Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method

A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4979-5013
Hauptverfasser: Sandoli, A., Lignola, G. P., Calderoni, B., Prota, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5013
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4979
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 19
creator Sandoli, A.
Lignola, G. P.
Calderoni, B.
Prota, A.
description A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration ( PGA ) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of PGA s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between PGA s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563568059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2563568059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd_wFPAczRf0iTtUYZzg4kgDryFtEm2jK6dSSvs31tXwZun7z28z_vBg9At0HugVD0koAJyQhkQCiAEyc7QBITiBDIhz0-ZEiXh4xJdpbSjlAlV0AmazaPZhDp0R1z18csl7NuIl52pg2nw-u0Fl32obWg2CZcmOYvbBhu8PZYxWLx33ba11-jCmzq5m987Rev50_tsQVavz8vZ44oYnsuO8NxmvvIFBWEqpZzyFkpDJedM5opzK5UUkhVKqswUpa1KY0EVFVNZDrkHPkV34-4htp-9S53etX1shpeaCcmFzKkohhYbW1VsU4rO60MMexOPGqj-kaVHWXqQpU-ydDZAfITSUG42Lv5N_0N9A3B-avw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563568059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sandoli, A. ; Lignola, G. P. ; Calderoni, B. ; Prota, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandoli, A. ; Lignola, G. P. ; Calderoni, B. ; Prota, A.</creatorcontrib><description>A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration ( PGA ) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of PGA s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between PGA s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Building damage ; Buildings ; Civil Engineering ; Construction ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Fragility ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Limit states ; Masonry ; Numerical analysis ; Original Article ; Prototypes ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic response ; Seismic surveys ; Stock assessment ; Structural Geology ; Typology ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4979-5013</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandoli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lignola, G. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderoni, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prota, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration ( PGA ) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of PGA s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between PGA s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.</description><subject>Building damage</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd_wFPAczRf0iTtUYZzg4kgDryFtEm2jK6dSSvs31tXwZun7z28z_vBg9At0HugVD0koAJyQhkQCiAEyc7QBITiBDIhz0-ZEiXh4xJdpbSjlAlV0AmazaPZhDp0R1z18csl7NuIl52pg2nw-u0Fl32obWg2CZcmOYvbBhu8PZYxWLx33ba11-jCmzq5m987Rev50_tsQVavz8vZ44oYnsuO8NxmvvIFBWEqpZzyFkpDJedM5opzK5UUkhVKqswUpa1KY0EVFVNZDrkHPkV34-4htp-9S53etX1shpeaCcmFzKkohhYbW1VsU4rO60MMexOPGqj-kaVHWXqQpU-ydDZAfITSUG42Lv5N_0N9A3B-avw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Sandoli, A.</creator><creator>Lignola, G. P.</creator><creator>Calderoni, B.</creator><creator>Prota, A.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</title><author>Sandoli, A. ; Lignola, G. P. ; Calderoni, B. ; Prota, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Building damage</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandoli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lignola, G. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderoni, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prota, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandoli, A.</au><au>Lignola, G. P.</au><au>Calderoni, B.</au><au>Prota, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4979</spage><epage>5013</epage><pages>4979-5013</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration ( PGA ) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of PGA s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between PGA s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4979-5013
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2563568059
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Building damage
Buildings
Civil Engineering
Construction
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake damage
Earthquakes
Empirical analysis
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Fragility
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Limit states
Masonry
Numerical analysis
Original Article
Prototypes
Seismic activity
Seismic hazard
Seismic response
Seismic surveys
Stock assessment
Structural Geology
Typology
Vulnerability
title Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fragility%20curves%20for%20Italian%20URM%20buildings%20based%20on%20a%20hybrid%20method&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Sandoli,%20A.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4979&rft.epage=5013&rft.pages=4979-5013&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563568059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563568059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true