Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government

Land is of primary importance to rural people whose livelihoods are in one way or another linked to the property where they live and work. This is especially true in the rural region of the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana. However, developments such as de-agrarianization, establishment of protec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105493, Article 105493
Hauptverfasser: Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen, Bardy, Roland, Rubens, Arthur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105493
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 107
creator Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen
Bardy, Roland
Rubens, Arthur
description Land is of primary importance to rural people whose livelihoods are in one way or another linked to the property where they live and work. This is especially true in the rural region of the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana. However, developments such as de-agrarianization, establishment of protected land areas, urbanization, migration, land reform, resettlement and re-peasantization have dramatically changed lands and land use in rural communities. These changes have impacted not only rural communities’ sources of income and employment, but also their overall access to land and thus their livelihoods and future ability to care for themselves. In addition, these developments have impacted family relationships, culture and the peace of the people which are the building blocks of rural community living. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual description of how land access, under the traditional system, can be reconciled with statutory law by communities of practice. Beyond just being a knowledge management tool that is employed for co-creating new compounds of shared knowledge, communities of practice can be used as standing committees that tie solid bonds within stakeholder groups and establish commonly accepted solutions to all problems related to a conflict-laden issue. In describing how this can be used to effectively merge the traditional with legislative land use policy, the paper provides an overview of the detrimental impact of land conflicts, the presence of dubious and unscrupulous land deals and of the role of women in these issues. It further discusses which specific provisions in Ghanaian law should prove to be effective. Yet, as the paper points out, central to the success of balancing the old with the new will be the continuation of the varied tasks performed by the traditional custodians of land, the “tindemba” (Earth priests are collectively called Tindaama/Tindaaba/ Tindaaduuma by the Gurure speaking people of Upper East Region, Tindemba by the Dagbani speaking speaking people of Northern Region and Tindaaba/Tendamba by the Gagaare speaking people of Upper West Region), who historically have always been involved in land transfers within the villages, as well as the important role which traditional leaders (tribal chiefs) need to play in land issues. The paper will demonstrate how communities of practices can be used to not only merge the old with the new, but also incorporate new policies that produce a more equitable struct
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563491750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837721002167</els_id><sourcerecordid>2563491750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-3168c757ae09bc4f5b3d0613391335d25cd0dd93d6327fdcf966fd58940400523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKvvEPC8NdlssrvetGgVil70HNJktk3ZTWqSrfj2prTg0cMwzDD_B_MhhCmZUULF3XbWK2fGCDvfz0pS0rzmVcvO0IQ2NSt4zatzNCGlqIqG1fUluopxSwgRLS0naFjmNF77PQSnnAZsHX7zIW3yjBcb5dQ9ngdQybo11n4YRmeThYh9h3dB6WRzZgXpG8DhFOxK9bgHZSBEfCBn0Ik-gEvX6KJTfYSbU5-iz-enj_lLsXxfvM4floVmlUgFo6LRNa8VkHalq46vmCGCMtbm4qbk2hBjWmYEK-vO6K4VojO8aStSEcJLNkW3R-4u-K8RYpJbP-YH-yhLLljV0pqTfNUcr3TwMQbo5C7YQYUfSYk8yJVb-SdXHuTKo9wcfTxGIX-xtxBk1BayP2MD6CSNt_9DfgGU74io</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563491750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen ; Bardy, Roland ; Rubens, Arthur</creator><creatorcontrib>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen ; Bardy, Roland ; Rubens, Arthur</creatorcontrib><description>Land is of primary importance to rural people whose livelihoods are in one way or another linked to the property where they live and work. This is especially true in the rural region of the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana. However, developments such as de-agrarianization, establishment of protected land areas, urbanization, migration, land reform, resettlement and re-peasantization have dramatically changed lands and land use in rural communities. These changes have impacted not only rural communities’ sources of income and employment, but also their overall access to land and thus their livelihoods and future ability to care for themselves. In addition, these developments have impacted family relationships, culture and the peace of the people which are the building blocks of rural community living. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual description of how land access, under the traditional system, can be reconciled with statutory law by communities of practice. Beyond just being a knowledge management tool that is employed for co-creating new compounds of shared knowledge, communities of practice can be used as standing committees that tie solid bonds within stakeholder groups and establish commonly accepted solutions to all problems related to a conflict-laden issue. In describing how this can be used to effectively merge the traditional with legislative land use policy, the paper provides an overview of the detrimental impact of land conflicts, the presence of dubious and unscrupulous land deals and of the role of women in these issues. It further discusses which specific provisions in Ghanaian law should prove to be effective. Yet, as the paper points out, central to the success of balancing the old with the new will be the continuation of the varied tasks performed by the traditional custodians of land, the “tindemba” (Earth priests are collectively called Tindaama/Tindaaba/ Tindaaduuma by the Gurure speaking people of Upper East Region, Tindemba by the Dagbani speaking speaking people of Northern Region and Tindaaba/Tendamba by the Gagaare speaking people of Upper West Region), who historically have always been involved in land transfers within the villages, as well as the important role which traditional leaders (tribal chiefs) need to play in land issues. The paper will demonstrate how communities of practices can be used to not only merge the old with the new, but also incorporate new policies that produce a more equitable structure in rural communities. •The paper shows how different systems, one historical and traditional and the other legislative, can work harmoniously on land issue through the knowledge management tool of communities of practice.