Evaluation of a Novel Teleradiology Technology for Image-Based Distant Consultations: Applications in Neurosurgery
In emergency settings, fast access to medical imaging for diagnostic is pivotal for clinical decision making. Hence, a need has emerged for solutions that allow rapid access to images on small mobile devices (SMD) without local data storage. Our objective was to evaluate access times to full quality...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | DIAGNOSTICS 2021-08, Vol.11 (8), p.1413 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1413 |
container_title | DIAGNOSTICS |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Cewe, Paulina Burström, Gustav Drnasin, Ivan Ohlsson, Marcus Skulason, Halldor Vucica, Stanislav Elmi-Terander, Adrian Edström, Erik |
description | In emergency settings, fast access to medical imaging for diagnostic is pivotal for clinical decision making. Hence, a need has emerged for solutions that allow rapid access to images on small mobile devices (SMD) without local data storage. Our objective was to evaluate access times to full quality anonymized DICOM datasets, comparing standard access through an authorized hospital computer (AHC) to a zero-footprint teleradiology technology (ZTT) used on a personal computer (PC) or SMD using national and international networks at a regional neurosurgical center. Image datasets were sent to a senior neurosurgeon, outside the hospital network using either an AHC and a VPN connection or a ZTT (Image Over Globe (IOG)), on a PC or an SMD. Time to access DICOM images was measured using both solutions. The mean time using AHC and VPN was 250 ± 10 s (median 249 s (233–274)) while the same procedure using IOG took 50 ± 8 s (median 49 s (42–60)) on a PC and 47 ± 20 s (median 39 (33–88)) on a SMD. Similarly, an international consultation was performed requiring 23 ± 5 s (median 21 (16–33)) and 27 ± 1 s (median 27 (25–29)) for PC and SMD respectively. IOG is a secure, rapid and easy to use telemedicine technology facilitating efficient clinical decision making and remote consultations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/diagnostics11081413 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2565174447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6ceee0cd3c6e4f619861628346c68ab7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2565174447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-4778a6f6621398d5d73eaed6841664427075039d7cb597e8e123a68f9eca22d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEotXSX8DFEhcugTh2_MEBqSylrFSVSzlbXnuSevHGi50s2n-P02yBReCLZ8bvPJoZT1G8xNUbQmT11jrd9SENziSMK4EpJk-K87riTUkpFk__sM-Ki5Q2VT4SE1E3z4szQvMDofy8iFd77Uc9uNCj0CKNbsMePLoDD1FbF3zoDtkz9_1stiGi1VZ3UH7QCSz66NKg-wEtQ59GPzyA0jt0udt5Z2YPuR7dwhhDGmMH8fCieNZqn-DieC-Kr5-u7pafy5sv16vl5U1pGkaHknIuNGsZqzGRwjaWE9BgmaCYMUprnvuriLTcrBvJQQCuiWailWB0XVtBFsVq5tqgN2oX3VbHgwraqYdAiJ3SMQ_Qg2IGACpjiWFAW4alYJjVglBmmNBrnlnlzEo_YDeuT2jH0LdsgaKNbDDNevlf_S4G-zvpMRFTTiTmYqr7_ZybBVuwBvohan-KOHnp3b3qwl6JCZCnsCheHwExfB8hDWrrkgHvdQ9hTKpuGKsIoc0kffWXdBPG2OdvmVQN5nlRpu7JrDL5E1OE9lcxuFLTOqp_rCP5Cbnp1xM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565174447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Novel Teleradiology Technology for Image-Based Distant Consultations: Applications in Neurosurgery</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cewe, Paulina ; Burström, Gustav ; Drnasin, Ivan ; Ohlsson, Marcus ; Skulason, Halldor ; Vucica, Stanislav ; Elmi-Terander, Adrian ; Edström, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Cewe, Paulina ; Burström, Gustav ; Drnasin, Ivan ; Ohlsson, Marcus ; Skulason, Halldor ; Vucica, Stanislav ; Elmi-Terander, Adrian ; Edström, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>In emergency settings, fast access to medical imaging for diagnostic is pivotal for clinical decision making. Hence, a need has emerged for solutions that allow rapid access to images on small mobile devices (SMD) without local data storage. Our objective was to evaluate access times to full quality anonymized DICOM datasets, comparing standard access through an authorized hospital computer (AHC) to a zero-footprint teleradiology technology (ZTT) used on a personal computer (PC) or SMD using national and international networks at a regional neurosurgical center. Image datasets were sent to a senior neurosurgeon, outside the hospital network using either an AHC and a VPN connection or a ZTT (Image Over Globe (IOG)), on a PC or an SMD. Time to access DICOM images was measured using both solutions. The mean time using AHC and VPN was 250 ± 10 s (median 249 s (233–274)) while the same procedure using IOG took 50 ± 8 s (median 49 s (42–60)) on a PC and 47 ± 20 s (median 39 (33–88)) on a SMD. Similarly, an international consultation was performed requiring 23 ± 5 s (median 21 (16–33)) and 