect on specific hot spots. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1742-6596/1224/1/012014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2566170303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2566170303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9405122a7fd16e47b23d28972378efb223ccf95a35c7d0e04cbc6ed86dbb5a453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMoqKu_wYBvQt1c2qb1TRavCArqc0iTyZqlTWrSVXzzp9t1RREE52UG5sw5zIfQASXHlFTVlIqcZWVRl1PKWD6lU0IZofkG2vnebH7PVbWNdlNaEMLHEjvofRa6XkWXgscNDK8AHusQWufnOA1RDTB3kLANEffhFSKGFvQQg3caG3hxGtIJtlHpQbW4c95l-kl5D23CyhusYlRvCQeLXdePnp-2y6aDOAeDFzCkPbRlVZtg_6tP0OP52cPsMru5vbiand5kmhf1kNU5Kcb_lLCGlpCLhnHDqlowLiqwDWNca1sXihdaGAIk140uwVSlaZpC5QWfoMO1bx_D8xLSIBdhGf0YKVlRllQQPjKZILFW6RhSimBlH12n4pukRK5wyxVIuYIqV7gllWvc4-XR-tKF_sf6-m52_1soe2NHMf9D_F_EB_VGkf4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2566170303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between cooling strategies for power electronic devices: fractal mini-channels and arrays of impinging submerged jets</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Baraldi, N ; Fregni, A ; Sabato, M ; Stalio, E ; Brusiani, F ; Tranchero, M ; Baritaud, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, N ; Fregni, A ; Sabato, M ; Stalio, E ; Brusiani, F ; Tranchero, M ; Baritaud, T</creatorcontrib><description>Power electronic devices like Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) and diodes are often characterized by power densities and dimensions that could result in very high heat flux densities. In order to guarantee the expected performance and lifetime for these components, dedicated active cooling devices are usually adopted. In the present paper, the comparison between two different cooling strategies for power electronics is presented: fractal-channel design and submerged impinging jets. Each cooling strategy is tested on two different geometrical configurations. Water is used as coolant in all cases. Assessment of the considered cooling methods is done through application of the selected configuration in a simplified system composed by a rectangular chip (heat source) separated from the coolant by a solid block. Three-dimensional conjugated heat transfer simulations are performed by using RANS solver implemented in OpenFOAM and two-equations turbulence models, resolving also the viscous sublayer. Numerical results allow to compare the cooling strategies in terms of maximum chip temperature, overall chip-to-coolant thermal resistance, and pumping power required. In summary, the fractal-channel design shows limitations in guaranteeing low chip temperatures at an affordable pumping power. The submerged impinging jets approach shows very high local heat transfer coefficient by which it is possible to tailor the cooling effect on specific hot spots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1224/1/012014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Configurations ; Coolants ; Cooling ; Cooling effects ; Electronic devices ; Fractals ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer coefficients ; Insulated gate bipolar transistors ; Jet impingement ; Physics ; Pumping ; Semiconductor devices ; Service life assessment ; Submerged jets ; Thermal resistance ; Turbulence models ; Viscous sublayers</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2019-05, Vol.1224 (1), p.12014</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9405122a7fd16e47b23d28972378efb223ccf95a35c7d0e04cbc6ed86dbb5a453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1224/1/012014/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregni, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabato, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalio, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brusiani, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranchero, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baritaud, T</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between cooling strategies for power electronic devices: fractal mini-channels and arrays of impinging submerged jets</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Power electronic devices like Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) and diodes are often characterized by power densities and dimensions that could result in very high heat flux densities. In order to guarantee the expected performance and lifetime for these components, dedicated active cooling devices are usually adopted. In the present paper, the comparison between two different cooling strategies for power electronics is presented: fractal-channel design and submerged impinging jets. Each cooling strategy is tested on two different geometrical configurations. Water is used as coolant in all cases. Assessment of the considered cooling methods is done through application of the selected configuration in a simplified system composed by a rectangular chip (heat source) separated from the coolant by a solid block. Three-dimensional conjugated heat transfer simulations are performed by using RANS solver implemented in OpenFOAM and two-equations turbulence models, resolving also the viscous sublayer. Numerical results allow to compare the cooling strategies in terms of maximum chip temperature, overall chip-to-coolant thermal resistance, and pumping power required. In summary, the fractal-channel design shows limitations in guaranteeing low chip temperatures at an affordable pumping power. The submerged impinging jets approach shows very high local heat transfer coefficient by which it is possible to tailor the cooling effect on specific hot spots.