•The onset is conflicts and disagreements that arise from the existence of two parallel land tenure systems throughout out Africa.•The showcase is in Norther Ghana where examples have shown that those conflicts can be solved by engaging communities of practice.•These bring in experts in the two systems fields, as well as representatives of all affected parties. While one cannot allay all conflicts, it is not than an overall conflictive prevents solutions.•Conflicts can remedy mis-understandings and mis-interpretation of interests if the representatives of either system fully acknowledge the role of the other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Committees ; Communities of practice ; Customary land tenure ; Employment ; Ghana ; Indigenous, culture ; Knowledge management ; Land reform ; Land use ; Law ; Legislation ; Migration ; Political leadership ; Relocation ; Resettlement ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural land use ; Statutory land governance ; Tribal leaders ; Urbanization ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105493, Article 105493</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-3168c757ae09bc4f5b3d0613391335d25cd0dd93d6327fdcf966fd58940400523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-3168c757ae09bc4f5b3d0613391335d25cd0dd93d6327fdcf966fd58940400523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27849,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardy, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubens, Arthur</creatorcontrib><title>Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>Land is of primary importance to rural people whose livelihoods are in one way or another linked to the property where they live and work. This is especially true in the rural region of the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana. However, developments such as de-agrarianization, establishment of protected land areas, urbanization, migration, land reform, resettlement and re-peasantization have dramatically changed lands and land use in rural communities. These changes have impacted not only rural communities’ sources of income and employment, but also their overall access to land and thus their livelihoods and future ability to care for themselves. In addition, these developments have impacted family relationships, culture and the peace of the people which are the building blocks of rural community living. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual description of how land access, under the traditional system, can be reconciled with statutory law by communities of practice. Beyond just being a knowledge management tool that is employed for co-creating new compounds of shared knowledge, communities of practice can be used as standing committees that tie solid bonds within stakeholder groups and establish commonly accepted solutions to all problems related to a conflict-laden issue. In describing how this can be used to effectively merge the traditional with legislative land use policy, the paper provides an overview of the detrimental impact of land conflicts, the presence of dubious and unscrupulous land deals and of the role of women in these issues. It further discusses which specific provisions in Ghanaian law should prove to be effective. Yet, as the paper points out, central to the success of balancing the old with the new will be the continuation of the varied tasks performed by the traditional custodians of land, the “tindemba” (Earth priests are collectively called Tindaama/Tindaaba/ Tindaaduuma by the Gurure speaking people of Upper East Region, Tindemba by the Dagbani speaking speaking people of Northern Region and Tindaaba/Tendamba by the Gagaare speaking people of Upper West Region), who historically have always been involved in land transfers within the villages, as well as the important role which traditional leaders (tribal chiefs) need to play in land issues. The paper will demonstrate how communities of practices can be used to not only merge the old with the new, but also incorporate new policies that produce a more equitable structure in rural communities. •The paper shows how different systems, one historical and traditional and the other legislative, can work harmoniously on land issue through the knowledge management tool of communities of practice.•The onset is conflicts and disagreements that arise from the existence of two parallel land tenure systems throughout out Africa.•The showcase is in Norther Ghana where examples have shown that those conflicts can be solved by engaging communities of practice.•These bring in experts in the two systems fields, as well as representatives of all affected parties. While one cannot allay all conflicts, it is not than an overall conflictive prevents solutions.•Conflicts can remedy mis-understandings and mis-interpretation of interests if the representatives of either system fully acknowledge the role of the other.</description><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Communities of practice</subject><subject>Customary land tenure</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Ghana</subject><subject>Indigenous, culture</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Resettlement</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural land use</subject><subject>Statutory land governance</subject><subject>Tribal leaders</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKvvEPC8NdlssrvetGgVil70HNJktk3ZTWqSrfj2prTg0cMwzDD_B_MhhCmZUULF3XbWK2fGCDvfz0pS0rzmVcvO0IQ2NSt4zatzNCGlqIqG1fUluopxSwgRLS0naFjmNF77PQSnnAZsHX7zIW3yjBcb5dQ9ngdQybo11n4YRmeThYh9h3dB6WRzZgXpG8DhFOxK9bgHZSBEfCBn0Ik-gEvX6KJTfYSbU5-iz-enj_lLsXxfvM4floVmlUgFo6LRNa8VkHalq46vmCGCMtbm4qbk2hBjWmYEK-vO6K4VojO8aStSEcJLNkW3R-4u-K8RYpJbP-YH-yhLLljV0pqTfNUcr3TwMQbo5C7YQYUfSYk8yJVb-SdXHuTKo9wcfTxGIX-xtxBk1BayP2MD6CSNt_9DfgGU74io</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen</creator><creator>Bardy, Roland</creator><creator>Rubens, Arthur</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government</title><author>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen ; Bardy, Roland ; Rubens, Arthur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-3168c757ae09bc4f5b3d0613391335d25cd0dd93d6327fdcf966fd58940400523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Communities of practice</topic><topic>Customary land tenure</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Ghana</topic><topic>Indigenous, culture</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Resettlement</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural land use</topic><topic>Statutory land governance</topic><topic>Tribal leaders</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardy, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubens, Arthur</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen</au><au>Bardy, Roland</au><au>Rubens, Arthur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>105493</spage><pages>105493-</pages><artnum>105493</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>Land is of primary importance to rural people whose livelihoods are in one way or another linked to the property where they live and work. This is especially true in the rural region of the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana. However, developments such as de-agrarianization, establishment of protected land areas, urbanization, migration, land reform, resettlement and re-peasantization have dramatically changed lands and land use in rural communities. These changes have impacted not only rural communities’ sources of income and employment, but also their overall access to land and thus their livelihoods and future ability to care for themselves. In addition, these developments have impacted family relationships, culture and the peace of the people which are the building blocks of rural community living. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual description of how land access, under the traditional system, can be reconciled with statutory law by communities of practice. Beyond just being a knowledge management tool that is employed for co-creating new compounds of shared knowledge, communities of practice can be used as standing committees that tie solid bonds within stakeholder groups and establish commonly accepted solutions to all problems related to a conflict-laden issue. In describing how this can be used to effectively merge the traditional with legislative land use policy, the paper provides an overview of the detrimental impact of land conflicts, the presence of dubious and unscrupulous land deals and of the role of women in these issues. It further discusses which specific provisions in Ghanaian law should prove to be effective. Yet, as the paper points out, central to the success of balancing the old with the new will be the continuation of the varied tasks performed by the traditional custodians of land, the “tindemba” (Earth priests are collectively called Tindaama/Tindaaba/ Tindaaduuma by the Gurure speaking people of Upper East Region, Tindemba by the Dagbani speaking speaking people of Northern Region and Tindaaba/Tendamba by the Gagaare speaking people of Upper West Region), who historically have always been involved in land transfers within the villages, as well as the important role which traditional leaders (tribal chiefs) need to play in land issues. The paper will demonstrate how communities of practices can be used to not only merge the old with the new, but also incorporate new policies that produce a more equitable structure in rural communities. •The paper shows how different systems, one historical and traditional and the other legislative, can work harmoniously on land issue through the knowledge management tool of communities of practice.•The onset is conflicts and disagreements that arise from the existence of two parallel land tenure systems throughout out Africa.•The showcase is in Norther Ghana where examples have shown that those conflicts can be solved by engaging communities of practice.•These bring in experts in the two systems fields, as well as representatives of all affected parties. While one cannot allay all conflicts, it is not than an overall conflictive prevents solutions.•Conflicts can remedy mis-understandings and mis-interpretation of interests if the representatives of either system fully acknowledge the role of the other.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105493</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105493, Article 105493
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2563491750
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Committees
Communities of practice
Customary land tenure
Employment
Ghana
Indigenous, culture
Knowledge management
Land reform
Land use
Law
Legislation
Migration
Political leadership
Relocation
Resettlement
Rural areas
Rural communities
Rural land use
Statutory land governance
Tribal leaders
Urbanization
Villages
title Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A24%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20governance%20in%20Northern%20Ghana:%20Creating%20communities%20of%20practice%20between%20tribal%20leaders%20and%20the%20government&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Akolgo-Azupogo,%20Helen&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=105493&rft.pages=105493-&rft.artnum=105493&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563491750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563491750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837721002167&rfr_iscdi=true