27 ± 1 s (median 27 (25–29)) for PC and SMD respectively. IOG is a secure, rapid and easy to use telemedicine technology facilitating efficient clinical decision making and remote consultations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081413</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34441347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Cellular telephones ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Datasets ; Digital archives ; Digital imaging ; General Data Protection Regulation ; Hospitals ; Infrastructure ; Internet ; Medical imaging ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; neurosurgery ; Patients ; Personal computers ; remote consultation ; Software ; Telemedicine ; teleradiology ; Virtual private networks ; Web browsers</subject><ispartof>DIAGNOSTICS, 2021-08, Vol.11 (8), p.1413</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-4778a6f6621398d5d73eaed6841664427075039d7cb597e8e123a68f9eca22d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-4778a6f6621398d5d73eaed6841664427075039d7cb597e8e123a68f9eca22d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3776-6136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391712/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391712/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:147391788$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cewe, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burström, Gustav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drnasin, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohlsson, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skulason, Halldor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vucica, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmi-Terander, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edström, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Novel Teleradiology Technology for Image-Based Distant Consultations: Applications in Neurosurgery</title><title>DIAGNOSTICS</title><description>In emergency settings, fast access to medical imaging for diagnostic is pivotal for clinical decision making. Hence, a need has emerged for solutions that allow rapid access to images on small mobile devices (SMD) without local data storage. Our objective was to evaluate access times to full quality anonymized DICOM datasets, comparing standard access through an authorized hospital computer (AHC) to a zero-footprint teleradiology technology (ZTT) used on a personal computer (PC) or SMD using national and international networks at a regional neurosurgical center. Image datasets were sent to a senior neurosurgeon, outside the hospital network using either an AHC and a VPN connection or a ZTT (Image Over Globe (IOG)), on a PC or an SMD. Time to access DICOM images was measured using both solutions. The mean time using AHC and VPN was 250 ± 10 s (median 249 s (233–274)) while the same procedure using IOG took 50 ± 8 s (median 49 s (42–60)) on a PC and 47 ± 20 s (median 39 (33–88)) on a SMD. Similarly, an international consultation was performed requiring 23 ± 5 s (median 21 (16–33)) and 27 ± 1 s (median 27 (25–29)) for PC and SMD respectively. IOG is a secure, rapid and easy to use telemedicine technology facilitating efficient clinical decision making and remote consultations.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Digital archives</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>General Data Protection Regulation</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal computers</subject><subject>remote consultation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>teleradiology</subject><subject>Virtual private networks</subject><subject>Web browsers</subject><issn>2075-4418</issn><issn>2075-4418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEotXSX8DFEhcugTh2_MEBqSylrFSVSzlbXnuSevHGi50s2n-P02yBReCLZ8bvPJoZT1G8xNUbQmT11jrd9SENziSMK4EpJk-K87riTUkpFk__sM-Ki5Q2VT4SE1E3z4szQvMDofy8iFd77Uc9uNCj0CKNbsMePLoDD1FbF3zoDtkz9_1stiGi1VZ3UH7QCSz66NKg-wEtQ59GPzyA0jt0udt5Z2YPuR7dwhhDGmMH8fCieNZqn-DieC-Kr5-u7pafy5sv16vl5U1pGkaHknIuNGsZqzGRwjaWE9BgmaCYMUprnvuriLTcrBvJQQCuiWailWB0XVtBFsVq5tqgN2oX3VbHgwraqYdAiJ3SMQ_Qg2IGACpjiWFAW4alYJjVglBmmNBrnlnlzEo_YDeuT2jH0LdsgaKNbDDNevlf_S4G-zvpMRFTTiTmYqr7_ZybBVuwBvohan-KOHnp3b3qwl6JCZCnsCheHwExfB8hDWrrkgHvdQ9hTKpuGKsIoc0kffWXdBPG2OdvmVQN5nlRpu7JrDL5E1OE9lcxuFLTOqp_rCP5Cbnp1xM</recordid><startdate>20210804</startdate><enddate>20210804</enddate><creator>Cewe, Paulina</creator><creator>Burström, Gustav</creator><creator>Drnasin, Ivan</creator><creator>Ohlsson, Marcus</creator><creator>Skulason, Halldor</creator><creator>Vucica, Stanislav</creator><creator>Elmi-Terander, Adrian</creator><creator>Edström, Erik</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3776-6136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210804</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Novel Teleradiology Technology for Image-Based Distant Consultations: Applications in Neurosurgery</title><author>Cewe, Paulina ; Burström, Gustav ; Drnasin, Ivan ; Ohlsson, Marcus ; Skulason, Halldor ; Vucica, Stanislav ; Elmi-Terander, Adrian ; Edström, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-4778a6f6621398d5d73eaed6841664427075039d7cb597e8e123a68f9eca22d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Digital archives</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>General Data Protection Regulation</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal computers</topic><topic>remote consultation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>teleradiology</topic><topic>Virtual private networks</topic><topic>Web browsers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cewe, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burström, Gustav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drnasin, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohlsson, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skulason, Halldor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vucica, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmi-Terander, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edström, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>DIAGNOSTICS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cewe, Paulina</au><au>Burström, Gustav</au><au>Drnasin, Ivan</au><au>Ohlsson, Marcus</au><au>Skulason, Halldor</au><au>Vucica, Stanislav</au><au>Elmi-Terander, Adrian</au><au>Edström, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Novel Teleradiology Technology for Image-Based Distant Consultations: Applications in Neurosurgery</atitle><jtitle>DIAGNOSTICS</jtitle><date>2021-08-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1413</spage><pages>1413-</pages><issn>2075-4418</issn><eissn>2075-4418</eissn><abstract>In emergency settings, fast access to medical imaging for diagnostic is pivotal for clinical decision making. Hence, a need has emerged for solutions that allow rapid access to images on small mobile devices (SMD) without local data storage. Our objective was to evaluate access times to full quality anonymized DICOM datasets, comparing standard access through an authorized hospital computer (AHC) to a zero-footprint teleradiology technology (ZTT) used on a personal computer (PC) or SMD using national and international networks at a regional neurosurgical center. Image datasets were sent to a senior neurosurgeon, outside the hospital network using either an AHC and a VPN connection or a ZTT (Image Over Globe (IOG)), on a PC or an SMD. Time to access DICOM images was measured using both solutions. The mean time using AHC and VPN was 250 ± 10 s (median 249 s (233–274)) while the same procedure using IOG took 50 ± 8 s (median 49 s (42–60)) on a PC and 47 ± 20 s (median 39 (33–88)) on a SMD. Similarly, an international consultation was performed requiring 23 ± 5 s (median 21 (16–33)) and 27 ± 1 s (median 27 (25–29)) for PC and SMD respectively. IOG is a secure, rapid and easy to use telemedicine technology facilitating efficient clinical decision making and remote consultations.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34441347</pmid><doi>10.3390/diagnostics11081413</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3776-6136</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-4418 |
ispartof | DIAGNOSTICS, 2021-08, Vol.11 (8), p.1413 |
issn | 2075-4418 2075-4418 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2565174447 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Access to information Cellular telephones Clinical decision making Clinical outcomes Collaboration Communication Datasets Digital archives Digital imaging General Data Protection Regulation Hospitals Infrastructure Internet Medical imaging Medicin och hälsovetenskap neurosurgery Patients Personal computers remote consultation Software Telemedicine teleradiology Virtual private networks Web browsers |
title | Evaluation of a Novel Teleradiology Technology for Image-Based Distant Consultations: Applications in Neurosurgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Novel%20Teleradiology%20Technology%20for%20Image-Based%20Distant%20Consultations:%20Applications%20in%20Neurosurgery&rft.jtitle=DIAGNOSTICS&rft.au=Cewe,%20Paulina&rft.date=2021-08-04&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1413&rft.pages=1413-&rft.issn=2075-4418&rft.eissn=2075-4418&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/diagnostics11081413&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2565174447%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565174447&rft_id=info:pmid/34441347&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6ceee0cd3c6e4f619861628346c68ab7&rfr_iscdi=true |