</description><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Coolants</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling effects</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer coefficients</subject><subject>Insulated gate bipolar transistors</subject><subject>Jet impingement</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pumping</subject><subject>Semiconductor devices</subject><subject>Service life assessment</subject><subject>Submerged jets</subject><subject>Thermal resistance</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Viscous sublayers</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMoqKu_wYBvQt1c2qb1TRavCArqc0iTyZqlTWrSVXzzp9t1RREE52UG5sw5zIfQASXHlFTVlIqcZWVRl1PKWD6lU0IZofkG2vnebH7PVbWNdlNaEMLHEjvofRa6XkWXgscNDK8AHusQWufnOA1RDTB3kLANEffhFSKGFvQQg3caG3hxGtIJtlHpQbW4c95l-kl5D23CyhusYlRvCQeLXdePnp-2y6aDOAeDFzCkPbRlVZtg_6tP0OP52cPsMru5vbiand5kmhf1kNU5Kcb_lLCGlpCLhnHDqlowLiqwDWNca1sXihdaGAIk140uwVSlaZpC5QWfoMO1bx_D8xLSIBdhGf0YKVlRllQQPjKZILFW6RhSimBlH12n4pukRK5wyxVIuYIqV7gllWvc4-XR-tKF_sf6-m52_1soe2NHMf9D_F_EB_VGkf4</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Baraldi, N</creator><creator>Fregni, A</creator><creator>Sabato, M</creator><creator>Stalio, E</creator><creator>Brusiani, F</creator><creator>Tranchero, M</creator><creator>Baritaud, T</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Comparison between cooling strategies for power electronic devices: fractal mini-channels and arrays of impinging submerged jets</title><author>Baraldi, N ; Fregni, A ; Sabato, M ; Stalio, E ; Brusiani, F ; Tranchero, M ; Baritaud, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9405122a7fd16e47b23d28972378efb223ccf95a35c7d0e04cbc6ed86dbb5a453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Coolants</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling effects</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer coefficients</topic><topic>Insulated gate bipolar transistors</topic><topic>Jet impingement</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pumping</topic><topic>Semiconductor devices</topic><topic>Service life assessment</topic><topic>Submerged jets</topic><topic>Thermal resistance</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Viscous sublayers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregni, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabato, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalio, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brusiani, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranchero, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baritaud, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baraldi, N</au><au>Fregni, A</au><au>Sabato, M</au><au>Stalio, E</au><au>Brusiani, F</au><au>Tranchero, M</au><au>Baritaud, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between cooling strategies for power electronic devices: fractal mini-channels and arrays of impinging submerged jets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>1224</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12014</spage><pages>12014-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Power electronic devices like Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) and diodes are often characterized by power densities and dimensions that could result in very high heat flux densities. In order to guarantee the expected performance and lifetime for these components, dedicated active cooling devices are usually adopted. In the present paper, the comparison between two different cooling strategies for power electronics is presented: fractal-channel design and submerged impinging jets. Each cooling strategy is tested on two different geometrical configurations. Water is used as coolant in all cases. Assessment of the considered cooling methods is done through application of the selected configuration in a simplified system composed by a rectangular chip (heat source) separated from the coolant by a solid block. Three-dimensional conjugated heat transfer simulations are performed by using RANS solver implemented in OpenFOAM and two-equations turbulence models, resolving also the viscous sublayer. Numerical results allow to compare the cooling strategies in terms of maximum chip temperature, overall chip-to-coolant thermal resistance, and pumping power required. In summary, the fractal-channel design shows limitations in guaranteeing low chip temperatures at an affordable pumping power. The submerged impinging jets approach shows very high local heat transfer coefficient by which it is possible to tailor the cooling effect on specific hot spots.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/1224/1/012014</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6588 |
ispartof | Journal of physics. Conference series, 2019-05, Vol.1224 (1), p.12014 |
issn | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2566170303 |
source | Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Configurations Coolants Cooling Cooling effects Electronic devices Fractals Heat flux Heat transfer coefficients Insulated gate bipolar transistors Jet impingement Physics Pumping Semiconductor devices Service life assessment Submerged jets Thermal resistance Turbulence models Viscous sublayers |
title | Comparison between cooling strategies for power electronic devices: fractal mini-channels and arrays of impinging submerged jets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20cooling%20strategies%20for%20power%20electronic%20devices:%20fractal%20mini-channels%20and%20arrays%20of%20impinging%20submerged%20jets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Baraldi,%20N&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=1224&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12014&rft.pages=12014-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/1224/1/012014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2566170303%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2566170303&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |