Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method
A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4979-5013 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5013 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4979 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Sandoli, A. Lignola, G. P. Calderoni, B. Prota, A. |
description | A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration (
PGA
) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of
PGA
s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between
PGA
s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563568059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2563568059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd_wFPAczRf0iTtUYZzg4kgDryFtEm2jK6dSSvs31tXwZun7z28z_vBg9At0HugVD0koAJyQhkQCiAEyc7QBITiBDIhz0-ZEiXh4xJdpbSjlAlV0AmazaPZhDp0R1z18csl7NuIl52pg2nw-u0Fl32obWg2CZcmOYvbBhu8PZYxWLx33ba11-jCmzq5m987Rev50_tsQVavz8vZ44oYnsuO8NxmvvIFBWEqpZzyFkpDJedM5opzK5UUkhVKqswUpa1KY0EVFVNZDrkHPkV34-4htp-9S53etX1shpeaCcmFzKkohhYbW1VsU4rO60MMexOPGqj-kaVHWXqQpU-ydDZAfITSUG42Lv5N_0N9A3B-avw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563568059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sandoli, A. ; Lignola, G. P. ; Calderoni, B. ; Prota, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandoli, A. ; Lignola, G. P. ; Calderoni, B. ; Prota, A.</creatorcontrib><description>A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration (
PGA
) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of
PGA
s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between
PGA
s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Building damage ; Buildings ; Civil Engineering ; Construction ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Fragility ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Limit states ; Masonry ; Numerical analysis ; Original Article ; Prototypes ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic response ; Seismic surveys ; Stock assessment ; Structural Geology ; Typology ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4979-5013</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandoli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lignola, G. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderoni, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prota, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration (
PGA
) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of
PGA
s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between
PGA
s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.</description><subject>Building damage</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd_wFPAczRf0iTtUYZzg4kgDryFtEm2jK6dSSvs31tXwZun7z28z_vBg9At0HugVD0koAJyQhkQCiAEyc7QBITiBDIhz0-ZEiXh4xJdpbSjlAlV0AmazaPZhDp0R1z18csl7NuIl52pg2nw-u0Fl32obWg2CZcmOYvbBhu8PZYxWLx33ba11-jCmzq5m987Rev50_tsQVavz8vZ44oYnsuO8NxmvvIFBWEqpZzyFkpDJedM5opzK5UUkhVKqswUpa1KY0EVFVNZDrkHPkV34-4htp-9S53etX1shpeaCcmFzKkohhYbW1VsU4rO60MMexOPGqj-kaVHWXqQpU-ydDZAfITSUG42Lv5N_0N9A3B-avw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Sandoli, A.</creator><creator>Lignola, G. P.</creator><creator>Calderoni, B.</creator><creator>Prota, A.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</title><author>Sandoli, A. ; Lignola, G. P. ; Calderoni, B. ; Prota, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-38d4fcf9015ac77e7fd1ba0633268733d67656297674a9bdcbad179c274818f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Building damage</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandoli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lignola, G. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderoni, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prota, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandoli, A.</au><au>Lignola, G. P.</au><au>Calderoni, B.</au><au>Prota, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4979</spage><epage>5013</epage><pages>4979-5013</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>A hybrid seismic fragility model for territorial-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings is developed and presented in this paper. The method combines expert-judgment and mechanical approaches to derive typological fragility curves for Italian residential masonry building stock. The first classifies Italian masonry buildings in five different typological classes as function of age of construction, structural typology, and seismic behaviour and damaging of buildings observed following the most severe earthquakes occurred in Italy. The second, based on numerical analyses results conducted on building prototypes, provides all the parameters necessary for developing fragility functions. Peak-Ground Acceleration (
PGA
) at Ultimate Limit State attainable by each building’s class has been chosen as an Intensity Measure to represent fragility curves: three types of curve have been developed, each referred to mean, maximum and minimum value of
PGA
s defined for each building class. To represent the expected damage scenario for increasing earthquake intensities, a correlation between
PGA
s and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieber macroseismic intensity scale has been used and the corresponding fragility curves developed. Results show that the proposed building’s classes are representative of the Italian masonry building stock and that fragility curves are effective for predicting both seismic vulnerability and expected damage scenarios for seismic-prone areas. Finally, the fragility curves have been compared with empirical curves obtained through a macroseismic approach on Italian masonry buildings available in literature, underlining the differences between the methods.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4979-5013 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2563568059 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Building damage Buildings Civil Engineering Construction Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake damage Earthquakes Empirical analysis Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Fragility Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Limit states Masonry Numerical analysis Original Article Prototypes Seismic activity Seismic hazard Seismic response Seismic surveys Stock assessment Structural Geology Typology Vulnerability |
title | Fragility curves for Italian URM buildings based on a hybrid method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fragility%20curves%20for%20Italian%20URM%20buildings%20based%20on%20a%20hybrid%20method&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Sandoli,%20A.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4979&rft.epage=5013&rft.pages=4979-5013&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-021-01155-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563568059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563568059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |