Multi-criteria evaluation methods in the production scheduling
The paper presents a discussion on the practical application of different methods of multi-criteria evaluation in the process of scheduling in manufacturing systems. Among the methods two main groups are specified: methods based on the distance function (using metacriterion) and methods that create...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2016-08, Vol.145 (2), p.22019-22024 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 22024 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 22019 |
| container_title | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering |
| container_volume | 145 |
| creator | Kalinowski, K Krenczyk, D Paprocka, I Kempa, W Grabowik, C |
| description | The paper presents a discussion on the practical application of different methods of multi-criteria evaluation in the process of scheduling in manufacturing systems. Among the methods two main groups are specified: methods based on the distance function (using metacriterion) and methods that create a Pareto set of possible solutions. The basic criteria used for scheduling were also described. The overall procedure of evaluation process in production scheduling was presented. It takes into account the actions in the whole scheduling process and human decision maker (HDM) participation. The specified HDM decisions are related to creating and editing a set of evaluation criteria, selection of multi-criteria evaluation method, interaction in the searching process, using informal criteria and making final changes in the schedule for implementation. According to need, process scheduling may be completely or partially automated. Full automatization is possible in case of metacriterion based objective function and if Pareto set is selected - the final decision has to be done by HDM. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022019 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2564732086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564732086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e520112a4347cec233319f02f04ef540460572c24906640f2809e43207b7f41d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQreeFN7kuajvRFkzA_Y8EIF70JNE5fRtTVpBP-9mZMNRfDqHDgP73l5EDrFcIGhKDIsmEiLsnzOMGUZyYAQwOUeGm0P-9u9wIfoyPslABeUwghdzkMz2FQ5O2hnq0S_V02oBtu1yUoPi672iW2TYaGT3nV1UF8Xrxa6Do1tX4_Rgakar0--5xg9XU8fJ7fp7P7mbnI1S1X8MqSaxUqYVDSnQmlF8jzHpQFigGrDKFAOTBBFaAmcUzCkgFLTnIB4EYbiOh-j801ubPEWtB_kynqlm6ZqdRe8xAVjueCckIie_UKXXXBtbCcJ41TE1IJHim8o5TrvnTayd3ZVuQ-JQa61yrUxubYno1ZJ5Ebrront-l3y_GH6A5N9bSJK_kD_yf8EEtKEtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564732086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria evaluation methods in the production scheduling</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kalinowski, K ; Krenczyk, D ; Paprocka, I ; Kempa, W ; Grabowik, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalinowski, K ; Krenczyk, D ; Paprocka, I ; Kempa, W ; Grabowik, C</creatorcontrib><description>The paper presents a discussion on the practical application of different methods of multi-criteria evaluation in the process of scheduling in manufacturing systems. Among the methods two main groups are specified: methods based on the distance function (using metacriterion) and methods that create a Pareto set of possible solutions. The basic criteria used for scheduling were also described. The overall procedure of evaluation process in production scheduling was presented. It takes into account the actions in the whole scheduling process and human decision maker (HDM) participation. The specified HDM decisions are related to creating and editing a set of evaluation criteria, selection of multi-criteria evaluation method, interaction in the searching process, using informal criteria and making final changes in the schedule for implementation. According to need, process scheduling may be completely or partially automated. Full automatization is possible in case of metacriterion based objective function and if Pareto set is selected - the final decision has to be done by HDM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Criteria ; Decision making ; Editing ; Multiple criterion ; Pareto optimality ; Production methods ; Production scheduling ; Schedules ; Scheduling ; Searching</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2016-08, Vol.145 (2), p.22019-22024</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e520112a4347cec233319f02f04ef540460572c24906640f2809e43207b7f41d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e520112a4347cec233319f02f04ef540460572c24906640f2809e43207b7f41d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022019/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalinowski, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krenczyk, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paprocka, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempa, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowik, C</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria evaluation methods in the production scheduling</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>The paper presents a discussion on the practical application of different methods of multi-criteria evaluation in the process of scheduling in manufacturing systems. Among the methods two main groups are specified: methods based on the distance function (using metacriterion) and methods that create a Pareto set of possible solutions. The basic criteria used for scheduling were also described. The overall procedure of evaluation process in production scheduling was presented. It takes into account the actions in the whole scheduling process and human decision maker (HDM) participation. The specified HDM decisions are related to creating and editing a set of evaluation criteria, selection of multi-criteria evaluation method, interaction in the searching process, using informal criteria and making final changes in the schedule for implementation. According to need, process scheduling may be completely or partially automated. Full automatization is possible in case of metacriterion based objective function and if Pareto set is selected - the final decision has to be done by HDM.</description><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Pareto optimality</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Searching</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQreeFN7kuajvRFkzA_Y8EIF70JNE5fRtTVpBP-9mZMNRfDqHDgP73l5EDrFcIGhKDIsmEiLsnzOMGUZyYAQwOUeGm0P-9u9wIfoyPslABeUwghdzkMz2FQ5O2hnq0S_V02oBtu1yUoPi672iW2TYaGT3nV1UF8Xrxa6Do1tX4_Rgakar0--5xg9XU8fJ7fp7P7mbnI1S1X8MqSaxUqYVDSnQmlF8jzHpQFigGrDKFAOTBBFaAmcUzCkgFLTnIB4EYbiOh-j801ubPEWtB_kynqlm6ZqdRe8xAVjueCckIie_UKXXXBtbCcJ41TE1IJHim8o5TrvnTayd3ZVuQ-JQa61yrUxubYno1ZJ5Ebrront-l3y_GH6A5N9bSJK_kD_yf8EEtKEtg</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Kalinowski, K</creator><creator>Krenczyk, D</creator><creator>Paprocka, I</creator><creator>Kempa, W</creator><creator>Grabowik, C</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria evaluation methods in the production scheduling</title><author>Kalinowski, K ; Krenczyk, D ; Paprocka, I ; Kempa, W ; Grabowik, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e520112a4347cec233319f02f04ef540460572c24906640f2809e43207b7f41d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Pareto optimality</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Searching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalinowski, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krenczyk, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paprocka, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempa, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowik, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalinowski, K</au><au>Krenczyk, D</au><au>Paprocka, I</au><au>Kempa, W</au><au>Grabowik, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria evaluation methods in the production scheduling</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>22019</spage><epage>22024</epage><pages>22019-22024</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>The paper presents a discussion on the practical application of different methods of multi-criteria evaluation in the process of scheduling in manufacturing systems. Among the methods two main groups are specified: methods based on the distance function (using metacriterion) and methods that create a Pareto set of possible solutions. The basic criteria used for scheduling were also described. The overall procedure of evaluation process in production scheduling was presented. It takes into account the actions in the whole scheduling process and human decision maker (HDM) participation. The specified HDM decisions are related to creating and editing a set of evaluation criteria, selection of multi-criteria evaluation method, interaction in the searching process, using informal criteria and making final changes in the schedule for implementation. According to need, process scheduling may be completely or partially automated. Full automatization is possible in case of metacriterion based objective function and if Pareto set is selected - the final decision has to be done by HDM.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022019</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1757-8981 |
| ispartof | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2016-08, Vol.145 (2), p.22019-22024 |
| issn | 1757-8981 1757-899X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2564732086 |
| source | Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Criteria Decision making Editing Multiple criterion Pareto optimality Production methods Production scheduling Schedules Scheduling Searching |
| title | Multi-criteria evaluation methods in the production scheduling |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A19%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20evaluation%20methods%20in%20the%20production%20scheduling&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Kalinowski,%20K&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=22019&rft.epage=22024&rft.pages=22019-22024&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2564732086%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564732086&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |