Rupture parameter sensitivity of low frequency ground motion response spectra using synthetic scenarios in North Chile
This research performs a sensitivity analysis of response spectrum values for various physical earthquake parameters, which are used to generate synthetic seismograms consistent with the expected seismicity in north Chile. Sensitivity analyses are based on the earthquake scenario and slip distributi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4833-4864 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4864 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4833 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Fortuño, Catalina de la Llera, Juan Carlos González, Gabriel González, Juan Aguirre, Paula |
description | This research performs a sensitivity analysis of response spectrum values for various physical earthquake parameters, which are used to generate synthetic seismograms consistent with the expected seismicity in north Chile. Sensitivity analyses are based on the earthquake scenario and slip distribution model of the 2014,
M
w
8.1 Pisagua earthquake, and seven other physically plausible interplate events for north Chile. A finite-fault rupture model, and slip distribution of the Pisagua earthquake, were obtained using inversion of InSAR and GPS data. Three other rupture models based on previous studies of interplate locking for north Chile and capable of generating
M
w
8.3–8.6 earthquakes with an estimated maximum slip of 9.2 m, were incorporated in the analyses. Also, four additional scenarios with moment magnitudes in the range
M
w
8.6–8.9 were generated by concatenating these physical scenarios into larger rupture areas within the north segment. Using these scenarios, synthetic ground motions were built at four observation sites: Pisagua, Iquique, Tocopilla, and Calama. Response sensitivity was studied for three key rupture parameters: mean rupture velocity, slip rise-time, and rupture directivity. Responses selected were peak ground displacement (PGD), spectral pseudo-velocities,
S
v
, and spectral displacements,
S
d
. First and second order variations of PGD,
S
v
, and
S
d
relative to the source parameters were computed and used together with a Taylor series expansion to propagate uncertainty into the responses as a function of
v
r
and rise-time
t
r
. To study the effect of rupture directivity, three different foci locations were considered for each scenario: north, south, and at the centroid of the slip model. Response PGD values show no clear trends with rupture velocity,
v
r
; however, the variability increases as the system period increases. The effect of the slip rise-time is significant, and as
t
r
increases, the spectral responses tend to decrease, suggesting that shorter slip rise-times lead to higher seismic demands in long period structures. The results obtained for the directivity analysis suggest that two factors control the expected waveforms and spectral responses: first, the direction of the rupture relative to the location of each site, and the hypocentral distance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-021-01113-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563567603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2563567603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bd45a679a801ded3fe479301bec4c44336b8bd1808fe356b7ef4831cdd1b0a7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkHPAU8V2eatukeZfELFgVR8BbSdrqbZTepmVTpv7e6gjdPM4f3eYd5kuQc4RIB1BUjFFilkGEKiChT2EuOsFAyxbwo9392SFWJb4fJMfMaICvUDI6Sj-ehj0Mg0ZtgthQpCCbHNtoPG0fhO7Hxn6IL9D6Qa0axDH5wrdj6aL0Tgbj3jklwT00MRgxs3VLw6OKKom0EN-RMsJ6FdeLRh7gS85Xd0Gly0JkN09nvPEleb29e5vfp4unuYX69SE2mspjWbV6YUs1MBdhSKzvK1UwC1tTkTZ5LWdZV3WIFVUeyKGtFXV5JbNoWazCqkyfJxa63D376gKNe-yG46aTOinJCVAlySmW7VBM8c6BO98FuTRg1gv72q3d-9eRX__jVMEFyB_EUdksKf9X_UF-C54D5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563567603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rupture parameter sensitivity of low frequency ground motion response spectra using synthetic scenarios in North Chile</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Fortuño, Catalina ; de la Llera, Juan Carlos ; González, Gabriel ; González, Juan ; Aguirre, Paula</creator><creatorcontrib>Fortuño, Catalina ; de la Llera, Juan Carlos ; González, Gabriel ; González, Juan ; Aguirre, Paula</creatorcontrib><description>This research performs a sensitivity analysis of response spectrum values for various physical earthquake parameters, which are used to generate synthetic seismograms consistent with the expected seismicity in north Chile. Sensitivity analyses are based on the earthquake scenario and slip distribution model of the 2014,
M
w
8.1 Pisagua earthquake, and seven other physically plausible interplate events for north Chile. A finite-fault rupture model, and slip distribution of the Pisagua earthquake, were obtained using inversion of InSAR and GPS data. Three other rupture models based on previous studies of interplate locking for north Chile and capable of generating
M
w
8.3–8.6 earthquakes with an estimated maximum slip of 9.2 m, were incorporated in the analyses. Also, four additional scenarios with moment magnitudes in the range
M
w
8.6–8.9 were generated by concatenating these physical scenarios into larger rupture areas within the north segment. Using these scenarios, synthetic ground motions were built at four observation sites: Pisagua, Iquique, Tocopilla, and Calama. Response sensitivity was studied for three key rupture parameters: mean rupture velocity, slip rise-time, and rupture directivity. Responses selected were peak ground displacement (PGD), spectral pseudo-velocities,
S
v
, and spectral displacements,
S
d
. First and second order variations of PGD,
S
v
, and
S
d
relative to the source parameters were computed and used together with a Taylor series expansion to propagate uncertainty into the responses as a function of
v
r
and rise-time
t
r
. To study the effect of rupture directivity, three different foci locations were considered for each scenario: north, south, and at the centroid of the slip model. Response PGD values show no clear trends with rupture velocity,
v
r
; however, the variability increases as the system period increases. The effect of the slip rise-time is significant, and as
t
r
increases, the spectral responses tend to decrease, suggesting that shorter slip rise-times lead to higher seismic demands in long period structures. The results obtained for the directivity analysis suggest that two factors control the expected waveforms and spectral responses: first, the direction of the rupture relative to the location of each site, and the hypocentral distance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01113-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Centroids ; Civil Engineering ; Directivity ; Distribution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Locking ; Mathematical models ; Original Article ; Parameter sensitivity ; Parameters ; Response spectra ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Seismic activity ; Seismicity ; Seismograms ; Sensitivity analysis ; Series expansion ; Slip ; Structural Geology ; Synthetic aperture radar interferometry ; Taylor series ; Velocity ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4833-4864</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bd45a679a801ded3fe479301bec4c44336b8bd1808fe356b7ef4831cdd1b0a7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bd45a679a801ded3fe479301bec4c44336b8bd1808fe356b7ef4831cdd1b0a7f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2792-3369</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-021-01113-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-021-01113-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fortuño, Catalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Llera, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Paula</creatorcontrib><title>Rupture parameter sensitivity of low frequency ground motion response spectra using synthetic scenarios in North Chile</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>This research performs a sensitivity analysis of response spectrum values for various physical earthquake parameters, which are used to generate synthetic seismograms consistent with the expected seismicity in north Chile. Sensitivity analyses are based on the earthquake scenario and slip distribution model of the 2014,
M
w
8.1 Pisagua earthquake, and seven other physically plausible interplate events for north Chile. A finite-fault rupture model, and slip distribution of the Pisagua earthquake, were obtained using inversion of InSAR and GPS data. Three other rupture models based on previous studies of interplate locking for north Chile and capable of generating
M
w
8.3–8.6 earthquakes with an estimated maximum slip of 9.2 m, were incorporated in the analyses. Also, four additional scenarios with moment magnitudes in the range
M
w
8.6–8.9 were generated by concatenating these physical scenarios into larger rupture areas within the north segment. Using these scenarios, synthetic ground motions were built at four observation sites: Pisagua, Iquique, Tocopilla, and Calama. Response sensitivity was studied for three key rupture parameters: mean rupture velocity, slip rise-time, and rupture directivity. Responses selected were peak ground displacement (PGD), spectral pseudo-velocities,
S
v
, and spectral displacements,
S
d
. First and second order variations of PGD,
S
v
, and
S
d
relative to the source parameters were computed and used together with a Taylor series expansion to propagate uncertainty into the responses as a function of
v
r
and rise-time
t
r
. To study the effect of rupture directivity, three different foci locations were considered for each scenario: north, south, and at the centroid of the slip model. Response PGD values show no clear trends with rupture velocity,
v
r
; however, the variability increases as the system period increases. The effect of the slip rise-time is significant, and as
t
r
increases, the spectral responses tend to decrease, suggesting that shorter slip rise-times lead to higher seismic demands in long period structures. The results obtained for the directivity analysis suggest that two factors control the expected waveforms and spectral responses: first, the direction of the rupture relative to the location of each site, and the hypocentral distance.</description><subject>Centroids</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Directivity</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Locking</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Response spectra</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Seismograms</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Series expansion</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</subject><subject>Taylor series</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkHPAU8V2eatukeZfELFgVR8BbSdrqbZTepmVTpv7e6gjdPM4f3eYd5kuQc4RIB1BUjFFilkGEKiChT2EuOsFAyxbwo9392SFWJb4fJMfMaICvUDI6Sj-ehj0Mg0ZtgthQpCCbHNtoPG0fhO7Hxn6IL9D6Qa0axDH5wrdj6aL0Tgbj3jklwT00MRgxs3VLw6OKKom0EN-RMsJ6FdeLRh7gS85Xd0Gly0JkN09nvPEleb29e5vfp4unuYX69SE2mspjWbV6YUs1MBdhSKzvK1UwC1tTkTZ5LWdZV3WIFVUeyKGtFXV5JbNoWazCqkyfJxa63D376gKNe-yG46aTOinJCVAlySmW7VBM8c6BO98FuTRg1gv72q3d-9eRX__jVMEFyB_EUdksKf9X_UF-C54D5</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Fortuño, Catalina</creator><creator>de la Llera, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>González, Gabriel</creator><creator>González, Juan</creator><creator>Aguirre, Paula</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-3369</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Rupture parameter sensitivity of low frequency ground motion response spectra using synthetic scenarios in North Chile</title><author>Fortuño, Catalina ; de la Llera, Juan Carlos ; González, Gabriel ; González, Juan ; Aguirre, Paula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bd45a679a801ded3fe479301bec4c44336b8bd1808fe356b7ef4831cdd1b0a7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Centroids</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Directivity</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Locking</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Response spectra</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Seismograms</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Series expansion</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</topic><topic>Taylor series</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fortuño, Catalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Llera, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Paula</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fortuño, Catalina</au><au>de la Llera, Juan Carlos</au><au>González, Gabriel</au><au>González, Juan</au><au>Aguirre, Paula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rupture parameter sensitivity of low frequency ground motion response spectra using synthetic scenarios in North Chile</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4833</spage><epage>4864</epage><pages>4833-4864</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>This research performs a sensitivity analysis of response spectrum values for various physical earthquake parameters, which are used to generate synthetic seismograms consistent with the expected seismicity in north Chile. Sensitivity analyses are based on the earthquake scenario and slip distribution model of the 2014,
M
w
8.1 Pisagua earthquake, and seven other physically plausible interplate events for north Chile. A finite-fault rupture model, and slip distribution of the Pisagua earthquake, were obtained using inversion of InSAR and GPS data. Three other rupture models based on previous studies of interplate locking for north Chile and capable of generating
M
w
8.3–8.6 earthquakes with an estimated maximum slip of 9.2 m, were incorporated in the analyses. Also, four additional scenarios with moment magnitudes in the range
M
w
8.6–8.9 were generated by concatenating these physical scenarios into larger rupture areas within the north segment. Using these scenarios, synthetic ground motions were built at four observation sites: Pisagua, Iquique, Tocopilla, and Calama. Response sensitivity was studied for three key rupture parameters: mean rupture velocity, slip rise-time, and rupture directivity. Responses selected were peak ground displacement (PGD), spectral pseudo-velocities,
S
v
, and spectral displacements,
S
d
. First and second order variations of PGD,
S
v
, and
S
d
relative to the source parameters were computed and used together with a Taylor series expansion to propagate uncertainty into the responses as a function of
v
r
and rise-time
t
r
. To study the effect of rupture directivity, three different foci locations were considered for each scenario: north, south, and at the centroid of the slip model. Response PGD values show no clear trends with rupture velocity,
v
r
; however, the variability increases as the system period increases. The effect of the slip rise-time is significant, and as
t
r
increases, the spectral responses tend to decrease, suggesting that shorter slip rise-times lead to higher seismic demands in long period structures. The results obtained for the directivity analysis suggest that two factors control the expected waveforms and spectral responses: first, the direction of the rupture relative to the location of each site, and the hypocentral distance.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-021-01113-0</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-3369</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-09, Vol.19 (12), p.4833-4864 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2563567603 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Centroids Civil Engineering Directivity Distribution Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquakes Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Global positioning systems GPS Ground motion Hydrogeology Locking Mathematical models Original Article Parameter sensitivity Parameters Response spectra Rupture Rupturing Seismic activity Seismicity Seismograms Sensitivity analysis Series expansion Slip Structural Geology Synthetic aperture radar interferometry Taylor series Velocity Waveforms |
title | Rupture parameter sensitivity of low frequency ground motion response spectra using synthetic scenarios in North Chile |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A19%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rupture%20parameter%20sensitivity%20of%20low%20frequency%20ground%20motion%20response%20spectra%20using%20synthetic%20scenarios%20in%20North%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Fortu%C3%B1o,%20Catalina&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4833&rft.epage=4864&rft.pages=4833-4864&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-021-01113-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563567603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563567603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |