Habit and creativity in judges’ definition and framing of legal questions

The dominant social scientific approach to studying judicial behavior treats judges as strategic actors pursuing their political preferences under institutional constraint. The intellectual roots of this rational choice approach are in American law’s long but sporadic engagement with pragmatist idea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Theory and society 2021-08, Vol.50 (5), p.741-767
Hauptverfasser:	Owens, B. Robert, Merriman, Ben
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Action Appeals Behavior Courts of appeals Creative ability Creativity Federal court decisions Frame analysis Habits Judges Judges & magistrates Judicial process Law Philosophy of the Social Sciences Political asylum Pragmatism Preferences Rational choice Social environment Social Sciences Social work Sociology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!